SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F and Intel Arc A310 form a desktop pairing that is defined by a stark contrast in capability. The CPU is a high-end 20-core processor that benchmarks in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a low-profile, 30-watt adapter that sits in the 40th percentile. This is a combination where the processor provides immense computational headroom, but the graphics card is a limiting factor for any 3D or gaming workload. The data shows a platform built for productivity, general computing, and multi-threaded tasks, not for high-end gaming.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A310 is a modest entry-level graphics solution built on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The data shows a chip with 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units. The GPU is equipped with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, and while the tensor core field is null, the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The card has a base and boost clock of 1750 MHz, which is a low clock speed, and a memory clock of 1937 MHz.

Memory capacity is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. This is a significant constraint for modern rendering workloads; a 4 GB frame buffer is insufficient for high-resolution textures or complex 3D scenes. The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s, which are figures consistent with a low-end part. The FP32 performance is 2.688 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1). For context, the benchmark scores show a Passmark G3D score of 5433 and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 2157, placing the GPU in the 40th percentile of all GPUs.

In rendering tasks, the implications are clear: the A310 can handle basic 2D acceleration and light 3D work, but it will not be suitable for professional 3D rendering, video editing with heavy effects, or modern gaming at high settings. The ray tracing cores are present, but with only 6 of them and 2.688 TFLOPS of compute, ray-traced workloads will be severely limited. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 7550, which puts it in the company of the AMD Radeon R7 250 (deltaPct -0.1) and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (deltaPct -0.4), while it is 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. The data illustrates that this is a GPU for basic display output and light compute, not for demanding graphical applications.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the performance tier of the Intel Core i7-14700F compared to all other CPUs?

A: The i7-14700F has a percentile ranking of 91, meaning it performs better than 91% of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 53620.

Q: How does the Arc A310's compute performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The A310 has an average benchmark score of 7550. It performs 1% better than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (deltaPct 1) and is 0.4% slower than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (deltaPct -0.4).

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of the Arc A310?

A: The GPU has a 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, which provides a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the core configuration of the i7-14700F?

A: The processor features 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: Does the Arc A310 support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the data shows support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 66, indicating it is better than 66% of all desktop pairings in the database.

Q: What is the TDP of the Arc A310, and what PSU does it suggest?

A: The Arc A310 has a TDP of 30 W, and the suggested power supply unit for the system is 200 W.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which houses the Raptor Lake-R architecture. The i7-14700F supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and it has 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The data indicates that the i7-14700F has a TDP of 65 watts and supports ECC memory, making it suitable for entry-level workstations. The Arc A310 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

The GPU is a single-slot card with no power connectors, which means it draws all its power from the motherboard slot. The A310 has a TDP of 30 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 200 W. This leaves significant PSU headroom. The CPU's 65 W TDP, combined with the GPU's 30 W TDP, means a typical 500 W or even 400 W power supply would have ample capacity. A sensible next upgrade would be the graphics card. The CPU is capable of supporting far more powerful GPUs, as its 91st percentile performance will not bottleneck modern mid-range or high-end graphics cards. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface of the A310 is sufficient for this low-end card, but a more powerful GPU would also be well-supported by the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, although the GPU itself would likely use PCIe 4.0. The motherboard must support the LGA 1700 socket, and memory should be chosen based on budget, with DDR5 offering higher bandwidth potential over DDR4.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance balance in this pairing is heavily skewed towards the CPU. The i7-14700F has a percentile of 91, while the Arc A310 sits at the 40th percentile. This indicates a significant bottleneck in graphical and GPU-accelerated workloads. For any task that relies on the GPU—such as 3D rendering, video encoding with hardware acceleration, or gaming—the A310 will be the limiting factor. The CPU will be left waiting for the GPU to complete its work.

The Passmark scores illustrate this clearly. The CPU scores 41317 in Passmark Multithread and 4257 in Passmark Single Thread. The GPU scores 5433 in Passmark G3D, which is a much lower number in the context of graphics performance. The combined percentile for the pair is 66, which is lower than the CPU's individual percentile, showing that the GPU drags down the overall system performance in mixed workloads. In a gaming scenario, the low GPU scores (Passmark DirectX 12 score of 29) will cap frame rates, regardless of the CPU's capability. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like data compression (Passmark Data Compression score of 505885) or integer math (Passmark Integer Math score of 155808), the GPU is irrelevant, and the system will perform at the level of the 91st percentile CPU.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The benchmark data provides a clear picture of this system's capabilities. The Intel Core i7-14700F achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 and a single-core score of 4958. In Geekbench, it scores 19620 multicore and 2429 single-core. The average benchmark score is 53620, placing it in the 91st percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6505P (avgScore 53701, deltaPct -0.2) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (avgScore 53288, deltaPct 0.6). This shows the i7-14700F is on par with, or slightly better than, a high-end Ryzen 9 part from the previous generation.

The Intel Arc A310 has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 30607 and a Vulkan score of 28964. Its Passmark G3D score is 5433, and the average benchmark score is 7550, placing it in the 40th percentile. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 66. This combined score is significantly lower than the CPU's individual percentile, confirming that the GPU is the performance limiter in this system. The data suggests that this build is a workstation or productivity machine where the GPU is only needed for display output and basic acceleration.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a viable scenario. The Arc A310's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 29 and its 40th percentile rank indicate that it cannot produce high frame rates in modern games. The CPU is capable, but the GPU will bottleneck any gaming workload to low settings and resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU can handle the encoding workload easily, given its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122. However, the GPU's low performance will limit the game's frame rate, making streaming a poor experience. The system could stream a low-demand game, but the video output from the GPU would be a weak point.

Video Editing: The CPU's high multicore performance (Passmark Multithread score of 41317) will speed up timeline rendering and export in software-based codecs. However, the 4 GB VRAM and low compute of the A310 will hinder GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. This is a system for light 4K editing with a focus on CPU-based workflows, not for heavy motion graphics.

3D Rendering: The CPU is excellent for CPU-based rendering (e.g., Cinebench R23 score of 35122). However, the Arc A310 lacks the compute power (FP32 of 2.688 TFLOPS) and VRAM for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane. This build is best suited for CPU-only rendering.

Software Development: This is a strong scenario. The CPU's high core count and threads (20 cores, 28 threads) will compile large codebases quickly. The Passmark Integer Math score of 155808 supports this. The GPU is sufficient for multiple monitors and IDE acceleration.

Student and Office Work: This is an ideal scenario. The CPU is overkill for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but the fast single-core performance (Geekbench Single Core of 2429) ensures a snappy experience. The GPU is adequate for 2D desktop rendering and video playback.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who need maximum CPU processing power for multi-threaded applications but do not require discrete graphics performance. The i7-14700F's 91st percentile performance makes it suitable for professionals in software development, data analysis, and financial modeling. The Passmark Data Encryption score of 30144 and Data Compression score of 505885 indicate strong performance in security and file management tasks.

For students, this system provides a high level of future-proofing for CPU-intensive coursework, though the GPU is more than enough for standard academic use. For small business workstations, the combination of a 65 W CPU and 30 W GPU creates a low-power, efficient machine for office tasks, accounting, and database management. The ECC memory support on the CPU adds a layer of reliability for data-sensitive work. Gamers, even those targeting 1080p, should look elsewhere, as the 40th percentile GPU will not deliver a satisfactory frame rate in modern titles. The target user is a developer or power user who will later invest in a proper discrete GPU.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build class combination. It pairs a high-end 20-core Intel processor with a low-end Intel entry-level graphics card. The system's combined percentile is 66, meaning it outperforms 66% of all desktop configurations in the database. However, this score is a composite; the CPU is in the 91st percentile for processors, while the GPU is in the 40th percentile for graphics cards.

The build is fundamentally a CPU-centric workstation. The Intel Arc A310 serves as a display adapter with basic 3D acceleration, not as a gaming or rendering solution. The data suggests this is a system for compute-heavy tasks that rely on the central processor, such as compilation, scientific computing, and heavy multitasking, rather than a balanced general-purpose machine.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. It is an unlocked part, meaning it cannot be overclocked, and has a TDP of 65 W. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

In real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 indicates exceptional performance in multi-threaded rendering and video encoding. The single-core score of 4958 is also strong, ensuring responsive performance in everyday applications. The Passmark tests corroborate this: a Multithread score of 41317 and a Single Thread score of 4257. The data shows this CPU is a workhorse for productivity. The low TDP of 65 W makes it an efficient choice for a workstation that runs long compute jobs. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, has an average score of 53288, which the i7-14700F edges out by 0.6%, highlighting its competitive standing.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rates here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A310's performance in synthetic tests is low: a Passmark DirectX 12 score of 29, a DirectX 11 score of 33, and a DirectX 9 score of 69. These scores are in the bottom percentile of GPUs and suggest that the card is not designed for gaming.

The CPU is not the bottleneck in gaming; the i7-14700F's high single-core score of 4958 in Cinebench R23 would support high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU will restrict performance. At 1080p with low settings, the A310 might achieve playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles (e.g., eSports games), but it will struggle with any modern AAA game. At 1440p or 4K, the 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will be insufficient, leading to low frame rates and texture pop-in. The estimated performance is that of a low-end GPU from several generations ago, akin to a GTX 1650 but with likely worse driver optimization in some titles. Users should expect to lower resolutions to 720p or 1080p and set graphical presets to the lowest for a chance at a smooth experience in modern titles. For any serious gaming, a different GPU is mandatory.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + Intel Arc A310

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-14700F

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds