SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900KF paired with the Intel Arc A580 is a desktop combination that sits at the 90th percentile overall, representing a high-tier build where the CPU is the undisputed performance anchor. The data shows a stark contrast between the components: the processor is a top-tier 24-core workstation-class part, while the graphics card is a mid-range 8 GB solution that delivers solid 1080p performance but will be the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive task. This is a build for users who prioritize compute-heavy workloads like CPU rendering and software compilation, with gaming as a secondary, albeit capable, consideration.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, resulting in a substantial 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU includes 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, along with 24 dedicated ray tracing cores. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility.

The benchmark scores place the Arc A580 at the 87th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 57756. In synthetic tests, it achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381. The data positions it in a tight cluster with competitors: it is 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, 0.8% behind the Intel Arc A570M, and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. The near-zero delta percentages against these rivals indicate that the Arc A580 is performance-equivalent to a broad range of cards spanning several generations and tiers.

For rendering workloads, the 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power and the 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance provide the raw throughput for rasterization and compute shaders. The 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest the card can handle texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution fill rates efficiently. The 8 GB VRAM capacity, while sufficient for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p, is a potential constraint for large 4K textures or complex 3D scenes that exceed this memory pool. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is a highlight, offering ample headroom for data-heavy operations that are often bottlenecked on narrower-bus cards. The 24 ray tracing cores mean the hardware is capable of real-time ray-traced effects, though the overall compute throughput will dictate that ray tracing performance will be moderate rather than class-leading. The card requires a 450 W suggested PSU and uses dual 8-pin power connectors, indicating it draws significant power relative to its performance tier.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the Arc A580’s benchmark scores, which put it within 1.1% of the Radeon RX 6950 XT, indicate it is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming. The 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput can drive competitive titles at high frame rates, though the 8 GB VRAM may require settings adjustments in the most demanding modern titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The i9-13900KF’s PassMark multithread score of 57729 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 ensure that the processor can handle the encoding workload without compromising frame pacing, making this a viable single-PC streaming setup.

Video Editing: The combination of the 24-core CPU and the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is strong for video editing timelines. The CPU’s high multi-core scores accelerate export and rendering, while the GPU can assist with effects and color grading; however, the 8 GB VRAM on the Arc A580 is a limiting factor for complex 4K projects with many layers and heavy GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: This build excels in CPU-based rendering. The i9-13900KF’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 is exceptional, making it ideal for Blender Cycles (CPU) or V-Ray. The GPU can contribute via its 24 ray tracing cores, but its 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance is secondary to the CPU’s massive parallel compute capability.

Software Development: The 32 threads and high single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2668) are perfect for compiling code, running virtual machines, and handling large codebases. The PassMark data encryption score of 46186 and data compression score of 786218 further indicate strong performance in developer utilities and build processes.

Student and Office Work: For general productivity, this build is overkill. The single-core performance is excellent for responsiveness, but the power draw and cost of the platform are not justified by spreadsheets or web browsing. The i9-13900KF’s massive multi-core capability is simply unused in these workloads, and the GPU’s capabilities go largely untapped outside of media consumption.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor with 24 cores and 32 threads, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory. The processor has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) and uses the Intel Socket 1700. It was released in September 2022 with a launch MSRP of $564, features an unlocked multiplier, and is actively in production.

The benchmark data confirms the i9-13900KF’s elite status, with a percentile rank of 93 among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 61841. Its nearest rivals show how tightly packed the top tier is: it is statistically tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (0% delta), 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900K, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900T, and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Xeon 636. This places it firmly in the high-end desktop and entry-level workstation segment.

The multi-threaded performance is staggering. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 and the 3DMark max threads score of 15405 demonstrate exceptional throughput for heavily parallel workloads. The 3DMark scaling from 2353 (2 threads) to 8510 (8 threads) to 15405 (max threads) shows near-linear scaling, indicating the architecture efficiently utilizes its available cores. The PassMark multithread score of 57729 and floating point math score of 150869 reinforce its capability in scientific computing and financial modeling. Single-threaded performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6897 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2668, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. The 5.80 GHz boost clock is a key driver of this single-thread dominance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a profound imbalance in this pairing. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is at the 87th percentile; while both are above average, the CPU’s absolute performance ceiling is vastly higher than the GPU’s. In CPU-bound workloads, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or code compilation, the i9-13900KF will operate at full capacity, leaving the Arc A580 mostly idle. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 will dominate any rendering task, and the GPU’s contribution will be minimal.

Conversely, in gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads, the Arc A580 becomes the primary constraint. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 57756 is significantly lower than the CPU’s average of 61841, and its 8 GB VRAM is a hard limit for large textures. The data suggests that in 1080p gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as the CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 11177 indicates it can easily feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. The imbalance means that investing in this CPU for gaming alone is inefficient; the i9-13900KF’s performance is only fully realized in multi-threaded productivity tasks. The system’s overall 90th percentile ranking reflects the CPU’s high contribution, but the GPU prevents the system from achieving top-tier performance in graphics-bound scenarios.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so the following figures are estimates inferred from the benchmark scores. The data is not measured, and any frame rate expectations are qualitative projections from the GPU’s relative performance.

Based on the GPU’s benchmark scores, which place it within 1.1% of the Radeon RX 6950 XT, the Arc A580 is expected to deliver excellent 1080p gaming performance. At 1080p with ultra settings, the card’s 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should push frame rates well above 60 FPS in most AAA titles and approach 144 FPS in competitive esports titles. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p, but texture-heavy games may require a reduction from ultra to high settings to avoid stuttering.

At 1440p, the GPU’s performance will scale down, with frame rates dropping to the 50-70 FPS range in demanding titles. The 256-bit memory bus provides decent bandwidth, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity becomes a more significant constraint at this resolution, potentially causing performance dips in games that exceed 8 GB of VRAM usage. The GPU’s ray tracing performance, while supported by 24 dedicated cores, will be moderate; enabling ray tracing will likely halve frame rates. Overall, gaming is a secondary use case for this build, with the CPU providing headroom for high-refresh 1080p gaming, but the GPU capping the experience at 1440p.

Who Should Build It

This build is engineered for the power user whose primary workload is CPU-intensive. Content creators working with video editing software that leverages multi-threading will see massive gains from the i9-13900KF’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855. 3D artists using CPU-based renderers will find the 32 threads indispensable for reducing render times. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the PassMark multithread score of 57729 and the high data compression score of 786218, which accelerates build and packaging tasks.

For gamers, this build is best suited for those targeting high-refresh 1080p gaming. The Arc A580 is a capable 1080p card, and the CPU ensures that no game will ever be CPU-bound at that resolution. It is not recommended for 4K gaming, as the 8 GB VRAM and the GPU’s compute power are insufficient for that resolution. Students and office workers should avoid this build; the power consumption and cost are not justified for basic tasks, and the i9-13900KF’s capabilities are entirely wasted on word processing or spreadsheet work. Small business workstations handling data analysis, simulation, or virtualization will find the CPU’s 32 threads and ECC memory support valuable, but they must ensure their software is not GPU-dependent, as the Arc A580 is the system’s bottleneck.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are its defining feature. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 and single-core score of 6897 are excellent, placing it in the top 7% of all CPUs (93rd percentile). The 3DMark results show strong scaling: 2-thread score of 2353, 4-thread score of 4643, 8-thread score of 8510, 16-thread score of 11177, and max-thread score of 15405. The Geekbench scores of 22486 (multi-core) and 2668 (single-core) corroborate the Cinebench results. PassMark scores include a multithread score of 57729, single-thread of 4584, integer math of 206859, floating point math of 150869, and data encryption of 46186.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are modest in comparison. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2229, with Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 91657 and 79381, respectively. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 57756 places it at the 87th percentile, but its raw numbers are far lower than the CPU’s. The combined percentile for the build is 90, driven primarily by the CPU’s high performance. The data paints a picture of a top-tier CPU paired with a mid-tier GPU, resulting in an overall system that is above average but not balanced.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core i9-13900KF desktop processor with the Intel Arc A580 desktop graphics card. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake part with a 5.80 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an Alchemist (Arc 5) part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 3072 shading units. The pairing represents a high-performance desktop configuration for productivity-focused users. The system’s overall tier is defined by its 90th percentile combined rank, which is a strong score, but the asymmetry is clear: the CPU is in the top 7% of processors, while the GPU is in the top 13% of graphics cards. The build class is desktop, and the data indicates it is a workstation-leaning system with gaming capabilities, rather than a dedicated gaming rig.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i9-13900KF and Intel Arc A580 pairing is 90, placing it above 90% of all tracked configurations.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has an average benchmark score of 57756, which is 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. It is 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance?

A: The i9-13900KF achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6897 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2668, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, driven by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU’s multi-thread performance suitable for rendering?

A: Yes, the i9-13900KF’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 and PassMark multithread score of 57729 make it exceptionally well-suited for CPU-based 3D rendering and video encoding workloads.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is built on Intel’s 10 nm process, while the GPU is manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this build?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, and the data is not measured.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900KF

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds