SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the core configuration of the Intel Core i7-13700?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700 is a desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture. It has 16 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How much memory does the Intel Arc B570 have, and what is its bus width?

A: The Intel Arc B570 comes with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2375 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i7-13700 and Intel Arc B570 pairing is 75, placing it above three-quarters of all desktop configurations in the benchmark database. The CPU alone sits at the 85th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile.

Q: Does the FACT PACK contain measured FPS data for this specific combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK explicitly states that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty. All FPS discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Q: What is the socket and memory support for the i7-13700?

A: The processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, a feature relevant for workstation builds.

Q: What is the process node and die size for both components?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700 is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The Intel Arc B570 is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with a die size of 272 mm² and contains 19,600 million transistors.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the GPU?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Arc B570 is 219 USD. The CPU's launch MSRP is $384. No other pricing information is available in the FACT PACK.

# Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a pairing where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU in relative standing. The Intel Core i7-13700 achieves a percentile rank of 85 against all CPUs, while the Intel Arc B570 achieves a percentile rank of 65 against all GPUs. This 20-point gap in percentiles is the first indicator that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. The combined percentile for the build is 75, which reflects the GPU's lower standing dragging the overall score down from the CPU's individual high.

Looking at specific CPU benchmarks, the 3DMark suite shows a clear scaling pattern from single-thread to multi-thread performance. The single-thread score of 1092 rises to 2176 at 2 threads, 4279 at 4 threads, 7649 at 8 threads, and peaks at 11737 at max threads. This scaling is not perfectly linear — the jump from 8 threads to max threads (which uses all 24 threads) is only about 53% improvement, whereas the jump from 4 to 8 threads is about 79%. This indicates diminishing returns as more threads are utilized, typical for a hybrid architecture with performance and efficiency cores.

Cinebench scores reinforce the multi-core strength. The R23 multi-core score of 25369 is about 12.6 times the single-core score of 2008.5. The R20 multi-core score of 12806 versus single-core 1807 shows a similar ratio of about 7.1 times, and the older R15 test shows 3692 multi-core versus 285 single-core, a ratio of about 13 times. This multi-core advantage is the defining characteristic of the i7-13700.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 is the most modern gaming-oriented metric. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 83514, suggesting the driver and hardware handle Vulkan workloads more efficiently than OpenCL. The PassMark G3D score of 14195 places the Arc B570 in a mid-range tier, while the G2D score of 661 is comparatively modest. The GPU compute score of 7281 indicates that the card's compute capabilities are not its primary strength relative to its rasterization performance.

The average benchmark score for the CPU is 37135, which places it within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 7 160, the Intel Core i9-12900T, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450. The GPU's average score of 20556 places it within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and the Intel Arc A750. These neighboring rivals provide context: the i7-13700 trades blows with a Ryzen 7 desktop chip and a previous-generation Core i9, while the Arc B570 matches a mobile RTX 3070 and the previous-generation Arc A750.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. The die size is 257 mm². The base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a hybrid architecture, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split, the thread count of 24 from 16 cores implies 8 performance cores with hyperthreading and 8 efficiency cores without.

The 3DMark max threads score of 11737 is the highest single metric in that suite, demonstrating that the processor can effectively utilize all 24 threads. The 8-thread score of 7649 is about 65% of the max-thread score, suggesting that the first 8 threads (likely the performance cores) handle a substantial portion of the workload. The 4-thread score of 4279 and 2-thread score of 2176 show strong scaling in lightly-threaded scenarios. The single-thread score of 1092 is respectable but not class-leading, which is expected for a chip with a 2.10 GHz base clock.

Cinebench R23 multi-core performance of 25369 is a strong result for a 65 W TDP processor. The single-core score of 2008.5 indicates good per-thread performance, which matters for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36387 aligns with the multi-core heavy nature of this chip, while the single-thread score of 4101 is solid. The PassMark integer math score of 138974 and floating-point math score of 97723 both indicate strong computational throughput for a desktop chip.

The PassMark data compression score of 443900 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance in archiving and file compression workloads. The data encryption score of 25653 and extended instructions score of 26578 show that the processor handles cryptographic and SIMD workloads well. The find prime numbers score of 147 is the lowest relative metric, but this is a specialized test that often favors different architectures.

The nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen 7 160, Intel Core i9-12900T, AMD Ryzen 7 7735H, and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 — all have average scores within 0.1% of the i7-13700's 37135. This clustering suggests that the i7-13700 is at a performance equilibrium with these chips, and real-world differences would be minor. The i9-12900T being essentially tied is notable, as it shows the i7-13700 matches a previous-generation flagship in a lower-TDP package.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates an imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile. This 20-point gap means the GPU will be the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios such as high-resolution gaming or heavy graphics rendering. Conversely, the CPU will be the limiting factor in CPU-bound scenarios like data compression, encryption, or heavily-threaded physics simulations.

The PassMark physics score of 2053, while not directly comparable to gaming FPS, suggests that the CPU's physics processing is strong enough to support modern game engines without becoming the primary constraint at lower resolutions. However, at higher resolutions where the GPU's fill rate and shading become the bottleneck, the Arc B570's 65th percentile standing will cap performance.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent because no measured FPS data exists for this combination. However, the benchmark scores provide a proxy. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 is a DX12 test that stresses modern rendering features. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 10075 indicates it can feed the GPU with draw calls and geometry data without stalling. The balance point is likely at 1080p or 1440p, where the GPU's 65th percentile will bound frame rates, while the CPU's 85th percentile ensures it is not the limiting factor.

In a multi-tasking scenario, the CPU's 24 threads provide headroom for background tasks like streaming encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36387 suggests that the CPU can handle concurrent workloads without significant degradation. Conversely, the GPU's compute score of 7281 is modest, so offloading compute tasks to the CPU may be preferable in some workflows.

The combined percentile of 75 is lower than the CPU's individual percentile of 85, confirming that the GPU drags down the overall system performance class. For users who intend to upgrade, replacing the GPU would yield a more balanced system, but the CPU has room to support a faster GPU without becoming the bottleneck.

# Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximate, not direct measurements.

The gaming performance of the Intel Core i7-13700 and Intel Arc B570 pair is best understood through their respective benchmark positions. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 places it at the 65th percentile, which suggests it is capable of running modern titles at 1080p with high settings and at 1440p with medium-to-high settings, depending on the game's optimization. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1092 and 2-thread score of 2176 indicate that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, even in titles that are heavily single-threaded.

The GPU's PassMark DirectX scores provide additional context: DirectX 11 score of 118 and DirectX 12 score of 72. The DirectX 12 score being lower than DirectX 11 suggests that the card's DX12 performance may be a relative weakness, although the 3DMark Steel Nomad score, which is a DX12 test, tells a more nuanced story. The DirectX 9 score of 164 and DirectX 10 score of 65 indicate that legacy titles should run without issues, though the DirectX 10 score is notably low.

For esports titles that are CPU-bound at high frame rates, the i7-13700's 2-thread score of 2176 and 4-thread score of 4279 will allow very high FPS, likely exceeding 144 Hz at 1080p. The GPU's 65th percentile will be the limiting factor once the resolution or graphics settings increase. For AAA titles, the estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings would be in the range that the GPU's 65th percentile suggests — playable but not high-refresh territory. At 1440p ultra, frame rates would drop further, making medium settings a more realistic target.

The GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures, though 4K ultra settings with high-resolution texture packs may exceed the VRAM capacity in some titles. The CPU's 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 24 threads provide ample headroom for game logic, AI, and physics calculations.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the same socket used across 12th and 13th generation Core processors. This means the motherboard compatibility is broad, though the FACT PACK does not specify chipset support. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in memory choice — DDR5 for higher bandwidth or DDR4 for lower cost and availability. ECC memory support is a notable feature that is uncommon in consumer platforms and expands the potential use cases to entry-level workstations.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself. This is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity, though the Intel Arc B570 only uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The GPU's bus interface means it has half the lanes of a typical x16 GPU, but at PCIe 4.0 speeds, the bandwidth is sufficient for most workloads. The motherboard must have a PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 slot to achieve full performance.

The GPU has a TDP of 150 W, and the suggested PSU is 450 W. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W. Combined, the system's peak power draw would be well within a 450 W power supply's capacity, leaving headroom for other components like drives, fans, and RGB lighting. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card with a length of 272 mm and height of 115 mm, which should fit in most mid-tower cases.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the GPU. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking means it has significant headroom to drive a faster graphics card. Swapping the Arc B570 for a GPU in the 85th percentile or higher would create a more balanced system and raise the combined percentile above the current 75. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 would benefit the CPU in memory-sensitive workloads, but the current memory support is already dual-channel.

The CPU's production status is Active, and its release date is 2023-01-03. The GPU's production status is also Active, with a release date of 2025-01-15. Both components are current-generation, so the upgrade path is not about obsolescence but about balancing the system's performance tiers.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is based on the BMG-G21 chip using the Xe2-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die measures 272 mm² and contains 19,600 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 72.1 million per mm². The GPU has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It includes 18 ray tracing cores specifically, though the FACT PACK does not list tensor cores.

The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2375 MHz, which is 19 Gbps effective. The core clock is fixed at 2500 MHz for both base and boost, which simplifies power and thermal behavior. The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 23.04 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a mid-range GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 is the most relevant for modern gaming. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 is notably higher than the OpenCL score of 83514, indicating that the Vulkan driver path is more mature or better optimized. The PassMark G3D score of 14195 places it in the 65th percentile, while the G2D score of 661 is less impressive. The PassMark GPU compute score of 7281 is modest, meaning compute-heavy workloads like machine learning inference or video encoding acceleration may not be this card's primary strength.

The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, has an average score of 20534, which is within 0.1% of the Arc B570's 20556. The Intel Arc A750, the previous-generation GPU, has an average score of 20582, also within 0.1%. This means the B570 effectively matches the A750 and a mobile RTX 3070 in aggregate benchmark performance. The other two rivals — Quadro M4000M and Radeon R9 M390X — are older or lower-tier parts, with deltas of 0.4% and -0.5% respectively, indicating the B570 is slightly ahead of one and slightly behind the other.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is adequate for entry-level 3D rendering, but the 10 GB VRAM may be a constraint for large scenes or high-resolution textures. The 18 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the overall RT performance will be limited by the card's mid-range compute throughput. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

# Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core i7-13700, a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor, with the Intel Arc B570, a 10 GB desktop graphics card. The build class is explicitly defined as desktop. The combined percentile of 75 places this system in the upper-middle tier of all desktop configurations in the database, meaning it outperforms roughly three-quarters of systems while being outperformed by the top quarter.

The CPU and GPU are from the same manufacturer, Intel, which may offer driver and software integration benefits, though the FACT PACK does not confirm any specific synergy. The CPU is a high-tier desktop part at the 85th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-tier part at the 65th percentile. This is a pairing where the processor is clearly the stronger component, which is unusual in pre-built systems that often pair high-end GPUs with mid-range CPUs.

The overall tier of this build is best described as a high-performance CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The system is suitable for 1080p gaming, productivity workloads, and light content creation. It is not a high-end gaming rig, nor is it a workstation-class system, but it occupies a sweet spot for users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance without requiring top-tier GPU capabilities.

The release dates show a two-year gap between the CPU (January 2023) and the GPU (January 2025). This means the CPU is established and mature, while the GPU is a newer product. Both are in active production, so availability should be stable. The CPU's launch MSRP is $384, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 219 USD, though pricing discussions are outside the scope of this analysis.

# Who Should Build It

This system is well-suited for software developers who compile large codebases and run virtual machines. The CPU's 24 threads and 85th percentile multi-core performance ensure fast compilation times, while the GPU's 65th percentile is more than adequate for running multiple displays and IDE acceleration. The ECC memory support is a bonus for those who require data integrity.

Content creators who work with video editing will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, particularly in export and rendering tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 and PassMark multi-thread score of 36387 indicate that video encoding and effects rendering will be smooth. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p video editing, though 4K timelines may strain the GPU.

Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the CPU's performance valuable for simulations, data analysis, and general computational tasks. The PassMark integer math score of 138974 and floating-point math score of 97723 show strong number-crunching ability. The GPU is less critical for these workloads, so the mid-range GPU is acceptable.

Small business workstations that run office productivity suites, database applications, and light virtualization will find this build more than capable. The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads handle concurrent office applications with ease, and the GPU's 65th percentile is sufficient for basic graphical tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running operations.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this build suitable for high settings in most titles. The GPU's 65th percentile ensures solid frame rates at 1080p, while the CPU's 85th percentile prevents bottlenecks. Gamers at 1440p should expect to lower settings to medium or high for demanding titles. The GPU is not intended for 4K gaming with ultra settings.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's 2-thread score of 2176 and 4-thread score of 4279 support high frame rates in esports titles. The GPU's 65th percentile will be the limiting factor, but it should still deliver 100+ FPS in competitive shooters at medium settings. At 1440p, frame rates will drop below high-refresh thresholds for AAA titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36387 suggests that the CPU can handle both game logic and encoding without significant performance degradation. The GPU's modest compute score of 7281 means hardware encoding is less of a strength, so software encoding via the CPU is the preferred path.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 indicates strong export performance. The PassMark data compression score of 443900 suggests fast project file handling and archiving. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p timelines with effects, but 4K projects may require proxies or GPU upgrades.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-core performance will drive CPU-based renderers effectively, with the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12806 demonstrating solid throughput. The GPU's FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS supports GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 10 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The 18 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT acceleration, though not at the level of higher-tier GPUs.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads accelerate compilation, with the PassMark integer math score of 138974 indicating strong integer performance. The ECC memory support reduces the risk of memory errors in long-running builds. The GPU is more than sufficient for running multiple IDEs, containers, and local development servers.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 1092 in 3DMark and PassMark single-thread score of 4101 ensure responsive day-to-day use. The PassMark data encryption score of 25653 supports secure file handling. The GPU's 65th percentile is overkill for office tasks, but it provides headroom for occasional light photo editing or casual gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + Intel Arc B570

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

Intel Arc B570

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds