SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700T

41,914 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i7-14700T pairs with the Intel Arc A350 in a desktop configuration that sits at the 69th combined percentile across all builds. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part running on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist Arc 3 chip with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. The data shows a substantial imbalance in compute capability between these two components, with the processor delivering top-tier multi-threaded performance and the graphics card providing only baseline rendering throughput.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-14700T is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². It combines 20 cores and 28 threads, a configuration that includes performance and efficiency core types, with a base clock of 1.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a 35 W TDP part, indicating a power-constrained design intended for compact or thermally limited systems, yet it maintains the full core count of the larger 14th-generation desktop lineup.

Benchmark results demonstrate where this CPU excels. In Cinebench R23, the i7-14700T scores 25,980 in multi-core and 3,667 in single-core. The multicore figure places it in the 88th percentile against all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market for heavily threaded workloads. The single-core score of 3,667 is also strong, indicating that the 5.20 GHz boost clock translates well into responsive single-threaded performance for everyday tasks and older software. The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern: 10,911 multi-core and 1,540 single-core. In Cinebench R15, the scores are 2,618 multi-core and 369 single-core.

PassMark tests add further detail. The i7-14700T scores 30,571 in multithread, 3,905 in single-thread, and 113,854 in integer math. Floating point math comes in at 79,042, while data compression hits 354,216 and data encryption reaches 21,277. The extended instructions score is 20,052, and random string sorting is 38,546. The find prime numbers test produces a relatively low 145, and physics scores 1,946. These results indicate the CPU is particularly strong at integer-heavy workloads like compilation, spreadsheet calculations, and database operations, while the floating point performance is adequate but not exceptional compared to the integer throughput.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 41,914. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS at 41,963 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 at 42,055 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core i7-12850HX at 41,779 (0.3% lower), and the Intel Core 7 251TE at 41,650 (0.6% lower). This positions the i7-14700T in a tight cluster where performance differences are negligible, meaning the choice between these parts would come down to platform features rather than raw compute.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU also supports ECC memory, a feature typically associated with workstation-class systems. For PCIe, the processor provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which offers display output capability even without a discrete GPU installed, although the Arc A350 in this build has no display outputs of its own.

The CPU's TDP is 35 W, and the GPU's TDP is 25 W, with the suggested PSU for the graphics card listed at 200 W. This creates a very low overall power requirement for the system, allowing for a compact power supply unit. The data shows a substantial headroom between the combined component TDP of 60 W and the 200 W suggested PSU, meaning the build could accommodate additional drives, fans, or other peripherals without requiring a larger power supply. This also suggests the pairing is designed for efficiency rather than raw performance scaling.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck. The CPU operates in the 88th percentile for all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile for all GPUs. Upgrading the Arc A350 to a more capable graphics card would better utilize the i7-14700T's multi-core performance in gaming and rendering workloads. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support and dual-channel DDR5 memory compatibility ensure that a future GPU upgrade would not be constrained by the motherboard or CPU interface. The CPU itself has no upgrade headroom on the same socket for a meaningfully faster part, as the 14700T already sits near the top of the 14th-generation desktop stack in its power class.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data reveals a clear bottleneck structure. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking against all CPUs versus the GPU's 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs indicates that the Arc A350 will limit performance in graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming, the GPU is the constraining factor for frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions and quality settings. The CPU has sufficient single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,667, to feed frames to a much faster GPU than the A350.

For non-graphics workloads, the CPU is the dominant component and the GPU plays a minimal role. The i7-14700T's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,980 demonstrates strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the GPU's 768 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are largely irrelevant. The PassMark multithread score of 30,571 further confirms that CPU-bound tasks will run at a level consistent with the 88th percentile, not the 50th.

The combined percentile of 69 for this build reflects the averaging of the two components. The CPU pulls the overall score upward, while the GPU drags it down. In any workload that scales with GPU compute, such as real-time graphics or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system will perform at the GPU's level. In CPU-bound workloads, it will perform at the CPU's level. There is no scenario where both components are evenly matched, making this a lopsided pairing that favors productivity over gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the multi-core performance of the Intel Core i7-14700T?

A: The CPU scores 25,980 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 10,911 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 30,571 in PassMark multithread, placing it in the 88th percentile against all CPUs.

Q: How does the i7-14700T compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The average benchmark score is 41,914, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS at 41,963, 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 at 42,055, 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i7-12850HX at 41,779, and 0.6% higher than the Intel Core 7 251TE at 41,650.

Q: What memory and PCIe support does the platform offer?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with ECC capability, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the power requirement for this build?

A: The CPU TDP is 35 W and the GPU TDP is 25 W, with a suggested PSU of 200 W for the graphics card.

Q: Does the GPU have display outputs?

A: No, the Arc A350 lists no display outputs, so the integrated UHD Graphics 770 in the CPU is required for display connectivity unless a different GPU is used.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A350 is marked as end-of-life, with its predecessor being Xe Graphics and its successor being Battlemage.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize CPU throughput over graphics performance. Content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, or large data sets will benefit from the i7-14700T's 25,980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and its 88th percentile ranking. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the 113,854 PassMark integer math score and the 354,216 data compression score, which indicate rapid build times and efficient handling of archive operations.

Students and small business workstations that run office applications, spreadsheet analysis, and light database work will find the CPU's single-thread score of 3,905 in PassMark and 3,667 in Cinebench R23 single-core sufficient for responsive daily use. The ECC memory support adds a level of data integrity that appeals to financial or scientific computing environments. The low TDP of 35 W for the CPU and 25 W for the GPU makes this an efficient system for always-on or space-constrained deployments.

Gamers are not the primary target for this pairing. At 1080p with low to medium settings, the Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB of VRAM can handle older titles or esports games, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle with modern AAA games at high settings. Users who occasionally game but prioritize CPU tasks might find this acceptable, but dedicated gamers should consider a stronger GPU.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A350 is an entry-level discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The chip, DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster output units. It includes 6 ray tracing cores, and its FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 6.144 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio.

Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective. The GPU's base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz. Pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The card is single-slot, has a TDP of 25 W, and connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU has no display outputs, which is unusual and means it is intended for compute or rendering tasks rather than direct display connection.

The arc A350 has no benchmark scores in the database, and its percentile ranking is 50 against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0. This lack of measured data makes direct performance comparisons difficult. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is a limiting factor for modern rendering workloads, as large textures and high-resolution scenes will exceed this capacity. The 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest, and the 64-bit bus width constrains memory throughput. For rendering tasks, the GPU can handle light 3D work and basic GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU will dominate any serious rendering workload.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The fact pack contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggest that gaming performance will be modest. At 1080p with low to medium settings, the Arc A350 can be expected to run older titles and less demanding esports games at playable frame rates, potentially exceeding 60 FPS. For modern AAA games at 1080p with high settings, the 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely cause frame rates to drop below 60 FPS in many scenarios.

At 1440p, the GPU is likely to struggle, and the 64-bit memory bus will limit performance further. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,667, ensures that frame rates will not be CPU-limited in most games, meaning the GPU is the sole bottleneck. Ray tracing performance, using the 6 RT cores, will be minimal and likely only usable in light implementations. The data clearly indicates that gaming is not this build's strength, and users should temper expectations accordingly.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining an Intel Core i7-14700T with an Intel Arc A350. The combined percentile is 69, which places it in the upper-middle tier of all builds in the database. The CPU is a high-performance 20-core processor with a 35 W TDP, designed for efficiency while retaining substantial multi-threaded capability. The GPU is an entry-level discrete part with a 25 W TDP and 4 GB of VRAM, positioned at the 50th percentile for GPUs.

The pairing is unusual in that the CPU is far more capable than the GPU. The i7-14700T's 88th percentile ranking dwarfs the GPU's 50th percentile, creating a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but underperforms in graphics-intensive workloads. This build is best described as a productivity-focused workstation with limited gaming potential. The low power draw of both components, totaling 60 W between them, makes it suitable for compact or energy-efficient desktop systems.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 41,914, placing it in the 88th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are clustered within 0.6% of its score, indicating that the i7-14700T is competitive with but not distinct from its immediate peers. The GPU has no benchmark scores in the database, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0, with a percentile ranking of 50 against all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 69.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU carries the performance load. The i7-14700T's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,980 and PassMark multithread score of 30,571 are strong indicators of high-end productivity performance. The GPU's lack of measured scores and 50th percentile ranking suggest it is an average performer among all GPUs, but the absence of data makes precise comparisons impossible. The combined percentile of 69 reflects a build that is better than most for CPU-heavy tasks but only average for GPU-heavy tasks.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: This build is not suitable for high-refresh gaming. The Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM will limit frame rates, and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking indicates it cannot sustain high FPS in demanding titles. The CPU's single-core score of 3,667 ensures frames are generated quickly, but the GPU will bottleneck output to well below 144 FPS in most games.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,980, can handle software encoding for streaming while maintaining game performance in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU's lack of display outputs complicates a streaming setup, as a separate display solution is required. The 35 W TDP keeps thermal and power overhead low during extended streaming sessions.

Video editing: The i7-14700T's multi-core performance, including a PassMark data compression score of 354,216, supports fast video encoding and decoding. The Arc A350's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth can assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but large projects will be limited by the GPU's modest capabilities. The 88th percentile CPU ranking makes this a capable video editing workstation for 1080p and some 4K work.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be strong, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,980 providing fast iteration times. GPU-based rendering will be weak, as the Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM are insufficient for complex scenes. The 6 RT cores offer minimal ray tracing acceleration.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 113,854 and multithread score of 30,571 indicate rapid code compilation and test execution. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this an efficient and capable developer machine.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,905 in PassMark ensures responsive application usage, while the 35 W TDP keeps energy costs low. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output since the Arc A350 has none, making the discrete GPU optional for office tasks. The combined 60 W power draw of CPU and GPU is ideal for a quiet, efficient workstation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700T + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700T

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds