SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900E + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

77 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 23% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
79%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900E

8,676 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines an Intel Core i9-13900E processor with an Intel Arc A380E graphics card in a desktop build. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S part based on Intel’s 10 nm process, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist (Arc 3) discrete card built on TSMC’s 6 nm node. Benchmark data places the combined system at the 58th percentile overall, indicating a configuration that sits slightly above the midpoint of all tracked desktop builds, but the component balance raises immediate questions about workload suitability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900E is a high-core-count desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture. It offers 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 1800 MHz and a boost clock of 5200 MHz. The chip draws a 65 W TDP, which is notably modest for a 24-core part, suggesting the E-series variant is engineered for power-constrained environments rather than maximum sustained performance. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, along with ECC memory, making it a plausible candidate for workstation or server-adjacent tasks where data integrity matters more than raw speed.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 34,244 points in multi-core and 4,834 points in single-core. The multi-core figure is substantial, placing it far ahead of typical laptop-class silicon, while the single-core result indicates strong per-thread performance that will benefit lightly threaded applications. The Geekbench scores — 8,337 multi-core and 1,646 single-core — reinforce this picture, though the gap between the Cinebench and Geekbench multi-core numbers suggests the chip scales well under sustained all-core loads. The average benchmark score across all tests is 8,676, which places the CPU at the 65th percentile among all tracked processors.

The nearest rivals in the database are a mixed group of mobile and enterprise parts: the Intel Core i7-8565U (avg score 8,665, delta 0.1%), the Intel Core i5-8365U (avg score 8,708, delta -0.4%), the AMD EPYC 7601 (avg score 8,619, delta 0.7%), and the Intel Core i7-10510U (avg score 8,580, delta 1.1%). The i9-13900E sits within 1.1% of all four, which is surprising given the vast architectural differences. These rivals are all lower-core-count, lower-power parts, yet their average scores nearly match the 24-core i9. This suggests that the i9-13900E’s average benchmark score is dragged down by single-threaded or lightly threaded tests, where its high boost clock cannot compensate for the fact that many workloads do not scale across 24 cores. In purely multi-threaded scenarios like Cinebench R23, the i9-13900E would outclass these rivals by a wide margin, but the average obscures that advantage.

The architecture itself is Raptor Lake-S, with a die size of 257 mm² and a cache hierarchy that includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The L3 is generous, which helps with gaming and data-heavy workloads, but the lack of a v-cache or other 3D-stacked memory means it relies on conventional cache design. The 10 nm process node from Intel is mature, and the chip is in active production with a release date of January 3, 2023. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option, which is typical for the E-series parts that prioritize efficiency and stability.

For real workloads, the data indicates a processor that excels at multi-threaded rendering, video encoding, and compilation tasks, where all 24 cores can be utilized. The 65 W TDP is a limiting factor for sustained all-core boost, but the 5.2 GHz boost clock ensures that short bursts of single-threaded activity, such as opening applications or light gaming, will feel responsive. The 65th percentile CPU ranking places it comfortably above the median, but the close proximity to low-power mobile rivals in average score suggests that the i9-13900E is not a top-tier performer in every scenario.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined system percentile is 58, which is lower than the CPU’s individual 65th percentile. This gap indicates that the GPU is holding the system back in overall performance terms. The Intel Arc A380E sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning the graphics card is exactly average, while the CPU is above average. In a balanced build, these two would be closer in percentile, but here the CPU has more headroom than the GPU can exploit.

The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so bottleneck analysis must be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s multi-threaded strength (34,244 in Cinebench R23) is far beyond what a 50th-percentile GPU can feed in gaming scenarios. For most games, the A380E will be the limiting factor, as it must produce frames that the CPU can process quickly. The CPU’s high boost clock and 36 MB of L3 cache will prevent it from becoming a bottleneck at lower resolutions, but at higher resolutions, the GPU’s workload increases, and the CPU’s advantage will be less apparent.

The GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest for modern gaming, and this will likely cause texture streaming bottlenecks in memory-hungry titles. The CPU, on the other hand, supports DDR4 and DDR5 with ECC, which means the memory subsystem can be configured for stability rather than raw speed. In productivity tasks, the CPU will dominate the GPU, as most rendering and compilation workloads are CPU-bound. For example, Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,244 indicates that the CPU can handle 3D rendering tasks without GPU assistance, but the GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will accelerate certain compute workloads, though not at a level that matches the CPU’s output.

The bottleneck direction depends on the workload. In gaming, the GPU limits FPS. In video editing, the CPU handles encoding while the GPU accelerates effects and rendering. In 3D modeling, the CPU handles physics and geometry, while the GPU handles shading. The 65 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP combine for a modest total power draw, which means the system will not require aggressive cooling, but it also means neither component is pushed to extreme performance levels.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and uses the DG2-128 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The die contains 7,200 million transistors across 157 mm², giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU operates at a fixed clock of 2000 MHz for both base and boost, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, delivering 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is on the lower end for discrete GPUs, and the 96-bit bus width is a clear indicator of the card’s entry-level positioning.

The shading unit count is 1,024, with 64 texture mapping units and 32 render output units. The GPU includes 8 ray tracing cores, which is a modest count but does provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing support. The pixel rate is 64.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 128.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 4.096 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.192 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). These figures place the A380E in the same class as older mid-range cards, but the 6 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for modern games that increasingly require 8 GB or more at high settings.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which means it is feature-complete for current APIs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for this class of card, and the display outputs are four DisplayPort 2.0 connections, allowing for multi-monitor setups. The card is single-slot, 254 mm long, 127 mm tall, and 20 mm wide, with no power connectors required, drawing 75 W from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W, which is very low, indicating that this is a low-power card suitable for small form factor builds.

The GPU is end-of-life, with a release date of March 31, 2024, and its predecessor is Xe Graphics, with Battlemage as the successor. The average benchmark score is 0, and there are no nearest rivals listed, which makes it difficult to contextualize its performance against peers. The 50th percentile ranking is the only comparative metric, and it suggests the A380E is exactly average among all GPUs, though the lack of benchmark data means this percentile is likely derived from limited information.

For rendering workloads, the 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance is enough for light 3D rendering, but the 6 GB VRAM will limit texture sizes and scene complexity. The RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but with only 8 of them, performance will be modest. The fixed 2000 MHz clock is unusual, as most GPUs have a range between base and boost, but the A380E appears to be locked, which simplifies power delivery but may leave performance on the table in thermally unconstrained scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need a high-core-count CPU for productivity but do not require a powerful GPU for their primary workloads. The i9-13900E’s 34,244 Cinebench R23 multi-core score makes it suitable for software developers who compile large codebases, video editors who render long timelines, and 3D artists who need to process complex scenes. The 65 W TDP and ECC memory support make it attractive for small business workstations that run 24/7 and require stability over raw speed.

For gamers, the A380E’s 50th percentile ranking means the system can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, but the 6 GB VRAM will be a bottleneck in newer titles. Gamers at 1440p or 4K will find the GPU inadequate, as the 186.0 GB/s bandwidth and 96-bit bus limit texture throughput. The CPU’s high boost clock and large L3 cache will ensure that the system does not stutter in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU will cap FPS in graphically intensive games.

Content creators who work with video or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded power, but they will need to rely on CPU-based rendering rather than GPU acceleration for most tasks. The A380E’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 is sufficient for basic effects and previews, but not for final renders. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable for everyday tasks, but the component cost is higher than necessary for such workloads, making it a poor fit for pure productivity.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined system sits at the 58th percentile among all tracked desktop builds.

Q: How does the CPU’s average benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-13900E has an average score of 8,676, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-8565U, 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i5-8365U, 0.7% higher than the AMD EPYC 7601, and 1.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-10510U.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and VRAM size?

A: The Intel Arc A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 96-bit bus and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900E supports ECC memory, along with DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc A380E is 250 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: Are there any measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU pairing, so all FPS figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-core score of 4,834 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest that the system can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles. The CPU’s 5.2 GHz boost clock will prevent frame drops in CPU-bound games, but the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the system should deliver high frame rates at 1080p, as these games are CPU-bound and the i9-13900E has ample single-threaded power. For AAA titles at 1080p, the A380E will likely manage 30-60 FPS at medium settings, but the 96-bit memory bus will cause stuttering in games with large texture pools. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles, and at 4K, the system is not viable for modern gaming.

The GPU’s 8 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the low shading unit count means that enabling ray tracing will significantly reduce frame rates. The 50th percentile GPU ranking confirms that this is an average-performing graphics card, so expectations should be set accordingly. Users who prioritize gaming should consider a more powerful GPU, but for mixed-use workloads, the system is acceptable at 1080p.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900E uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports 13th-gen Raptor Lake processors. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the CPU has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). This provides a solid foundation for future upgrades, but the socket is not forward-compatible with newer Intel generations, so any CPU upgrade would require a motherboard change.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots. The A380E is end-of-life, and its successor is Battlemage, so a GPU upgrade would be the most impactful change for gaming performance. The 250 W suggested PSU leaves headroom for a more powerful GPU, as the current system draws only 65 W for the CPU and 75 W for the GPU, totaling 140 W. A PSU with a higher wattage rating would support a mid-range GPU upgrade without needing to replace the power supply.

The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low for a 24-core part, meaning the cooling solution can be modest. A future CPU upgrade within the same socket would likely have a higher TDP, so the current cooler may need to be replaced. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility, but the motherboard choice will determine which type is used. Overall, the platform is capable but not future-proof, with the GPU being the most obvious upgrade target.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a high-core-count Intel Core i9-13900E with an entry-level Intel Arc A380E GPU. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a 75 W single-slot card with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined system sits at the 58th percentile, indicating a configuration that is slightly above average but not exceptional. The CPU’s individual percentile is 65, while the GPU’s is 50, showing a clear imbalance where the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU.

This pairing is best suited for productivity workloads that leverage the CPU’s multi-threaded performance, such as software compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering. Gaming performance is limited by the GPU, which is average at best. The system’s low power draw (140 W total) makes it easy to cool and quiet, but the component selection does not maximize gaming potential. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is mid-range, with the CPU providing the majority of the performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900E achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,244 and a single-core score of 4,834. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 14,382 multi-core and 2,030 single-core, while Cinebench R15 yields 3,451 multi-core and 487 single-core. The Geekbench scores are 8,337 multi-core and 1,646 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 8,676, placing the CPU at the 65th percentile among all CPUs.

The Intel Arc A380E has no benchmark scores listed, and its average benchmark score is 0, with a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The lack of benchmark data for the GPU makes it difficult to compare its performance directly, but the 50th percentile indicates an average card. The combined percentile is 58, which is between the CPU’s 65 and the GPU’s 50, reflecting the GPU’s drag on overall performance. The data shows a CPU that is well above average and a GPU that is exactly average, resulting in a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but is unremarkable in GPU-bound ones.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and 6 GB VRAM limit the system to 1080p gaming at medium settings, with estimated frame rates of 30-60 FPS in AAA titles. Esports titles will run at higher frame rates due to the CPU’s strong single-core performance, but the GPU will cap FPS in graphically demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads can handle encoding at high bitrates, but the GPU’s limited VRAM and bandwidth will struggle with simultaneous gaming and encoding. The system can stream at 1080p with a software encoder, but the GPU’s modest performance will reduce game quality.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,244 indicates strong performance for video encoding and effects processing. The GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 can accelerate previews and light effects, but final renders will rely on the CPU.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s multi-threaded power is excellent for CPU-based renderers, and the GPU’s 8 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the 6 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The system is suitable for small to medium scenes, but not for large production work.

Software Development: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads, along with ECC memory support, make it ideal for compilation and testing. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so the system’s overall performance is strong.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for these tasks, with the CPU providing far more performance than needed for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The low power draw is a benefit, but the component cost is higher than necessary for such workloads. The GPU’s 4 DisplayPort 2.0 outputs allow for multi-monitor setups, which is useful for productivity.