SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

49,957 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration that balances a 20-core CPU with a 16 GB GPU. The processor, built on Raptor Lake architecture and a 10 nm process, operates with a 65 W TDP and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its 20 cores and 28 threads are supported by a 33 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 per core, which positions it for both heavily threaded productivity tasks and high-frequency gaming workloads. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 53,620 places it in the 91st percentile among all processors, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of desktop CPUs currently available.

The RTX 5070 Ti, based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, houses 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. Its 8,960 shading units, 280 tensor cores, and 70 RT cores deliver a raw FP32 performance of 43.94 TFLOPS. The graphics card’s 16 GB of GDDR7 memory across a 256-bit bus provides 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is crucial for high-resolution textures and compute-heavy workloads. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 49,957 puts it in the 86th percentile among all graphics cards. Combined, the pair achieves an 89th percentile rank across all desktop builds, with a measured average frame rate of 197.6 FPS across a broad set of games.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-14700F’s 20 cores and 28 threads are arranged in a hybrid configuration typical of Raptor Lake, with performance and efficiency cores working together to scale from lightly threaded tasks to fully parallel workloads. The base clock of 2.10 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz allow for significant single-thread speed when needed, which is reflected in the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958. For multi-threaded applications, the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 35,122 points demonstrates strong scaling, placing the CPU well ahead of many server-class alternatives.

In the Geekbench suite, the processor scores 2,429 in single-core and 19,620 in multi-core tests. These figures suggest that the CPU can handle everyday responsiveness and bursty workloads with ease while also sustaining long rendering or compilation sessions. The PassMark results reinforce this dual nature: the single-thread score of 4,257 is solid, but the multi-thread score of 41,317 and integer math score of 155,808 indicate exceptional throughput for number-crunching tasks. The floating-point math score of 107,005 further confirms its suitability for scientific simulations or financial modeling.

The data compression score of 505,885 and encryption score of 30,144 show that the CPU is proficient in data-centric workloads, making it suitable for database management or archival tasks. The extended instructions score of 28,564 highlights AVX-512 and similar capabilities, which accelerate certain professional applications. Comparing to its nearest rivals, the i7-14700F is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and 0.8% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P, while being essentially tied with the Intel Xeon 6505P (0.2% behind) and Xeon Phi 7290 (0.3% ahead). This places it in a performance tier that rivals both high-end consumer and entry-level server CPUs, meaning real-world workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering will see negligible differences between these processors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the final socket for Core 14th Gen processors. This platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more common DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits. The memory bandwidth figures are not specified, so the actual throughput depends on the chosen memory type and speed, but the dual-channel interface is standard for this class. PCIe connectivity is provided by the CPU with Gen 5 support on 16 lanes, allowing for the latest high-bandwidth SSDs and graphics cards to operate at full speed.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU is notably low for a 20-core processor, which means a capable air cooler or a modest liquid cooler will suffice for most use cases. The GPU, however, has a 300 W TDP and requires a 700 W power supply per its suggested PSU rating. This headroom is important because the system’s peak draw during gaming or rendering will be dominated by the graphics card. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, so the power supply must have that connector available or an adapter.

A sensible next upgrade path within this platform is limited because Socket 1700 does not support future generations. Users looking to improve performance would need to move to a new socket entirely, but within this build, the most impactful upgrade would be increasing memory capacity or speed, given that the CPU and GPU are already near the top of their respective performance percentiles. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that storage upgrades to the fastest NVMe drives are possible without bottlenecking, and the dual-channel memory controller provides a stable foundation for overclocking the memory, even though the CPU multiplier is locked.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the data shows exceptional performance. In Counter-Strike 2, the system achieves 308.4 FPS, and in Valorant, it reaches 534 FPS at 1080p. These numbers indicate that the CPU and GPU combination can push frame rates far beyond the refresh rates of most monitors, ensuring smooth gameplay in esports titles. The 1% low performance is not directly measured, but the average FPS figures suggest minimal CPU bottlenecks in these lighter titles.

At 1440p, the system remains highly capable for streaming and gaming simultaneously. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 146.9 FPS, which is above the threshold for high-refresh monitors, while Fortnite hits 95.7 FPS. The 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding overhead during live streaming, as the CPU can handle both the game and the encoding workload without significant frame drops. The PassMark multi-thread score of 41,317 supports this, showing that the CPU has substantial spare capacity.

Video editing workflows benefit from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122, which translates to fast export times in applications like Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 4K timelines and effects-heavy projects, as evidenced by its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,604. For 3D rendering, the CPU’s 20 cores and the GPU’s CUDA cores work together, with the FP32 performance of 43.94 TFLOPS accelerating real-time viewports and final frame renders.

Software development benefits from the high integer math score of 155,808, which accelerates code compilation and unit testing. The data encryption score of 30,144 also aids in secure development practices. For students and office work, the single-core Geekbench score of 2,429 ensures snappy application launches and document processing, while the low 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and efficient under light loads, making it a versatile machine for academic and professional tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system’s balance is evident from the measured FPS data. At 1080p, the CPU is often the limiting factor in esports titles, as seen in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with 676 FPS, where the GPU has more than enough headroom. In contrast, at 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, with games like Cyberpunk 2077 dropping to 46.6 FPS. The pairRankByFps of 287 out of 3,732 pairs places this configuration in the top 8% of all tested combinations, indicating a well-matched duo.

The percentile data shows that the CPU is in the 91st percentile, while the GPU is in the 86th percentile, meaning the CPU has slightly more relative strength. This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-FPS competitive gaming, the CPU will not hold back the GPU. However, in GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming or path-traced rendering, the GPU’s limitations will be the defining factor. The FPS scaling across resolutions illustrates this: Warzone drops from 166.7 FPS at 1080p to 127.9 FPS at 4K, a 23% reduction that is purely GPU-driven.

For productivity, the CPU’s 91st percentile rank versus the GPU’s 86th percentile means that compute tasks relying on the CPU, such as physics simulations or code compilation, will perform relatively better than GPU-accelerated tasks like machine learning inference. The PassMark physics score of 2,455 indicates that the CPU handles game physics well, so in games with heavy physics calculations, the CPU will not be the bottleneck. Overall, the system is balanced for 1440p gaming, where neither component consistently holds the other back, and for mixed workloads that alternate between CPU and GPU intensity.

GPU Analysis

The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is a 16 GB GDDR7 graphics card with a 256-bit memory bus, yielding 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This bandwidth is critical for high-resolution textures and data-intensive compute tasks. The base clock of 2295 MHz and boost clock of 2452 MHz, combined with 8,960 shading units, produce a fill rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s. The 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores are dedicated to ray tracing and AI workloads, respectively, with the tensor cores enabling DLSS and other neural rendering features.

In benchmark tests, the GPU scores 6,604 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is a DirectX 12 test that stresses both rasterization and compute. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 212,363 and Vulkan score of 225,122 show strong cross-API performance, indicating that the GPU works well in both gaming and professional applications. The PassMark G3D score of 32,974 places it in the 86th percentile, and its direct competitors include the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, which it trails by 2%, and the RX 6800 XT, which it leads by 3.1%. The GPU is also essentially tied with the RX Vega 64 (0.1% behind) and Intel Arc A550M (0.4% ahead), though these are older or lower-tier parts.

The FP32 performance of 43.94 TFLOPS is identical to the FP16 performance (1:1 ratio), which is unusual and indicates that the GPU does not have dedicated lower-precision cores, meaning it will handle FP16 workloads at the same speed as FP32. This has implications for AI training, where FP16 is often used, but the tensor cores can accelerate these operations separately. For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures and complex scenes, and the 896.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data can be fed to the shaders quickly, reducing stutter in open-world games.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is ideal for gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh monitors. The measured FPS in titles like Call of Duty: Warzone (146.9 FPS at 1440p) and Rainbow Six Siege (238 FPS at 1440p) shows that the system can drive 144Hz and 240Hz displays without compromising settings. For 4K gaming, the system is playable but not always at ultra settings and high frame rates, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077 at 46.6 FPS, so it is better suited for those who prioritize frame rate over resolution.

Content creators working with 4K video or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s 20 cores and GPU’s 16 GB VRAM to be a strong combination. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 and the GPU’s compute scores of 202,363 OpenCL and 225,122 Vulkan indicate that both rendering and export tasks will be accelerated. Software developers compiling large codebases will see benefits from the integer math score of 155,808, and the low 65 W TDP makes it a viable workstation that does not require exotic cooling.

Students and small business users will appreciate the system’s versatility. The single-core performance of 4,958 in Cinebench R23 ensures that office applications and web browsing are snappy, while the GPU can handle occasional CAD or data visualization tasks. The 16 GB GDDR7 memory is also future-proof for AI-assisted applications, as the tensor cores can accelerate features like background blur in video conferencing or local language models. For professionals in finance or data analysis, the encryption score of 30,144 and compression score of 505,885 suggest that database operations and data transfer tasks will complete quickly.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 53,620, placing it in the 91st percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6505P, scores 53,701, a difference of only 0.2%, which is within measurement noise. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X trails by 0.6%, and the EPYC 7313P by 0.8%. The CPU’s strongest results are in PassMark multi-thread (41,317) and Cinebench R23 multi-core (35,122), while its single-thread scores are also competitive, with the Geekbench single-core at 2,429.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 49,957, placing it in the 86th percentile. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, scores 50,001, a 0.1% difference, while the RX 6900 XT is 2% ahead and the RX 6800 XT is 3.1% behind. The GPU’s best result is in PassMark G3D with a score of 32,974, followed by Geekbench Vulkan at 225,122, indicating strong performance in both legacy and modern APIs.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 89, which is higher than either component individually. This suggests that the pairing is synergistic, with the CPU’s strengths complementing the GPU’s capabilities. The pairRankByFps of 287 out of 3,732 pairs means that this configuration outperforms 92% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations in terms of average FPS across games. The measured average FPS across all games is 197.6, which is a strong indicator of overall gaming performance.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop-class system featuring the Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. The CPU represents the high end of the Core 14th Gen lineup with 20 cores, while the GPU is a current-generation Blackwell part. The combined 89th percentile rank places this system in the upper tier of desktop configurations, suitable for enthusiasts and professionals who demand high performance across both gaming and productivity workloads.

The CPU’s 91st percentile and GPU’s 86th percentile show that both components are well above average, with the CPU having a slight edge in relative performance. This means that for most tasks, the system will not be bottlenecked by either component, but in GPU-heavy scenarios like 4K gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The measured FPS data confirms this, with 1080p results often exceeding 200 FPS in esports titles, while 4K results drop to 40-80 FPS in demanding AAA games.

The pairing is well-suited for a high-refresh 1440p gaming rig, a professional content creation workstation, or a developer’s daily driver. The low TDP of the CPU (65 W) makes it efficient for sustained workloads, while the GPU’s 300 W TDP requires a robust power supply, but the suggested 700 W PSU is adequate for most configurations. This is a balanced, high-performance desktop that excels in a wide range of applications, from gaming to rendering to software development.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 89, meaning this build outperforms 89% of all desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X?

A: The Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53,620, which is 0.6% higher than the Ryzen 9 7900X’s score of 53,288.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM and memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The boost clock is 5.40 GHz, and the TDP is 65 W.

Q: Is the system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The system can play 4K, but frame rates vary by title. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 127.9 FPS at 4K, while Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 46.6 FPS.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 700 W.

Q: How does the GPU’s performance compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti’s average benchmark score is 49,957, which is 2% lower than the RX 6900 XT’s score of 50,951.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, collected at ultra settings, reveals a wide range of performance across different titles and resolutions. At 1080p, the system excels in esports and lighter games, achieving 676 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and 534 FPS in Valorant. More demanding titles still perform well, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 92.9 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 82 FPS. At 1440p, the system remains very capable, with Warzone at 146.9 FPS and Fortnite at 95.7 FPS, though the most demanding games like Ark: Survival Ascended drop to 27.4 FPS.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiter. Titles like Counter-Strike 2 still achieve 113.8 FPS, and Valorant hits 470 FPS, but AAA games see significant drops. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 46.6 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 40 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 17.2 FPS. The data shows that this system is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can deliver high frame rates in most titles, while 4K gaming is playable but requires settings adjustments for the most demanding games. The measured average FPS across all games and resolutions is 197.6, confirming its strength in high-refresh scenarios. Since dataIsMeasured is true, these figures represent actual observed performance rather than estimates.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds