SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-13900KF and where does it sit among other CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a 13th Gen Raptor Lake desktop processor with 24 cores and 32 threads, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It holds a 93rd percentile position among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61841. Its closest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (avg score 61834, delta 0%), the Intel Core i9-13900K (avg score 61766, delta 0.1%), and the Intel Core i9-13900T (avg score 61723, delta 0.2%).

Q: What kind of GPU is the Intel Arc A770, and what is its memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A770 is a desktop GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation), fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors. It comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock is 2100 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and it has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs.

Q: How does the Arc A770 compare to its nearest rival GPUs?

A: The Arc A770 sits at the 90th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 68809. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (avg score 69000, delta -0.3%), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (avg score 68562, delta 0.4%), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (avg score 69870, delta -1.5%), and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (avg score 69986, delta -1.7%). The deltas are all within 2%, indicating very close overall performance.

Q: What are the key multi-threaded performance scores for the i9-13900KF?

A: The i9-13900KF achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855, a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20519, and a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4924. In 3DMark, it scores 15405 in the max-threads test and 11177 in the 16-thread test. Geekbench multicore score is 22486, and PassMark multithread score is 57729.

Q: Does the i9-13900KF have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integratedGraphics field is null for this processor. The "KF" designation in the name indicates it lacks integrated graphics, which means a discrete GPU is required for any display output.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combinedPercentile for the Intel Core i9-13900KF paired with the Intel Arc A770 is 92. This places the overall build in the upper tier of desktop systems, reflecting the strong individual benchmarks of both components.

Q: Are there any measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this CPU+GPU pairing (measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty). All FPS figures discussed in the gaming section are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not directly measured results.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i9-13900KF and the Intel Arc A770 is an interesting case because the CPU’s raw multi-threaded performance vastly outstrips what the GPU can render at most gaming resolutions. The i9-13900KF’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 and Geekbench multicore score of 22486 indicate a processor capable of handling extremely heavy compute workloads. Meanwhile, the Arc A770’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 and OpenCL score of 109175 reflect a GPU that, while strong, is nowhere near the top of the GPU hierarchy. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 90th percentile — both are high, but the CPU’s absolute benchmark scores (avg 61841 vs GPU avg 68809) suggest a pairing where the CPU is less likely to be the limiting factor in most tasks.

In gaming workloads, the bottleneck will almost always be the GPU. The i9-13900KF’s single-thread performance is exceptional, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1188 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6897. This means that even at high frame rates, the CPU is unlikely to hold back the GPU in most titles. However, at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU’s role becomes more prominent, and the Arc A770’s rendering throughput becomes the primary constraint. The data suggests that the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are generous for its class, but the 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute and pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s set a ceiling on how many frames can be pushed at high settings.

For productivity and content creation, the balance shifts. The i9-13900KF’s 24 cores and 32 threads will dominate multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, where the GPU’s role is either secondary or irrelevant. PassMark data compression score of 786218 and floating point math score of 150869 highlight the CPU’s strength in compute-heavy workloads. Meanwhile, the Arc A770’s OpenCL score of 109175 suggests it can accelerate certain GPU compute tasks, but its overall compute is a fraction of what the CPU can deliver in multi-threaded scenarios. The bottleneck in these cases is more about which component is actually used — the CPU handles most workloads, and the GPU only becomes the bottleneck when the task is GPU-specific, such as ray tracing or large texture rendering.

The pair’s combined percentile of 92 suggests that, overall, the system is well-balanced for a high-end desktop, but the data implies that buyers should expect the GPU to be the first component requiring an upgrade for gaming, while the CPU will remain relevant for years for productivity tasks.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor from Intel’s 13th generation, manufactured on a 10 nm process node at Intel’s foundry. It packs 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a desktop-class chip with a 125 W TDP, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it has a PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, making it overclockable, and it has a launch MSRP of $564.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that is exceptionally strong in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In single-threaded tests, the i9-13900KF scores 1188 in 3DMark single-thread, 695 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 2896 in Cinebench R20 single-core, 6897 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 2668 in Geekbench single-core. These numbers, combined with a PassMark single-thread score of 4584, indicate that the CPU can handle lightly-threaded tasks with ease, such as gaming, office work, and web browsing. The boost clock of 5.80 GHz is a major contributor here, as high single-core frequencies directly translate to snappy responsiveness in everyday applications.

Multi-threaded performance is where the i9-13900KF truly excels. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 places it in the top tier of desktop processors, and the 3DMark max-threads score of 15405 reinforces this. The Geekbench multicore score of 22486 and PassMark multithread score of 57729 further confirm that the 24-core/32-thread configuration can handle demanding workloads like video rendering, software compilation, and scientific simulations. PassMark integer math score of 206859 and floating point math score of 150869 show that the CPU is not just about core count — its execution units are efficient at both integer and floating-point operations. The extended instructions score of 46084 suggests that modern SIMD-heavy applications will run well.

The nearest rival data shows that the i9-13900KF is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (delta 0%), the Intel Core i9-13900K (delta 0.1%), and the Intel Core i9-13900T (delta 0.2%). This means that within the same generation and similar price tier, performance differences are negligible. The Xeon 636 sits slightly behind with a delta of 0.8%. For real-world workloads, this means that the i9-13900KF is a top-tier choice for users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput, but it also delivers class-leading single-thread performance, making it a versatile processor for a wide range of use cases.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A770 combination is best suited for users who want a high-end desktop that can handle both compute-heavy productivity tasks and reasonably demanding gaming. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU’s 90th percentile ranking indicate that this build is in the upper echelon of desktop systems, with a combined percentile of 92. This makes it an appropriate choice for enthusiasts and professionals who need a single machine for multiple workloads.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit from the Arc A770’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, which are adequate for high-resolution textures and modern game assets. The i9-13900KF’s strong single-thread performance ensures that frame times are consistent, and its high core count means that streaming or recording gameplay while gaming will not cause significant performance drops. However, the data does not include measured FPS for this pairing, so expectations should be tempered by the GPU’s benchmark scores rather than direct gaming results.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will find the i9-13900KF to be a workhorse. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 and Geekbench multicore score of 22486 indicate that rendering and encoding tasks will complete quickly. The Arc A770’s OpenCL score of 109175 also suggests it can assist with GPU-accelerated effects in some applications, though its compute is limited compared to the CPU’s multi-threaded output. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, as well as the PassMark integer math score of 206859, which reflects strong integer throughput.

Students and small business workstations are also viable use cases, but this build is likely overkill for basic office tasks. The i9-13900KF’s single-thread scores are excellent for spreadsheet and browser workloads, but the power and cost of this CPU are better justified by demanding applications. For users who do occasional heavy work but mostly run standard productivity software, the performance headroom is substantial.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900KF delivers a comprehensive set of benchmark scores that place it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 61841, with the nearest rival being the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 61834 (delta 0%). The i9-13900K is nearly identical at 61766 (delta 0.1%), and the i9-13900T is at 61723 (delta 0.2%). The Intel Xeon 636 trails at 61360 (delta 0.8%). These deltas are all under 1%, meaning that the i9-13900KF has essentially the same average performance as its closest competitors, which is notable given the different power envelopes and features across these chips.

In specific benchmarks, the i9-13900KF’s 3DMark scores show strong scaling from single-thread (1188) to 4-thread (4643), 8-thread (8510), 16-thread (11177), and max-threads (15405). This scaling curve is nearly linear, indicating that the CPU can effectively utilize all available threads without significant contention. Cinebench scores follow a similar pattern, with R15 multicore at 4924, R20 multicore at 20519, and R23 multicore at 48855. Single-core scores in Cinebench are 695 (R15), 2896 (R20), and 6897 (R23). Geekbench results are 22486 multicore and 2668 single-core, while PassMark scores include multithread 57729, single-thread 4584, integer math 206859, floating point math 150869, data compression 786218, data encryption 46186, extended instructions 46084, find prime numbers 225, physics 2956, and random string sorting 86510.

The Intel Arc A770, with an average benchmark score of 68809, is at the 90th percentile among all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2969, Geekbench OpenCL score is 109175, and Geekbench Vulkan score is 94284. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (avg score 69000, delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (avg score 68562, delta 0.4%), AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (avg score 69870, delta -1.5%), and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (avg score 69986, delta -1.7%). The GPU’s raw compute is 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), with a pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s.

When combined, the CPU and GPU produce a system in the 92nd overall percentile. The CPU is clearly the dominant component in average benchmark terms, but the GPU’s scores are respectable for its class. The combined picture suggests that this build is well-suited for a range of tasks, with the CPU providing massive multi-threaded throughput and the GPU providing solid graphics performance, though the GPU is the weaker link in raw compute terms.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK does not contain any measured FPS data for the Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A770 combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of both components. This is an important caveat — no direct game testing was performed for this pairing, and actual FPS will vary depending on the title, settings, drivers, and system configuration.

Based on the GPU’s benchmark scores, the Arc A770 should be capable of handling modern games at 1080p and 1440p with high or ultra settings, assuming its drivers are mature. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969, while not directly translatable to game FPS, indicates that the GPU can handle DirectX 12 workloads reasonably well. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 suggests that Vulkan titles will also perform adequately. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for games that require large texture pools at high resolutions, and the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should prevent memory bandwidth bottlenecks in most scenarios.

The i9-13900KF’s single-thread performance is more than sufficient for gaming, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1188 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6897. This means that the CPU will not be a limiting factor in frame rate generation for most games. However, at lower resolutions like 1080p, some games may become CPU-bound, and the GPU’s rendering throughput will set the final frame rate. Given the GPU’s FP32 compute of 19.66 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s, users should expect solid but not class-leading performance at high settings.

For 4K gaming, the Arc A770’s 16 GB VRAM is helpful, but its compute capabilities are likely to be stretched. The pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s is adequate for 4K, but the overall compute may result in lower frame rates compared to higher-end GPUs. As an estimate, this pairing is likely best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, with 4K gaming requiring reduced settings for playable frame rates. Without measured data, these are qualitative expectations derived from the benchmark scores.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The i9-13900KF’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1188, Cinebench R23 single-core 6897) ensures that the CPU can feed a high-refresh-rate monitor at 1080p or 1440p. The Arc A770’s benchmark scores suggest it can deliver high frame rates in many titles, though the lack of measured FPS means exact numbers are unknown. At 1080p, the GPU is the likely bottleneck, but its 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should support high settings.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads of the i9-13900KF are ideal for streaming while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 57729 and 3DMark max-threads score of 15405 indicate that the CPU can handle encoding (e.g., x264) concurrently with game rendering without significant performance degradation. The GPU can also offload encoding tasks, though its capabilities are not explicitly measured.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 and Geekbench multicore score of 22486 make the i9-13900KF a strong choice for video editing. Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export times will be short. The Arc A770’s OpenCL score of 109175 suggests it can accelerate some GPU-accelerated effects, though the CPU will carry most of the load.

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering engines, the i9-13900KF excels with its high core count and strong multi-threaded scores. The PassMark floating point math score of 150869 is relevant for rendering calculations. The Arc A770 can assist with real-time viewport rendering or GPU-accelerated renderers, but its 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute is modest compared to higher-end GPUs.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 206859 and data compression score of 786218 indicate that the i9-13900KF is well-suited for compiling code, running tests, and handling large data sets. The 32 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 36 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data. Developers working on large projects will benefit from reduced compile times.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for standard office tasks, but it will handle any student workload with ease. The single-thread scores (Geekbench single-core 2668, PassMark single-thread 4584) ensure fast application load times and responsive multitasking. The Arc A770’s 16 GB VRAM is not necessary for office work, but it doesn’t hurt. This configuration is better suited for students in STEM fields who need to run simulations or compile code.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900KF with the Intel Arc A770, creating a desktop system that ranks in the 92nd combined percentile. The CPU is a 24-core/32-thread Raptor Lake-S processor on Intel Socket 1700, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc A770 with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. Both components are from Intel, which is notable as it represents a full-Intel platform (CPU and GPU). The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is high-end, given the CPU’s 93rd percentile and GPU’s 90th percentile rankings.

The i9-13900KF is the clear performance leader in this pairing, with an average benchmark score of 61841 compared to the GPU’s 68809. The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads make it a productivity powerhouse, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth make it a capable graphics solution for gaming and GPU compute. The combined percentile of 92 suggests that this system is in the upper tier of all desktop configurations, though not at the absolute top.

The launch MSRP of the CPU is $564, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 329 USD. These figures are provided for context, but the build’s value is not assessed here. The system requires a discrete GPU (the CPU has no integrated graphics), and the Arc A770 fulfills that role. The overall tier is high, with the CPU providing most of the compute power and the GPU offering solid, if not spectacular, graphics performance.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation (Arc 7). It uses the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors and a die size of 406 mm². The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, along with 32 ray tracing cores. Its base clock is 2100 MHz, and the boost clock is 2400 MHz. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s, and the FP32 compute is 19.66 TFLOPS (with FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS via 2:1 ratio). The TDP is 225 W, requiring a 550 W suggested PSU and using 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmark terms, the Arc A770 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284. Its average benchmark score is 68809, placing it at the 90th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are all within a 2% delta: NVIDIA CMP 90HX (avg 69000, delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (avg 68562, delta 0.4%), AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (avg 69870, delta -1.5%), and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (avg 69986, delta -1.7%). This means the Arc A770 performs at a similar level to these professional and mining-focused GPUs.

For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM is substantial and can handle large textures and scenes without running out of memory. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for most workloads, and the 32 RT cores provide ray tracing support, though the FP32 compute of 19.66 TFLOPS is modest compared to higher-end GPUs. The OpenCL score of 109175 indicates that the GPU can accelerate compute tasks, but its performance in this area is not class-leading. The Vulkan score of 94284 suggests better performance in Vulkan-based applications. Overall, the Arc A770 is a capable GPU for 1080p and 1440p gaming and light-to-moderate GPU compute, but it is not designed for extreme compute workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with 13th Gen Raptor Lake processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which means modern SSDs and GPUs can take advantage of the high bandwidth. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported, which is a feature that can be important for workstation use.

The Arc A770 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes (it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds). The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and requires a suggested PSU of 550 W. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, so the total system power draw is manageable with a quality power supply. The GPU uses 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors, so the PSU must have these available.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the more likely candidate for replacement. The Arc A770 is at the 90th percentile, while the CPU is at the 93rd percentile. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is exceptional, and it is unlikely to be a bottleneck for many years. Upgrading the GPU to a higher-performing model would improve gaming frame rates and GPU compute performance. The CPU’s socket (LGA 1700) may not support future generations beyond 13th Gen, so a CPU upgrade would likely require a new motherboard, but the current CPU is already at a high level. Memory upgrades to faster DDR5 modules could provide a small performance boost, but the dual-channel configuration is already standard. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support means that future storage devices will not be bottlenecked, making this a forward-looking build for storage upgrades.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900KF

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds