SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R refresh) using Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a locked multiplier part (no overclocking), and it lacks integrated graphics, meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Benchmark data places this CPU in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, which is a strong showing. Its average benchmark score is 53,620. In multi-core workloads, the Cinebench R23 score of 35,122 and Cinebench R20 score of 14,751 indicate heavy parallel processing capability. The single-core performance is also robust, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 4,958 and Geekbench single-core at 2,429. The Passmark multithread score of 41,317 and integer math score of 155,808 further confirm that this chip excels at tasks that scale across many threads.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i7-14700F is essentially at parity. It trails the Intel Xeon 6505P by just 0.2% (average score 53,701), while it leads the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 0.3% (53,469), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.6% (53,288), and the AMD EPYC 7313P by 0.8% (53,206). These deltas are minuscule, meaning the i7-14700F sits in a performance class where a few points separate it from both server-grade and enthusiast desktop parts. For real workloads, this means the CPU will not be the limiting factor in most modern applications; it offers a balanced mix of high-frequency single-thread performance and massive multi-thread throughput.

The Passmark data compression score of 505,885 and data encryption score of 30,144 show that the CPU handles archival and cryptographic tasks with ease. The floating point math score of 107,005 and extended instructions score of 28,564 indicate strong scientific and SIMD workload performance. In essence, this is a high-end desktop CPU that competes with workstation-class silicon in multi-threaded tasks while maintaining excellent responsiveness in single-threaded scenarios.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology; the memory bus is dual-channel. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is the latest standard for high-bandwidth devices like GPUs and NVMe SSDs.

The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 20-core part, which means cooling requirements are modest. However, the GPU in this pairing, the Intel Arc A380, has its own TDP of 75 W and a suggested PSU rating of 250 W. This combined power draw is low, so a typical 400-500 W power supply would have ample headroom, though the exact PSU requirement depends on the rest of the system components. The Arc A380 requires a single 8-pin power connector.

A sensible next upgrade path on this platform would be to replace the Arc A380 with a more powerful GPU. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that any modern graphics card will have full bandwidth available. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a user upgrading from an older DDR4 system could reuse their memory, or they could move to faster DDR5 modules for a slight performance uplift in memory-sensitive workloads. The socket 1700 platform is mature, with a wide range of motherboards available from entry-level to high-end.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Core i7-14700F sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A380 GPU sits in only the 44th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 68. This indicates a significant performance mismatch, where the CPU vastly outclasses the GPU in relative terms.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 8,558, with its nearest rivals being the AMD FirePro W5170M (8,595, -0.4%), AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8,462, 1.1%), NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8,458, 1.2%), and AMD Radeon 880M (8,436, 1.4%). The Arc A380 is thus positioned in the lower-midrange of GPU performance, roughly equivalent to an entry-level discrete laptop GPU from several generations ago.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the Arc A380 scores 808 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 38,224 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 36,736 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark G3D score is 6,252, with a DirectX 12 score of 35, DirectX 11 score of 38, and DirectX 9 score of 73. The GPU compute score is 2,762. These numbers place it firmly in entry-level territory for gaming and compute.

The CPU's benchmark scores are far more impressive. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3,540 and single-core of 499 show older-generation scaling. The Geekbench multicore score of 19,620 reinforces the strong multi-threaded performance. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,257 indicates that even lightly-threaded applications will run smoothly. The combined picture is clear: this is a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level GPU, making the system ideal for CPU-heavy productivity tasks but limited for graphics-intensive workloads.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is not suited for high-refresh gaming. The Arc A380's 44th percentile GPU ranking and low DirectX 12 score of 35 mean that even at 1080p, frame rates will struggle to reach high refresh rates in demanding titles. The CPU is more than capable, but the GPU will bottleneck any gaming scenario severely.

Streaming: Streaming involves both CPU encoding and GPU rendering. The i7-14700F's 20 cores and 28 threads, with a Passmark multithread score of 41,317, can handle x264 encoding without breaking a sweat. The GPU, however, will limit the game's frame rate, making the stream quality less important when the gameplay itself is stuttering.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for the CPU. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,122 and Passmark integer math score of 155,808 indicate that video encoding, rendering, and effects processing will be fast. The GPU's limited compute performance (Passmark GPU compute score of 2,762) will slow down GPU-accelerated effects and previews, but CPU-based rendering will be excellent.

3D Rendering: The CPU excels here. The high multi-core scores mean that CPU-based ray tracing and rendering engines will perform admirably. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, so GPU-accelerated renderers will be slower, but the CPU will carry the workload effectively.

Software Development: Compilation and code analysis benefit from high core counts and fast single-thread performance. The i7-14700F offers both, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4,257 and a 91st percentile CPU ranking. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a very capable development machine.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is overkill for typical office tasks like word processing and spreadsheets, but the powerful CPU ensures that even complex multitasking and data analysis (Passmark data compression score of 505,885) will be instant. The low power draw of both components (65 W CPU, 75 W GPU) makes it an efficient, quiet workstation for academic work.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the GPU benchmark scores and CPU performance, not direct measurements.

The Intel Arc A380's Passmark G3D score of 6,252 and DirectX 11 score of 38 suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will deliver playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles, but will struggle with modern AAA games. The DirectX 12 score of 35 indicates marginal performance in current-generation APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is very low, implying that at 1440p or 4K, frame rates will drop to near-unplayable levels in most games.

The CPU's high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958) ensures that the frame pacing will be smooth, but the GPU will be the definitive bottleneck. At 1080p ultra, a user could expect roughly 30-40 FPS in well-optimized esports titles, but this is an estimate. In graphically intensive single-player games, frame rates could fall below 20 FPS. The 6 GB VRAM and 96-bit memory bus (186.0 GB/s bandwidth) will also limit texture quality and resolution scaling. The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores are present, but the raw compute power is insufficient for meaningful ray-traced effects at acceptable frame rates.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. It is ideal for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where the i7-14700F's 91st percentile CPU ranking and multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 35,122, Passmark multithread 41,317) provide professional-level throughput. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output and light acceleration, but it is not a gaming part.

Students and office workers who handle large datasets, compile code, or run virtual machines will benefit from the CPU's power while the low TDP (65 W) keeps electricity costs down. Small business workstations that run database queries, financial modeling, or scientific simulations will find the CPU's Passmark data encryption score of 30,144 and floating point math score of 107,005 advantageous. However, anyone intending to play modern 3D games at high settings should look elsewhere, as the Arc A380's 44th percentile GPU ranking will severely limit the experience.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: the GPU is the limiting factor in virtually every workload that involves graphics, while the CPU is the dominant component in all other tasks. The CPU's 91st percentile versus the GPU's 44th percentile creates a massive disparity. In gaming, the GPU's low DirectX scores (35-38) and Passmark G3D score of 6,252 mean that the CPU will spend most of its time idle, waiting for the GPU to render frames. Even at 1080p, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is insufficient to feed the CPU's processing capability.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the star, with the GPU providing only minor acceleration. The Passmark GPU compute score of 2,762 is low, so any task offloaded to the GPU (such as video encoding via Quick Sync, though the i7-14700F lacks iGPU, so this is moot, or GPU-accelerated rendering) will be slower than CPU-based alternatives. The 65 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP suggest that power delivery is not a concern, but the performance imbalance means that upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant system-wide performance gains. The CPU has significant headroom to support a much faster GPU without becoming a bottleneck.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-14700F (a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake CPU) with the Intel Arc A380 (a 6 GB GDDR6 GPU based on Xe-HPG architecture). The CPU is a high-end part (91st percentile), while the GPU is entry-level (44th percentile), resulting in a combined percentile of 68. The CPU has a launch MSRP of $359, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 149 USD.

The system is fundamentally a CPU-centric workstation that happens to have a discrete GPU for basic display output. The Arc A380's 75 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU mean the system is power-efficient, but its 2,050 MHz boost clock and 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are not enough for demanding graphics tasks. Overall, this pairing represents a lopsided configuration where the CPU's capability is far ahead of the GPU's, making it suitable for computation-heavy use cases but not for gaming or graphics-intensive work.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: What memory types does this build support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, operating in dual-channel mode.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-14700F is nearly identical in performance to the Intel Xeon 6505P (0.2% slower), and slightly faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (0.6% faster) and AMD EPYC 7313P (0.8% faster).

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Arc A380 sits in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8,558.

Q: Is this system good for 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 35 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 indicate that 4K gaming is not feasible; even 1080p gaming will be limited.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 68, reflecting the strong CPU but weak GPU.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the i7-14700F has no integrated graphics (N/A), so the discrete Arc A380 is required for display output.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700F

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds