SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-13700 + Intel Arc A380: A Desktop Build Analysis

This desktop build pairs Intel's 16-core Raptor Lake CPU with Intel's entry-level Arc A380 GPU, creating a configuration where processing power vastly outstrips graphics capability. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 44th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 65 for the pairing. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the individual benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build achieves a combined percentile of 65, indicating it outperforms 65% of all tracked configurations. This places it in the upper-middle tier of desktop systems, though the CPU's 85th percentile and GPU's 44th percentile reveal a significant performance gap between components.

Q: How does the Core i7-13700 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 160?

A: The Core i7-13700 has an average benchmark score of 37,135, while the AMD Ryzen 7 160 scores 37,117, showing a delta of 0%. The Intel chip is also within 0.1% of the Intel Core i9-12900T and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, and 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The Core i7-13700 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop processor and relevant for workstation use cases.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A380 comes with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz with an effective speed of 15.5 Gbps.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Core i7-13700 includes Intel UHD Graphics 770. This provides a basic display output capability that can be useful for troubleshooting or for systems that run headless, though the discrete Arc A380 will handle all graphical workloads.

Q: What is the production status of the Arc A380?

A: The Arc A380 is marked as end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage. Its predecessor was Xe Graphics. The CPU, by contrast, remains in active production.

Q: What PCIe interfaces do these components use?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. This means the GPU connection is not a bottleneck from the CPU side, as the GPU's interface is fully supported.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a dramatic asymmetry between CPU and GPU capabilities. The Core i7-13700 delivers an average benchmark score of 37,135, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its multi-threaded performance is particularly strong: Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 25,369 points, while Geekbench multicore hits 17,025. Single-thread performance is equally competitive, with Cinebench R23 single-core scoring 2,008.5 and Geekbench single-core at 2,329.

The Arc A380, by contrast, produces an average benchmark score of 8,558, placing it at the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 808, and Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 38,224 and 36,736 respectively. PassMark G3D reaches 6,252, with DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 scores of 38 and 35 respectively. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD FirePro W5170M at 8,595 (0.4% ahead), followed by the AMD Radeon HD 8870M at 8,462 (1.1% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 at 8,458 (1.2% behind).

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU operates at a level roughly matching high-end desktop processors, while the GPU functions at entry-level mobile graphics territory. The 41-point percentile gap between CPU and GPU indicates that the processor will rarely be the limiting factor in any workload; instead, the GPU will constrain graphics-heavy tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show scaling behavior that reflects the hybrid core design. The 3DMark suite scores progress from 1,092 in single-thread, to 2,176 in 2-thread, 4,279 in 4-thread, 7,649 in 8-thread, and 11,737 in max-thread tests. This scaling indicates efficient utilization of additional cores up to the full thread count. PassMark results reinforce this: multithread score is 36,387, integer math reaches 138,974, and floating-point math hits 97,723.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25,369 suggests strong performance in CPU-bound rendering tasks, while the single-core score of 2,008.5 indicates responsive operation in lightly-threaded applications. Data compression performance is notable at 443,900 in PassMark, and encryption throughput reaches 25,653. The processor's 85th percentile ranking places it above the majority of CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i9-12900T, both within 0.1% of its average score.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p with competitive settings, the CPU's single-thread score of 4,101 in PassMark and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,176 will keep frame pacing consistent, but the Arc A380's 44th percentile rank limits achievable frame rates. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 6,252 suggests 1080p gaming at medium settings is the realistic ceiling for demanding titles.

Streaming: The 16 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. PassMark multithread score of 36,387 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 25,369 indicate the CPU can handle concurrent game and encode workloads, though the GPU's modest performance may require lower in-game settings to maintain stream quality.

Video Editing: The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 11,737 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 25,369 support smooth timeline scrubbing and fast export times in CPU-accelerated workflows. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth can assist with effects and color grading, but its 44th percentile rank means GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower than CPU-based processing.

3D Rendering: Cinebench scores of 25,369 (multicore) and 2,008.5 (single-core) show the CPU excels at ray-traced and rasterized rendering. The GPU's FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS and 8 RT cores provide some acceleration for supported renderers, but the overall GPU percentile of 44 suggests it will not substantially accelerate GPU-based render engines.

Software Development: The 16 cores and 24 threads handle parallel compilation efficiently, with PassMark integer math at 138,974 indicating strong arithmetic throughput. Data encryption score of 25,653 supports secure development workflows, while the 30 MB L3 cache benefits large codebases that fit within the shared cache.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench 2,329, Cinebench R23 2,008.5) ensures responsive application launches and document editing. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for multiple 4K displays through its 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, making this a capable productivity system.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else and require only modest graphics capability. Gamers at 1080p with medium-to-low settings will find the CPU ensures consistent frame pacing, though the GPU's 44th percentile limits visual fidelity. Content creators working primarily in CPU-heavy applications like video encoding or software compilation will benefit from the 85th percentile CPU performance. Developers compiling large codebases or running virtual machines will appreciate the 16 cores and 24 threads, with PassMark multithread score of 36,387 indicating strong parallel throughput.

Students and office workers who need a responsive system for general productivity will find the single-thread performance adequate, while small business workstations that rely on CPU-based tasks like database operations or spreadsheet calculations can leverage the 30 MB L3 cache and 16-core design. The platform's ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation builds where data integrity is critical. However, users seeking any form of high-end gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering should look elsewhere, as the Arc A380's performance tier is more aligned with entry-level mobile graphics.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i7-13700 uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring forward compatibility with high-bandwidth storage and future GPUs. The Arc A380 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which runs without issue on this platform.

The CPU's TDP of 65 W is modest for a 16-core processor, and the GPU's 75 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 250 W means the total system power draw is low. This leaves significant headroom in most power supplies for upgrades. The GPU requires a 1x 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor with dimensions of 222 mm length, 114 mm height, and 42 mm width.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A380 with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 85th percentile performance can support significantly more powerful graphics cards. The PCIe Gen 5 CPU interface and 16 lanes ensure that any modern GPU will have full bandwidth available. The platform's DDR5 support also allows for memory bandwidth improvements if the current configuration uses DDR4. The CPU's production status is active, meaning availability for future replacements is not a concern, while the GPU's end-of-life status suggests planning for a graphics upgrade is prudent.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance differential between the CPU and GPU creates a clear bottleneck structure. The CPU operates at the 85th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 44th percentile — a 41-point gap that indicates the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads. In gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 4,101, Geekbench 2,329) is sufficient to drive high frame rates, but the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 6,252 will cap actual FPS well below what the CPU can support.

In CPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, or software compilation, the GPU bottleneck is irrelevant, and the system performs at a level consistent with the CPU's 85th percentile ranking. The 3DMark thread scaling from 1,092 (single) to 11,737 (max) shows the CPU scales effectively with thread count, so multi-threaded applications will utilize the full 24 threads.

The GPU's compute performance is relatively stronger than its graphics performance: PassMark GPU compute score of 2,762 versus G3D of 6,252 suggests compute tasks are less bottlenecked. However, the 44th percentile overall ranking means any GPU-accelerated workload will be constrained compared to what the CPU could theoretically feed. Memory bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s on the GPU is modest, potentially limiting performance in bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700, a 16-core Raptor Lake processor at the 85th CPU percentile, with the Intel Arc A380, an entry-level Xe-HPG GPU at the 44th GPU percentile. The combined percentile of 65 places this system in the upper-middle tier of tracked configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score of 37,135 is within 0.1% of its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i9-12900T, confirming its position as a high-performance processor.

The Arc A380's average score of 8,558 places it near the AMD FirePro W5170M and NVIDIA GeForce MX330, both within 1.2% of its performance. This GPU is fundamentally an entry-level part, suitable for basic gaming and display output but not for demanding graphics workloads. The CPU+GPU pairing creates a system where processing power is abundant but graphical capability is limited, making this a CPU-centric build for users who prioritize compute performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 2,008.5, Geekbench 2,329) indicates it can support high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 44th percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 6,252 are the primary constraints.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A380's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely sufficient for many titles at medium-to-high settings, but the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 35 and Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 suggest modern AAA games will require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates. Esports titles with lighter graphics requirements could run at higher settings, as the CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,176 indicates strong low-thread performance.

At 1440p, the GPU's 44th percentile ranking makes smooth gameplay unlikely in demanding titles, and users should expect to lower settings substantially or cap resolution at 1080p. The GPU's 8 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits ray-traced workloads to light effects at best. Overall, this build is not designed for high-refresh gaming; it is a CPU-first system where graphics performance is adequate for casual or competitive gaming at modest settings.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz and boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). It features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, delivering 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, along with 8 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1). The 75 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU make it a low-power add-in card, requiring a single 8-pin connector and dual-slot cooling with dimensions of 222 mm length, 114 mm height, and 42 mm width.

Benchmark results place the GPU at the 44th percentile overall, with an average score of 8,558. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 and PassMark G3D of 6,252 indicate entry-level graphics performance. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores of 37, 38, and 35 respectively show consistent performance across API generations, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 38,224 and 36,736 suggest compute workloads are relatively stronger. For rendering, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, providing modern API coverage. The 8 RT cores enable basic ray tracing, but the modest 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits the complexity of renderable scenes. The GPU is end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor, meaning software optimization may slow as focus shifts to newer architectures.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + Intel Arc A380

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds