SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing matches Intel's Core i7-14700KF, a 20-core Raptor Lake Refresh processor sitting in the 94th percentile of all CPUs in the benchmark database, with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, a Blackwell 2.0-based card built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 18 GB of GDDR7. The combined percentile of this build is 56, which immediately signals a CPU-forward configuration: the processor is close to the top of the database, while the GPU's percentile of 18 places it far lower in its own ranking. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database — all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores, not recorded in-game measurements.

Gaming Performance

The database contains no measured FPS entries for this pairing, so the gaming figures discussed here are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than captured in-game data. That caveat matters, because the story those scores tell is an unusual one. The CPU side is unambiguous: a single-core Cinebench R23 score of 6235 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2578 place the i7-14700KF among the strongest gaming processors in the dataset, with the raw thread throughput to keep frame delivery smooth even when a game leans on background tasks. The GPU side is where interpretation becomes difficult.

The RTX 5070 SUPER's only recorded benchmark is a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690, and its percentile position versus all GPUs is 18. Taken at face value, the percentile and the nearestRivals list — Quadro K1100M, GT 1030, Arc Pro B50, GT 440, all clustered within roughly two percent of this card's score — would frame it as an entry-tier GPU. The hardware specifications in the fact pack point in a very different direction: 6400 shading units, 200 tensor cores, 50 RT cores, 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, and 672.0 GB/s of GDDR7 bandwidth describe a modern, high-bandwidth card with heavy ray tracing and AI acceleration resources.

Because these two signals conflict, the honest framing for estimated gaming performance is a range. If the Steel Nomad percentile is the better predictor, expect the CPU to be drastically underfed: the 94th-percentile processor would sit idle waiting on the GPU, and high-refresh play at demanding settings would be off the table. If the specification sheet is the better predictor — as the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support suggest — the card should handle modern titles at 1440p and make credible attempts at 4K, with the 18 GB frame buffer absorbing high-resolution texture loads. What is certain either way: the CPU will never be the limit. Every gaming bottleneck estimate for this build points at the graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The processor's benchmark record is extensive and consistent. Cinebench R15 delivers 4452 multi-core and 628 single-core; Cinebench R20 scales to 18550 multi-core and 2618 single-core; Cinebench R23 reaches 44167 multi-core and 6235 single-core. Geekbench adds 21462 multi-core and 2578 single-core, and the PassMark suite fills out the picture with a 52425 multithread score, a 4480 single-thread score, and strong sub-scores across integer math (183056), floating point (134393), data compression (694963), encryption (40046), extended instructions (40660), physics (2961), string sorting (74723), and prime finding (212).

The average benchmark score across these tests is 70163, which lands the i7-14700KF in the 94th percentile versus all CPUs in the database. The nearestRivals data shows how tight the competition is at this level: AMD's Ryzen 7 9700F averages 69996, just 0.2 percent behind; the Ryzen 9 7940HX averages 69875, 0.4 percent back; the Ryzen 9 7950X sits at 69515, 0.9 percent behind; and Intel's own Core Ultra 7 265K edges ahead at 70879, a 1 percent advantage over the 14700KF. In practical terms the 14700KF trades blows with chips a class above and below it, and effectively matches a 16-core Ryzen 9 flagship from the prior generation in aggregate score.

The GPU's benchmark record is thin: a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690, an average benchmark score of 2690, and a percentile of 18 against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals by score are the Quadro K1100M (2664, 1 percent behind), the GT 1030 (2662, 1.1 percent behind), the Arc Pro B50 (2660, 1.1 percent behind), and the GT 440 (2645, 1.7 percent behind). The combined build percentile of 56 reflects the split: a near-flagship CPU dragging a low-percentile GPU upward.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake-R processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die. It runs a 3.40 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.60 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. Cache allocation is generous: 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, plus a 33 MB shared L3. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — a rarity in this segment and a genuine draw for workstation use.

The benchmark scores translate directly into workload capability. A 44167 Cinebench R23 multi-core result and 52425 PassMark multithread score indicate sustained throughput for rendering, compilation, and batch processing well beyond mainstream quad- and hexa-core parts. The 6235 R23 single-core and 4480 PassMark single-thread scores matter just as much: they govern game logic, tool responsiveness, and any workload that refuses to parallelize. The 94th percentile placement means fewer than one in ten CPUs in the database outscores it on average.

The hybrid 20-core topology — 28 threads across performance and efficient cores — explains the profile: it wins multi-core contests against the Ryzen 7 9700F and Ryzen 9 7940HX by a hair, matches the 7950X within a percent, and concedes a percent to the Core Ultra 7 265K. That is elite company for a Core i7. The "KF" suffix also means no integrated graphics, which is worth noting: the system is entirely dependent on the discrete card for display output, via the GPU's one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connectors.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. The CPU is fully capable: 94th percentile aggregate, 6235 single-core in R23, and 2961 in PassMark physics are frame-delivery numbers. Whether high-refresh gaming actually materializes depends entirely on the GPU's true output, since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing. Estimates must come from the benchmark scores, and those scores conflict with the card's specifications.

Streaming. With 20 cores and 28 threads, encoding alongside gameplay is trivial for this processor — the 52425 PassMark multithread score and 40046 encryption score indicate huge headroom for concurrent capture, encode, and chat overlays. Streaming is one of the strongest cases for this configuration.

Video editing. The 44167 R23 multi-core result and 694963 compression score support timeline scrubbing, export, and proxy generation with ease. On the GPU side, the 200 tensor cores and 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 (with FP16 at 1:1) provide hardware-accelerated effects paths, and 18 GB of VRAM at 672.0 GB/s accommodates large timelines.

3D rendering. CPU rendering is a 94th-percentile affair, and GPU rendering has abundant dedicated hardware: 50 RT cores, 200 tensor cores, and DirectX Raytracing via 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4. The database's single GPU benchmark score of 2690 is the only measured anchor, so treat GPU render throughput estimates cautiously.

Software development. Compiling is thread-hungry, and 28 threads with a 33 MB shared L3 chew through large builds. The 2578 Geekbench single-core score keeps single-threaded build steps and IDE responsiveness snappy. This is arguably the scenario where the build's CPU weighting pays off most reliably.

Student and office work. Massive overkill in the best way. Documents, browsers, and conferencing software barely register against this processor; the 4480 single-thread score makes everyday interaction instantaneous. The dual-slot, 245 mm card is also physically compact for a modern GPU, easing case selection.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5070 SUPER's specification sheet reads like a serious card. The GB205 chip on TSMC's 5 nm node packs 31,100 million transistors into a 263 mm² die — a density of 118.3 million transistors per square millimetre. Clocks run from a 2325 MHz base to a 2512 MHz boost, with memory at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem is the standout: 18 GB of GDDR7 across a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is generous for the bus width and directly benefits high-resolution texturing and ray tracing workloads.

Rendering hardware includes 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, producing a 201.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and a 502.4 GTexel/s texture rate. The 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores carry the ray tracing and AI workloads, with FP32 and FP16 both rated at 32.15 TFLOPS. API support is current: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, over a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

The puzzle is the benchmark record. A percentile of 18 versus all GPUs, a single Steel Nomad score of 2690, and nearest rivals consisting of a Quadro K1100M, GT 1030, Arc Pro B50, and GT 440 — all within 1.7 percent — sit in stark contrast to those specifications. The database analysis is straightforward: by recorded benchmark score alone, this card ranks in the bottom fifth of the GPU dataset, and any performance verdict drawn from measured data must reflect that. Whether the sample is thin (one test) or the percentile reflects the full historical dataset rather than the card's generation, the specification numbers and the benchmark numbers cannot both describe class-leading performance. Buyers should treat the GPU's real-world placement as unresolved pending more measured results.

Who Should Build It

The primary audience is anyone whose workload is CPU-dominant: software developers running large compiles, video editors whose timelines lean on CPU rendering, students in compute-heavy fields, and small businesses needing ECC-capable workstation reliability with desktop pricing. The launch MSRP of $384 for the processor reflects its Core i7 positioning, and its benchmark parity with the Ryzen 9 7950X makes it a rational pick for multi-threaded productivity.

Gamers are a conditional audience. If the RTX 5070 SUPER's specifications — 18 GB GDDR7, 672.0 GB/s, 50 RT cores — translate to real performance, this is a 1440p-focused build with 4K aspirations. If the database's 18th-percentile GPU ranking is the better guide, gamers would be better served by a different GPU allocation, because no CPU in this dataset's top tier can compensate for a GPU bottleneck. Streamers and content creators get consistent value either way, since the i7-14700KF's 94th-percentile score is independent of the graphics card's fortunes.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is Intel Socket 1700 with support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory — a flexible position, since builders can carry forward existing DDR4 kits or step into DDR5. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself, and the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface matches it exactly, so no interface bottleneck exists between the two components.

Power budgets are defined by the two TDP figures: 125 W for the CPU and 275 W for the GPU. The card draws through a single 16-pin connector and occupies a dual-slot footprint measuring 245 mm long, 115 mm tall, and 40 mm wide — compact by modern standards, and compatible with a wide range of cases. The suggestedPsu field is empty in the database, so no specific wattage recommendation is given here; qualitatively, the combined load of a 125 W processor and a 275 W card leaves room for a comfortably sized power supply with headroom for transients and future upgrades.

The logical next upgrade is on the graphics side, given the GPU's 18th-percentile standing versus the CPU's 94th. A higher-percentile card would slot into the same PCIe 5.0 x16 slot and immediately rebalance the build. The CPU, by contrast, already sits within a percent of the Core Ultra 7 265K and ahead of the Ryzen 9 7950X on average score — there is no meaningful upgrade available without leaving the performance envelope this processor already occupies.

FAQ

Q: No measured FPS data exists for this build — how should gaming performance be judged?

A: Treat all frame-rate expectations as estimates. The CPU's 94th-percentile benchmark standing is verified, but the GPU's single 2690 Steel Nomad score and 18th-percentile ranking conflict with its specifications, so gaming estimates carry meaningful uncertainty.

Q: How does the i7-14700KF compare to AMD alternatives?

A: Its average score of 70163 leads the Ryzen 7 9700F by 0.2 percent, the Ryzen 9 7940HX by 0.4 percent, and the Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.9 percent, while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 1 percent — effectively tier-parity with all four.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: Both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, with ECC support — unusual flexibility for a desktop platform.

Q: Is 18 GB of VRAM enough?

A: For the card's class, 18 GB of GDDR7 at 672.0 GB/s is a generous allocation, suited to high-resolution textures and large creative workloads.

Q: What powers the build?

A: The CPU is rated at 125 W and the GPU at 275 W, with the card using a single 16-pin connector. No suggested PSU figure is recorded in the database.

Q: Can the system run without a discrete GPU?

A: No. The i7-14700KF has no integrated graphics; display output comes solely from the RTX 5070 SUPER's one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b ports.

Q: Is overclocking possible?

A: Yes, the CPU's multiplier is unlocked, with a stock boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Balance and Bottleneck

This is a GPU-bottlenecked configuration by every measure the database provides. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile with an average benchmark score of 70163; the GPU sits in the 18th percentile with an average score of 2690 and rivals that include the GT 1030 and GT 440. The combined build percentile of 56 sits almost exactly between those two extremes, weighted by the CPU's strength.

In gaming, the bottleneck is the graphics card regardless of resolution — the processor's single-core scores (6235 in R23, 4480 in PassMark single-thread) would drive far higher frame rates than the GPU's recorded benchmark position can feed. In production workloads the picture inverts: CPU-bound tasks like compiling (28 threads, 52425 PassMark multithread), CPU rendering (44167 in R23 multi-core), and compression (694963) run at near-flagship speed, while GPU-bound rendering is limited by the card's measured standing — though its 200 tensor cores and 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 rating suggest the measured record may understate its rendering capability. The build's identity is that of a workstation-grade processor paired with an unproven graphics card; the data says upgrade the GPU first, and the processor will be ready for whatever replaces it.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds