SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-14700F + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-14700F

53,620 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop configuration that sits at the 77th combined percentile, indicating a system that is well above average but not at the absolute top tier. The CPU is a 20-core, 28-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part, while the GPU is a RDNA 2.0-based mid-range card. The data shows a significant asymmetry in performance potential, with the processor vastly outperforming the graphics card in their respective percentile standings. This analysis examines the measured performance data to determine the strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases for this specific pairing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The card operates at a base clock of 1626 MHz, a game clock of 2044 MHz, and a boost clock of 2491 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz or 14 Gbps effective. It has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with a pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 279.0 GTexel/s.

The GPU features 28 ray accelerators for ray tracing, but it has no dedicated tensor cores, meaning AI-accelerated features are limited. Its compute capabilities include 8.928 TFLOPS for FP32 and 17.86 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1). In terms of API support, it is fully modern, with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The card is a dual-slot design that requires a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested 300 W power supply.

Benchmark scores show the RX 6600 achieving an average score of 19036, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 with an average score of 19030 and a 0% delta, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile with a score of 19049 and a -0.1% delta, and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation with a score of 18954 and a 0.4% delta. This indicates that the RX 6600 is essentially performance-equivalent to these cards in general compute benchmarks, despite being from different generations and classes. The data shows the GPU is a solid performer for 1080p gaming but will be the primary limiting factor in this system.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The data is measured, so the following are actual frame rates observed at ultra settings. At 1920x1080, the RX 6600 demonstrates strong capability in esports titles. For example, it achieves 326 FPS in Valorant, 315.5 FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, and 180.9 FPS in Roblox. Even in more demanding shooters like Call of Duty: Warzone, it hits 163 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 169 FPS. These figures indicate the card can handle high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p for competitive titles.

In AAA single-player games at 1080p, performance is respectable but not always high-refresh. Assetto Corsa runs at 86.6 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 143.4 FPS. However, more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 44.9 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 37.9 FPS. The data shows that while the card can play these games, it may not achieve high frame rates on ultra settings in the most graphically intensive releases.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops significantly across the board. Valorant still manages 278 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 214.8 FPS, but Call of Duty: Warzone falls to 145.8 FPS. More demanding titles suffer: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 32 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 25.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 11.8 FPS. This resolution is only playable for esports and lighter games; it is not suitable for ultra settings in AAA titles.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is generally outmatched. Valorant remains playable at 232 FPS, but most other games see significant drops. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 19.3 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18.7 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 7.7 FPS. The average FPS across all games is 92.8, but this is heavily weighted by esports titles. The data clearly shows that 1080p is the intended resolution for this GPU, with 1440p being a stretch for many games.

Usage Scenarios — Grounded in the scores

High-Refresh Gaming: For competitive esports titles, this system is excellent. At 1080p, Valorant runs at 326 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 315.5 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 169 FPS. These frame rates easily support high-refresh monitors, making this build ideal for players who prioritize speed in shooters.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU is more than capable of handling game streaming. With a high Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122, the processor can encode video while maintaining high frame rates in games. The GPU's performance in esports titles ensures the game itself runs smoothly, even while the CPU handles the streaming workload.

Video Editing: This is a strong workload for the system. The i7-14700F has a Geekbench multi-core score of 19620, which is highly competitive. The GPU also helps with rendering effects. The PassMark G3D score of 15096 indicates the GPU can handle GPU-accelerated effects and rendering, making this a capable editing workstation.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 28 threads and high Cinebench scores, including a multi-core score of 14751 in R20 and 3540 in R15, make it a powerful tool for CPU-based rendering. For GPU-based rendering, the RX 6600's 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be slower than higher-end cards, but the system is still workable for smaller projects or for using the CPU as the primary renderer.

Software Development: The processor excels here. With a PassMark multi-thread score of 41317 and data encryption score of 30144, it can handle compilation and parallel builds with ease. The single-thread performance is also strong, with a GeckoBench single-core score of 2429, ensuring responsiveness in IDEs and development tools.

Student and Office Work: The system is massively overqualified for these tasks. The CPU's high single-core performance and the GPU's 2D score of 889 will handle web browsing, office suites, and productivity software without breaking a sweat. The 65W TDP of the CPU and the 132W TDP of the GPU mean the system is also relatively efficient.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates a CPU-bound system in most gaming scenarios. The CPU's percentile rank of 91st among all CPUs is significantly higher than the GPU's 63rd percentile. This means the i7-14700F has far more performance headroom than the RX 6600 can use. In games, the GPU will almost always be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the GPU is stressed to produce 44.9 FPS at 1080p, while the CPU could likely handle more frames. The bottleneck shifts to the CPU in games with very high frame rates. In Valorant at 1080p, the system hits 326 FPS, which is likely near the CPU's limit for that game.

The FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this. For instance, in Call of Duty: Warzone, the frame rate drops from 163 at 1080p to 145.8 at 1440p, a relatively small drop, which shows the CPU is not the limit in this case. In contrast, for a game like Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate drops from 44.9 at 1080p to 32 at 1440p, a 29% drop, which shows the GPU is struggling to maintain performance as the resolution increases. The average FPS across all games is 92.8, but the performance is highly uneven, with esports titles pushing well over 100 FPS while AAA games fall below 60.

The CPU is the clear performance leader, and it will not be a bottleneck for the GPU in most scenarios. For a system like this, the CPU is a long-term investment, while the GPU is a current-generation mid-range part. This imbalance means that users will be leaving CPU performance on the table in gaming workloads, but the system will excel in productivity tasks that use all cores.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 53620, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. This score puts it just 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6505P, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Xeon Phi 7290, 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, and 0.8% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313P. This shows the i7-14700F is a top-tier performer for multi-threaded workloads. The GPU has an average score of 19036, which is in the 63rd percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 with a 0% delta, the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile with a -0.1% delta, and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation with a 0.4% delta.

The combined system percentile is 77th, which indicates the overall performance is above average but not exceptional. The CPU's high percentile is offset by the GPU's lower standing. In the specific ranking of this CPU+GPU pair, it ranks 2959th out of 3732 pairs for FPS, which places it in the lower half of pairings. This reinforces the idea that the GPU is the limiting factor for gaming. The CPU is a powerhouse, and the GPU is a capable mid-range part that cannot fully utilize the CPU's potential in gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of the Core i7-14700F and RX 6600?

A: The system has a combined percentile of 77, indicating it is above average in overall performance.

Q: How does the RX 6600's average benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RX 6600 has an average score of 19036, which is 0% different from the NVIDIA Quadro K6000, and 0.1% lower than the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile.

Q: What is the maximum FPS measured for this system in any game?

A: The highest measured FPS is 326 in Valorant at 1920x1080 resolution.

Q: Is the RX 6600's performance in the 90th percentile of all GPUs?

A: No, the RX 6600 is in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19036.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: Does the GPU support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

CPU Analysis — Cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture and Raptor Lake-R codename. It has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. It has a 65W TDP and uses the Intel Socket 1700. The chip is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and it has ECC memory support. The CPU has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 2 MB per core, and a shared L3 cache of 33 MB. It does not have integrated graphics.

The benchmark results show the CPU is a top-tier performer. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 35122, and its single-core score is 4958. In GeckoBench, it scores 19620 multi-core and 2429 single-core. The PassMark multi-thread score is 41317, and the single-thread score is 4257. These scores indicate the CPU is excellent for both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. For example, its PassMark data compression score of 505885 suggests it is a powerful tool for file archiving and data processing.

The CPU's high core count and clock speeds make it a strong choice for heavy multitasking, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The PassMark floating point math score of 107005 and integer math score of 155808 show it can handle scientific computing and data analysis. The 91st percentile ranking confirms that the CPU is among the top 9% of all CPUs in the database, making it a high-end processor that will not be a bottleneck for most applications. Its performance is within 1% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, showing it is a direct competitor in the high-end desktop segment.

Build Overview — What this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

This is a desktop build that pairs a high-end 20-core Intel Core i7-14700F processor with a mid-range AMD Radeon RX 6600 graphics card. The CPU is a top-tier performer, ranking in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a solid mid-range part that ranks in the 63rd percentile. The system's combined percentile is 77, which places it in the upper tier of all systems, but it is not a top-tier enthusiast machine.

The system is designed for users who need a powerful processor for productivity, but who are also interested in gaming. The CPU is overkill for most gaming scenarios, but the GPU can still provide a good 1080p experience. The 92.8 average FPS across all games is a decent figure, but it is skewed by high-performance esports titles. The system is best classified as a high-performance productivity and 1080p gaming desktop. It is not a workstation for 4K rendering, nor is it a budget gaming PC. The CPU is a future-proof investment, but the GPU is a current-generation mid-range part.

Who Should Build It — Target users and industries

This build is suited for a specific set of users who prioritize CPU performance. For gamers, the system is ideal for those who play esports titles like Valorant, Counter-Strike 2, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 1080p, where it achieves high frame rates of 326, 143.4, and 163 FPS, respectively. It is also suitable for those who are willing to lower settings for AAA games to get higher frame rates. The system is not recommended for 4K gaming, as the GPU cannot handle it.

Content creators and video editors will find the CPU a powerful ally. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and the GeckoBench multi-core score of 19620 make it a beast for rendering and encoding. Software developers will also benefit from the 28 threads and high PassMark multi-thread score of 41317, which will speed up compilation times. The CPU's data encryption score of 30144 is also valuable for security-related tasks.

Students and office workers will find this system to be significantly overpowered. The CPU's single-core performance and the GPU's 2D score of 889 will handle any office suite, web browser, or coding assignment with ease. The system is also a viable small business workstation, where the high CPU core count is beneficial for running multiple virtual machines or data processing tasks. The 65W TDP of the CPU and the 132W TDP of the GPU keep the system relatively efficient for a high-performance desktop, making it a good choice for a professional environment where the CPU is the primary driver of performance.