SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900K paired with the Intel Arc A350 is a desktop configuration that combines one of the most powerful consumer processors available with a modest entry-level graphics card. Benchmark data indicates a significant performance disparity between the two components, with the CPU ranking in the 92nd percentile among all processors while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This pairing is best understood as a high-performance compute platform with limited graphics acceleration, suitable for specific productivity tasks rather than balanced gaming. The following analysis examines the measured data for this combination, noting that no measured FPS figures exist for this exact pairing.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This configuration is not suitable for high-refresh gaming at demanding settings. The Arc A350’s 50th percentile GPU ranking and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance place it firmly in entry-level territory, meaning even at lower resolutions, frame rates would likely fall well short of 144Hz targets in modern titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1187 in 3dmark would not be the limiting factor, but the GPU’s modest 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM capacity would constrain performance.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide exceptional headroom for software encoding while gaming, as evidenced by the 15509 max-thread score in 3dmark. However, the GPU would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in most titles, making the streaming experience poor overall. The 3dmark 16-thread score of 11201 suggests the CPU can handle simultaneous game and encode workloads, but the graphics card becomes the bottleneck.

Video Editing: This scenario favors the CPU heavily. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 indicates rapid rendering and export times for video projects. The 36 MB shared L3 cache and high memory bandwidth support smooth timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU’s lack of display outputs means users would need to rely on the integrated UHD Graphics 770 for monitor connectivity, though the Arc A350 could assist with hardware-accelerated effects if properly supported.

3D Rendering: The CPU excels in ray-traced and CPU-based rendering workloads, with a Passmark multithread score of 58589 placing it near the top of the processor hierarchy. The Arc A350’s 6 RT cores provide some ray-tracing capability, but its 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is minimal compared to dedicated workstation GPUs. For final-frame rendering, the CPU would carry the workload; for viewport performance, the GPU would lag.

Software Development: The 32 threads and high single-thread performance (2238.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core) make this an excellent compilation platform. The Passmark integer math score of 207792 shows strong performance for code compilation and data processing tasks. The GPU is irrelevant for most development work, though the 4 GB VRAM could handle basic shader compilation or light GPU compute tasks.

Student and Office Work: This is massively overprovisioned for typical productivity tasks. The 3dmark 2-thread score of 2355 shows excellent responsiveness in everyday applications, while the 4 GB GPU memory is more than sufficient for document processing and web browsing. However, the lack of display outputs on the Arc A350 means the integrated graphics would handle all display duties, making the discrete GPU unnecessary for this scenario.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark data shows exceptional performance across all thread counts. The 3dmark suite demonstrates strong scaling: 2355 at 2 threads, 4648 at 4 threads, 8520 at 8 threads, 11201 at 16 threads, and 15509 at max threads. This scaling pattern indicates efficient utilization of the 24 physical cores across 32 threads. The single-thread score of 1187 in 3dmark and 4608 in Passmark single-thread confirms strong per-core performance for a desktop processor.

In Cinebench tests, the processor achieves 318 (R15 single-core), 5805.5 (R15 multicore), 2927 (R20 single-core), 20740 (R20 multicore), 2238.5 (R23 single-core), and 38271.5 (R23 multicore). Geekbench results show 2628 single-core and 22820 multicore. The average benchmark score of 61766 places the CPU at the 92nd percentile among all processors, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i9-13900T at 61723 (0.1% delta), Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 61834 (-0.1% delta), Intel Core i9-13900KF at 61841 (-0.1% delta), and Intel Xeon 636 at 61360 (0.7% delta). This shows the 13900K is essentially tied with its closest competitors, all within 0.7% of each other.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data pack, but its 50th percentile ranking positions it at the median of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 71, indicating that the powerful CPU boosts the overall system ranking despite the modest GPU. The Arc A350’s average benchmark score is listed as 0, meaning no standardized benchmarking data exists for this GPU in the database.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is built on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors in a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a fixed clock speed of 2000 MHz for both base and boost, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is limited for modern games but acceptable for basic compute tasks.

The GPU contains 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, yielding a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The 6 RT cores provide hardware ray-tracing support, though the low overall compute throughput limits ray-tracing performance. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, indicating modern API compatibility.

The 25 W TDP is exceptionally low for a discrete GPU, and the suggested PSU is 200 W. The card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and is single-slot with no display outputs, meaning it cannot drive monitors directly. This is a critical limitation for any use case requiring video output. The Arc A350 has no launch MSRP listed and is marked as end-of-life with the successor being Battlemage.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows an extreme imbalance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU ranks at the 92nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, creating a scenario where the GPU will bottleneck almost any graphics-intensive workload. In gaming, the CPU’s 3dmark 8-thread score of 8520 indicates it can feed frames well beyond what the Arc A350 can render, meaning frame rates would be dictated entirely by GPU performance.

For compute workloads, the balance reverses. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 58589 versus the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 means CPU-bound tasks like data compression (793645 in Passmark data compression) or integer math (207792) will dominate. The GPU would only accelerate specific parallel workloads, and even then, its limited memory bandwidth would constrain performance.

The 4 GB VRAM is a significant bottleneck for any modern workload. Data-heavy applications requiring more than 4 GB of GPU memory would either fail or spill to system memory, causing severe performance degradation. In CPU-bound productivity tasks, the GPU sits largely idle, making it an unnecessary component for users who primarily need processing power.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the measured data, but the percentile gap alone indicates that increasing GPU load would show minimal frame rate improvement from the CPU side. The system is effectively a CPU workstation with a token GPU, not a balanced gaming or content creation platform.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It features a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with 80 KB L1 cache per core, 2 MB L2 cache per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with ECC support available.

The CPU’s benchmark results demonstrate its position at the top of the consumer desktop hierarchy. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 is approximately 94% higher than the single-core score of 2238.5, showing strong multi-threaded scaling. Geekbench multicore at 22820 versus single-core at 2628 shows similar scaling. Passmark tests show particular strengths in data compression (793645), integer math (207792), and floating-point math (151562), while prime number finding is lower at 236.

The 3dmark thread scaling from 2 to max threads shows near-linear improvement up to 8 threads, then diminishing returns beyond that point. This is typical for applications that cannot fully utilize 32 threads. The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, providing fallback display capability given the Arc A350 has no outputs.

The CPU is unlocked for overclocking and has a launch MSRP of $589. It was released on 2022-09-26 and remains in active production. The nearest rival comparisons show it is virtually tied with the 13900T and 13900KF, with deltas under 0.2%, meaning real-world performance differences would be negligible.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need maximum CPU compute power but have minimal GPU requirements. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking makes it ideal for professionals running CPU-intensive applications: software developers compiling large codebases, researchers running mathematical simulations (Passmark floating-point score of 151562), or data analysts processing large datasets (Passmark data compression score of 793645).

Content creators working primarily in CPU-based rendering pipelines would benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5. Video editors using software encoding would find the 32 threads advantageous, though they would need the integrated UHD Graphics 770 for display output since the Arc A350 has no outputs. Students in engineering or computer science fields would have ample processing headroom, but the GPU adds no value for their typical workloads.

Small business workstations requiring heavy spreadsheet analysis, database operations, or scientific computing would see strong performance. The CPU’s ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations. Gamers should avoid this build for the GPU; the Arc A350’s 50th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM would severely limit modern game performance. Anyone considering this build for gaming should instead opt for a lower-tier CPU with a more capable GPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures herein are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A350’s 50th percentile GPU ranking and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it would manage 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in older or less demanding titles. Modern AAA games at 1080p ultra settings would likely run below 30 FPS, while 1440p and 4K gaming would be largely unplayable.

The CPU’s 3dmark single-thread score of 1187 confirms it would not bottleneck any game, meaning all frame rate limitations come from the GPU. The 4 GB VRAM would cause texture pop-in and stuttering in games exceeding that memory footprint. Esports titles like CS2 or Valorant might achieve 60-90 FPS at low settings given the GPU’s 96.00 GTexel/s texture rate, but the lack of measured data means these are rough estimates. The GPU’s 6 RT cores would allow ray tracing at very low resolutions and settings, but performance would be marginal at best.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 might actually outperform the Arc A350 in some lightweight titles due to driver maturity, though it lacks dedicated VRAM. The absence of display outputs on the Arc A350 means all gaming must occur through the motherboard’s display ports using the integrated GPU, which defeats the purpose of the discrete card entirely.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-13900K bottleneck the Intel Arc A350?

A: No. The CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile with a 3dmark 16-thread score of 11201, while the GPU ranks in the 50th percentile. The GPU is the limiting factor in any graphics workload.

Q: What memory types does the i9-13900K support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support available.

Q: How many display outputs does the Arc A350 have?

A: The GPU has no display outputs. Users must connect monitors to the motherboard using the integrated UHD Graphics 770.

Q: What is the power consumption of the Arc A350?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 25 W, and the suggested power supply size for the system is 200 W.

Q: Is the i9-13900K overclockable?

A: Yes, the processor has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking beyond its 5.80 GHz boost clock.

Q: What API support does the Arc A350 offer?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does the i9-13900K compare to the Core i9-13900KF?

A: The 13900K averages a benchmark score of 61766, while the 13900KF scores 61841, a delta of -0.1%, meaning they perform essentially identically.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the Arc A350 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, meaning the GPU operates at half the available CPU lanes. The platform supports ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer desktop processors and beneficial for workstation reliability.

The Arc A350’s 25 W TDP is negligible, so the system’s power requirements are dominated by the CPU’s 125 W TDP. The suggested PSU of 200 W provides ample headroom for the current configuration, but a GPU upgrade would require a more substantial power supply. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor, so users should consider future GPU replacement.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A350 with a more capable GPU that has display outputs and higher performance. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking means it will remain relevant for years, so investing in a stronger GPU would balance the system. For pure compute users, removing the Arc A350 entirely and relying on the integrated UHD Graphics 770 would simplify the build without sacrificing CPU performance. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so a future GPU using that interface would be fully compatible.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900K, a 24-core/32-thread Raptor Lake processor ranking in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with the Intel Arc A350, a 25 W entry-level GPU ranking in the 50th percentile. The combined system percentile is 71, reflecting the dominant influence of the powerful CPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 61766 places it in a dead heat with rivals like the 13900T and 13900KF, all within 0.7% of each other.

The Arc A350’s 4 GB GDDR6 memory, 64-bit bus, and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance classify it as an entry-level compute device rather than a gaming GPU. Its lack of display outputs forces reliance on the CPU’s integrated graphics for any visual output. The system is best characterized as a high-performance CPU workstation with a token discrete GPU, suitable for compute-heavy productivity tasks but poorly balanced for gaming or GPU-accelerated workflows. The 71st combined percentile indicates the CPU carries the system’s overall performance tier, while the GPU contributes minimal value in most real-world scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds