SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing is not optimized for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming. The Intel Arc A380E sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which places it firmly in entry-level territory for rasterization. The CPU, by contrast, is a top-tier performer at the 94th percentile, but gaming frame rates at high refresh rates will be constrained by the GPU's 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. At 1080p with medium settings, the A380E can produce playable frame rates, but pushing 144Hz or higher refresh rates in modern titles will require significant settings reductions. The 8 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable ray-traced effects, but the modest 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means ray tracing should be used sparingly.

Streaming: The i7-14700KF provides more than enough multi-threaded headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,167 and Passmark multi-thread score of 52,425 indicate substantial capacity for handling both game logic and stream encoding without bottlenecking. The GPU's 8.192 TFLOPS of FP16 throughput (2:1 ratio) can assist with lighter encoding tasks, but the 75W TDP and lack of dedicated tensor cores mean the CPU will likely handle most encoding duties. The 28 threads of the i7-14700KF are more than sufficient for x264 or x265 encoding alongside gaming, though the GPU will still limit game frame rates during streaming sessions.

Video editing: The combination of a 94th-percentile CPU and a 50th-percentile GPU creates an asymmetric video editing experience. Timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export encoding will be dominated by the CPU's strong multi-core performance — the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 18,550 and Geekbench multi-core score of 21,462 reflect excellent rendering throughput for video codecs. The A380E's 6 GB GDDR6 memory with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p editing timelines with multiple layers, but 4K multi-stream projects will likely exceed its 96-bit memory bus capacity. The GPU does support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad application compatibility, but hardware-accelerated effects will be limited by the 1,024 shading units.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be the primary strength of this build. The i7-14700KF's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4,452, R20 score of 18,550, and R23 score of 44,167 show progressive scaling that indicates strong sustained multi-threaded performance across render workloads. The Passmark floating-point math score of 134,393 and integer math score of 183,056 further confirm robust compute capability for physics simulations and geometric calculations. The GPU's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 RT cores provide some acceleration for real-time viewport rendering, but GPU-accelerated final-frame rendering will be markedly slower than a higher-tier GPU. For Blender or similar CPU-based render engines, this system will perform admirably; for GPU-accelerated renderers, expect modest performance.

Software development: The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads provide excellent parallel compilation performance. The Passmark data compression score of 694,963 and random string sorting score of 74,723 indicate strong throughput for build tools and code indexing. The 33 MB of shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code segments, while the 2 MB L2 per core reduces latency for single-threaded compilation tasks. The Geekbench single-core score of 2,578 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,235 demonstrate that even single-threaded compiler passes will execute swiftly. The GPU's 50th-percentile standing is largely irrelevant for development workloads, making this a well-balanced system for developers who need fast builds and don't require high-end graphics.

Student and office work: This configuration is overpowered for standard productivity tasks but offers longevity. The i7-14700KF's Passmark single-thread score of 4,480 and data encryption score of 40,046 indicate snappy response in office applications, spreadsheet calculations, and database operations. The CPU's 94th-percentile ranking means it will handle any future software demands with ease. The A380E's 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups, which is beneficial for research, coding, or financial analysis. The 6 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for 2D applications and light 3D visualization. However, the system's 125W CPU TDP and 75W GPU TDP mean it draws more power than necessary for basic office tasks, making it a practical choice only if the user also needs the CPU's computational power.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-14700KF achieves an average benchmark score of 70,163, placing it at the 94th percentile among all CPUs. This places it in the top 6% of all processors tested, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (average score 69,996, delta +0.2%), AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (average score 69,875, delta +0.4%), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (average score 69,515, delta +0.9%), and Intel Core Ultra 7 265K (average score 70,879, delta -1%). The i7-14700KF essentially matches the Ryzen 7 9700F and Ryzen 9 7940HX, edges out the Ryzen 9 7950X by less than 1%, and trails the Core Ultra 7 265K by 1%. This positions the CPU as a top-tier desktop processor with performance that is statistically indistinguishable from its closest competitors.

The Intel Arc A380E, by contrast, has an empty benchmark suite in the data, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile rank of 50 places it at the exact median of all GPUs, meaning half of all GPUs are faster and half are slower. This 50th-percentile standing is the key reference point for understanding the GPU's capabilities — it is a mid-pack performer, neither notably fast nor notably slow.

The combined percentile for this system is 72, reflecting the substantial gap between the CPU's 94th-percentile performance and the GPU's 50th-percentile performance. The combined metric pulls the system down from the CPU's elite tier to a solidly mid-range overall standing. Benchmark results indicate that the CPU is the dominant component, contributing the vast majority of the system's compute capability. The GPU's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS FP16 throughput are adequate for entry-level gaming and light compute, but they do not complement the CPU's high-end status.

The CPU's individual benchmark scores reveal consistent strength across workloads: Cinebench R15 multi-core 4,452 and single-core 628; Cinebench R20 multi-core 18,550 and single-core 2,618; Cinebench R23 multi-core 44,167 and single-core 6,235; Geekbench multi-core 21,462 and single-core 2,578. Passmark results further show specialized strengths: data compression 694,963, data encryption 40,046, extended instructions 40,660, floating-point math 134,393, integer math 183,056, multi-thread 52,425, physics 2,961, random string sorting 74,723, and single-thread 4,480. The GPU's lack of benchmark scores means all GPU performance assessments must be derived from its 50th-percentile rank and architectural specifications.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the i7-14700KF at the 94th percentile and the Arc A380E at the 50th percentile creates a clear CPU-bound system in most workloads. The CPU's nearest rival comparison shows it trading blows with the Ryzen 9 7950X and Core Ultra 7 265K, while the GPU has no rivals listed and no benchmark scores, making it a mid-pack performer at best. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor for frame rates in essentially every scenario, as the CPU has far more headroom than the GPU can utilize. The GPU's 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 96-bit bus width constrain texture streaming and high-resolution rendering, while the CPU's 33 MB L3 cache and 5.60 GHz boost clock can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them.

In productivity and compute workloads, the CPU is the performance driver and the GPU plays a minimal role. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,167 and Passmark multi-thread score of 52,425 indicate that CPU-bound tasks will scale well across all 20 cores and 28 threads. The GPU's 50th-percentile rank means it will not accelerate these workloads significantly, but it also will not bottleneck them — the CPU will simply do the work itself. For tasks like video encoding, the CPU's 28 threads can handle x264/x265 encoding efficiently, with the GPU providing only marginal help.

The combined percentile of 72 reflects this imbalance: the system is stronger than the 50th-percentile GPU alone would suggest, but weaker than the 94th-percentile CPU alone would imply. In GPU-bound gaming scenarios, the system will perform like a mid-range gaming PC. In CPU-bound productivity scenarios, it will perform like a high-end workstation. The bottleneck shifts depending on workload: the GPU limits gaming and real-time graphics, while the CPU dominates compute and rendering tasks. There is no scenario where both components are equally utilized, which means users should choose this pairing based on whether their primary workloads are CPU-heavy (where it excels) or GPU-heavy (where it will disappoint).

# Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: This system is suitable for gamers who play at 1080p resolution with moderate settings and accept frame rates in the 60 FPS range. The GPU's 50th-percentile standing means it can handle esports titles and older games well, but modern AAA games will require reduced quality settings. The CPU's 94th-percentile performance ensures that frame times will be consistent and stutter-free, even if absolute frame rates are modest. Gamers at 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere, as the A380E's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will struggle at these resolutions.

Content creators focused on CPU rendering: Video editors, 3D artists using CPU-based render engines, and software developers will find this system well-suited. The CPU's multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 44,167, Geekbench multi-core 21,462) provide excellent rendering and compilation throughput. The GPU is sufficient for viewport display and light GPU acceleration, but the CPU carries the workload. This is a sensible choice for creators who prioritize render times over GPU-accelerated effects.

Students and professionals in STEM fields: The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 694,963 and integer math score of 183,056 support heavy computational workloads like data analysis, simulation, and machine learning preprocessing. The 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs on the GPU enable multi-monitor setups for research and coding. The 125W TDP is manageable for a desktop system, and the CPU's 94th-percentile rank ensures it will remain relevant for years of academic or professional use.

Small business workstations: For businesses running CPU-intensive applications like database management, financial modeling, or engineering simulation, this system offers strong performance. The CPU's data encryption score of 40,046 and floating-point math score of 134,393 indicate capability for secure transactions and scientific computing. The GPU's modest performance is adequate for office productivity and 2D applications. The system's ECC memory support (a feature of the CPU) adds reliability for long-running workloads.

Not suitable for: Gamers targeting high refresh rates (144Hz+), 4K gaming enthusiasts, GPU-accelerated renderers, or anyone relying on CUDA-accelerated applications. The A380E's 50th-percentile GPU rank and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance are insufficient for these use cases.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation (Arc 3), using the DG2-128 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). It features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory configuration is the primary limitation — 6 GB is sufficient for 1080p gaming with moderate textures, but the 96-bit bus restricts memory throughput compared to wider-memory GPUs.

The GPU has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. Its pixel rate is 64.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 128.0 GTexel/s. Compute performance includes 4.096 TFLOPS of FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS of FP16 (at a 2:1 ratio). The 8 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The lack of tensor cores (listed as null) means no dedicated AI acceleration hardware, which limits performance in DLSS-style upscaling and AI-based workloads.

The GPU's 50th-percentile rank confirms it as a mid-pack performer. With no benchmark scores in the data, the percentile rank is the primary performance indicator. The 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 is roughly entry-level for modern GPUs, suitable for 1080p gaming at medium settings and light compute tasks. The 8 RT cores enable ray-traced effects but at reduced performance compared to higher-tier GPUs. The 75W TDP and single-slot design with no power connectors make it an energy-efficient option that draws power entirely from the PCIe slot. The 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support modern high-refresh monitors, and the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's memory needs.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 8.192 TFLOPS FP16 provide modest compute capability. It can accelerate some GPU-rendering tasks in applications that support Intel's Xe-HPG architecture, but performance will be far below dedicated workstation GPUs. The 186.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM limit texture-heavy scenes and large model datasets. The GPU is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor, which means driver optimization and future support may decline.

# Gaming Performance

Important note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark percentile and architectural specifications, not measured results.

Estimated 1080p gaming: At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A380E's 50th-percentile rank suggests frame rates in the 30-50 FPS range for modern AAA titles. The 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are less demanding, frame rates could reach 60-100 FPS at medium settings. The CPU's 94th-percentile performance ensures that the GPU will be the bottleneck in all gaming scenarios, providing consistent frame pacing without CPU-induced stutters.

Estimated 1440p gaming: At 1440p, the A380E will struggle significantly. The 6 GB VRAM is insufficient for high-resolution textures in many modern games, and the 96-bit memory bus will choke on the increased bandwidth demands. Expect frame rates in the 20-35 FPS range at medium settings, and lower at ultra. The 8 RT cores can enable ray tracing at 1440p, but only at severely reduced frame rates. This resolution is not recommended for this GPU.

Estimated 4K gaming: 4K gaming is not practical with this GPU. The 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 cannot handle 4K rendering in modern titles, and the 6 GB VRAM will exceed capacity in most AAA games. Frame rates below 20 FPS are expected even at low settings. The CPU has ample headroom for 4K gaming, but the GPU is the definitive bottleneck.

Ray tracing performance: The 8 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the modest compute throughput means ray-traced effects will incur significant performance penalties. At 1080p with ray tracing enabled, expect frame rates 30-50% lower than with ray tracing disabled. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern ray-traced games, but performance will be entry-level.

Frame time consistency: The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 6,235, Passmark single-thread 4,480) ensures that frame times will be stable, with no CPU-induced hitches. The GPU's 50th-percentile rank means it will deliver consistent but modest frame rates, with no sudden drops from memory or compute saturation.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R, Core 14th Gen). It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 125W. The CPU is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and the CPU fits the Intel Socket 1700.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache benefits workloads with significant data reuse, such as databases, compilers, and scientific simulations. The 5.60 GHz boost clock provides excellent single-threaded performance, as demonstrated by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,235 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,578. The 20 cores and 28 threads deliver strong multi-threaded performance, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 44,167 and Geekbench multi-core at 21,462.

The CPU's benchmark scores indicate it is a top-tier desktop processor. The Passmark multi-thread score of 52,425 and single-thread score of 4,480 confirm its high standing. Specialized scores show strengths across workloads: data compression 694,963, data encryption 40,046, extended instructions 40,660, floating-point math 134,393, integer math 183,056, and random string sorting 74,723. The physics score of 2,961 is relatively modest, suggesting the CPU may not be optimized for physics simulation in some benchmarks.

The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average score, indicating that the i7-14700KF is competitive with the best processors from both Intel and AMD. Its 94th-percentile rank places it among the top 6% of all CPUs tested. The launch MSRP is $384, and the CPU is currently in active production. The Raptor Lake architecture supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in platform choice, though DDR5 will likely be preferred for maximum performance. The CPU has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output — which this pairing provides via the Arc A380E.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF is at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 94% of processors tested. Its average benchmark score is 70,163, which places it within 1% of top rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and Intel Core Ultra 7 265K.

Q: How does the GPU compare to other graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A380E is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, placing it at the exact median. It has no benchmark scores in the data and no nearest rivals listed, so its performance is characterized by its mid-pack rank and specifications: 4.096 TFLOPS FP32, 6 GB GDDR6 memory, and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 96-bit memory bus are insufficient for 4K gaming, and its 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 compute cannot render modern titles at 4K. The CPU has sufficient power, but the GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: What is the CPU's memory support and does it support ECC?

A: The i7-14700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature not commonly found on consumer desktop processors.

Q: How many display outputs does the GPU have?

A: The Arc A380E has 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, supporting multi-monitor setups with modern high-refresh displays.

Q: What is the power consumption of this system?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250W. The GPU requires no external power connectors, drawing power entirely from the PCIe slot.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No. The Intel Arc A380E is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor. The CPU, by contrast, is in active production.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The system's memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, but the dual-channel support for DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility for builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5.

The GPU's 75W TDP and lack of external power connectors mean it draws power entirely from the PCIe slot, with a suggested PSU of 250W. The CPU's 125W TDP brings the total system power requirement to a modest level, meaning most standard desktop PSUs will be sufficient. The GPU is single-slot, 254 mm in length, 127 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, making it a compact card that fits in most cases.

For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU is the clear priority. The CPU's 94th-percentile performance leaves substantial headroom, while the GPU's 50th-percentile rank is the system's primary limitation. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would unlock the CPU's full gaming potential, as the i7-14700KF's strong multi-core (Cinebench R23 44,167) and single-core (Cinebench R23 6,235) scores would support a much faster graphics card without bottlenecking. The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads would also benefit from a GPU with higher compute throughput for GPU-accelerated workloads.

The platform itself is at the end of the Intel Socket 1700 generation, with the CPU being part of the Raptor Lake refresh. Future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard, as the Socket 1700 platform is not forward-compatible with newer Intel platforms. The ECC memory support on the CPU is an unusual feature for a desktop processor, which may be valuable for workstation builds that require data integrity. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking to extract additional performance from the CPU, though this would increase power draw beyond the 125W TDP.

The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for its memory and compute capabilities, and the 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support high-refresh monitors. The GPU is end-of-life, so upgrading to a Battlemage successor would be a natural next step when it becomes available. The system's combined percentile of 72 reflects the GPU's 50th-percentile rank dragging down the CPU's 94th-percentile excellence; addressing the GPU bottleneck through an upgrade would bring the system closer to its CPU's elite tier.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + Intel Arc A380E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700KF

Intel Arc A380E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds