SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700KF sits near the top of the desktop CPU hierarchy, while the Intel Arc A750 is a solid mid-range graphics card. Combined, they form a desktop build where the processor’s capability far outstrips the GPU’s, creating a system that excels at heavily threaded productivity tasks but is held back in gaming by the graphics card’s more modest standing. This pairing is a study in imbalance, and the benchmark data illustrates exactly where the strengths and bottlenecks lie.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. It uses a hybrid design, though the specific P-core and E-core counts are not detailed in the data. The base clock is 3.40 GHz, and it can boost up to 5.60 GHz. This is a desktop-class chip with a 125 W TDP, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The cache layout is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

In raw multi-threaded throughput, the data is impressive. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44167 places it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. This is a processor built for heavy parallel workloads. The single-core performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6235, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly threaded applications. The Geekbench scores reinforce this: 21462 multicore and 2578 single-core.

The nearest rivals provide context for these numbers. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F averages 69996, which is 0.2% lower than the i7-14700KF's average of 70163. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is 0.4% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is 0.9% behind. The only competitor ahead is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, which scores 1% higher. This indicates the i7-14700KF is at the very top tier of consumer CPUs, trading blows with the best available options. The Passmark multithread score of 52425 and integer math score of 183056 further confirm its dominance in compute-heavy scenarios.

For real workloads, these scores translate to a CPU that will tear through video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and any other task that can utilize its 28 threads. The data encryption score of 40046 and compression score of 694963 show strong performance in data-intensive operations. This is not a processor that will be the limiting factor in a workstation build; it has ample headroom for the most demanding productivity applications.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-14700KF compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X in average benchmark score?

A: The i7-14700KF has an average benchmark score of 70163, which is 0.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X's average score of 69515.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A750 sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it performs better than most but is not a top-tier part.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the CPU?

A: The Core i7-14700KF has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, while its base clock is 3.40 GHz.

Q: What type of memory and bus width does the GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc A750 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU's multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplierUnlocked field is true, meaning the CPU supports overclocking.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 80, which is lower than the CPU's solo 94th percentile but higher than the GPU's 66th percentile.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has a suggested PSU of 550 W, and its own TDP is 225 W.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data shows a clear split between the CPU and GPU. The Core i7-14700KF is a high-end performer, while the Arc A750 is a mid-range card. The CPU's average benchmark score is 70163, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, scores 1% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is 0.2% lower. This puts the i7-14700KF at the absolute top of the consumer stack.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20582, which lands it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest competitor is the Intel Arc B570, which is only 0.1% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which is 0.2% higher. This shows the Arc A750 is competitive with other mid-range options but is not a high-end card.

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the fact pack. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and there are no entries in measuredFpsUltraByGame. Therefore, all performance discussions must be inferred from the benchmark scores. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and the Passmark G3D score of 12534 give a general indication of the GPU's gaming capability, but they do not translate directly to specific frame rates in any game.

The combined picture is one of a system where the CPU is performing at a 94th percentile level, while the GPU is at a 66th percentile level. The combined percentile for the build is 80, which is a weighted average of the two. In practical terms, this means that in a gaming workload, the GPU will be the limiting factor. In a CPU-bound productivity task, the system will perform at a near-top-tier level.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need top-tier CPU performance for productivity but are willing to compromise on GPU performance. The 94th percentile CPU score makes this an ideal platform for content creators, specifically video editors and 3D renderers. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44167 is a strong indicator of performance in rendering workloads, where every additional core and thread directly reduces render times.

Software developers will also benefit. The high Passmark integer math score of 183056 and data compression score of 694963 indicate strong performance in code compilation and data processing tasks. The 20 cores and 28 threads allow for fast parallel builds and running multiple virtual machines or containers simultaneously.

For gamers at 1080p or 1440p, the system will work, but the experience will be dictated by the Arc A750's 66th percentile standing. It is not a high-refresh-rate powerhouse for the latest AAA titles. However, for students or small business workstations that need to handle office productivity, data analysis, and occasional light gaming, this pairing is more than sufficient. The CPU's speed ensures that even the most complex spreadsheets or databases will be responsive, and the GPU can handle basic graphics acceleration and less demanding games.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A750 is the limiting factor here. With a Passmark G3D score of 12534 and a 66th percentile ranking, it is not capable of driving a high-refresh-rate monitor in demanding titles. While the CPU's single-core score of 6235 in Cinebench R23 is excellent, it cannot compensate for the GPU's mid-range performance. Users should expect to dial down settings to achieve high frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 28 threads are a major advantage. The 44167 Cinebench R23 multicore score means the i7-14700KF can handle both the game and the encoding workload simultaneously without a significant performance hit. The GPU's lack of a dedicated encoder is not a concern because the CPU can easily handle x264 encoding at high quality presets.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for the build. The CPU's multicore performance is exceptional for timeline rendering and export. The GPU can assist with effects and transitions, but its 8 GB of VRAM and 66th percentile score mean it is not a top-tier accelerator. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is decent, but the overall GPU compute score of 5368 in Passmark limits its utility for complex GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU is a rendering beast. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 18550 and the R15 score of 4452 show excellent scaling across its 20 cores. For CPU-based renderers, this system will perform near the top of the consumer market. For GPU-based renderers, the Arc A750's 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is workable, but it is far from the fastest option and will result in longer render times.

Software development: The combination of high single-thread and multi-thread performance is ideal. The Geekbench single-core score of 2578 ensures fast IDE responsiveness, while the multicore score of 21462 and Passmark multithread score of 52425 speed up compilation times. The data on the CPU shows it is a top-tier tool for developers.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for this scenario, but it means it will never be the bottleneck. The CPU's single-thread performance makes spreadsheet calculations and web browsing instantaneous. The GPU is more than capable of driving multiple 4K displays, as it supports 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. It will handle any office task without breaking a sweat.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is based on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-512 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. It has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines. The GPU includes 28 ray tracing cores, but it does not have dedicated tensor cores. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The base clock is 2050 MHz, and the boost clock is 2400 MHz.

The GPU's performance metrics show a capable mid-range card. Its FP32 compute power is 17.20 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1). The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. In benchmark scores, it achieves a Passmark G3D score of 12534 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612.

The nearest rivals show it is positioned in a tight cluster. The Intel Arc B570 is 0.1% faster, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.2% faster, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.4% slower. This shows the Arc A750 is competitive with these parts, but it is not leading the pack. The 66th percentile ranking confirms it is a mainstream card, not a high-end one. For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for modern high-resolution textures. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is good for its class, but the lack of tensor cores means it lacks the AI acceleration found in some competitors. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern game compatibility.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-14700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket is also compatible with other 14th Gen and 13th Gen processors, allowing for a drop-in upgrade to a higher-tier chip if needed. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but a user building this system with a modern motherboard would likely choose DDR5. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a feature for workstation reliability.

The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and suggests a 550 W power supply. It requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector. This leaves headroom in a typical 750 W or 850 W power supply for a future GPU upgrade. The most sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A750 with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The i7-14700KF's 94th percentile score means it will not bottleneck a high-end graphics card. A user could easily step up to a top-tier GPU without needing to change the CPU or platform. The CPU's launch MSRP is $384, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 289 USD.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-14700KF with the Intel Arc A750. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread desktop processor based on Raptor Lake, and the GPU is a mid-range desktop card based on Xe-HPG. The combined percentile for this build is 80, which reflects a system where the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs.

This pairing represents a strong productivity platform with a modest gaming component. It is a system where the processor is the star, and the graphics card is a functional, but not exceptional, partner. The build is best described as a high-performance workstation CPU with a mainstream GPU attached. It is not a balanced gaming rig, but it is a very capable machine for tasks that are heavily threaded and CPU-bound. The data suggests this is a build for users who prioritize compute performance over graphical fidelity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The i7-14700KF's 94th percentile score dwarfs the Arc A750's 66th percentile score. This means in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. For gaming, the GPU will cap frame rates, and the CPU will be left with significant idle headroom. The CPU's single-core score of 6235 in Cinebench R23 is far higher than what the GPU can feed it in terms of frame generation, so in a gaming scenario, the bottleneck is clearly the GPU.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, or data processing, the GPU is not the primary constraint. The CPU's multicore score of 44167 in Cinebench R23 will be the driving factor, and the GPU will only be relevant if the specific application uses GPU acceleration. In hybrid tasks like video editing, the balance shifts depending on the specific operation. Exporting a timeline will be CPU-bound, while applying GPU-accelerated effects will be GPU-bound.

The FPS scaling, since there is no measured data, must be estimated. Given the GPU's 66th percentile standing, it is estimated that the Arc A750 will deliver moderate frame rates in modern games, but it will not achieve high refresh rates at high settings. The CPU's performance is not the issue; the GPU is the clear limiting factor for any gaming scenario. For users seeking a balanced system, upgrading the GPU to a higher-percentile part would be the logical first step.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700KF

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds