SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900KF and Intel Arc A350 pairing is an unusual desktop configuration, placing a top-tier 24-core processor alongside an entry-level graphics card. The data indicates a system with extreme CPU headroom and limited GPU capability, creating a substantial performance imbalance. This analysis relies strictly on the provided benchmark scores and specifications to interpret what this combination means for potential users.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The processor also supports ECC memory and has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1188 for single-thread to 2353 for 2 threads, 4643 for 4 threads, 8510 for 8 threads, 11177 for 16 threads, and 15405 for max threads. This scaling pattern indicates strong multi-core efficiency, with the max-thread score being approximately 13 times the single-thread score. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 against a single-core score of 6897 further demonstrates this processor's ability to handle heavily threaded workloads, with multi-core performance exceeding single-core by a factor of roughly 7. The Geekbench scores of 22486 multi-core and 2668 single-core align with this narrative.

PassMark results provide additional context for specific workloads. The data encryption score of 46186 and extended instructions score of 46084 suggest robust cryptographic and SIMD processing capabilities. The floating-point math score of 150869 and integer math score of 206859 indicate strong mathematical throughput, which is valuable for scientific computing and financial modeling. The data compression score of 786218 and random string sorting score of 86510 point to impressive data manipulation abilities. The multithread score of 57729 places this processor in the 93rd percentile against all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of available processors.

The nearest rivals provide a frame of reference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has an average score of 61834 with a 0% delta, making it essentially a statistical tie. The Intel Core i9-13900K scores 61766 with a 0.1% delta, and the Intel Core i9-13900T scores 61723 with a 0.2% delta. The Intel Xeon 636 scores 61360 with a 0.8% delta, meaning the 13900KF leads these rivals by less than one percent. This suggests the processor is at the very top of its performance class, with differences so small they fall within normal benchmark variance.

The average benchmark score of 61841 and the 93rd percentile ranking confirm that this is an elite processor. For real workloads, this means the CPU will not be a limiting factor in any task. Whether compiling code, rendering 3D scenes, or running complex simulations, the 13900KF provides massive computational headroom. The 32 threads allow for efficient parallel processing, and the high single-thread score of 4584 on PassMark ensures responsiveness in lightly threaded applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 61841 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average benchmark score is listed as 0 with a 50th percentile ranking. The combined percentile for this build is 72, which reflects a system where the CPU is far more capable than the GPU. The lack of GPU benchmark scores in the data means the GPU's 50th percentile is based on its position relative to other graphics cards, but without specific scores to interpret.

The CPU scores paint a clear picture of top-tier performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 is particularly strong, indicating excellent performance in rendering and other multi-threaded applications. The single-core score of 6897 on the same test shows that the processor maintains high performance even in tasks that use only one thread. The 3DMark max-thread score of 15405 versus the single-thread score of 1188 highlights the processor's ability to scale performance with additional cores.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A350, has no benchmark scores listed in the data. Its specifications include a 4 GB GDDR6 memory with a 64-bit bus width and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, along with 6 ray tracing cores. Its clock speeds are listed as 2000 MHz for both base and boost, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz or 15.5 Gbps effective. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 6.144 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is in the top 7% of all processors, while the GPU sits at the median of all graphics cards. This creates a significant imbalance. The CPU can handle any workload thrown at it, but the GPU will struggle with graphically intensive tasks. The data suggests that this build is optimized for CPU-heavy workloads like software development, data analysis, and content creation that does not rely heavily on GPU acceleration.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is severely limited by the GPU. The Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB of VRAM indicate it is designed for entry-level gaming at best. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4584 on PassMark ensures that the processor will not bottleneck games, but the GPU will likely prevent achieving high frame rates at 1080p with demanding settings. The lack of measured FPS data means specific frame rates cannot be cited, but the GPU's specifications suggest it is suited for esports titles at lower settings rather than AAA games at high refresh rates.

Streaming is a mixed scenario. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample capacity for encoding video while gaming or performing other tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 indicates the CPU can handle x264 encoding without impacting other workloads significantly. However, the GPU's limited capabilities mean that game performance while streaming will still be constrained. The system can likely handle streaming, but the visual quality of games will be limited by the GPU.

Video editing benefits from the CPU's strong multi-core performance. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20519 and PassMark multithread score of 57729 suggest that timeline scrubbing, exporting, and applying effects will be fast. The CPU's high data compression score of 786218 also helps with video codecs that rely on compression. However, GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be slow due to the Arc A350's limited compute power. Editors working primarily with CPU-based workflows will see excellent performance, but those relying on GPU acceleration will encounter bottlenecks.

3D rendering is where this CPU excels. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 demonstrates outstanding performance in CPU-based rendering engines. The 32 threads allow for efficient utilization of multi-core renderers, and the processor's high floating-point math score of 150869 supports complex scene calculations. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is minimal for GPU rendering, so this system is best suited for CPU-based rendering workflows like Blender's Cycles engine or similar software.

Software development is a strong use case for this CPU. The high multi-core scores, including the Geekbench multi-core score of 22486, support fast compilation of large codebases. The data encryption score of 46186 is relevant for secure development workflows, and the extended instructions score of 46084 indicates solid SIMD performance for vectorized code. The GPU is not critical for most development tasks, making this an excellent developer workstation.

Student and office work is massively over-provisioned with this CPU. The 93rd percentile ranking means the processor outperforms nearly all alternatives, but office applications rarely utilize more than a few cores. The single-thread score of 4584 on PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output, though the data shows no display outputs on the GPU, which is a significant caveat for any usage scenario.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Content creators working with CPU-based rendering engines will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855, which indicates rapid render times for complex scenes. Software developers compiling large projects will appreciate the Geekbench multi-core score of 22486 and the PassMark multithread score of 57729, which translate to faster build times.

Data scientists and researchers analyzing large datasets will find the data compression score of 786218 and the integer math score of 206859 useful for processing and manipulating data. The processor's 93rd percentile ranking ensures it handles demanding computational tasks with ease. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU's power, though they may find the GPU limiting for any graphics-related coursework.

Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive applications, such as financial modeling or scientific simulations, will see strong performance. The floating-point math score of 150869 supports complex numerical calculations, and the extended instructions score of 46084 indicates good support for specialized workloads. However, businesses requiring GPU acceleration for tasks like CAD or video editing need to consider the Arc A350's limitations.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the system capable of running lighter titles, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution in modern games. The CPU's high single-thread score ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU will be the limiting factor. Gamers seeking high refresh rates in competitive titles may find the system adequate for esports games, but AAA titles will require lower settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The dual-channel memory bus means users can choose either memory type, though DDR5 offers higher bandwidth potential. The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for high-speed storage and graphics cards.

The GPU has a suggested PSU of 200 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 125 W. This indicates that the system's power supply headroom is more than sufficient for the current configuration. The GPU's 25 W TDP is minimal, so the main power draw comes from the CPU. Users upgrading to a more powerful GPU will need to consider the additional power requirements, but the current 200 W suggestion for the GPU leaves room for higher-end cards.

The GPU is End-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage. This means the Arc A350 is a dead end for upgrades within the same architecture. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with most motherboards on the Socket 1700 platform. Users can replace the GPU with any modern graphics card that fits the PCIe slot and meets power requirements.

The CPU's production status is Active, and its launch MSRP is $564. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking to extract additional performance. The 125 W TDP suggests that a capable air cooler or liquid cooler is needed to manage thermals under sustained load, though specific cooler requirements are not detailed in the data.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A350 with a more powerful GPU that has higher compute capabilities. The CPU has massive headroom, as evidenced by its 93rd percentile ranking, so a GPU upgrade would balance the system. Users should ensure their power supply can handle the new GPU's requirements, as the current 200 W suggestion is based on the Arc A350's low power draw.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900KF is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 93% of processors in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus has an average score of 61834 with a 0% delta, making it statistically tied with the 13900KF, which has an average score of 61841.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 64-bit bus width and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU have any display outputs?

A: No, the data lists the display outputs as "No outputs," which means the GPU cannot connect to a monitor directly.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900KF has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile for the system is 72, reflecting the imbalance between the high-performing CPU and the mid-range GPU.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 48855, demonstrating strong multi-threaded rendering performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly shows the GPU as the limiting factor in this system. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile creates a massive performance gap. In CPU-intensive workloads like 3D rendering and software compilation, the system will perform at an elite level, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 22486.

In GPU-intensive workloads like gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A350 will be the bottleneck. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is minimal compared to modern graphics cards, and the 4 GB VRAM will limit texture sizes and resolution. The CPU will remain underutilized in these scenarios, as the GPU cannot feed data to the processor fast enough to use its full capabilities.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, can be inferred from the specifications. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4584 on PassMark suggests it can handle game logic and physics calculations without bottlenecking. However, the GPU's low compute power means frame rates will be limited by the graphics card's ability to render frames. The system is balanced for CPU-heavy workloads but severely unbalanced for gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks.

The power draw also reflects this imbalance. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 25 W TDP mean the system's total power consumption is modest, but the suggested PSU of 200 W for the GPU indicates that users upgrading to a more powerful GPU will need to consider additional power requirements. The current configuration leaves significant headroom for a GPU upgrade without changing the power supply, as long as the new GPU's power draw stays within the CPU's 125 W TDP plus the GPU's requirements.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system combining the Intel Core i9-13900KF with the Intel Arc A350. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is an entry-level Arc A350 from the Alchemist generation, built on the Xe-HPG architecture.

The combined percentile of 72 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all builds. This ranking is heavily influenced by the CPU's 93rd percentile performance, which is offset by the GPU's 50th percentile ranking. The overall tier reflects a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but is limited in GPU-bound workloads.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 61841 and the GPU's lack of benchmark scores indicate a significant performance disparity. The system is best described as a CPU-centric workstation with a basic GPU for display output. The GPU's lack of display outputs is notable, suggesting the system may require an additional graphics solution for video output, or the GPU is intended for compute-only tasks.

The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for users. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures compatibility with future high-bandwidth devices. The system's active production status for the CPU and End-of-life status for the GPU indicate that the CPU has a longer upgrade horizon than the graphics card.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The GPU has 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU's clock speeds are fixed at 2000 MHz for both base and boost, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz or 15.5 Gbps effective.

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a limited configuration, with both capacity and bandwidth on the lower end for modern graphics cards. The 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs suggest entry-level compute capabilities. The 6 ray tracing cores provide some RT functionality, but the overall RT performance will be limited by the low compute throughput.

The GPU's FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.144 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. These figures indicate the GPU can handle basic 1080p gaming at low to medium settings, but will struggle with higher resolutions or demanding effects. The 25 W TDP is extremely low, reflecting the GPU's entry-level positioning.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, providing compatibility with modern APIs. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is sufficient for the GPU's bandwidth needs. The lack of display outputs is a significant limitation, as the GPU cannot directly drive a monitor. The GPU is marked as End-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor, suggesting it is at the end of its product cycle.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed, and its 50th percentile ranking is based on its position relative to all GPUs. This median ranking suggests it performs at the midpoint of all graphics cards, but the lack of specific scores means detailed performance comparisons are not possible. The GPU's average benchmark score of 0 further indicates that no performance data is available for this specific model.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data. All FPS discussions are therefore estimates based on the benchmark scores and specifications. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in less demanding titles.

For esports games like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the system may achieve playable frame rates, as these titles are not graphically intensive. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4584 on PassMark ensures that game logic and physics are processed without bottlenecking. However, the GPU's limited compute power will cap frame rates, and players seeking high refresh rates above 144 Hz may find the system inadequate.

For AAA titles at 1080p, the system will likely require low settings to maintain playable frame rates. The 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality, and the 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture streaming. Games with high VRAM requirements, such as modern open-world titles, may experience stuttering or reduced quality. The GPU's 6 ray tracing cores provide some RT capability, but the low compute throughput will make RT effects prohibitively expensive.

At 1440p or 4K, the system will struggle significantly. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS is insufficient for these resolutions, and the 64-bit memory bus will bottleneck performance. Users should expect to play at 1080p with reduced settings for any modern gaming. The system is not suited for high-refresh gaming or competitive play at high settings, and users with gaming as a primary use case should consider a more powerful GPU.