SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts up to 5.80 GHz. The chip is part of the Core 13th Gen series, released on 2022-09-26, and remains in active production. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. The die size measures 257 mm², and the processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Benchmark results position this CPU at the 92nd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 61766. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900T, scores 61723, a delta of just 0.1% — essentially a statistical tie. The Core i9-13900KF scores 61841, which is 0.1% higher, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus also scores 61834 at a 0.1% advantage. The Intel Xeon 636 trails by 0.7% with a score of 61360. These margins are negligible; the i9-13900K sits in a dead heat with its closest competitors.

Looking at thread scaling, the 3DMark tests show a clear progression: 2-thread score of 2355, 4-thread score of 4648, 8-thread score of 8520, and 16-thread score of 11201. The max-thread score reaches 15509. This scaling from 2 to 8 threads is nearly linear, indicating strong efficiency in lightly threaded workloads. The jump from 16 to 32 threads (max) adds 4308 points, which is a 38.4% improvement — respectable, but showing diminishing returns as the scheduler manages the hybrid core layout. The single-thread score of 1187 in 3DMark, paired with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2238.5, confirms that the 5.80 GHz boost clock delivers top-tier per-core performance.

In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 38271.5 is the headline figure. To put it in context, the R20 multicore score is 20740, and the R15 multicore score is 5805.5. These numbers indicate that the i9-13900K excels in heavily threaded rendering workloads, where all 24 cores can operate at sustained high clocks. The single-core R23 score of 2238.5 is equally strong, meaning applications that depend on single-threaded responsiveness — such as older games or certain productivity tools — will perform admirably.

Geekbench scores reinforce the picture: multicore at 22820 and single-core at 2628. PassMark tests further break down the workload characteristics. Integer math scores 207792, floating-point math scores 151562, and extended instructions score 46477. Data compression scores 793645, while data encryption scores 46609. The random string sorting score of 87705 suggests strong memory subsystem performance, though the dual-channel memory bus is a limiting factor for some data-intensive tasks. The find prime numbers score of 236 is modest, indicating that the CPU does not prioritize this particular workload.

For real-world workloads, these scores translate to a processor that handles video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing with ease. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces latency in data-heavy applications, and the 257 mm² die with 24 cores ensures that multi-threaded tasks scale well. The 125 W TDP is the base power draw; with the boost clocks reaching 5.80 GHz, thermal management becomes critical, but the data shows the chip sustains high performance across all benchmark types.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is the primary interface for a discrete GPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, offering a fallback display output and hardware acceleration for media tasks. The processor has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking for users who want to push beyond the stock 5.80 GHz boost clock.

The i9-13900K's TDP is 125 W, and the suggested PSU for the paired GPU in this build is 550 W. This suggests that the total system power draw, including the Intel Arc A770 GPU with its 225 W TDP, is within the headroom of a 550 W power supply. The GPU's power connectors are 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin, which are standard on mid-range PSUs. The CPU's TDP plus the GPU's TDP totals 350 W, leaving 200 W of headroom for the rest of the system — motherboard, RAM, storage, and fans. This is adequate for a typical desktop build, though users adding multiple drives or heavy cooling solutions should consider a higher-wattage PSU.

Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5, which gives builders flexibility. DDR4 is more affordable and widely available, while DDR5 offers higher bandwidth. The dual-channel configuration means that memory-intensive workloads like data compression (PassMark score of 793645) will benefit from higher-frequency kits, but the CPU does not require them for basic operation. ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation-class builds, where data integrity is paramount.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform is at the end of its socket generation — the i9-13900K is the flagship of the 13th Gen Core series on Socket 1700. Users looking to upgrade the CPU would need a new motherboard for a newer socket. However, the GPU slot is PCIe Gen 5 x16, and the Arc A770 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, meaning the GPU is not bandwidth-limited. A future GPU upgrade to a PCIe Gen 5 card would be fully supported by the CPU's lanes. The memory can be upgraded to higher-capacity DDR5 kits, and the storage can be expanded with NVMe drives on the available PCIe lanes. The 550 W PSU may need upgrading if a more power-hungry GPU is installed later, but for the current pairing, it is sufficient.

Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a top-tier CPU at the 92nd percentile, while the Intel Arc A770 GPU is at the 90th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 91, indicating a well-matched system where neither component dramatically overshadows the other. The CPU's avgBenchmarkScore of 61766 and the GPU's avgBenchmarkScore of 68809 show that the GPU has a slightly higher raw score, but the CPU is not a bottleneck in most scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads — such as software compilation, data compression (PassMark score of 793645), or physics simulations (PassMark physics score of 3140) — the i9-13900K will be the limiting factor only if the workload exceeds its 32 threads, which is rare. The GPU, in contrast, is the bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks like 3D rendering and gaming at high resolutions. The Arc A770's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 is its key gaming metric, and it will cap frame rates in demanding titles.

For gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1187, Cinebench R23 single-core of 2238.5) ensures that even at high refresh rates, the CPU can feed frames to the GPU. However, at 1080p with a powerful GPU, the CPU can become the bottleneck if the game is poorly optimized for multi-threading. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's rendering load increases, and the CPU's role diminishes, making the Arc A770 the primary limiter. The data supports this: the CPU's 16-thread score of 11201 and max-thread score of 15509 indicate it can handle high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 90th percentile ranking means it will struggle with ultra settings at 4K.

The FPS scaling between the two components is not measured for this exact combination — the data contains no measuredFps rows. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 58589 and the GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284 suggest that the system is balanced for 1440p gaming, where the GPU is the primary driver. For CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, the i9-13900K's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 ensures that the GPU is not a bottleneck, as the CPU can process frames faster than the GPU can render them.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need both high-end CPU performance and solid GPU capability. Gamers at 1440p resolution will find the pairing suitable for high-refresh gaming, with the CPU's single-thread strength ensuring consistent frame pacing. Content creators — video editors, 3D renderers, and animators — will benefit from the CPU's 24 cores and the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM for large textures and scenes. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 is ideal for rendering tasks, while the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supports GPU-accelerated effects.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the 32 threads; the PassMark integer math score of 207792 indicates strong computation throughput. Students in engineering or computer science programs can run virtual machines, simulations, and data analysis tools without hitting performance ceilings. Small business workstations that run accounting software, database management, or light CAD work will find the CPU's 24 cores and the GPU's 16 GB memory more than adequate. The ECC memory support adds reliability for server-like workloads.

The GPU's 16 GB GDDR6 memory is a standout feature for machine learning inference and data science tasks, where memory capacity often limits model size. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 46609 supports secure file operations, and the data compression score of 793645 accelerates backup and archival processes. For users who want a single system that handles both productivity and entertainment, this build covers both without compromising on either front.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1187 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 indicate the system can drive 1440p at high refresh rates in esports titles. The GPU's 90th percentile ranking suggests it will handle competitive shooters at 144+ FPS with medium-to-high settings, though ultra settings at 4K will be challenging.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5, provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 793645 ensures fast stream encoding, and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM supports simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding without memory pressure.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 22820 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175 combine for fast timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerates effects processing, and the 16 GB VRAM handles 4K and 8K footage without out-of-memory errors.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 puts the CPU in the top tier for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's fp32 of 19.66 TFLOPS supports GPU-accelerated renderers. The 32 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, and the 256 TMUs and 128 ROPs handle texture-heavy scenes efficiently.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 207792 and multithread score of 58589 speed up code compilation and test execution. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache reduces access times for large codebases, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity during long builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4608 in PassMark single-thread and the GPU's 90th percentile ranking handle spreadsheet calculations, document processing, and web browsing with ease. The system is overkill for basic tasks but provides a future-proof foundation for more demanding coursework.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K has 24 cores and 32 threads, operating at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i9-13900K scores 61766 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i9-13900T (61723) and 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900KF (61841). The differences are negligible.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i9-13900K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, which covers the CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 225 W TDP with headroom for the rest of the system.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i9-13900K includes UHD Graphics 770, which provides a display output and media acceleration fallback.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A770 is end-of-life, with the successor being Battlemage. The CPU remains in active production.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900K achieves an average benchmark score of 61766, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are clustered tightly: the Core i9-13900T scores 61723 (0.1% lower), the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61834 (0.1% higher), and the Core i9-13900KF scores 61841 (0.1% higher). The Intel Xeon 636 is the only rival with a meaningful gap, scoring 61360 at 0.7% lower. The CPU's best results come in Cinebench R23 multicore (38271.5), Geekbench multicore (22820), and PassMark multithread (58589).

The Intel Arc A770 GPU has an average benchmark score of 68809, placing it at the 90th percentile among all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2969, Geekbench OpenCL is 109175, and Geekbench Vulkan is 94284. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA CMP 90HX at 69000 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 at 68562 (0.4% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 at 69870 (1.5% higher). The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 91.

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All frame rate figures discussed are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The combined picture is a system where the CPU slightly underperforms the GPU in raw benchmark scores (61766 vs 68809), but both components sit in the top decile of their respective categories, indicating a high-performance desktop build.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900K with the Intel Arc A770 GPU. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, released in September 2022, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 7 part released in October 2022. Both components are high performers: the CPU is at the 92nd percentile and the GPU at the 90th percentile, with a combined percentile of 91. The build class is desktop, indicating a full-size system with upgrade potential.

The i9-13900K has a launch MSRP of $589, and the Arc A770 has a launch MSRP of 329 USD. The CPU is actively produced, while the GPU is end-of-life with Battlemage as its successor. The system is positioned as a high-end desktop for gaming, content creation, and productivity, with the CPU's 32 threads and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM providing a balanced foundation for demanding workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process node. It contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU has 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. It includes 32 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The base clock is 2100 MHz, boosting to 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration is a standout feature: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a high capacity for the GPU's class, enabling large textures and datasets. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. Compute performance reaches 19.66 TFLOPS in FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully compatible with modern games and applications.

In benchmarks, the Arc A770 scores 2969 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 109175 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 94284 in Geekbench Vulkan. The avgBenchmarkScore of 68809 places it at the 90th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, scores 69000 (0.3% higher), while the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 scores 68562 (0.4% lower). For rendering workloads, the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM support large scenes, and the 32 RT cores enable real-time ray tracing. The FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS is suitable for GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1187 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 provide the basis for these estimates.

At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 2238.5) ensures it can feed frames to the GPU without bottlenecking. The GPU's 90th percentile ranking suggests it can achieve high frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, likely exceeding 144 FPS at high settings. For AAA games at 1080p ultra, frame rates would be lower, possibly in the 60–100 FPS range, depending on the title's optimization for Intel GPUs.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary limiter. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2969 indicates the Arc A770 is competitive with mid-range GPUs, so demanding titles at ultra settings would likely run at 50–80 FPS. Lowering settings to high or medium would push frame rates higher, making 1440p high-refresh gaming possible in less demanding games.

At 4K, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth help, but the raw compute of 19.66 TFLOPS is not sufficient for ultra settings at 60 FPS in most AAA titles. Users would need to rely on upscaling technologies or lower settings to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU's performance is not a limiting factor at this resolution — the GPU is the clear bottleneck. These are estimates, as no measured FPS data is available for this pairing, but the benchmark scores provide a consistent picture of the system's capabilities.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds