SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER form a desktop pairing that sits in a peculiar position within the benchmark database. The CPU is a strong performer, ranking in the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU’s single 3DMark Steel Nomad score places it in just the 18th percentile among all graphics cards. This combination yields a combined percentile of 55, indicating a system that is heavily tilted toward processor-bound tasks. The data shows a clear mismatch in raw capability: the i7-14700F is a high-end 20-core workhorse, while the RTX 5070 SUPER, based on its benchmark results, appears to be a modest performer relative to the broader GPU landscape. This analysis walks through the implications of that imbalance, using only the scores and specifications available in the fact pack.

Balance and Bottleneck

The first and most obvious observation from the benchmark data is that this system is CPU-dominant. The i7-14700F achieves an average benchmark score of 53,620, which places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6505P (average score 53,701, delta of -0.2%), the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53,469, +0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53,288, +0.6%), and the AMD EPYC 7313P (53,206, +0.8%). These are all high-end server or enthusiast-class processors, confirming that the i7-14700F is operating at the upper echelon of CPU performance. In contrast, the RTX 5070 SUPER’s only benchmark score is 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2,664, +1%), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2,662, +1.1%), the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2,660, +1.1%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (2,645, +1.7%). These are entry-level or older graphics solutions, suggesting the GPU is far below the CPU’s tier.

In CPU-bound workloads—such as data compression, encryption, or multi-threaded rendering—the i7-14700F will not be the limiting factor. The PassMark multi-thread score of 41,317 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 indicate substantial parallel throughput. For example, the CPU’s PassMark data compression score is 505,885, and its integer math score is 155,808, both figures that point to rapid processing of large datasets. In these scenarios, the GPU’s lower standing becomes irrelevant because the workload does not engage the graphics card.

However, in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering with ray tracing, the RTX 5070 SUPER becomes the bottleneck. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,690, relative to rivals like the GT 1030, suggests that this GPU is not designed for high-end graphics workloads. The fact that the GPU’s nearest rivals are all significantly older or lower-tier models means the graphics card will likely cap frame rates or render times well before the CPU is stressed. The data indicates a system where the CPU has headroom to spare, but the GPU will struggle to keep up in graphics-intensive applications.

The combined percentile of 55 reflects this imbalance: the system is neither a top-tier gaming rig nor a budget office machine, but rather a configuration where the processor vastly outperforms the graphics card. This is a classic case of a CPU-bound build, where any upgrade to the GPU would yield larger performance gains than further CPU improvements.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5070 SUPER’s 3DMark score of 2,690, which is only about 1% above the GT 1030’s 2,662, indicates that this GPU is not suited for high-refresh gaming. The i7-14700F’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958) would not compensate for the GPU’s limitations in rendering frames. Expect low to medium settings at best for modern titles, with frame rates far below what high-refresh monitors require.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and 28 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The PassMark multithread score of 41,317 and the floating point math score of 107,005 suggest that the i7-14700F can handle video encoding tasks without stuttering. However, the GPU’s weak performance would still bottleneck game rendering, leading to a poor streaming experience in graphically demanding games.

Video editing: The CPU excels here. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 19,620 indicate fast rendering and export times for video projects. The GPU’s 18 GB of VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth could assist with effects and previews, but its low benchmark standing means GPU-accelerated effects may not perform well. The overall system is better suited for CPU-heavy editing workflows.

3D rendering: The i7-14700F’s multi-core scores are the standout feature. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14,751 and the PassMark floating point score of 107,005 point to solid performance in CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU’s 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a theoretical figure, but its actual benchmark score of 2,690 suggests that GPU-accelerated rendering would be underwhelming. This is a CPU-first rendering machine.

Software development: The CPU’s high multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 35,122) speeds up compilation times, while its single-core score of 4,958 ensures responsive IDE interactions. The PassMark data encryption score of 30,144 indicates decent cryptography performance for secure development tasks. The GPU’s limitations are less relevant here, making this a strong build for developers.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical office tasks. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,257 (PassMark) and 2,429 (Geekbench) handle word processing and spreadsheets effortlessly. The GPU’s low performance is irrelevant for 2D applications. However, the system’s power draw (CPU TDP of 65 W and GPU TDP of 275 W) and size make it less practical for a basic student setup, though it would handle any academic workload with ease.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows a consistent pattern of high performance. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 3,540 and the single-core score is 499. Moving to R20, the multi-core score rises to 14,751 and single-core to 2,082. In R23, the multi-core score reaches 35,122, while single-core is 4,958. Geekbench results are similarly strong: multi-core at 19,620 and single-core at 2,429. PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: multithread score of 41,317, integer math of 155,808, floating point math of 107,005, and data compression of 505,885. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 53,620 places it in the 91st percentile, with nearest rivals all within 0.8% of its score, indicating it is tightly grouped with top-tier server chips like the EPYC 7313P.

The GPU’s benchmark data is far more limited, containing only one score: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2,690. This places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Quadro K1100M (2,664, +1%), GT 1030 (2,662, +1.1%), Arc Pro B50 (2,660, +1.1%), and GT 440 (2,645, +1.7%). The fact that the RTX 5070 SUPER is only 1.7% faster than a GT 440—a card from the early 2010s—is a striking indicator of its low standing. The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms 91% of all processors and a GPU that outperforms only 18% of all graphics cards, yielding a combined percentile of 55.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU-centric workloads over graphics performance. Gamers at 1080p with low graphical settings might find the system usable, but the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking means it will not handle modern titles at high settings or high resolutions. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications—such as video encoding, 3D modeling with CPU renderers, or data analysis—would benefit from the i7-14700F’s 91st percentile standing. Developers compiling large codebases or running virtual machines would appreciate the 20 cores and 28 threads. Students in engineering or computer science fields would find the CPU power useful for simulations, but the GPU adds little value for their needs. Small business workstations that rely on multi-threaded office applications, database processing, or financial modeling would see strong performance from the CPU, though the GPU would be wasted in such a context. The system is not suitable for users seeking a balanced gaming or graphics workstation, given the GPU’s low benchmark position.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and is built on a 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.10 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The TDP is 65 W, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The CPU has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU. It was released in January 2024 with a launch MSRP of $359.

Benchmark results show the CPU’s strength in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 is a substantial figure, indicative of strong parallel processing. The PassMark multithread score of 41,317 and the integer math score of 155,808 further confirm this. Single-thread performance is also respectable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,257. The data suggests that the i7-14700F is well-suited for tasks like video rendering, scientific computing, and heavy multitasking, where its 20 cores can be fully utilized. The 65 W TDP is relatively low for a processor with this core count, making it an efficient choice for sustained workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,620.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER ranks in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, based on its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,690.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X?

A: The i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53,620, which is 0.6% higher than the Ryzen 9 7900X’s score of 53,288.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the i7-14700F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The i7-14700F has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has an FP32 performance of 32.15 TFLOPS, with a texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The chip, designated GB205, has 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It includes 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores. The base clock is 2,325 MHz, with a boost clock of 2,512 MHz. Memory is 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, providing 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has a TDP of 275 W and requires a 16-pin power connector. It supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and outputs via 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The card is dual-slot, measuring 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

The only benchmark score available is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2,690, which places it in the 18th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M, scores 2,664, a 1% difference. The GT 1030 scores 2,662, and the GT 440 scores 2,645, meaning the RTX 5070 SUPER is only 1.7% faster than a card released over a decade earlier. This suggests that despite its modern architecture and large VRAM pool, the GPU’s actual rendering performance is severely limited. The 18 GB of VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are high-end specifications, but they do not translate into competitive benchmark results. For rendering tasks, the CPU’s multi-core scores would likely dominate, with the GPU contributing little beyond basic display output.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i7-14700F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The system’s power requirements are modest on the CPU side, with a TDP of 65 W, but the GPU has a TDP of 275 W, necessitating a power supply with sufficient headroom. The fact pack does not list a suggested PSU wattage, so users should ensure their PSU can handle the GPU’s 275 W draw plus the CPU’s 65 W, along with other components.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-performing model, as the CPU has significant headroom to support a more powerful graphics card. The i7-14700F’s 91st percentile ranking means it is not the bottleneck in most workloads, so a GPU upgrade would yield immediate gains in graphics-bound tasks. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so newer GPUs would not be limited by the interface. Memory upgrades are also possible, given the support for both DDR4 and DDR5, though the choice of memory type is fixed by the motherboard. Given the CPU’s 65 W TDP, there is no need for a high-end cooling solution, and the platform’s active production status ensures ongoing driver and BIOS support.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-14700F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The CPU is a high-end performer, ranking in the 91st percentile of all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 18th percentile of all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 55 places this system in the middle of the database, reflecting the stark contrast between the two components. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 53,620 is comparable to server-grade chips like the Intel Xeon 6505P, while the GPU’s score of 2,690 is comparable to entry-level cards like the GT 1030. This is a processor-first build, where the CPU’s capabilities are far ahead of the GPU’s. The system is best described as a high-performance workstation CPU paired with a low-end graphics card, suitable for CPU-bound tasks but ill-equipped for demanding graphics workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination; the fact pack contains no entries in the measuredFpsUltraByGame field. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,690, which is only 1.1% above the GT 1030, suggests that gaming performance would be very low. At 1080p with ultra settings, modern games would likely run at low frame rates, possibly below playable thresholds. The CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 4,958) would prevent CPU bottlenecks, but the GPU would be the limiting factor. At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s weaknesses would be even more pronounced, as the rendering load increases. Given that the GPU ranks in the 18th percentile, this system is not recommended for gaming beyond casual or esports titles with low graphical demands. The estimates suggest that users should expect frame rates far below what a high-refresh monitor requires, and upgrading the GPU should be a priority for any gaming use case.