SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700F + Intel Arc A750: A Desktop Pairing with Asymmetric Strengths

The Intel Core i7-14700F and Intel Arc A750 form a desktop build that pairs a high-end 20-core CPU with a mid-range graphics card, creating a system where the processor vastly outperforms the GPU in raw benchmark terms. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 79 for this pairing. This asymmetry suggests a machine built for CPU-heavy productivity workloads, with gaming performance that is respectable but not flagship-tier, and the data indicates that the processor will frequently be the component waiting on the graphics card rather than the reverse.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i7-14700F?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620. It is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6505P (53701), 0.3% ahead of the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53469), 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53288), and 0.8% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206).

Q: What is the memory configuration and capacity of the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Intel Arc A750 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and its closest rival?

A: The Arc A750 is at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. Its closest rival is the Intel Arc B570, which has an average score of 20556 compared to the A750's 20582, a difference of 0.1%.

Q: Does this build have measured gaming FPS data available?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The data is not measured; therefore, all gaming performance discussion must be treated as an estimate derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the suggested PSU for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested power supply of 550 W.

Q: What PCIe generations do the CPU and GPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-14700F delivers a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 35122, which places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, a position that reflects its 20-core, 28-thread configuration. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4958 is less dominant but still strong, indicating that the CPU handles both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads with competence. In Geekbench, the CPU scores 19620 multi-core and 2429 single-core, reinforcing the same pattern of high throughput with solid per-core performance. The PassMark multithread score of 41317 further corroborates the CPU's strength in parallel tasks, while the single-thread score of 4257 shows it is not a slouch in single-threaded applications either. The data reveals a processor that is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X in average benchmark score, a close margin that suggests the two are near-peers in overall performance, though the Intel chip uses more cores to achieve this parity.

The Intel Arc A750, in contrast, posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612, which corresponds to a 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its PassMark G3D score of 12534 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 indicate a mid-range graphics solution. The GPU's nearest rival is the Intel Arc B570, which trails by only 0.1% in average score, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is 0.2% behind, suggesting the A750 sits in a competitive but not dominant position within its class. The combined picture is one of a lopsided pairing: the CPU is in the top 9% of all processors, while the GPU is only in the top 34% of all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 79 for this build reflects this gap, meaning that in most workloads, the GPU will be the primary constraint on system performance, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build can drive frame rates at 1080p or 1440p, but the GPU's 66th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle to maintain very high frame rates at 4K or with maximum settings in demanding titles. The CPU's 91st percentile ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, as the processor has ample headroom to feed frames to the graphics card.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's 28 threads, which can handle encoding and simultaneous gameplay without significant performance degradation. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 indicates that the CPU can manage the overhead of streaming software while maintaining game performance, though the GPU's mid-range position means the overall streaming quality may be limited by graphics rendering rather than encoding.

Video editing is a strong suit for this pairing, as the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R20 (14751) and PassMark multithread (41317) translates to fast rendering and export times in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate support for GPU-accelerated effects, but the 66th percentile ranking means complex timelines with heavy effects may see slowdowns.

3D rendering workloads, such as Blender or Maya, will be dominated by the CPU's 20 cores, with the PassMark floating-point math score of 107005 indicating strong compute throughput. The GPU's compute capabilities, evidenced by a PassMark GPU compute score of 5368, can assist in rendering, but the CPU will be the primary driver of performance, making this build suitable for CPU-based renderers rather than GPU-accelerated ones.

Software development benefits from the CPU's high single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2429) for compilation and code editing, while the multi-core score (19620) speeds up build times for large projects. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and basic graphical debugging, but developers working on graphics-intensive applications may find the GPU limiting.

For student and office work, this build is overwhelmingly overqualified. The CPU's performance in PassMark data compression (505885) and encryption (30144) ensures rapid file handling and secure data processing, while the GPU easily handles office applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing. However, the power requirements and desktop form factor make this a less portable option compared to laptops, and the TDP of 65 W for the CPU plus 225 W for the GPU means a 550 W PSU is necessary.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The Intel Arc A750's 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it can deliver playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most games, but it will not be competitive at 4K with ultra settings. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 places the GPU in a performance tier comparable to the Intel Arc B570 (0.1% difference) and slightly ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.2% difference), indicating it should handle esports titles and older AAA games well at high settings. For modern AAA games, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256-bit memory bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p ultra or 1440p high settings, but frame rates will likely dip below 60 FPS in the most demanding scenes. The CPU's high single-thread performance (4958 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that even if the GPU cannot maintain high frame rates, the processor will not be the limiting factor. Gamers should expect a smooth experience at 1080p with high settings, with occasional drops in heavy scenes, while 1440p gaming will require settings adjustments to maintain consistent frame rates.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component in this build for most workloads. The CPU's 91st percentile versus the GPU's 66th percentile creates a situation where the processor is waiting for the graphics card to finish rendering frames in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. In gaming, this means that the i7-14700F could easily drive a much more powerful GPU, as evidenced by its high single-thread score of 4958 in Cinebench R23, which is more than sufficient for feeding frames to the A750. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 is the primary constraint on frame rates, and upgrading the GPU would yield immediate performance gains without requiring a CPU change. Conversely, in CPU-heavy workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU becomes the dominant component, and the GPU's role is secondary. The PassMark multithread score of 41317 for the CPU versus the GPU compute score of 5368 shows that the processor handles most compute tasks far faster than the graphics card. A bottleneck analysis of the FPS scaling from the benchmark scores suggests that in gaming, the GPU will be at 100% utilization while the CPU sits at perhaps 40-50%, but in productivity tasks, the CPU will be fully utilized while the GPU remains mostly idle. This asymmetry means the build is well-balanced for CPU-intensive work but unbalanced for gaming, where the GPU is the clear weak point.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for content creators and professionals who prioritize CPU performance for rendering, video editing, and software development. The CPU's 20 cores and 28 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122, make it a powerhouse for video editors using Premiere Pro or After Effects, where the CPU handles most of the heavy lifting. 3D artists working with CPU-based renderers like V-Ray or Arnold will see exceptional performance, as the PassMark floating-point score of 107005 indicates strong compute throughput. Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times from the multi-core score of 19620 in Geekbench, while the high single-thread score of 2429 ensures responsive IDEs. Students and small business users will find this build overkill for basic office tasks, but it offers headroom for future workloads or multitasking. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this a capable system, particularly for esports titles that are less GPU-intensive, but those seeking 1440p or 4K gaming should consider a more powerful GPU. The build is not suited for high-end gaming at 4K, as the GPU's 66th percentile ranking will struggle with modern AAA titles at that resolution, but it is an excellent choice for a workstation that can also handle casual gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in memory choice. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, providing ample bandwidth for future GPUs or NVMe storage devices. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the current GPU does not fully utilize the available bandwidth. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is modest for a 20-core processor, and the GPU has a TDP of 225 W with a suggested PSU of 550 W, leaving some headroom for upgrades. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Intel Arc A750 with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom to support a higher-tier graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking indicates it will remain relevant for several years, and its support for DDR5 memory allows for future memory upgrades. The GPU's end-of-life production status as an "Alchemist" generation part suggests that an upgrade to a newer architecture (like the successor "Battlemage") would provide better performance and driver maturity. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a future GPU upgrade will not be limited by the bus interface, and the 550 W PSU recommendation provides sufficient power for a moderate GPU upgrade, though a more powerful GPU would require a PSU upgrade.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs the Intel Core i7-14700F, a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with the Intel Arc A750, an 8 GB GDDR6 graphics card from the Alchemist generation. The combined percentile of 79 places this build in the upper-mid range of all desktop configurations, with the CPU at 91% and the GPU at 66% of all respective components. The pairing is characterized by a significant performance disparity: the CPU is a top-tier processor that rivals server-class chips like the Intel Xeon 6505P (within 0.2%), while the GPU is a mid-range card that competes with the Intel Arc B570 (within 0.1%) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (within 0.2%). This is a build that excels in CPU-bound workloads, such as video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, but is less impressive in GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming. The overall tier of this build is that of a professional workstation with gaming capabilities, rather than a dedicated gaming rig. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking ensures that the processor will not be a limiting factor for years to come, while the GPU's 66th percentile ranking is the primary weakness of the system.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W, making it relatively power-efficient for its core count. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample fast memory for data-intensive workloads. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation use where data integrity is critical. In benchmark tests, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and a single-core score of 4958, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The PassMark multithread score of 41317 and integer math score of 155808 indicate exceptional performance in parallel computing tasks, while the data compression score of 505885 and encryption score of 30144 suggest strong performance in file handling and security applications. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, is 0.6% behind in average score, showing that the i7-14700F is competitive with the best consumer processors, despite using a higher core count to achieve this performance. The CPU's 28 threads make it particularly well-suited for heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing, where the multi-core scores translate directly to faster completion times.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is a graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, which is generous for its class. The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units, along with 28 ray tracing cores, providing hardware support for ray-traced lighting effects. The base clock is 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and the memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. In benchmark tests, the GPU achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and a PassMark G3D score of 12534, placing it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 indicate solid compute performance, while the PassMark GPU compute score of 5368 shows the GPU can handle general-purpose compute tasks. The GPU's nearest rival is the Intel Arc B570, which is 0.1% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which is 0.2% behind, indicating that the A750 sits in a competitive mid-range segment. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 550 W PSU, with power delivered via a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin connector. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, supporting modern high-refresh monitors. The GPU's production status is end-of-life, with the successor being Battlemage, which suggests that driver optimization may be limited going forward. The data shows that the GPU is a capable mid-range card for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but its 66th percentile ranking means it will not compete with high-end GPUs in demanding scenarios.