SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900F + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900F

51,730 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900F and Intel Arc A380E pairing represents a stark imbalance in a desktop configuration, combining a high-end 24-core processor with an entry-level graphics card. While the CPU delivers top-tier compute performance, the GPU anchors the system's gaming and graphics capabilities to a specific, modest tier. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark scores and hardware specifications, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a classic bottleneck scenario where the Intel Arc A380E severely restricts the system's overall gaming and graphics potential, while the Core i9-13900F operates with significant headroom. The CPU's average benchmark score of 51730 places it in the 91st percentile of all processors, indicating it can handle virtually any computational task without becoming a limiting factor. In contrast, the GPU sits at the 50th percentile of all graphics cards, meaning half of all GPUs outperform it. This dichotomy suggests that in CPU-bound workloads such as data compression, encryption, and multi-threaded rendering, the i9-13900F will dominate, but in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the A380E will cap performance.

The CPU's benchmark results demonstrate exceptional scaling across thread counts, which is critical for understanding the bottleneck. The 3dmark scores progress from 1145 for single-thread to 2265 for 2 threads, 4393 for 4 threads, 7426 for 8 threads, 9957 for 16 threads, and peak at 13985 for max threads. This scaling pattern indicates that the processor efficiently utilizes its 24 cores and 32 threads, delivering near-linear performance gains as workload parallelism increases. For a gaming system, this means the CPU can easily feed frames to the GPU, but the A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will limit frame rates, especially in graphically intensive titles.

The FPS discussion must be framed as estimated from benchmark scores, as no measured FPS rows exist for this combination. Based on the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and its 6 GB GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, the system will likely deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium settings, but will struggle at 1440p or with high-detail presets. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 49693 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 indicate it can handle any game's physics and AI calculations, but the GPU's pixel rate of 64.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 128.0 GTexel/s will constrain overall visual output. This creates a situation where the CPU is essentially idle-waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames, a classic imbalance that leaves significant processor performance on the table in gaming workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-13900F delivers outstanding processor benchmark results across all major testing suites. In Cinebench R23, it scores 40928 multi-core and 5778 single-core, demonstrating both massive multi-threaded throughput and strong single-thread performance for legacy applications. The Geekbench results show 19680 multi-core and 2533 single-core, while PassMark reports a multi-thread score of 49693 and single-thread score of 4406. These numbers place the CPU in the 91st percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 51730.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the i9-13900F shows competitive positioning. It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by only 0.4% in average score, with the Ryzen scoring 51947 against the Intel's 51730. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX scores 52073, which is 0.7% higher, and the AMD EPYC 8124P also scores 52073, also 0.7% higher. The Core Ultra 9 285T scores 51310, which is 0.8% lower than the i9-13900F. This indicates the 13900F sits in a tightly contested performance band where no single rival has a decisive advantage.

The GPU benchmarks present a different picture entirely. The Arc A380E has no benchmark scores listed in the data, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. However, its percentile ranking of 50 indicates mid-pack performance relative to all GPUs. The combined system percentile of 71 reflects the CPU's strong showing pulling up the GPU's modest performance. The GPU's specifications paint a clear picture: 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores operating at a 2000 MHz boost clock. This translates to 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is adequate for entry-level gaming but far from high-performance territory. The combined picture shows a system that excels in CPU-intensive productivity tasks but remains firmly in the entry-level segment for graphics workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 71, indicating the pairing performs better than 71% of all benchmarked systems. This is driven primarily by the CPU's strong 91st percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: How does the Core i9-13900F compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The i9-13900F has an average benchmark score of 51730, which is 0.4% lower than the Ryzen 9 5950X's score of 51947. This places the two processors in a statistical tie, with performance differences well within normal benchmark variance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A380E features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory operates at 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked on the Core i9-13900F, as indicated by the multiplierUnlocked field being false. Users cannot adjust the clock multiplier to overclock this processor.

Q: What is the CPU's power consumption specification?

A: The i9-13900F has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 watts, which is notably low for a 24-core processor. The system's suggested power supply is 250 watts, which accounts for the GPU's 75-watt TDP and other components.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A380E is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of March 31, 2024. Its predecessor is Xe Graphics, and its successor is Battlemage, indicating this GPU is at the end of its product lifecycle.

Q: What are the CPU's cache specifications?

A: The i9-13900F has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache helps with data reuse across the 24 cores and 32 threads.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system will underperform relative to the CPU's capabilities. The Arc A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit frame rates, making high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming unrealistic. At 1080p, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests medium to high settings are achievable, but the CPU's 91st percentile means it will never be the bottleneck in gaming scenarios.

Streaming workloads benefit substantially from the CPU's multi-threaded might. The 24 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by the 3dmark max threads score of 13985 and PassMark multi-thread score of 49693, allow simultaneous game encoding and gameplay without sacrificing performance. The GPU's AV1 encoding capabilities, while not specified in the data, are part of the Xe-HPG architecture's feature set, but the modest GPU compute limits overall streaming quality at higher resolutions.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see strong CPU performance for timeline operations and rendering. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40928 and Geekbench multi-core score of 19680 indicate excellent export times. However, GPU-accelerated effects and color grading will be limited by the A380E's 1024 shading units and 6 GB VRAM, potentially causing slowdowns with complex timelines or 4K footage.

3D rendering workloads favor the CPU heavily. The i9-13900F's 40928 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 17189 Cinebench R20 multi-core score demonstrate exceptional ray tracing performance in CPU-based renderers. GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender will be constrained by the A380E's 8 ray tracing cores and 4.096 TFLOPS, making it suitable for preview renders but not final production quality output.

Software development benefits from the CPU's compile times and parallel build capabilities. The PassMark integer math score of 188022 and data compression score of 635147 indicate rapid code compilation and file operations. The 32 threads allow multiple virtual machines or containers to run concurrently without performance degradation. The GPU's capabilities are largely irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a solid if unbalanced choice.

Student and office work is where this system is massively overprovisioned on the CPU side. The 91st percentile CPU performance handles any productivity suite, spreadsheet, or document workload with ease, while the 50th percentile GPU is sufficient for basic 2D acceleration and video playback. The 65-watt TDP CPU and 75-watt TDP GPU keep the system energy-efficient for daily use.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, supported by a substantial cache hierarchy including 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration, combined with a 65-watt TDP, makes it one of the most power-efficient high-core-count processors available.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels across all workload types. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17189 and R15 multi-core score of 4125 show consistent scaling across generations of the benchmark. The PassMark physics score of 2766 and floating point math score of 131007 indicate strong computational throughput for scientific and engineering applications. The data encryption score of 38214 and extended instructions score of 36525 demonstrate robust security and vector processing capabilities.

The CPU's 91st percentile ranking places it among the top processors available, with its average benchmark score of 51730 nearly matching the Ryzen 9 5950X's 51947. The multi-threaded performance is exceptional, as evidenced by the 3dmark max threads score of 13985, which is nearly 3.4 times the 8-thread score of 7426, showing excellent scalability. The single-thread performance, with a 3dmark score of 1145 and PassMark score of 4406, ensures snappy response in everyday tasks and games that rely on single-core performance.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, along with dual-channel architecture and ECC memory support, provides flexibility for different build budgets and reliability requirements. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes ensures high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and expansion cards. The processor's launch MSRP was $524, positioning it as a premium desktop component.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is an entry-level graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores, operating at a fixed 2000 MHz clock. The GPU is equipped with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU's compute capabilities are modest, with 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8.192 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The pixel rate of 64.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 128.0 GTexel/s indicate it can handle 1080p gaming at reasonable settings but will struggle with higher resolutions or demanding visual effects. The 75-watt TDP and single-slot design with no power connectors make it an efficient, easy-to-install card for compact builds.

The 50th percentile ranking places the A380E in the middle of the GPU performance distribution, but this is misleading given the lack of benchmark scores in the data. The GPU's specifications suggest it is designed for entry-level gaming and basic content creation, not high-end workloads. The 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs provide modern display connectivity, and the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface offers adequate bandwidth for its performance class.

The ray tracing capabilities, while present with 8 dedicated cores, are limited by the overall GPU compute power. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility ensure broad software compatibility, but the hardware's modest specifications mean ray tracing effects will require significant performance compromises. The GPU's end-of-life status and 2024 release date indicate it is a relatively recent but already discontinued product.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over gaming performance. Content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, or data analysis will benefit from the i9-13900F's 91st percentile CPU performance, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scores of 40928 and PassMark multi-thread scores of 49693. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 32 threads and PassMark integer math score of 188022.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings will find the system adequate, as the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 6 GB VRAM handle most esports and older titles. However, gamers seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K experiences should look elsewhere, as the A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS will bottleneck the CPU significantly. Students and office workers will find the system overkill for their needs but benefit from the CPU's efficiency with a 65-watt TDP.

Small business workstations requiring heavy computation, such as financial modeling, scientific simulation, or database management, will leverage the CPU's 24 cores effectively. The PassMark data compression score of 635147 and encryption score of 38214 indicate strong performance for data-intensive applications. The GPU's 50th percentile performance handles standard office graphics and video playback without issue.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing Intel's flagship Core 13th Gen processor with an entry-level Arc 3 GPU. The i9-13900F is a Raptor Lake architecture processor with 24 cores, 32 threads, and a 5.60 GHz boost clock, representing the high end of Intel's desktop CPU lineup. The Arc A380E is an Alchemist generation GPU with 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 1024 shading units, representing Intel's entry-level discrete graphics offering.

The combined system percentile of 71 indicates this pairing outperforms 71% of all benchmarked systems, but this figure is heavily skewed by the CPU's 91st percentile ranking. The GPU's 50th percentile means the system's gaming performance is average at best. This creates a tier mismatch where the CPU is top-tier while the GPU is mid-pack, resulting in a system that is exceptional for productivity but only adequate for gaming.

The build class is desktop, confirming this is a stationary PC configuration. The 65-watt TDP CPU and 75-watt TDP GPU suggest a system with modest power requirements, supported by the 250-watt suggested PSU. The GPU's single-slot design and lack of power connectors make it easy to install in various chassis, while the CPU's Socket 1700 requires a compatible motherboard.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900F uses the LGA 1700 socket, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel architecture. This provides flexibility for users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5 modules. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 CPU lanes, enabling high-speed NVMe storage and future expansion cards.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which provides sufficient bandwidth for its performance class. The system's suggested power supply of 250 watts accommodates the CPU's 65-watt TDP and GPU's 75-watt TDP with headroom for additional components. The GPU's end-of-life status suggests users should consider future upgrades, with the successor Battlemage architecture being the natural progression.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the graphics card. The CPU's 91st percentile performance provides substantial headroom for a more powerful GPU, and the 250-watt PSU can support higher-end cards within reasonable power limits. Upgrading to a GPU with higher than 50th percentile performance would dramatically improve gaming frame rates and GPU-accelerated workloads, better utilizing the CPU's capabilities. The Socket 1700 platform supports 13th Gen processors, but the i9-13900F is already near the top of this generation, so CPU upgrades would require a platform change to a newer socket.