SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
84%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

6,270 Benchmark Score
Top 16% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the graphics powerhouse in this build, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC. The GPU packs 16 GB of GDDR7 memory across a 256-bit bus, yielding 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is substantial for high-resolution texture workloads and large scene data, with the bandwidth figure being a decisive factor for 4K rendering tasks that demand rapid asset streaming.

Clock speeds are set at a 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost, which are conservative figures for a 350 W TDP card. The 45,600 million transistor count on a 378 mm² die gives a transistor density of 120.6M / mm², indicating a dense but not exotic implementation. The shading unit count reaches 8960, paired with 280 texture mapping units and 96 render output units. These raw numbers translate to a pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s, which are the throughput ceilings for rasterization-heavy work.

Ray tracing hardware is present with 70 RT cores, and the tensor core count is 280, which drives AI-accelerated features like DLSS and neural rendering workloads. The FP32 performance is 43.94 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), meaning the card does not halve throughput for half-precision math — a useful trait for machine learning inference and certain scientific compute tasks that rely on FP16. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility indicate full modern graphics feature set readiness.

The benchmark data available for this GPU is limited to a single test: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, scoring 6269.5. This score places the GPU at the 36th percentile among all GPUs, which is a modest standing. However, the nearest rivals are revealing: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 scores 6270 (0% delta), the AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223 (0.8% slower), and the Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327 (0.9% faster). The Quadro K620 is also in the mix at 6282 (-0.2%). This clustering suggests the 5070 Ti SUPER sits in a performance band where it trades blows with last-generation mid-high tier cards, but the percentile rank indicates that many GPUs outperform it in the Steel Nomad workload specifically — a synthetic DX12 test that stresses overall graphics pipeline efficiency.

For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature. The 896.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that texture-heavy scenes and multi-material rendering pipelines do not stall on memory transfers. The 280 tensor cores provide acceleration for denoising and AI upscaling in renderers that support such features, while the 70 RT cores handle hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS is the ceiling for raw compute in offline rendering; it is competitive but not class-leading, meaning the GPU is better suited for interactive viewport rendering and real-time engines than for final-frame production renders that favor higher FP32 counts.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i7-13700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. As such, all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5 and the CPU's various multi-threaded scores inform these expectations.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the combination of the 5070 Ti SUPER and the i7-13700 should produce high frame rates in most titles. The GPU's 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 output and 686.6 GTexel/s texture rate are sufficient for heavy geometric detail and texture filtering at this resolution. The 235.4 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests the card can fill frames rapidly. Expect 100+ FPS in esports and lighter titles, with demanding AAA games likely in the 80-120 FPS range. The CPU's single-thread score of 1092 in 3DMark and 2008.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate no significant bottleneck at this resolution.

At 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the more dominant factor. The 896.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM are well-matched for 1440p texture sets. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5 is a moderate result, suggesting that the card will deliver playable frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range for most AAA titles at 1440p ultra. Games with heavy ray tracing will see lower performance, but the 70 RT cores provide hardware acceleration that should keep frame rates acceptable. The 36th percentile ranking among all GPUs tempers expectations — this is not a top-tier 1440p ultra card, but it is capable of high-refresh gaming at this resolution with settings adjustments.

At 4K ultra, the 16 GB VRAM and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth are critical assets. The memory capacity prevents texture pop-in and stuttering in large open-world games, while the bandwidth supports high-resolution framebuffers. However, the 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 and the modest Steel Nomad score indicate that 4K ultra will be demanding. Expect 30-60 FPS in the most graphically intensive titles, with lighter games hitting 60+ FPS. DLSS upscaling, enabled by the 280 tensor cores, would be the primary tool to push these numbers higher, though the estimated frame rates without it are moderate. The 60th percentile combined build rank suggests a balanced system, but the GPU's individual 36th percentile is the limiting factor for 4K gaming.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename) on Intel Socket 1700. It runs at a 2.10 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The process node is Intel's 10 nm, and the die size is 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported — a feature that appeals to workstation users.

The core configuration is asymmetric, typical of Raptor Lake, with performance cores and efficiency cores combining to reach 16 cores and 24 threads. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz is the headline figure for single-threaded responsiveness. The 30 MB L3 cache is shared across all cores, which aids in multi-threaded workloads that share data. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides the interface for the GPU, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present as a fallback or for office tasks.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of the CPU's capabilities. In 3DMark tests, the scaling from 2176 (2 threads) to 4279 (4 threads) to 7649 (8 threads) to 10075 (16 threads) to 11737 (max threads) shows strong multi-threading efficiency. The single-thread score of 1092 is respectable, but the max-thread score of 11737 is nearly 11 times higher, indicating excellent parallel scaling. Cinebench R23 results are more telling: a multicore score of 25369 versus a single-core score of 2008.5. This 12.6x ratio between multicore and single-core performance demonstrates that the chip excels in heavily threaded workloads like video rendering and 3D simulation.

Geekbench scores of 17025 (multicore) and 2329 (single-core) align with the 3DMark and Cinebench patterns. The PassMark suite provides workload-specific insights: integer math at 138974, floating point math at 97723, data compression at 443900, and data encryption at 25653. These figures indicate the CPU handles integer-heavy tasks (like database operations and code compilation) better than floating-point-heavy tasks (like scientific simulations). The extended instructions score of 26578 and prime number finding at 147 suggest moderate SIMD and cryptographic performance. The multithread score of 36387 and single-thread score of 4101 round out the picture.

The 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs places this processor well above average. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (37117 avg score, 0% delta), Intel Core i9-12900T (37112, 0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37161, -0.1% delta), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093, 0.1% delta). The average benchmark score of 37135 is essentially identical to these rivals, meaning the i7-13700 performs on par with a low-power i9 and mid-range Ryzen 7 parts. For real workloads, this translates to fast compile times, smooth video editing timelines, and responsive multitasking — the 5.20 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded applications, while the 16 cores handle parallel tasks with authority.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i7-13700 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is skewed toward the CPU in terms of relative standing. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 36th percentile among all GPUs. This discrepancy is significant: the processor is a high-tier part, while the graphics card is a mid-tier performer. In most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where graphics load increases.

The FPS scaling evidence supports this conclusion. At 1080p, where CPU load is proportionally higher, the i7-13700's strong single-thread score (1092 in 3DMark single-thread, 2008.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core) can feed the GPU adequately. But the GPU's 36th percentile rank means it cannot translate that CPU headroom into top-tier frame rates. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as the 6269.5 Steel Nomad score is the only graphics benchmark available and it indicates mid-pack performance.

For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression (PassMark 443900), and multi-threaded rendering in Cinebench (25369 multicore), the CPU will be the star. The GPU's 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 is decent, but the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads provide more headroom for parallel compute tasks. In gaming, however, the GPU is the constraint. The combined percentile of 61 reflects this imbalance — the system is better than average overall, but the GPU drags down the ceiling for graphics-intensive tasks.

The memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s on the GPU versus the CPU's dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support creates another potential bottleneck. For data-heavy workloads that require CPU-GPU transfers, the CPU's memory bandwidth (not listed in the FACT PACK) could limit throughput, though the PCIe Gen 5 x16 interface mitigates this. The 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores on the GPU are specialized hardware that the CPU lacks, so ray tracing and AI workloads will always favor the GPU, but the GPU's overall compute is not overwhelming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37135, with a percentile rank of 85 among all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 6270, with a percentile rank of 36 among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 61. These numbers indicate a system where the CPU is a standout component and the GPU is average at best.

The CPU scores across multiple tests are consistent: 3DMark 16-thread at 10075, Cinebench R23 multicore at 25369, Geekbench multicore at 17025, and PassMark multithread at 36387. The single-thread scores are similarly consistent: 3DMark single-thread at 1092, Cinebench R23 single-core at 2008.5, Geekbench single-core at 2329, and PassMark single-thread at 4101. The GPU's single benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 6269.5, is the only data point for graphics, making direct comparisons difficult.

The nearest rivals for the CPU are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (37117), Intel Core i9-12900T (37112), AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37161), and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093) all within 0.1% of the i7-13700's score. This means the CPU is essentially tied with these parts in synthetic benchmarks, despite different core counts and architectures. For the GPU, the nearest rival is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at 6270 (0% delta), with the Quadro K620 at 6282 (-0.2%) and Radeon R7 M350 at 6327 (-0.9%). The GPU's performance is virtually identical to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 in this test, which is a notable comparison — the 5070 Ti SUPER offers no measurable improvement over its predecessor in Steel Nomad.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU provides 85th-percentile compute power, but the GPU's 36th-percentile graphics performance limits the overall experience. The 61st combined percentile suggests a balanced-but-not-exceptional system, where the CPU's strength compensates for the GPU's mediocrity in some workloads but not in graphics-heavy tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (2008.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core) and the GPU's 235.4 GPixel/s pixel rate should support frame rates well above 100 FPS in most titles, though the GPU's 36th percentile ranking means it will not reach the highest refresh rates in demanding games. At 1440p, expect 60-90 FPS in AAA titles, which is adequate for 144 Hz monitors with adaptive sync.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU with a 11737 max-thread 3DMark score and 24 threads provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with the 280 tensor cores on the GPU offering NVENC-like acceleration (though not explicitly stated). The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 350 W TDP of the GPU require adequate cooling, but the system can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding without major frame drops.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 and Geekbench multicore of 17025 indicate fast timeline rendering and export times. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU accelerates effects and color grading, while the 896.0 GB/s bandwidth supports 4K multi-stream editing. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 443900 speeds up file operations.

3D rendering: The GPU's 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 and 70 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 36th percentile GPU performance means render times will be moderate. The CPU's 25369 Cinebench R23 multicore score is strong for CPU-based rendering, making this a viable hybrid rendering system.

Software development: The CPU's 138974 PassMark integer math score and 11737 3DMark max-thread score indicate fast code compilation and test execution. The 30 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed data. The 85th CPU percentile places this well above development machine averages.

Student and office work: The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic tasks, while the CPU's single-thread score of 4101 in PassMark ensures responsive application usage. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for daily use, and the 16 cores handle multitasking across spreadsheets, browsers, and document editors with ease.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU compute power over GPU graphics performance. Gamers at 1080p who want high refresh rates will find the CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and 85th percentile ranking beneficial, though the GPU's 36th percentile means 1080p ultra settings in the latest AAA titles will not hit max refresh on 240 Hz panels — 144 Hz is more realistic. Gamers at 1440p should expect solid performance with settings tweaks, but 4K gaming is not this system's strength given the GPU's Steel Nomad score of 6269.5.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development will benefit most from the CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25369 and PassMark multithread score of 36387 indicate strong performance in rendering and compilation tasks. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU supports large textures and complex scenes, but the GPU's modest compute means final-frame renders will not be as fast as with higher-tier GPUs.

Developers writing multi-threaded applications will appreciate the 11737 3DMark max-thread score and the 30 MB L3 cache, which reduces shared-memory contention. Students and office workers will find the system overkill for basic tasks, but the 85th CPU percentile ensures longevity. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or database workloads will benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 443900 and ECC memory support, though the 65 W TDP and 350 W GPU TDP require a robust power supply and cooling solution.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700 ranks at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37135.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is identical (0% delta) to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's score of 6270.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported, alongside DDR4 and DDR5 memory types with a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 61, indicating the system performs better than average overall, but the GPU's 36th percentile drags down the graphics potential.

Q: Are there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact combination, so all FPS figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Q: What are the CPU's clock speeds?

A: The base clock is 2.10 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i7-13700 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The CPU is a 16-core, 24-thread Raptor Lake processor on Intel Socket 1700, with a 5.20 GHz boost clock and 30 MB of L3 cache, ranking at the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, 8960 shading units, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores, ranking at the 36th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 61, placing this system in the upper-mid tier of desktop configurations. The CPU is the standout component, while the GPU is a capable but not exceptional performer, making this build best suited for compute-heavy tasks and 1080p-to-1440p gaming rather than 4K ultra or top-tier ray tracing workloads.