SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-14700F + Intel Arc A380E: A Desktop Pairing Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F and Intel Arc A380E form an unusual desktop pairing, combining a high-end 20-core CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU. The benchmark data reveals a system with broad computational strength but limited graphics throughput, placing the overall combination at the 71st percentile for all desktop builds. This analysis interprets the available CPU benchmark scores and GPU specifications to project real-world behavior, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. The die measures 257 mm² and houses a hybrid configuration of performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core distribution. The processor operates from a 2.10 GHz base clock up to a 5.40 GHz boost clock, with a 65 W TDP that suggests a power-efficient design despite the high core count. Cache is organized with 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, providing substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support, making it flexible for workstation use. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the processor, though the integrated graphics are listed as N/A, meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,620. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 35,122 and single-core score of 4,958 indicate strong performance across both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The multicore-to-single-core ratio suggests excellent scaling, which is typical for a processor with this many cores. Geekbench scores of 19,620 multicore and 2,429 single-core reinforce this picture, showing a balanced design that excels in parallel tasks while maintaining competitive single-thread speed. PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: integer math hits 155,808, floating-point math reaches 107,005, and multithread performance scores 41,317. Data compression achieves 505,885, while encryption scores 30,144, indicating robust data processing capabilities. The extended instructions score of 28,564 suggests strong SIMD performance for vectorized workloads.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i7-14700F sits within 1% of the Intel Xeon 6505P, Intel Xeon Phi 7290, AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, and AMD EPYC 7313P. Specifically, it trails the Xeon 6505P by 0.2% (53,701 vs 53,620), leads the Xeon Phi 7290 by 0.3% (53,469 vs 53,620), leads the Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.6% (53,288 vs 53,620), and leads the EPYC 7313P by 0.8% (53,206 vs 53,620). These near-identical scores indicate the i7-14700F competes directly with both server-class Xeon and EPYC processors as well as AMD's high-end desktop Ryzen 9, making it a versatile choice for productivity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's single-core performance is particularly notable: Cinebench R15 single-core scores 499, R20 single-core scores 2,082, and R23 single-core scores 4,958. These figures place it among the fastest consumer processors for single-threaded tasks, which translates to responsive application performance and strong gaming physics. The multicore scores — 3,540 in R15, 14,751 in R20, and 35,122 in R23 — demonstrate that the processor scales effectively with additional threads, making it suitable for rendering and compilation workloads. PassMark single-thread performance of 4,257 and physics score of 2,455 further confirm the CPU's ability to handle both basic and complex computational tasks.

The GPU, Intel Arc A380E, has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs. This places it exactly at the median, meaning half of all GPUs perform better and half perform worse. The combined percentile for the CPU+GPU pairing is 71, which suggests that the CPU's strong showing (91st percentile) pulls the overall system above the GPU's median position. The absence of GPU benchmarks means the data cannot quantify graphics performance relative to rivals, but the 50th percentile ranking provides a reference point: the A380E is a mid-pack GPU, not a high-end or low-end offering.

The disparity between the CPU's 91st percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile creates a significant performance gap. In CPU-bound workloads, this system will outperform the vast majority of desktops, but in GPU-bound scenarios, it will deliver only average results. The combined 71st percentile reflects this imbalance, indicating a system that excels at computation but lags in graphics-intensive tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU as the primary bottleneck in this pairing. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile means that in any graphics-heavy workload, the Arc A380E will limit performance well before the i7-14700F reaches its capacity. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 41,317 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,122 indicate it can feed data to the GPU far faster than the GPU can render it. For example, in gaming, the CPU can calculate game logic and physics at a rate that would support high frame rates, but the GPU's rendering throughput will cap the actual FPS.

The 6 GB GDDR6 memory with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth on the A380E is modest by modern standards, and the 64.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 128.0 GTexel/s texture rate suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings but will falter at higher resolutions or with ray tracing enabled. The CPU's 33 MB L3 cache and 5.40 GHz boost clock mean it will rarely be the limiting factor, even in esports titles where high frame rates are expected. The bottleneck is thus unidirectional: the GPU constrains frame rates, while the CPU remains underutilized in most graphics scenarios.

In productivity tasks that rely on the CPU alone, such as video encoding or 3D rendering using the CPU, the system performs at the 91st percentile level. However, GPU-accelerated tasks like real-time rendering or machine learning inference will operate at the GPU's 50th percentile level. This imbalance suggests the pairing is best suited for workloads that are primarily CPU-bound, with occasional light GPU use, rather than graphics-intensive applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and GPU specifications, not measured results. The i7-14700F's single-core performance, exemplified by a 4,958 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 4,257 PassMark single-thread score, is more than sufficient for high-refresh gaming in CPU-bound scenarios. The Arc A380E, with 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 RT cores, is positioned for entry-level 1080p gaming.

Based on the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and its specifications, the A380E is expected to deliver playable frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant at 1080p with medium settings, where the CPU's strong single-core performance will allow frame rates to approach the GPU's maximum output. In more demanding AAA titles, the 6 GB VRAM and 96-bit memory bus will likely cause performance to drop below 60 FPS at high settings, with the 186.0 GB/s bandwidth becoming a limiting factor for texture-heavy scenes. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's modest pixel rate of 64.00 GPixel/s will struggle, and frame rates will likely fall to low levels, making these resolutions impractical for smooth gaming.

Ray tracing performance will be particularly constrained, as the 8 RT cores in the A380E are a minimal implementation, and the absence of tensor cores (listed as null) means no dedicated AI acceleration for upscaling technologies. The CPU's high single-core score ensures that even in GPU-bound scenarios, frame pacing will be consistent, reducing stutter, but the overall FPS ceiling remains firmly set by the graphics card. For gamers, this pairing is best understood as a CPU that can handle future GPU upgrades, with the current GPU serving as a placeholder for 1080p gaming at moderate settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum memory speeds or capacities. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, providing ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The Arc A380E uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will operate at the lower spec.

The GPU has a 75 W TDP and suggests a 250 W PSU, while the CPU has a 65 W TDP. Combined, the system has modest power requirements, meaning most standard desktop power supplies can handle it without issue. The GPU requires no external power connectors and is single-slot, making it easy to install in compact cases. However, the GPU is listed as end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor, so upgrade paths for the graphics card are more relevant than upgrading this specific GPU.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A380E with a higher-performance GPU that can take advantage of the CPU's capabilities. The i7-14700F's 91st percentile CPU score means it can support GPUs far beyond the A380E's level without becoming a bottleneck. The CPU's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure compatibility with future high-end graphics cards. For memory, moving from DDR4 to DDR5 would provide a modest performance uplift, though the FACT PACK does not quantify the difference. The platform itself is mature, with the CPU's active production status indicating ongoing availability, but the Socket 1700 platform is likely near the end of its lifecycle, given the CPU was released in January 2024.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F ranks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,620.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X?

A: The i7-14700F has an average score of 53,620, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X's score of 53,288.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i7-14700F supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation stability.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pair ranks at the 71st percentile for all desktop builds, reflecting the CPU's strength and GPU's median position.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The Intel Arc A380E is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor, and it was released in March 2024.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU's strong single-core performance (4,958 in Cinebench R23 single-core) can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking will limit actual FPS to entry-level levels, making 1080p at medium settings the realistic ceiling. Streaming benefits from the 20 cores and 28 threads, allowing simultaneous game encoding and gameplay, though the GPU's encoder capabilities are not quantified in the data, so software encoding using the CPU is a reliable alternative. Video editing is a strong use case, as the CPU's multicore score of 35,122 in Cinebench R23 accelerates rendering and export times, while the GPU provides basic acceleration for effects and previews. 3D rendering on the CPU is excellent, with the 91st percentile CPU ranking ensuring fast scene compilation, but GPU-based renderers will be limited by the A380E's 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance. Software development benefits from the high core count, with PassMark integer math at 155,808 and data compression at 505,885 speeding up compilation and code analysis. Student and office work is overserved by this CPU, as even single-threaded tasks like document editing will be highly responsive, but the GPU's median performance is more than adequate for office applications.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i7-14700F, a 20-core Raptor Lake processor, with the Intel Arc A380E, an entry-level Xe-HPG architecture GPU. The CPU is the dominant component, ranking at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system ranks at the 71st percentile for all desktop builds, indicating an above-average overall system with a significant performance skew toward CPU-bound tasks. The build is best described as a powerful productivity workstation with modest gaming capability, suitable for users who prioritize processing power over graphics fidelity. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 75 W TDP keep power requirements low, with the suggested PSU at 250 W, making this an energy-efficient desktop configuration.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a professional or enthusiast who needs exceptional CPU performance for multi-threaded workloads. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the 91st percentile CPU performance invaluable, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 35,122 ensuring fast processing. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 20 cores and 28 threads, with PassMark integer math at 155,808 indicating rapid throughput. Students and small business users who run data analysis or scientific computing will appreciate the ECC memory support and the CPU's near-parity with server-class Xeon and EPYC processors, as shown by delta percentages within 1% of those rivals. Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles at medium settings can use this build as a foundation, with the understanding that the GPU is the limiting factor and will require an upgrade for AAA gaming. The build is not suited for high-resolution gaming (1440p or 4K), as the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 96-bit memory bus are insufficient for modern titles at those resolutions. For users who plan to upgrade the GPU later, the i7-14700F's PCIe Gen 5 support and high single-core score (4,958 in R23) ensure the CPU will not bottleneck future graphics cards.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is based on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective) across a 96-bit bus for 186.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 6 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is modest, and the 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output processors define its throughput: 64.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 128.0 GTexel/s texture rate. The FP32 performance is 4.096 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.192 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio, and there are 8 RT cores but no tensor cores listed. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with four DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

The 50th percentile ranking places the A380E at the median of all GPUs, meaning it delivers average performance relative to the entire GPU market. Its 75 W TDP and lack of power connectors make it a low-power solution, but the 250 W suggested PSU indicates minimal system-wide power draw. The GPU's interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which halves the bandwidth of a full x16 slot, though for a GPU of this class, the 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is more likely a limiting factor than the bus interface. The absence of benchmark scores in the FACT PACK means quantitative comparisons to other GPUs are impossible, but the specifications suggest it is designed for entry-level 1080p gaming and basic compute tasks rather than high-end rendering. The 8 RT cores are a minimal ray tracing implementation, and without tensor cores, AI-accelerated features like DLSS are unavailable, making the GPU reliant on raw compute for graphics. For rendering workloads, the 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for simple scenes but will struggle with complex geometry or high resolutions, reinforcing the CPU-centric nature of this build.