SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

3,075 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900T pairs with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER in a desktop build that occupies an unusual position in the benchmark database. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at only the 19th percentile among all graphics cards, yet the combined system percentile is 56. This discrepancy is the first clue that the pairing produces a lopsided profile, and the data below walks through what each component contributes, where the bottlenecks form, and what workloads this system handles best. All benchmark figures come from the FACT PACK; no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the raw scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process. Its base clock is listed at 1100.00 MHz, but the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz, which is the more relevant figure for burst workloads. The CPU has an 80 KB L1 cache per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, includes ECC memory support, and carries integrated UHD Graphics 770. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The 35 W TDP is remarkably low for a Core i9, which explains the “T” suffix — this is a power-constrained variant designed for thermally limited systems.

The benchmark scores show a processor that excels in multi-threaded throughput despite its low power envelope. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 36517, while the single-core score is 5155. The R20 results are 15337 multicore and 2165 single-core, and the R15 scores are 3680 multicore and 519 single-core. These numbers indicate that the chip maintains strong per-core performance — the boost clock of 5.30 GHz is clearly doing heavy lifting — while the 24 cores provide substantial parallel capability. PassMark results reinforce this: multithread score is 43036, single-thread is 4177, integer math is 157324, floating-point math is 108779, and data compression is 538254. The extended instructions score of 29719 and data encryption score of 34415 suggest solid SIMD and cryptographic performance.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i9-13900T is essentially tied with the top of the pack. The Intel Core i9-13900K has an average score of 61766, which is only 0.1% higher than this chip’s 61723 average. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61834 (0.2% higher), and the i9-13900KF scores 61841 (0.2% higher). The Intel Xeon 636 trails slightly at 61360, putting the i9-13900T 0.6% ahead. This means the power-limited T-series chip loses almost nothing to the unlocked K-series parts in aggregate benchmark performance — the 35 W TDP does not translate into a meaningful performance deficit in these tests. The 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms that this is a high-end processor by any measure.

For real workloads, the data suggests the i9-13900T handles heavily threaded applications with ease. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36517 is strong enough for 3D rendering and video encoding, while the single-core score of 5155 ensures snappy responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks like web browsing and office applications. The PassMark physics score of 2497 is modest, but that test is often more dependent on clock behavior than raw core count. The overall picture is a CPU that punches far above its power draw, making it an unusual but effective choice for systems where thermal headroom is scarce.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core performance is excellent — the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5155 and PassMark single-thread score of 4177 are near the top of the database. This suggests the i9-13900T can feed a high-refresh monitor without becoming the limiting factor in most titles, though the GPU’s position (19th percentile) will cap frame rates well before the CPU does.

Streaming: With 24 cores and 32 threads, the processor has abundant headroom for encoding and broadcasting simultaneously. The PassMark multithread score of 43036 and data compression score of 538254 indicate that background streaming tasks — whether using x264 or other CPU-based encoders — will run alongside a game without starving the main thread.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36517 and the floating-point math score of 108779 point to strong performance in rendering timelines and applying effects. The 36 MB L3 cache and DDR5 support further aid large file operations. This CPU is a capable editing workhorse, though the GPU’s low percentile may limit GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The multicore scores across Cinebench R15 (3680), R20 (15337), and R23 (36517) all indicate that CPU-based rendering in Blender, Maya, or similar tools will complete quickly. The 24-core configuration is well-suited to ray tracing workloads that rely on CPU compute, and the power-efficient design means sustained rendering sessions won’t overwhelm a modest cooling solution.

Software development: The data encryption score of 34415 and integer math score of 157324 are relevant for compilation, hashing, and data processing. The 32 threads allow parallel builds to scale well, and the single-thread score of 4177 ensures that interactive IDE use remains fluid. The i9-13900T is a strong choice for developers who compile frequently.

Student and office work: The single-core scores are more than sufficient for word processing, spreadsheets, and web applications. The 35 W TDP means this CPU runs cool and quiet, which suits a shared or dorm-room environment. The 92nd percentile ranking is overkill for these tasks, but the power efficiency makes it a reasonable if unconventional pick.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 61723, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900K, scores 61766 — a difference of just 0.1%, so the two are statistically inseparable. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834) and i9-13900KF (61841) are similarly close, while the Xeon 636 (61360) trails by 0.6%. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36517 is the headline figure, but the single-core score of 5155 is equally important for understanding the chip’s balanced nature.

The GPU, by contrast, has a single benchmark entry: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075. This places the RTX 5080 SUPER at the 19th percentile among all GPUs, which is strikingly low for a card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and a 1.02 TB/s bandwidth. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163, 2.8% higher), the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182, 3.4% higher), and on the lower side the GeForce 820A (2983, 3.1% lower) and GTX 860M (2967, 3.6% lower). The deltaPct values show that the RTX 5080 SUPER is within a few percentage points of these much older or lower-tier cards in this specific test, which is a red flag for gaming performance.

The combined percentile is 56, which sits between the CPU’s 92nd and the GPU’s 19th. This reflects a system where a top-tier processor is paired with a GPU that benchmarks like an entry-level part. The data indicates that any workload heavily dependent on the GPU — gaming at high settings, GPU rendering, or AI inference — will be severely constrained, while CPU-bound tasks will perform at near-flagship levels.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i9-13900T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame-rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 5155) suggests it can handle game logic and physics without bottlenecking, but the GPU’s 19th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 imply that the graphics card will be the limiting factor in most titles.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU’s high boost clock of 5.30 GHz should drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU’s low benchmark score means the graphics card will struggle to keep up, likely capping frames well below what the CPU could deliver. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the bottleneck, and the 24 GB VRAM will go largely unused because the rendering pipeline is limited by the card’s compute throughput rather than memory capacity. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance is numerically high, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 — which is only 3.1% higher than the GeForce 820A’s 2983 — suggests real-world gaming performance is far below what the specs imply. Expect playable but not high-refresh experiences at 1080p, and increasingly compromised frame rates as resolution rises.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a clear picture of imbalance. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile, while the GPU is at the 19th percentile — a gap of 73 percentile points. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data compression (PassMark score of 538254), and multi-threaded rendering (Cinebench R23 multicore of 36517), the system performs like a high-end desktop. In GPU-bound workloads — gaming, GPU-accelerated rendering, or machine learning inference — the system performs like an entry-level machine.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3075 is the smoking gun. This DX12 test is designed to stress the GPU, and the RTX 5080 SUPER scores within 3.6% of the GeForce GTX 860M (2967), a mobile GPU from years ago. The CPU’s single-core score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can produce frames quickly, but the GPU cannot keep up, so any game will be limited by the graphics card. The FPS scaling between resolutions would show a typical GPU-bound pattern: frame rates drop as resolution increases, with the CPU’s advantage diminishing because the GPU is always the bottleneck. The combined percentile of 56 reflects this split — the system is neither a top-tier gaming rig nor a weak office PC, but a hybrid where the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900T ranks at the 92nd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 61723.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-13900K?

A: The i9-13900K has an average score of 61766, which is only 0.1% higher than the i9-13900T’s 61723 — they are effectively tied.

Q: What is the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the GPU outperform its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER is 3.1% lower than the GeForce 820A (2983) but 3.4% lower than the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182) and 2.8% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163).

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The i9-13900T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it includes ECC memory support.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth and a 2000 MHz base memory clock (32 Gbps effective).

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this system?

A: No — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this combination, so all frame-rate figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die contains 45,600 million transistors across a 378 mm² area, which yields a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The GPU has 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It includes 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, which are the hardware blocks for ray tracing and AI acceleration, respectively. The base clock is 2295 MHz, with a boost clock of 2617 MHz. Memory is 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth.

The compute specifications look impressive on paper: FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS, and FP16 is the same at 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s. The card uses a dual-slot design, measures 304 mm in length, and draws power from a single 16-pin connector. The TDP is listed at 415 W. It supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and outputs video through 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

However, the benchmark results do not match the hardware specs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075 places the card at the 19th percentile, and its nearest rivals are all far less capable on paper — the Quadro P1000, GeForce 820A, Intel Arc Pro B60, and GTX 860M. The deltaPct values range from -3.4% to +3.6%, meaning the RTX 5080 SUPER is within a few points of these parts. This suggests that either the benchmark is not representative of the card’s intended workloads (e.g., it may favor older architectures) or the card is severely underperforming in synthetic tests. For rendering, the 24 GB VRAM and 1.02 TB/s bandwidth are useful for large textures and datasets, but the low benchmark score indicates that compute-heavy tasks will not see the expected gains. The RT and tensor cores are present, but without measured ray tracing or AI benchmark data, their real-world impact cannot be quantified from this pack.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a 92nd-percentile CPU with a 19th-percentile GPU, resulting in a combined percentile of 56. The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 35 W TDP processor with 24 cores and 32 threads, designed for efficient multi-threaded work. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is a 415 W graphics card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory, but its benchmark score of 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad places it near the bottom of the GPU rankings. The system is a desktop class, but the performance split is extreme: the CPU is among the best available, while the GPU benchmarks like an entry-level part. This is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a workstation-style CPU paired with a GPU that cannot keep up in graphics-intensive tasks.

Who Should Build It

The target user is someone who prioritizes CPU-bound workloads over gaming. Developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, with the PassMark integer math score of 157324 and data encryption score of 34415 supporting heavy parallel processing. Students and office workers will find the single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 5155) more than adequate for everyday tasks, and the 35 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool. Content creators focused on CPU-based rendering — such as video encoding with x264 or 3D rendering in CPU-only modes — will see strong results from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36517.

However, gamers should avoid this build. The GPU’s 19th percentile ranking means that even at 1080p, frame rates will be limited by the graphics card, and the 24 GB VRAM is wasted on titles that cannot be rendered fast enough. The system is also unsuitable for GPU-accelerated workloads like machine learning training or GPU rendering, where the RTX 5080 SUPER’s low benchmark score would cripple performance. Small business workstations that run database queries, spreadsheet calculations, or server-side processing could benefit from the CPU’s strength, but they would be paying for a GPU they do not need. The ideal builder is one who already owns a powerful GPU or plans to replace the RTX 5080 SUPER, because the CPU is a solid foundation while the GPU is the weak link.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900T uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, so the motherboard must have a compatible chipset to take full advantage of the PCIe 5.0 x16 slot used by the RTX 5080 SUPER. The CPU’s TDP is 35 W, which is remarkably low, so the existing power delivery and cooling solution will have ample headroom — the system’s power draw will be dominated by the GPU’s 415 W TDP. The suggested PSU is not listed in the FACT PACK, but the GPU’s 415 W requirement means a substantial power supply is necessary, and the single 16-pin connector must be supported by the PSU and case.

The most sensible upgrade path is to replace the GPU. The CPU is already at the 92nd percentile and matches the i9-13900K within 0.1%, so there is little to gain from a processor swap. The motherboard socket (1700) is fixed, but memory can be upgraded from DDR4 to DDR5 if the board supports it, which would increase memory bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 5 interface is future-proof, so any next-generation GPU will work without a motherboard change. The GPU’s low benchmark score (3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad) is the primary bottleneck, and upgrading to a higher-performing GPU would raise the combined percentile significantly. The CPU’s 36 MB L3 cache and 24 cores will continue to serve well in CPU-bound tasks, so the platform has a long useful life ahead of it once the graphics card is addressed.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds