SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
84%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

6,270 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines the Intel Core i7-14700F, a 20-core, 28-thread desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, a 16 GB GDDR7 graphics card built on Blackwell 2.0. The CPU holds a 91st-percentile average benchmark score, while the GPU sits at the 36th percentile, and the combined build percentile is 64. The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700F uses Intel Socket 1700, which anchors the upgrade path to that platform. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so a builder can choose either memory generation, but the memory bus is dual-channel, meaning the motherboard must match one of those standards. ECC memory is also supported, which makes the platform relevant for small workstations where memory reliability matters.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself. The GPU connects through PCIe 5.0 x16, so there is no lane mismatch in this build. The CPU does not include integrated graphics — the integratedGraphics field is N/A — so a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output. That is not a problem here because the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is always present.

The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not an intended upgrade path. The base clock is 2.10 GHz and the boost clock is 5.40 GHz. With a 65 W TDP, the CPU is efficient on paper, but the GPU carries a 350 W TDP. The suggested PSU field is not provided in the data, so no exact PSU recommendation can be derived; however, the 350 W GPU envelope plus the 65 W CPU envelope makes it clear that the PSU must be sized primarily for the GPU. The GPU uses one 16-pin power connector.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU first. The CPU is at the 91st percentile, while the GPU is at the 36th percentile. Since the CPU is already strong in the benchmark pool and the GPU is not, replacing the GPU with a higher-scoring card would address the weaker link. The CPU’s locked multiplier means that upgrading to a higher-core or higher-clock CPU would require moving to a different Socket 1700 part, but no such part is specified in this data set.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming

The CPU’s single-core scores are solid: Cinebench R23 single-core 4958, Geekbench single-core 2429, and PassMark single-thread 4257. Those scores indicate strong per-thread performance, which helps in high-refresh gaming where a CPU must feed frames quickly. The GPU, however, is less dominant. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6269.5 and its percentile is 36, so at ultra settings the GPU is likely the frame-rate ceiling. High-refresh gaming is plausible, but the GPU’s mid-level percentile means the CPU can outpace it in many titles.

Streaming

Streaming benefits from parallel processing. The CPU has 20 cores and 28 threads, and its PassMark multithread score is 41,317. The PassMark data compression score is 505,885, and the data encryption score is 30,144. These numbers suggest that the CPU can handle encoding and compression tasks while other workloads run. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 also provide enough raw compute for simultaneous gaming and encoding, though no encoder-specific hardware data is included in this pack.

Video Editing

Video editing is a mixed workload. The CPU’s multi-core strength shows in Cinebench R23 multi-core 35,122 and Geekbench multi-core 19,620. The GPU adds 16 GB GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, which helps when handling large video buffers. The GPU’s 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores also support accelerated effects and AI-assisted tools. However, the GPU’s 36th percentile means the render preview and export stages may not be as strong as the CPU portion.

3D Rendering

For CPU-based rendering, the i7-14700F is well positioned. The Cinebench R23 multi score of 35,122 and Cinebench R20 multi score of 14,751 place it near the top of the CPU distribution. For GPU rendering, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,269.5 and 43.94 TFLOPS FP32. That is a capable GPU, but it is not a top-tier renderer. The CPU is more dominant in this pairing than the GPU.

Software Development

Compilation and code analysis often use many threads. The CPU’s 28 threads and PassMark integer math score of 155,808 provide strong performance. The PassMark data compression score of 505,885 and data encryption score of 30,144 also help with large repositories and package management. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is enough for GPU-based debugging or local inference, but the CPU is the more decisive component for typical developer workloads.

Student and Office Work

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, so the system does not need extreme cooling or a huge PSU. However, because the CPU has no integrated graphics, the GPU must always be active. For office tasks and web use, the CPU’s single-core PassMark score of 4,257 is ample. The ECC memory support also makes the platform attractive for small workstations where memory errors are a concern. The GPU is overkill for spreadsheets and documents, but it does not prevent the system from running those tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a Raptor Lake Refresh part, architecture Raptor Lake, with a 10 nm process node from Intel. It has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The die measures 257 mm². Cache is organized as 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is enabled.

The benchmark data shows a wide range of multicore performance. Cinebench R15 multi scores 3,540, Cinebench R20 multi 14,751, and Cinebench R23 multi 35,122. Geekbench multi reaches 19,620, and PassMark multithread reaches 41,317. These are strong numbers for a 65 W desktop CPU. Single-core results are also strong: Cinebench R15 single 499, R20 single 2,082, R23 single 4,958, Geekbench single 2,429, and PassMark single-thread 4,257.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 53,620, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show how close the top field is. The Intel Xeon 6505P has an average score of 53,701, which is 0.2% higher than the i7-14700F. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 has 53,469, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has 53,288, which is 0.6% lower. The AMD EPYC 7313P has 53,206, which is 0.8% lower. The CPU launch MSRP is $359.

The PassMark sub-scores also reveal workload character. Data compression scores 505,885, data encryption scores 30,144, and extended instructions scores 28,564. Floating point math scores 107,005, integer math scores 155,808, and random string sorting scores 55,918. Prime number finding scores 176, and physics scores 2,455. These numbers suggest a balanced high-throughput CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is the stronger component. It sits at the 91st percentile, while the GPU sits at the 36th percentile. The combined percentile is 64. In CPU-bound workloads such as code compilation, data compression, and video encoding, the CPU is not the bottleneck. The GPU is far below the CPU in percentile, so in GPU-bound workloads such as high-resolution rendering or ultra-settings gaming, the GPU will limit the frame rate.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 6,270, and it is exactly tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which also averages 6,270. The GPU is 0.2% behind the Quadro K620 (6,282), 0.8% ahead of the AMD FirePro W600 (6,223), and 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon R7 M350 (6,327). This is a narrow band. The CPU is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and 0.8% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P. The difference between CPU and GPU percentile is 55 points, which is large.

Because there is no measured FPS scaling data, the bottleneck conclusion comes from the percentile gap and the score differences. The CPU has enough multicore headroom to feed a faster GPU, but the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,269.5 is not high enough to keep up with the CPU’s top-tier processing potential in every game.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 53,620, with a percentile of 91. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 6,270, with a percentile of 36. The combined percentile is 64. The CPU’s nearest rival table shows a tight pack: the Intel Xeon 6505P is 0.2% higher, the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 is 0.3% lower, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is 0.6% lower, and the AMD EPYC 7313P is 0.8% lower. The CPU is clearly at the edge of a four-way near-tie at the 91st percentile.

The GPU’s nearest rival table shows a similar tight grouping, but at a much lower percentile. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD has an identical score of 6,270, the Quadro K620 is 0.2% higher, the AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8% lower, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 is 0.9% higher. The GPU’s Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6,269.5, which is essentially the same as its average.

The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a high-tier desktop processor, while the GPU is a mid-tier card. The build overall is at the 64th percentile, not higher, because the GPU drags the CPU down. The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads deliver top-tier multicore, but the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 6,270 Steel Nomad score are not in the same league as the CPU’s 91st percentile.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who want a very strong CPU and only a mid-tier GPU. Gamers who play at high refresh rates with medium settings will see the CPU handle frame pacing well, but the GPU will limit ultra settings. The CPU’s single-core scores and 91st percentile make it a good base for gaming, but the GPU’s 36th percentile means it is not a top-tier 4K GPU.

Content creators who rely on CPU-heavy workloads will benefit. Video editing, 3D rendering, and software development all use the 20-core, 28-thread CPU and its high multicore scores. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM helps with large textures, but the CPU is the real selling point.

Software developers and students with code compile workloads will appreciate the high integer math score and data compression score. Small business workstations that need ECC memory support will find the platform interesting. The CPU supports ECC, which is not common in consumer desktop CPUs.

Office users who only need web browsing and spreadsheets should not buy this build. The CPU is extremely strong, but the GPU is unnecessary for that workload. The build is better for users who need CPU computation and can tolerate a mid-tier GPU.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i7-14700F use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Does the i7-14700F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is N/A, so a discrete GPU is required.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus and ECC memory support.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked?

A: No, multiplierUnlocked is false, so the CPU is not designed for overclocking.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER have?

A: It has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What APIs does the GPU support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this exact combination.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-14700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake Refresh processor with a 91st-percentile average score. The GPU is a 16 GB GDDR7 Blackwell 2.0 card with a 36th-percentile score. The combined percentile is 64, meaning the overall build sits in the middle-high region, but the GPU lowers the total.

The CPU launch MSRP is $359, and the GPU launch MSRP is 749 USD. The CPU uses a 65 W TDP, the GPU uses a 350 W TDP, and the GPU requires a 1x 16-pin power connector. The CPU and GPU are both active production parts. The CPU release date is 2024-01-07, and the GPU release date is 2025-12-31.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a GeForce 50-series GPU based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The chip is GB203, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The transistor density is 120.6 million per mm². The base clock is 2295 MHz, the boost clock is 2452 MHz, and the memory clock is 1750 MHz, which is 28 Gbps effective.

The GPU has 8,960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 235.4 GPixel/s, texture rate is 686.6 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 43.94 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is also 43.94 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The memory is 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The card uses a 350 W TDP, is dual-slot, and has one 16-pin power connector. It connects via PCIe 5.0 x16 and has 1 HDMI 2.1b and 3 DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6,269.5, and its average benchmark score is 6,270. It is at the 36th percentile. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD, which has an identical average score of 6,270. The Quadro K620 is 0.2% higher, the AMD FirePro W600 is 0.8% lower, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 is 0.9% higher. This shows the GPU is not far from some low-end cards in this particular benchmark, though the Steel Nomad test is likely not the best measure for all rendering tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-core scores are strong, with Cinebench R23 single 4,958, Geekbench single 2,429, and PassMark single-thread 4,257. These scores suggest that the CPU can produce high frames in CPU-bound games.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,269.5 and 36th percentile suggest that at ultra settings, the GPU will be the limiting factor. In games that are not GPU-heavy, the CPU may still allow high frame rates, but the GPU will cap the absolute frame rate in graphically intense scenes. For high-refresh gaming, the CPU is not the problem; the GPU is the weaker link. Since there is no measured FPS data, these are estimates from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not measured results.