SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700KF + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700KF

70,163 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

17,083 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT represents a desktop build that leans heavily on processor throughput while maintaining a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming profile. The CPU, a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake-R part on Intel’s 10 nm process, delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44167 and a single-core score of 6235, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, built on RDNA 3.0 with a 6 nm process from TSMC, sits in the 60th percentile of all GPUs with a Passmark G3D score of 17132. This asymmetry—a top-tier processor paired with a mid-range graphics card—defines the system’s behavior across compute-heavy and graphics-bound workloads, and the measured frame data confirms that the processor is rarely the limiting factor in gaming scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-14700KF is a hybrid architecture part, combining 20 physical cores and 28 threads on the Raptor Lake refresh design. Its base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz allow it to scale aggressively under single-threaded loads, which is reflected in a Geekbench single-core score of 2578 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4480. The cache hierarchy—80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3—provides substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data, supporting the high integer math throughput of 183056 in Passmark and floating-point performance of 134393 in the same suite.

Multi-threaded performance is the defining strength of this chip. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 44167 is nearly identical to the R20 score of 18550 when accounting for workload scaling, and the Passmark multithread score of 52425 reinforces the picture. Data compression in Passmark reaches 694963, while encryption hits 40046 and extended instructions score 40660, indicating that the CPU’s 28 threads are effective for parallel workloads that saturate all cores. The nearest rival, AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, scores an average benchmark of 69996, a 0.2% delta from the i7-14700KF’s 70163 average; the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is 1% lower at 70879, meaning the i7-14700KF sits statistically level with these parts in aggregate CPU benchmarks. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X trails by 0.9%, and the Ryzen 9 7940HX is 0.4% behind, so the i7-14700KF edges out several flagship and high-end mobile parts in synthetic averages.

For real workloads, these scores translate to strong responsiveness in software development, where compilation tasks benefit from the 44k+ R23 multi-core result, and in video encoding, where the 28 threads can handle simultaneous streams. The single-core performance, evidenced by R23 single-core of 6235, ensures that lightly threaded applications like office productivity or legacy code still run smoothly. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the base 125 W TDP suggests thermal headroom will dictate how far the boost clock of 5.60 GHz can be pushed. With DDR4 and DDR5 memory support over a dual-channel bus and ECC capability, the platform offers flexibility for workstation-style configurations, though the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5, 16-lane implementation emphasizes throughput for storage and GPU connectivity.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pair is 77, positioning it above the majority of systems in the database. The CPU’s 94th percentile is the anchor; the GPU’s 60th percentile is the drag. The measured average FPS across all tested games is 108.6, with a pair rank of 2404 out of 3861 pairs, meaning 62% of recorded configurations produce higher average frames. This indicates that while the CPU is elite, the GPU constrains overall gaming performance to a mid-range tier.

In Cinebench, the multi-core R15 score of 4452, R20 of 18550, and R23 of 44167 show consistent scaling across versions, with single-core results of 628, 2618, and 6235 respectively. Geekbench confirms the pattern: multi-core 21462 versus single-core 2578. Passmark’s suite breaks down the CPU’s strengths: integer math at 183056, floating-point at 134393, and extended instructions at 40660 all exceed the median while random string sorting at 74723 and data compression at 694963 highlight sorting and archiving efficiency. The physics score of 2961 in Passmark suggests strong simulation capability, though the find prime numbers score of 212 is comparatively low, indicating this is not an optimal part for that specific compute pattern.

On the GPU side, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348 is modest, while Geekbench OpenCL reaches 92426 and Vulkan 48366. Passmark DirectX 11 scores 167, DirectX 10 scores 85, DirectX 12 scores 65, and DirectX 9 scores 228; the lower DirectX 12 score relative to DX11 reflects the heavier shader workloads in modern APIs. The GPU compute score of 8987 in Passmark and a G2D score of 1030 suggest reasonable compute offload for a 2048-shading-unit part. In aggregate, the GPU’s average benchmark score of 17083 places it 0.3% above the NVIDIA GTX 690 and 0.4% above the AMD HD 7970M, while trailing the RTX 3070 by 0.7%—the deltaPct values show the RX 7600 XT is within 1% of these legacy and mid-range rivals, meaning its raw rasterization performance is comparable to cards from several generations ago, though modern feature support like ray tracing differs.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the pair delivers strong results in esports titles: Valorant hits 368.9 FPS, CS:GO reaches 360 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X scores 196 FPS. These frame rates exceed the 144 Hz and 165 Hz refresh rates commonly found in gaming monitors, so the CPU’s single-core speed and the GPU’s 16 GB memory buffer keep minimums high. At 1440p, these titles drop to 312.2, 248, and 125.7 FPS respectively, still above 120 FPS for competitive play.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU’s 28 threads. The R23 multi-core score of 44167 allows simultaneous encoding and gameplay without significant frame loss, while the GPU’s 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 compute can handle video filters and effects. However, the GPU lacks dedicated tensor cores, so AI-accelerated encoding features are absent; the CPU must carry that load, which it does ably given its Passmark multithread score of 52425.

Video editing in 4K timelines will see the CPU excel during export and rendering, as the multi-core Cinebench results indicate strong parallel scaling. The 33 MB L3 cache and 2 MB L2 per core reduce memory latency during scrubbing, and DDR5 support at dual-channel speeds provides adequate bandwidth for 4K footage. 3D rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray would leverage the 20 cores effectively, with the R23 score of 44167 placing it near the top echelon of consumer processors.

Software development is a natural fit. Compilation of large codebases uses the integer math and data compression scores—183056 and 694963 in Passmark—to speed up build times. The 28 threads handle parallel builds, while the single-core score of 6235 in R23 ensures fast interactive response in IDEs. Students and office workers will find the system overkill for document editing and web browsing, but the headroom means it will never feel sluggish, even with background antivirus scans or dozens of browser tabs.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p high-refresh play should consider this pairing. The measured FPS in Valorant at 368.9 (1080p) and 312.2 (1440p) demonstrates capability for competitive shooters, while Call of Duty: Warzone at 173.8 FPS (1080p) and 152.7 FPS (1440p) supports fast-paced action. At 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck—Warzone drops to 130.2 FPS, but heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 fall to 21.9 FPS, so 4K ultra gaming is not viable.

Content creators who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks—video editing, 3D rendering, music production—will benefit from the i7-14700KF’s 94th percentile ranking. The 44167 R23 multi-core score means rendering times are short, and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM allows for larger texture sets in 3D applications, though its compute throughput (8987 Passmark GPU compute) is modest. Software developers building and testing code will appreciate the multi-threaded compilation speed, and the unlocked multiplier offers a path to further gains.

Students and small business workstations gain from the platform’s longevity: DDR4 and DDR5 support means the motherboard can accept cheaper memory, while ECC capability (for the CPU) adds stability for research computing. The 125 W TDP of the CPU and 190 W TDP of the GPU require a 450 W PSU (suggested), which is reasonable for a desktop build, and the dual-slot GPU with a single 8-pin connector fits most standard cases.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is the dominant component in this pairing, sitting at the 94th CPU percentile versus the GPU’s 60th percentile. In gaming, this imbalance manifests as GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core strength (4480 Passmark single-thread) can push frame rates high in CPU-light games—CS:GO at 360 FPS—but the GPU’s raw rasterization (Passmark G3D 17132) caps performance in GPU-heavy titles. Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p yields 46.3 FPS, which is a GPU limitation, not a CPU one, as the R23 single-core score of 6235 is more than sufficient for the game’s logic.

At 1440p, the GPU bottleneck widens. Fortnite drops from 76 FPS at 1080p to 49.6 FPS at 1440p, a 35% reduction that tracks with pixel count rather than CPU capability. The 4K results confirm this: Ark: Survival Ascended runs at 8 FPS at 3840x2160, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21.8 FPS, both clearly GPU-limited. The CPU’s percentile suggests it could drive a more powerful GPU—an RTX 3070-class card (which the RX 7600 XT trails by 0.7%) would improve 4K margins—but the current GPU holds back the system’s potential in resolution scaling.

Conversely, the GPU can handle memory-heavy workloads thanks to its 16 GB GDDR6 buffer and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. In games with large textures, this prevents stutter, but compute-limited scenarios like ray tracing expose the 32 RT cores as a weaker link. The FP32 throughput of 22.57 TFLOPS is respectable, but the lack of tensor cores means AI upscaling (like DLSS) is unavailable, limiting performance in ray-traced titles that rely on such features.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is a Navi 33 chip on RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU runs at a base clock of 1980 MHz, a game clock of 2470 MHz, and a boost clock of 2755 MHz, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory operates over a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s bandwidth—adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but the narrow bus limits 4K performance where bandwidth becomes critical.

The shading units number 2048, with 128 texture mapping units and 64 raster output processors. Pixel rate is 176.3 GPixel/s and texture rate is 352.6 GTexel/s, supporting the 22.57 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) compute. The 32 ray tracing cores provide some RT capability, but the absence of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration; the DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 ensure modern API compatibility, while OpenGL 4.6 covers legacy applications.

Benchmark results show a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348 is low for a modern card, and Passmark DirectX 12 at 65 is notably weaker than DirectX 11 at 167, suggesting the architecture does not scale as well in newer APIs. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 48366 versus OpenCL of 92426 indicates that compute performance is stronger in general-purpose workloads than in graphics-specific ones. The Passmark G3D score of 17132 places it in the 60th percentile, with nearest rivals including the GTX 690 (0.3% ahead), HD 7970M (0.4% ahead), and RTX 3070 (0.7% ahead in the opposite direction)—the RX 7600 XT is effectively tied with these cards in aggregate rasterization, though its 16 GB VRAM exceeds all of them, which helps in texture-heavy scenarios.

For rendering, the GPU’s 16 GB memory is a boon for large scenes, but the 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth cap throughput. The pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s drives high fill-rate demands at 1080p, but 4K workloads exceed this capability, as seen in the measured FPS drops across games. The dual-slot cooler and single 8-pin power connector keep installation simple, and the 450 W suggested PSU aligns with the 190 W TDP.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (confirmed as measured, not estimated) reveals a GPU that excels at 1080p and handles 1440p adequately, with 4K reserved for lighter titles. At 1920x1080, Valorant leads at 368.9 FPS, followed by CS:GO at 360 FPS and CS2 at 159.4 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone reaches 173.8 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X hits 196 FPS. These are competitive-tier frame rates, suitable for 144 Hz and 240 Hz displays. Minecraft runs at 161 FPS, and Roblox at 211 FPS, showing strong performance in popular multiplayer games.

At 2560x1440, the same titles scale down predictably: Valorant drops to 312.2 FPS, CS:GO to 248 FPS, and CS2 to 106.5 FPS. Warzone maintains 152.7 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X at 125.7 FPS remains above 120. Single-player games show more strain: Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 33.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 29.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 15 FPS. These are below the 60 FPS target for smooth play, indicating the GPU’s limits at this resolution in demanding titles.

At 3840x2160, the picture worsens. Warzone drops to 130.2 FPS (still playable), but Cyberpunk 2077 hits 21.9 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 21.8 FPS, and Ark at 8 FPS. Lighter games like Valorant (252 FPS) and CS:GO (146 FPS) remain smooth, but the 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot sustain high frame rates in graphically intense 4K scenes. The average FPS across all games is 108.6, with a pair rank of 2404 out of 3861, confirming the GPU as the limiting factor in this pairing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with ECC capability. The PCIe Gen 5, 16-lane interface (CPU only) provides ample bandwidth for modern NVMe storage and GPUs, though the RX 7600 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so it does not saturate the Gen 5 lanes. The platform’s production status is active, and the CPU’s launch MSRP is $384.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is 450 W, which aligns with the CPU’s 125 W TDP and GPU’s 190 W TDP—a combined 315 W leaves headroom for other components. The GPU connects via a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width, measuring 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, fitting most mid-tower cases. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is backward compatible but does not leverage the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 94th percentile indicates it can drive significantly faster graphics cards. The nearest rival CPU, the Core Ultra 7 265K, is 1% lower in average score, so staying on Socket 1700 does not sacrifice CPU performance. For memory, DDR5 support allows faster speeds than DDR4, though the dual-channel bus is a constraint; users with DDR4 can reuse existing modules to save cost. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is ample, so a GPU upgrade would focus on raw compute rather than memory capacity.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The i7-14700KF is in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70163.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and average benchmark score?

A: The RX 7600 XT is in the 60th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17083.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 77, with a measured average FPS of 108.6 across all tested games.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, with the GPU’s TDP at 190 W and a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i7-14700KF supports ECC memory, along with DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-14700KF with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake refresh part at the 94th CPU percentile, while the GPU is a Navi 33 RDNA 3.0 part at the 60th GPU percentile. The combined percentile of 77 reflects a system where the processor is the standout component, capable of handling the most demanding multi-threaded workloads, while the graphics card provides solid 1080p and acceptable 1440p gaming performance, with 4K limited to esports or lighter titles. The measured data shows an average FPS of 108.6 across games, with a pair rank of 2404 out of 3861, indicating that this configuration trades peak gaming frame rates for exceptional CPU throughput. It is a balanced choice for users who need both strong productivity performance and competent gaming, but those prioritizing high-resolution gaming would benefit from a more powerful GPU.