SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700F + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700F

39,009 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700F + Intel Arc A350: A Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines a high-end 13th Gen Intel desktop processor with an entry-level Intel Arc discrete GPU, creating a system with a striking performance disparity between CPU and graphics capabilities. The Intel Core i7-13700F sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Arc A350 lands precisely at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, placing the combined platform in the 68th percentile overall. The data in this analysis is drawn entirely from benchmark scores, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the foundation for 13th Gen Raptor Lake desktop processors. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more established memory technology or the newer standard. This socket compatibility means the platform can accommodate a range of 13th Gen processors, though the 13700F itself represents one of the higher-tier options in that generation.

Memory configuration matters significantly for this CPU. The dual-channel memory bus works with either DDR4 or DDR5 modules, and the choice affects overall system responsiveness and application performance. The CPU's 30 MB of shared L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency, but the memory subsystem still plays a critical role in feeding the 16 cores and 24 threads. For a processor with this level of compute capability, fast memory is recommended to avoid leaving performance on the table.

The PCIe implementation on this platform is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. This provides substantial bandwidth for modern expansion cards, including high-end graphics cards and NVMe storage devices. The GPU in this pairing, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which means it operates comfortably within the available lanes without bottlenecking the connection. The Gen 5 lanes are forward-looking, ensuring that future upgrades to more powerful graphics cards will have the necessary bandwidth.

Power delivery is not a concern with this configuration. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is remarkably modest for a 16-core processor, and the GPU draws only 25 W. The suggested PSU for this system is 200 W, which is relatively low by modern desktop standards. This makes the platform suitable for compact builds with modest power supplies, though users should consider headroom for future upgrades when selecting a PSU.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful discrete GPU. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking indicates it has substantial compute headroom that the current GPU cannot fully utilize. Swapping the Arc A350 for a higher-tier graphics card would immediately improve gaming and rendering performance without requiring any other platform changes. The Socket 1700 platform and PCIe Gen 5 support ensure that virtually any modern GPU can be accommodated.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i7-13700F demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance across all benchmark suites. In 3DMark, the CPU scores 10,716 at max threads, 8,994 at 16 threads, and 7,136 at 8 threads. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads shows a 26% improvement, while max threads adds another 19% over 16 threads. This indicates good scaling across the 16-core, 24-thread configuration, though the hyperthreading benefit diminishes at higher thread counts.

Cinebench results confirm the CPU's multi-core prowess. The R23 multi-core score of 32,101 is particularly strong, while the single-core score of 4,532 shows respectable single-thread performance. The R20 multi-core score of 13,482 and single-core score of 1,903 follow the expected pattern. Geekbench results show 15,058 multi-core and 2,225 single-core, reinforcing the CPU's balanced performance profile.

The PassMark suite provides insight into specific workloads. Multi-thread performance scores 38,369, while single-thread performance comes in at 4,121. Integer math scores 141,370, floating-point math scores 100,422, and extended instructions score 28,295. Data encryption scores 26,956, data compression scores 471,838, and random string sorting scores 49,974. Physics simulation scores 2,236, and prime number finding scores 156.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 39,009, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39,215 (0.5% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39,325 (0.8% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 38,561 (1.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39,485 (1.2% higher). This clustering indicates the 13700F is positioned in a highly competitive performance tier.

The Intel Arc A350 GPU presents a starkly different picture. The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. Its 50th percentile ranking places it exactly in the middle of all GPUs, which for a 25 W, 4 GB part suggests it is designed for basic graphics tasks rather than high-performance gaming. The combined platform percentile of 68 reflects the CPU's strong contribution pulling the overall score upward.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between CPU and GPU defines this system's character. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This 36-percentage-point gap means the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in any workload. Instead, the GPU will constrain graphics-intensive tasks, while CPU-bound workloads will run at near-full processor potential.

In gaming scenarios, the GPU is overwhelmingly the bottleneck. The Arc A350's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus provide 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest by modern standards. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,092 in 3DMark and 4,532 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU cannot keep up with the CPU's output. The result is that frame rates will be limited by the GPU's rasterization and shading throughput.

The FP32 performance of the GPU, rated at 3.072 TFLOPS, further illustrates the imbalance. Modern gaming GPUs typically offer 10-20 TFLOPS or more, so the Arc A350's compute throughput is clearly entry-level. The CPU, by contrast, demonstrates exceptional compute capability in PassMark floating-point math with a score of 100,422. This gap means CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation, data compression, and productivity applications will perform at high levels, while GPU-bound tasks like gaming and 3D rendering will be constrained.

Productivity workloads that are primarily CPU-driven will show the processor's strength. The PassMark multi-thread score of 38,369 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 indicate strong performance in video encoding, software compilation, and data processing. These workloads do not heavily depend on the GPU, so the system will perform well in them. Conversely, GPU-accelerated tasks like machine learning training or GPU rendering will be severely limited by the Arc A350.

The memory configuration also plays a role in system balance. The CPU's dual-channel memory support with either DDR4 or DDR5 means the memory bandwidth is shared between CPU and GPU operations. The GPU's 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is independent of system memory, but the CPU's access to system memory affects overall system responsiveness. For optimal CPU performance, fast DDR5 memory would be preferable, but the GPU's limitations mean the memory subsystem is unlikely to be the primary constraint.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive productivity over graphics performance. The 86th percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for professionals who run multi-threaded applications that do not require powerful GPUs. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 16 cores and 24 threads, with the PassMark integer math score of 141,370 indicating strong processing capability for compilation and data manipulation tasks.

Students and academic users will find the system capable for research, data analysis, and general productivity. The CPU's strong multi-thread performance handles scientific computing and statistical analysis well, while the GPU provides basic display output and light acceleration. The 65 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP keep power consumption low, making the system economical to run over extended study sessions.

Small business workstations that handle document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and database management will perform admirably. The PassMark data compression score of 471,838 and random string sorting score of 49,974 indicate strong database and file operation performance. The GPU's capabilities are sufficient for office applications and 2D graphics, though not for demanding visualization tasks.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based workflows will find value in this configuration. Video editors using software encoding, audio producers running plugins, and graphic designers working in 2D will see strong performance from the 13700F. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15,058 support demanding creative applications, though GPU-accelerated effects will be limited.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations can use this system, but the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests playable frame rates in less demanding titles at lower settings, while the CPU ensures consistent frame pacing. Users who prioritize competitive esports titles that are CPU-bound may find acceptable performance, but graphically intensive AAA games will require reduced settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread 3DMark score of 1,092 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,532 indicate strong frame generation capability, but the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM limit achievable frame rates. High-refresh gaming at 144 Hz is only possible in undemanding titles at low settings.

Streaming: The 16-core, 24-thread CPU can handle game capture and encoding alongside gameplay, with the PassMark multi-thread score of 38,369 supporting simultaneous workloads. However, the GPU's limitations mean streamed games must run at modest settings to maintain smooth gameplay and stream output.

Video editing: CPU-based editing workflows benefit from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101, enabling smooth timeline scrubbing and efficient export in software-encoded projects. GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be slow due to the Arc A350's limited compute capability.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will perform well, with the 16 cores providing substantial render throughput. GPU rendering is severely constrained by the Arc A350's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM, making it unsuitable for complex scenes.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis benefit from the CPU's 24 threads and PassMark integer math score of 141,370. The system handles large codebases efficiently, though the GPU provides no meaningful acceleration for development tasks.

Student and office work: Everyday productivity applications run with excellent responsiveness thanks to the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the system's low power requirements. The 65 W CPU TDP and 200 W suggested PSU make this an economical system for long work sessions.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700F ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 39,009.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD EPYC 4245P scores 0.5% higher, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 0.8% higher, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T scores 1.2% lower, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 1.2% higher.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this system?

A: The suggested PSU is 200 W, based on the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 25 W TDP.

Q: Does this system support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What PCIe interface does the GPU use?

A: The Intel Arc A350 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; all performance discussion is based on benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700F is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. Its die size is 257 mm², with a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3.

The processor's benchmark performance reveals strong multi-threaded capability. The 3DMark max threads score of 10,716 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,101 demonstrate excellent scaling across the 16 cores. The PassMark multi-thread score of 38,369 reinforces this assessment. Single-thread performance is also respectable, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,092 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,532.

The CPU's 86th percentile ranking places it among the top tier of desktop processors. The nearest rival comparisons show differences of 1.2% or less, indicating the 13700F is competitively positioned within its performance class. The average benchmark score of 39,009 provides a composite measure of its capabilities across various workloads.

For real workloads, the CPU excels in multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computation. The PassMark integer math score of 141,370 and floating-point math score of 100,422 indicate strong arithmetic processing. Data compression at 471,838 and encryption at 26,956 show capability in data-intensive tasks. The 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample parallelism for modern productivity applications.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is notably efficient for its performance class, making it suitable for systems where power consumption is a consideration. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz ensures responsive single-thread performance when needed, while the base clock maintains reasonable power draw under sustained loads.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i7-13700F with the Intel Arc A350, creating a system with a substantial CPU-to-GPU performance gap. The CPU represents a high-end desktop processor in the 86th percentile, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete graphics card at the 50th percentile. The combined system percentile is 68, reflecting the CPU's strong contribution to overall performance.

The build class is desktop, indicating a traditional desktop form factor with the CPU mounted on a Socket 1700 motherboard. The system supports DDR4 or DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU and PCIe 4.0 for the GPU, and requires only a 200 W PSU. This makes it a flexible platform that can be configured for various use cases.

The overall tier of this system, based on the 68th combined percentile, places it in the upper-midrange category. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking is undermined by the GPU's 50th percentile, resulting in a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but falls short in GPU-intensive workloads. This asymmetry defines the system's character and determines its suitability for different applications.

The GPU's production status is end-of-life, with the predecessor listed as Xe Graphics and the successor as Battlemage. The CPU remains in active production, ensuring ongoing availability. This combination is best suited for users who prioritize processor performance and are willing to accept entry-level graphics capability, with the option to upgrade the GPU later.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350 is an entry-level discrete GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip, codenamed DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory running at 1937 MHz for 15.5 Gbps effective throughput.

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for basic graphics tasks but limits performance in high-resolution or high-detail gaming scenarios. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units, along with 6 ray tracing cores.

Compute performance is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS for FP32 and 6.144 TFLOPS for FP16 with 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a TDP of 25 W.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all GPUs. With no benchmark scores available, this ranking is based on its specifications and relative positioning. For rendering tasks, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, and the 4 GB VRAM may be insufficient for complex scenes. The 6 ray tracing cores provide some hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the overall compute capability limits their effectiveness.

The GPU's 25 W TDP and single-slot design make it suitable for compact systems. It has no display outputs, which means it is designed for compute or rendering tasks rather than as a primary display adapter. The 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64-bit bus are entry-level specifications that define the GPU's performance ceiling. Its production status is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as the successor.