SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration built around a 20-core Raptor Lake processor and an Ampere-architecture GPU. The combined percentile rank of 80 places this system firmly in the upper tier of all benchmarked configurations, with the CPU alone outperforming 91 percent of all processors tested.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the GA102 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, packing 28,300 million transistors onto a 628 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1440 MHz and a boost clock of 1710 MHz, paired with 10 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 320-bit bus. Memory runs at 1188 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed, yielding a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s — a figure that explains why this card sustains high frame rates at 1440p and remains competitive at 4K in less demanding titles.

The RTX 3080's compute resources include 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operations pipelines. Ray tracing hardware comprises 68 RT cores, while 272 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated workloads. The card delivers 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and matches that with 29.77 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1), indicating strong compute capability for both gaming and creative applications. Pixel rate reaches 164.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate hits 465.1 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show the GPU scoring 25086 in Passmark G3D, with a Passmark GPU compute score of 14397. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card achieves 4407 points. Geekbench results show 152423 in OpenCL and 33620 in Vulkan. The GPU sits at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23172. Rival comparisons show a tight cluster: NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249 (0.3 percent lower), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250 (0.3 percent lower), AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273 (0.4 percent lower), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276 (0.4 percent lower). The RTX 3080 essentially ties these cards in raw average score, though its real-world gaming performance in the measured FPS data shows far greater capability, particularly at higher resolutions.

For rendering, the combination of 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores means the card handles DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) workloads with hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS-capable tensor operations. The 760.3 GB/s bandwidth proves sufficient for high-resolution texture streaming, as evidenced by playable frame rates in demanding titles.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The FPS data reveals a system that scales predictably across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average frame rate across all measured games is 159.7 FPS, placing this pair at rank 991 out of 3861 pairs. The CPU's strength at lower resolutions is evident in titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, which hits 540 FPS at 1080p, 368.5 FPS at 1440p, and 219.3 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a 59 percent drop, indicating that at 1080p the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in esports titles.

In contrast, GPU-bound scenarios show steeper performance cliffs. Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 71.7 FPS at 1080p to 52.2 FPS at 1440p and 33.6 FPS at 4K — a 53 percent reduction from 1080p to 4K. Red Dead Redemption 2 follows a similar pattern: 65 FPS at 1080p, 49 FPS at 1440p, 32 FPS at 4K. The RTX 3080's 10 GB VRAM buffer allows these titles to run without memory-related stutters at 1440p, but the 4K results show clear GPU limitations in the most demanding titles.

The CPU's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 68th percentile indicates the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. This imbalance manifests in lighter games like Valorant, which reaches 533.2 FPS at 1080p and still manages 377.7 FPS at 4K. The 14700F's single-thread performance of 4958 in Cinebench R23 single-core helps drive these high frame rates, while the GPU becomes the bottleneck only when pixel throughput demands exceed its 164.2 GPixel/s fill rate.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-14700F brings 20 cores and 28 threads to the desktop platform, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. The die measures 257 mm², and the chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. ECC memory support is included, which broadens its appeal for workstation tasks. The processor runs at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boosts to 5.40 GHz, though it is not multiplier-unlocked. The 65 W TDP reflects Intel's efficiency focus for this non-K variant.

Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes from the processor, enabling fast GPU and NVMe connectivity. Integrated graphics are absent, requiring a discrete GPU — which this build has in the form of the RTX 3080.

Benchmark results demonstrate strong multi-threaded capability. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 35122, while single-core reaches 4958. Cinebench R20 shows 14751 multicore and 2082 single-core, with R15 at 3540 and 499 respectively. Geekbench results show 19620 multicore and 2429 single-core. Passmark tests reveal specific strengths: multithread score of 41317, integer math at 155808, floating point math at 107005, and data compression at 505885. Data encryption scores 30144, extended instructions hit 28564, and random string sorting reaches 55918. Single-thread performance in Passmark is 4257.

The average benchmark score of 53620 places this CPU at the 91st percentile. Nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6505P at 53701 (0.2 percent faster), Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 53469 (0.3 percent slower), AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 53288 (0.6 percent slower), and AMD EPYC 7313P at 53206 (0.8 percent slower). The 14700F essentially matches a Xeon workstation chip in average score, which underscores its suitability for multi-threaded productivity.

For real workloads, the 33 MB L3 cache and 28 threads handle compilation, rendering, and simulation tasks effectively. The 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded response in applications that rely on one or two cores.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh-rate monitors represent the primary audience. The measured FPS data shows 147 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone at 2560x1440, 160.9 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, and 189.2 FPS in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X at the same resolution. These figures exceed 144 Hz refresh rates, making this build ideal for competitive and action titles at 1440p.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 and the GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The Passmark GPU compute score of 14397 supports GPU-accelerated rendering workflows, while the CPU's data compression score of 505885 aids in archival and asset management tasks.

Software developers will find the 28 threads and 19620 Geekbench multicore score useful for parallel compilation. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes. Students in engineering or computer science programs can run virtual machines and compile code without performance constraints, though the 65 W TDP CPU paired with a 320 W GPU requires a proper desktop setup.

Small business workstations benefit from the CPU's 91st percentile ranking and the GPU's compute capability. The 14700F's Passmark integer math score of 155808 handles database operations, while the RTX 3080's tensor cores accelerate AI inference tasks. The lack of integrated graphics means every display output comes from the discrete GPU, which supports 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1920x1080, the system delivers 243.9 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 533.2 FPS in Valorant, easily saturating 240 Hz panels. At 2560x1440, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X hits 189.2 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone reaches 147 FPS, keeping gameplay above 144 Hz in competitive shooters.

Streaming: The 14700F's 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 41317 ensures simultaneous game and stream encoding tasks proceed without contention, while the GPU's 272 tensor cores can handle AI-based stream enhancements.

Video editing: The GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding. The 760.3 GB/s memory bandwidth moves large video frames quickly between GPU and VRAM.

3D rendering: The 68 RT cores deliver hardware ray tracing in DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads. Cinebench R20 multicore score of 14751 indicates strong CPU-based rendering for scenes that cannot use GPU acceleration. The 10 GB GDDR6X VRAM allows moderately complex scenes to reside fully in GPU memory.

Software development: The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2429 ensures responsive IDE interactions, while the multicore score of 19620 speeds up unit test suites and build pipelines. The 33 MB L3 cache improves locality for frequently accessed code modules.

Student and office work: The 14700F's single-thread Passmark score of 4257 handles spreadsheet recalculation and document processing with ease. The system's 80th combined percentile means it outperforms most office machines, though the 320 W GPU power draw makes it a heavier solution than typical productivity desktops.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform centers on Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. Memory options include both DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel configuration. Users building fresh can choose DDR5 for future relevance, while those upgrading from older 12th or 13th gen systems can retain DDR4 modules. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and the RTX 3080's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface operates without bandwidth constraints.

Power requirements show a 65 W TDP for the CPU and 320 W for the GPU, with a suggested PSU of 700 W. This leaves reasonable headroom for system fans, storage, and modest overclocking of the GPU. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is limited to the GPU and memory.

A sensible next upgrade depends on workload. For gaming, replacing the RTX 3080 with a newer GPU would address the 68th percentile GPU ranking, which is the system's weaker component. The CPU's 91st percentile means it can support a faster GPU without becoming a bottleneck. For productivity, the 14700F's 20 cores already rival Xeon-class processors, so additional RAM capacity or faster DDR5 memory would yield greater benefits than a CPU swap.

The RTX 3080 uses a 1x 12-pin power connector, which may require an adapter for older PSUs. The dual-slot design measuring 285 mm in length fits most mid-tower cases, but users should verify clearance. The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor, meaning availability will decline over time.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 53620, placing it at the 91st percentile among all processors. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 35122 and single-core at 4958, Geekbench multicore at 19620 and single-core at 2429, and Passmark multithread at 41317. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6505P, scores 53701, which is 0.2 percent higher — a negligible difference that puts the 14700F in workstation-class territory.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 23172, placing it at the 68th percentile. Passmark G3D scores 25086, while GPU compute reaches 14397. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 4407. Geekbench OpenCL results show 152423, with Vulkan at 33620. The nearest rival, NVIDIA P106-100, scores 23249, just 0.3 percent higher, indicating the RTX 3080 sits at the top of a tightly packed cluster of comparable GPUs.

The combined percentile is 80, reflecting the CPU's strength offsetting the GPU's mid-tier ranking. Measured FPS across all games averages 159.7 at 1080p, with this pair ranking 991 out of 3861 tested pairs. The average frame rate places this configuration in the top 26 percent of all tested CPU-GPU pairs by gaming performance.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-14700F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The CPU ranks at the 91st percentile, placing it among the top processors available, while the GPU ranks at the 68th percentile. The combined percentile of 80 positions this system in the upper quintile of all benchmarked configurations.

The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads, with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, deliver workstation-level multi-threaded performance. The GPU's 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide solid 1440p gaming and capable 4K performance in less demanding titles. The 65 W CPU TDP paired with the 320 W GPU TDP creates a power profile that requires a 700 W PSU, making this a mid-to-high-power desktop build.

The 14700F's launch MSRP is $359, and the RTX 3080's launch MSRP is 699 USD. The system excels in 1440p gaming, with measured frame rates above 144 FPS in major esports titles and above 60 FPS in most AAA games at that resolution. At 4K, performance varies widely: 125 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, 89.7 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, but only 33.6 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i7-14700F compare to its nearest rivals in CPU benchmarks?

A: The 14700F scores 53620 on average, ranking at the 91st percentile. It is 0.2 percent slower than the Intel Xeon 6505P (53701), 0.3 percent faster than the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53469), 0.6 percent faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53288), and 0.8 percent faster than the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206).

Q: What is the RTX 3080's performance tier relative to other GPUs?

A: The GPU holds the 68th percentile with an average benchmark score of 23172. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA P106-100, scores 23249, which is 0.3 percent higher. The AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276, also 0.4 percent higher.

Q: What frame rates can this system achieve in competitive shooters at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Counter-Strike 2 reaches 160.9 FPS, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X hits 189.2 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 147 FPS. Valorant achieves 472.9 FPS at this resolution.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core i7-14700F supports ECC memory. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in memory choice.

Q: What is the power draw for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 320 W TDP. The suggested PSU for this configuration is 700 W, which provides adequate headroom for the system.

Q: How does the system perform in 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160, Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 125 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 at 89.7 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 60.9 FPS. More demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 33.6 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 to 32 FPS.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 still in production?

A: No, the RTX 3080 is end-of-life. Its predecessor was the GeForce 20 series, and its successor is the GeForce 40 series. The card uses a 1x 12-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot width.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds