SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900T + Intel Arc A350

This pairing combines a 24-core, 32-thread Intel Raptor Lake desktop processor with a 4 GB Intel Arc A350 entry-level GPU, producing a system that ranks at the 71st percentile overall among all builds. The CPU is the dominant component, sitting at the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at exactly the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Intel Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth place it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which indicates roughly average performance for an entry-level card. At 1080p with competitive settings, this GPU can reasonably be expected to deliver playable frame rates in esports titles, but it lacks the headroom for sustained high-refresh gaming at 144 Hz or beyond. The CPU's single-thread score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 and 4177 in PassMark single-thread place it near the top of the processor hierarchy, so the GPU will be the limiting factor in any gaming scenario that demands more than the Arc A350 can output.

Streaming: The i9-13900T's 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial parallel processing capability, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 and a PassMark multithread score of 43036. This CPU has ample headroom to handle software encoding alongside gameplay, though the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and modest compute throughput may constrain the overall streaming quality at higher resolutions. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking versus all CPUs means encoding workloads will not bottleneck the system, but the Arc A350's 50th percentile GPU position suggests that game capture and encoding offload to the GPU would be less efficient than CPU-side encoding.

Video Editing: Multi-core performance is exceptional here, with the CPU posting 15337 in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 157324 in PassMark integer math. These scores indicate strong capability for video rendering, timeline scrubbing, and export tasks in applications that leverage multiple cores. The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for basic GPU-accelerated effects but will struggle with 4K timelines or heavy color grading. The system can handle 1080p editing workflows comfortably, with the CPU carrying most of the processing weight.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 36517 Cinebench R23 multi-core score places it within 0.1% of the Intel Core i9-13900K, a flagship desktop processor, making this build highly capable for CPU-based rendering in Blender, V-Ray, or similar applications. The Arc A350's 6 RT cores and 768 shading units provide entry-level ray tracing support, but its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate will limit GPU-accelerated rendering to light workloads. For serious 3D work, CPU rendering is the clear strength of this system.

Software Development: Compilation tasks benefit directly from the CPU's 157324 PassMark integer math score and 538254 PassMark data compression score. The 36 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache reduce memory access latency, which helps with large codebases and frequent rebuilds. The 32 threads handle parallel builds effectively, and the 92nd percentile CPU ranking means developer productivity will not be hampered by processor limitations. The GPU's modest capabilities are irrelevant for most development workflows.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread performance, with a 519 Cinebench R15 single-core score and 5155 Cinebench R23 single-core score, ensures responsive day-to-day operation in productivity suites, web browsing, and document editing. The PassMark single-thread score of 4177 confirms strong per-core performance, and the 35 W TDP means this system runs cool and quiet. The Arc A350's basic 2D acceleration is sufficient for office applications, and the system's overall 71st percentile ranking among all builds indicates it outperforms the majority of typical office machines.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 61723, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900K, scores 61766, a difference of only 0.1%, meaning the 13900T delivers essentially identical performance to the flagship unlocked 13900K despite its lower 35 W TDP. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61834 (0.2% ahead), and the Intel Core i9-13900KF scores 61841 (0.2% ahead). The Intel Xeon 636 trails at 61360, which is 0.6% behind. This clustering places the 13900T in elite company, with the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 36517 and R20 score of 15337 confirming its position among the fastest desktop processors available.

The GPU's benchmark picture is less detailed, with no measured benchmark scores listed and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile ranking of 50 places it exactly at the median of all GPUs, indicating middle-of-the-pack performance. The Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 768 shading units, and 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus define its capabilities. The combined system percentile of 71 reflects the CPU's dominance dragging the overall score upward, while the GPU sits at the median.

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry: a top-tier CPU paired with a mid-tier GPU. The CPU outperforms 92% of all processors, while the GPU outperforms exactly 50% of all graphics cards. This means the system's overall 71st percentile ranking is pulled down significantly by the GPU, and any workload that depends heavily on graphics performance will see the system perform at roughly median levels, while CPU-bound tasks will deliver near-flagship results.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units, producing a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) across a 64-bit bus, yielding 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

With 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM, the A350 is limited to 1080p gaming with modest texture settings. The 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for entry-level workloads but will bottleneck higher-resolution textures or large scenes. The 6 RT cores provide basic ray tracing acceleration, but the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means ray-traced workloads will be slow compared to higher-tier GPUs. The FP16 throughput of 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) offers some advantage for AI-accelerated workloads that can use reduced precision.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and has no display outputs, meaning this GPU is designed for compute or auxiliary use rather than as a primary display adapter. The 25 W TDP and 200 W suggested PSU indicate minimal power requirements, making this GPU suitable for systems where power efficiency is a priority. The GPU is marked as end-of-life with Battlemage listed as its successor, indicating it is a first-generation Arc product.

For rendering workloads, the A350's 50th percentile ranking means it delivers average performance among all GPUs. The 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate support basic 3D rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM capacity and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth constrain scene complexity and texture resolution. The 6 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but performance will be modest given the overall compute throughput.

Balance and Bottleneck

This system exhibits a severe CPU-to-GPU imbalance, with the processor ranking at the 92nd percentile while the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile. The CPU's nearest rival, the Core i9-13900K, scores within 0.1%, confirming the 13900T's flagship-level performance. In gaming workloads, the Arc A350 will almost always be the limiting factor, as its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are far below what the CPU can feed. The GPU's 50th percentile position means it delivers median frame rates, and the CPU's high single-thread performance (5155 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it will never bottleneck even the most demanding game engine logic.

In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, compilation, and data processing, the GPU becomes nearly irrelevant. The CPU's 36517 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 43036 PassMark multithread score place it among the fastest processors, meaning these workloads will run at near-flagship speeds regardless of the GPU. The PassMark data compression score of 538254 and integer math score of 157324 further confirm the CPU's dominance in compute-heavy tasks.

The bottleneck direction is clear: the GPU limits gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, while the CPU limits nothing. The combined 71st percentile ranking reflects this asymmetry, as the GPU's median performance drags the system below what the CPU alone would achieve. For users prioritizing gaming, the GPU is the obvious upgrade target; for users prioritizing CPU-bound productivity, this system is already near the top of the performance curve. The 35 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP mean power consumption is minimal, and the 200 W suggested PSU provides ample headroom for either component to be upgraded without changing the power supply.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It features a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 35 W TDP that makes it an exceptionally power-efficient flagship-tier processor. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration and offers ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation applications that require data integrity.

The 24 cores are divided into performance and efficiency cores, a hybrid architecture that delivers both high single-thread performance and massive multi-thread throughput. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz drives the single-thread Cinebench R23 score of 5155, which places it in the top tier of desktop processors. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 36517 is within 0.1% of the Core i9-13900K, indicating that the 35 W TDP does not meaningfully sacrifice multi-threaded performance.

Benchmark results show broad strength across diverse workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 43036, floating point math score of 108779, and integer math score of 157324 all confirm exceptional compute capability. The data encryption score of 34415 and extended instructions score of 29719 demonstrate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance, useful for security-sensitive applications. The find prime numbers score of 175 and physics score of 2497 are the only relatively weak results, but these are not representative of typical real-world workloads.

The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion cards. It includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback display output even without the Arc A350. The processor is socketed on Intel Socket 1700 and was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $549. It remains in active production, and its multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported. The 92nd percentile ranking versus all CPUs places it among the fastest processors ever made, with only 8% of CPUs performing better.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p with moderate graphics settings will find this system adequate, as the Arc A350's 50th percentile GPU position indicates median frame rates in most titles. However, the 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution, and users seeking high-refresh or ultra-settings gaming should look elsewhere. The CPU's 92nd percentile single-thread performance ensures smooth frame pacing, but the GPU will cap maximum frame rates.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or large data processing will benefit most from this build. The CPU's 36517 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 43036 PassMark multithread score deliver near-flagship performance for CPU-bound workloads, and the 35 W TDP means sustained loads can run without thermal throttling. The GPU accelerates lighter effects work but is not the primary driver of performance in these workflows.

Software developers will appreciate the 24 cores, 32 threads, and 157324 PassMark integer math score for fast compilation and testing. The 36 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support provide flexibility for different build configurations, and ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build servers. The 92nd percentile CPU ranking means developers will rarely wait on the processor.

Students and small business users will find this system more powerful than needed for office productivity, with the CPU's 5155 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensuring responsive application performance. The 200 W suggested PSU keeps power costs low, and the 35 W CPU TDP plus 25 W GPU TDP make this an energy-efficient workstation. The system's 71st overall percentile ranking means it outperforms most typical office machines while consuming far less power than comparable systems.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Arc A350 suitable for gaming?

A: The Arc A350 ranks at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, indicating median gaming performance. With 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, it can handle 1080p gaming at moderate settings, but the 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth limit high-resolution or high-detail gaming.

Q: How does the Core i9-13900T compare to the Core i9-13900K?

A: The 13900T scores 61723 on average, within 0.1% of the 13900K's 61766. Despite a 35 W TDP versus the K-series' higher power envelope, the 13900T delivers nearly identical multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517.

Q: Can this system handle 4K video editing?

A: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, with a 36517 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, can handle 4K video processing, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit GPU-accelerated effects and color grading at 4K resolution. 1080p editing workflows are better suited to this GPU.

Q: What is the power consumption of this build?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP and the GPU has a 25 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 200 W. This makes the system highly power-efficient, with total system power draw well below that of typical high-performance desktops.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A350 includes 6 RT cores based on the Xe-HPG architecture. However, with 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, ray-traced workloads will perform at entry-level levels, suitable for light effects but not demanding ray-traced scenes.

Q: What memory does this system support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The memory bus width is dual-channel, and the CPU has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Arc A350 is marked as end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor. The CPU remains in active production.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that combines the Intel Core i9-13900T, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor on Socket 1700, with the Intel Arc A350, a 4 GB GDDR6 GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The CPU ranks at the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile, resulting in a combined system percentile of 71. This places the overall build above the majority of desktop systems, driven almost entirely by the CPU's exceptional performance.

The i9-13900T is a flagship-tier processor in an energy-efficient package, with a 35 W TDP that allows it to deliver 92nd-percentile performance without the power demands of typical high-end CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Core i9-13900K, scores only 0.1% higher, making this one of the most efficient high-performance processors available. The Arc A350, by contrast, is an entry-level GPU that delivers median performance, with 768 shading units and 6 RT cores on a 64-bit memory bus.

This pairing is best understood as a CPU-centric system: the processor provides near-flagship compute power for productivity, development, and rendering workloads, while the GPU provides adequate but unremarkable graphics performance for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The 71st overall percentile ranking reflects this imbalance, and users should prioritize GPU upgrades if graphics performance is a primary need.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in memory selection. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for NVMe storage and expansion cards. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the Arc A350's bandwidth requirements.

With a 35 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP, the system's total power draw is minimal, and the 200 W suggested PSU provides significant headroom for upgrades. The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU, as the CPU's 92nd percentile performance means it will not bottleneck any graphics card currently available. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would shift the system's 50th-percentile GPU position upward and likely raise the combined percentile well beyond 71.

The CPU's locked multiplier prevents overclocking, but its 5.30 GHz boost clock and 35 W TDP mean it already operates at high efficiency. The platform supports ECC memory, which is valuable for workstation reliability. The CPU is in active production, ensuring ongoing availability. The GPU is end-of-life, so users planning to keep this system long-term should consider a GPU replacement, as the Arc A350's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will increasingly limit modern game and application requirements. The 36 MB L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample on-chip storage, and the dual-channel memory bus supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing future memory upgrades without changing the motherboard.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds