SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900

60,676 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900 paired with the Intel Arc A380E is an unconventional combination that pairs a top-tier 24-core desktop processor with a modest, entry-level discrete GPU. The benchmark data contains no measured FPS rows for this specific pairing, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU scores. The processor is a powerhouse, sitting at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, creating a massive imbalance in capability that heavily favors compute and productivity workloads over gaming.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, all frame rate expectations are estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Arc A380E features 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with a FP32 throughput of 4.096 TFLOPS. This places it in the mid-range of the GPU percentile distribution at the 50th percentile. In practical terms, this card is designed for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, not for high-refresh-rate or high-resolution play.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by Cinebench R23 single-core at 5355 points and Geekbench single-core at 2604 points, indicates that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. However, the GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS of compute power and 186.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth will be the limiting factor. At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A380E would likely deliver playable but not impressive frame rates in most modern titles. At 1440p, the 6 GB GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus would struggle, with the 186.0 GB/s bandwidth becoming a significant constraint. At 4K, the card would be largely unsuitable for anything but very light or older games.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility. The 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, but with only 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, enabling such effects would severely impact frame rates. The estimated gaming experience is one where the CPU sits mostly idle waiting on the GPU, and users would need to lower settings or resolution to achieve smooth gameplay.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This means the graphics card is limited to half the bandwidth of a x16 slot, though for a card with 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, this is unlikely to be a major constraint.

The system’s power requirements are modest overall. The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 watts, with a suggested PSU rating of 250 watts for the entire system. The GPU requires no external power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe slot. This leaves considerable headroom in a typical 500-600 watt power supply for future upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A380E with a more powerful GPU. The CPU’s performance at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs means it can handle virtually any graphics card on the market without becoming a bottleneck. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU side, combined with the 16 available lanes, ensures compatibility with the fastest current and near-future graphics cards. The 65-watt TDP of the CPU also means that a larger portion of the PSU budget can be allocated to a new GPU. Users with a 250-watt suggested PSU would need to upgrade the power supply when moving to a higher-end graphics card, but the CPU itself does not require any additional power delivery changes.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache configuration helps feed the 32 threads during demanding multi-threaded workloads.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 points places this CPU at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. The Geekbench multi-core score of 21164 points confirms this strength. In the Passmark suite, the multi-thread score is 45680, with integer math at 176107 and floating-point math at 120492. These scores indicate that the processor excels at heavily parallel workloads such as video rendering, scientific computing, and software compilation.

Single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5355 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2604. The Passmark single-thread score of 4309 confirms that the 5.60 GHz boost clock delivers excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The processor also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop chip and may appeal to users running critical workloads.

Real-world implications are clear: this CPU can handle the most demanding multi-threaded tasks with ease. The 36 MB of L3 cache helps reduce memory latency, and the dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility. The 65-watt TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core processor, suggesting efficient power management. The processor’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output, though the discrete Arc A380E would be the primary graphics solution.

Who Should Build It

This combination targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive productivity tasks over gaming. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking makes it suitable for content creators working with 4K video editing, 3D rendering, and large-scale software development. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means it can handle light gaming and accelerated rendering in supported applications, but it is not a gaming-focused card.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings might find the Arc A380E acceptable, but they would be better served by a more balanced build. The CPU’s strength in multi-threaded workloads makes it ideal for video editors using software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, where the 32 threads and 37931 Cinebench R23 multi-core score translate directly to faster export times. 3D artists using Blender or similar tools would benefit from the CPU’s rendering capabilities, though the GPU’s 4.096 TFLOPS would provide only modest acceleration in GPU-based renderers.

Software developers, particularly those compiling large codebases, would see significant benefits from the 24 cores and 32 threads. The Passmark data compression score of 577285 indicates strong performance in archiving and compression tasks. Students and small business workstations would be overpowered for typical office tasks, but the ECC memory support could be valuable for research or financial applications where data integrity is critical.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A380E with 4.096 TFLOPS and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth is not suited for high-refresh 144Hz or 240Hz gaming at 1080p in demanding titles. Estimated frame rates would likely fall in the 40-60 FPS range at ultra settings, which is below the threshold for high-refresh displays. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 5355 in Cinebench R23 ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU simply cannot push enough frames.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 45680 suggests that a single core or two dedicated to encoding would have minimal impact on overall performance. However, the GPU’s limited gaming performance means the streamed content itself would be at lower quality settings.

Video editing: This is where the combination shines. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37931 and Geekbench multi-core score of 21164 handle 4K timeline scrubbing and export with ease. The GPU’s 1024 shading units provide hardware acceleration for effects and color grading in compatible software, though the 6 GB VRAM may be limiting for very large projects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 32 threads deliver exceptional performance in CPU-based renderers, with the 176107 integer math score and 120492 floating-point math score indicating strong computational throughput. The GPU’s 8 ray tracing cores offer some acceleration in ray-traced renders, but the 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest compared to dedicated render GPUs.

Software development: The 24 cores and 32 threads dramatically reduce compile times. The Passmark extended instructions score of 32760 suggests strong SIMD performance for vectorized code. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases that exceed typical cache sizes.

Student and office work: This build is significantly overpowered for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The CPU’s 4309 Passmark single-thread score ensures snappy responsiveness, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle basic display duties if the discrete GPU were removed. The 65-watt TDP on the CPU keeps power consumption reasonable for a workstation.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU has a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, which is a single fixed frequency rather than a variable boost curve.

Memory configuration consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, running at 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective speed, yielding a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. This memory bandwidth is a limiting factor for higher resolutions and texture-heavy workloads. The pixel rate is 64.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 128.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 4.096 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.192 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU is a single-slot design measuring 254 mm in length, 127 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. It has no external power connectors, drawing a maximum of 75 watts from the PCIe slot. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for the 6 GB frame buffer. Display outputs include 4x DisplayPort 2.0, supporting modern high-resolution monitors.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), ensuring full feature support for modern games, including mesh shaders and variable rate shading. The 8 ray tracing cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, though performance with ray tracing enabled would be limited by the 4.096 TFLOPS compute throughput. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it is an average performer, suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings and basic GPU-accelerated compute tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance in this pairing is extreme. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 71, which reflects the GPU pulling the overall system down from the CPU’s level. In gaming workloads, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5355 would allow it to feed frames to a much more powerful GPU without issue, but the Arc A380E’s 4.096 TFLOPS and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth limit frame rates.

In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the GPU has minimal involvement. The CPU’s 37931 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 45680 Passmark multithread score dominate these tasks. The GPU could provide some acceleration in applications that support OpenCL or DirectX compute, but its 4.096 TFLOPS is not a decisive factor.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. For gaming, the GPU limits everything. For productivity, the CPU is the star and the GPU is nearly irrelevant. The 65-watt TDP of the CPU and 75-watt TDP of the GPU mean the system has a total component draw of approximately 140 watts, well within a 250-watt suggested PSU. This balance means users could upgrade the GPU to a much more powerful model without needing to change the power supply, though the 6 GB VRAM of the current card would remain a limitation for modern titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900 has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A380E features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What type of memory does the CPU support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the power requirement for this GPU?

A: The Arc A380E has a TDP of 75 watts and requires no external power connectors, with a suggested PSU rating of 250 watts.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i9-13900 is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T, 1% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900F in average benchmark scores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has 186.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, using 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The processor has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900 delivers outstanding benchmark scores across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3823 multi-core and 539 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 15931 multi-core and 2249 single-core. Cinebench R23 produces 37931 multi-core and 5355 single-core. Geekbench results are 21164 multi-core and 2604 single-core.

Passmark results are equally comprehensive: multithread at 45680, single-thread at 4309, integer math at 176107, floating-point math at 120492, extended instructions at 32760, data compression at 577285, data encryption at 35242, random string sorting at 64396, find prime numbers at 186, and physics at 2484. The average benchmark score is 60676, placing the CPU at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest rivals and their deltas confirm the CPU’s competitive position. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T has an average score of 60572, which is 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX both score around 60100, which is 1% lower. The Intel Core i9-14900F scores 60008, which is 1.1% lower.

The Intel Arc A380E has no benchmark scores listed in the data, and its average benchmark score is 0, placing it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 71. This combined figure accurately reflects the system’s character: a top-tier CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, resulting in a system that excels at productivity but delivers only moderate gaming performance. The CPU’s benchmark scores are exceptional, and the GPU’s lack of benchmark data underscores its position as the limiting factor in this build.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900 + Intel Arc A380E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900

Intel Arc A380E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds