SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-13700 and Intel Arc A310E pairing presents a distinct combination of a high-end desktop processor with an entry-level dedicated graphics card. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, and the `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, so all frame rate expectations discussed below are estimates derived from the CPU’s benchmark scores and the GPU’s hardware specifications rather than empirical game testing. This analysis relies strictly on the provided benchmark and specification data to characterize the system’s capabilities and limitations.

Gaming Performance

The absence of measured FPS rows means that no direct frame rate figures can be cited for any game or resolution. However, the benchmark scores for the CPU and the hardware profile of the GPU allow for a qualitative estimate of gaming behavior. The Intel Arc A310E is a 4 GB GDDR6 graphics card with a 64-bit memory bus and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, figures that indicate a limited memory interface. The GPU’s 768 shading units and 16 ROPs, alongside a 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, position it as a low-tier discrete solution. For 1080p gaming, the data suggests the GPU would be the primary constraint, likely delivering playable frame rates in less demanding or older titles, but struggling with modern AAA games at high settings due to the small memory pool and narrow bus.

The CPU, by contrast, is far more capable. The Intel Core i7-13700’s multi-threaded scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 25369 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 17025, indicate a processor that can easily feed frames to a more powerful GPU. In this pairing, the CPU’s performance headroom means that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as competitive esports titles at lower resolutions, the system might achieve higher frame rates than the GPU’s raw power suggests, but the A310E’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will cap overall performance. The data implies that for 1440p or 4K gaming, the GPU would be overwhelmed, and the estimated frame rates would be significantly lower than at 1080p. Overall, the gaming experience is characterized by the GPU holding back a much stronger processor, making this pairing suitable for light or older games rather than high-refresh or high-resolution gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results place it in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37135. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 160 (avg score 37117, deltaPct 0), the Intel Core i9-12900T (avg score 37112, deltaPct 0.1), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (avg score 37161, deltaPct -0.1). These deltas, all within 0.1%, indicate that the i7-13700 is statistically tied with these processors in overall CPU performance, showing a balanced competitive position. The CPU’s single-threaded performance is strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2329 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2008.5, which supports good responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks.

The GPU’s benchmark data is entirely absent, with an `avgBenchmarkScore` of 0 and no benchmark entries, which places its percentile at 50. This lack of data means the GPU’s raw performance cannot be directly compared to rivals. The combined percentile for the build is 68, which reflects the CPU’s high standing pulling the overall score upward despite the GPU’s unmeasured performance. The data suggests that the combined picture is one of extreme imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier performer in the 85th percentile, while the GPU, based on its hardware specifications, is likely a bottom-half performer. In practical terms, the benchmark scores indicate that the CPU would dominate any compute-heavy workload, while the GPU would lag in graphics-intensive tasks, creating a system where the processor’s potential is not fully utilized by the graphics card.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not well-supported by the data. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM, 64-bit bus, and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are insufficient for driving high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles. The CPU’s high single-threaded scores (e.g., 4101 in Passmark single-thread) could handle the logic, but the A310E would likely cap frame rates well below the 144 Hz or 240 Hz targets typical of high-refresh monitors. Estimated performance would be suitable only for very light or older esports games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads, evidenced by a 3DMark max-threads score of 11737, provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The Passmark data compression score of 443900 indicates strong throughput for encoding workloads. However, the GPU’s lack of a dedicated encoder mention in the data and its low shader count mean that relying on the CPU for encoding is feasible, but the overall gaming experience would still be bottlenecked by the A310E. Streaming light games is viable, but not demanding titles.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 12806 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 36387, indicating fast rendering and export times for 1080p and even 1440p footage. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are limited for effects-heavy timelines or 4K editing, but for basic cuts and color grading, the system would perform adequately, relying on the CPU’s muscle.

3D rendering: This scenario favors the CPU significantly. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 positions the i7-13700 as a strong renderer for CPU-based engines. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 ray tracing cores are minimal for GPU-accelerated rendering, meaning that the A310E would contribute little to rendering tasks. Software that uses the CPU for rendering would see excellent performance, while GPU-accelerated renderers would be slow.

Software development: The CPU’s high multi-threaded scores, including a Passmark integer math score of 138974 and a floating point math score of 97723, support fast compilation times and parallel builds. The GPU is largely irrelevant for coding tasks, so the system would perform excellently for developers, with the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking ensuring smooth multi-tasking and virtual machine usage.

Student and office work: This is a strong fit. The CPU’s single-threaded performance (Geekbench 2329) handles office applications and web browsing with ease, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could even handle display output without the discrete GPU, though the A310E is present. The 65W TDP and low power draw of the GPU (75W) suggest an efficient system for daily productivity, with the CPU’s 16 cores providing more than enough power for spreadsheets, documents, and multitasking.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 50th percentile (based on a lack of data) highlights a severe imbalance. In gaming, the CPU’s high single-threaded performance, such as a 3DMark single-thread score of 1092, would allow it to process game logic quickly, but the GPU’s limited 4 GB memory and 64-bit bus would constrain texture loading and frame buffer, leading to lower FPS than the CPU could otherwise support. The FPS scaling, though not measured, would be poor at higher resolutions because the GPU’s bandwidth (124.0 GB/s) is insufficient for 1440p or 4K textures.

In compute workloads, the balance shifts. For tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that use the CPU, the i7-13700 would not be bottlenecked by the GPU, and performance would be excellent, as seen in the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369. However, for GPU-accelerated tasks like ray tracing, the A310E’s 6 RT cores and 3.072 TFLOPS would be the limiting factor, far slower than the CPU’s processing capability. The data suggests that the system’s overall balance is heavily skewed toward CPU performance, making the GPU a weak link for any graphics-intensive workload, but a non-issue for CPU-bound tasks. The recommended PSU of 250 W further underscores that the GPU draws minimal power (75W TDP), so the CPU’s 65W TDP is the primary power consumer, but neither component stresses a typical power supply.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel setup, with ECC memory support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The benchmark scores reflect a processor that is strong in both single and multi-threaded tasks. The Passmark single-thread score of 4101 and Geekbench single-core score of 2329 indicate excellent responsiveness, while the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 shows substantial parallel processing power.

The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking places it above the vast majority of processors, and its nearest rivals show it is on par with the AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i9-12900T, with deltas of 0 and 0.1 percent, respectively. This suggests that in real workloads, the i7-13700 offers performance equivalent to those chips, making it a high-end choice for productivity. The Passmark data encryption score of 25653 and extended instructions score of 26578 indicate robust cryptographic and SIMD performance, which is beneficial for security and scientific applications. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10075 and max-threads score of 11737 demonstrate scaling across cores, confirming that the hybrid architecture of performance and efficiency cores works well. For real-world workloads, the CPU’s combination of high clock speeds and many cores means it can handle gaming, content creation, and development without breaking a sweat, with the only limitation being the paired GPU.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over gaming graphics. Gamers playing at 1080p with low to medium settings in older or less demanding titles would find the system adequate, but those seeking high-refresh or 4K gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are insufficient. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers using CPU-based software, would benefit greatly from the i7-13700’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369, making this a viable workstation for rendering and encoding tasks. Software developers would appreciate the fast compilation times enabled by the Passmark integer math score of 138974 and the 16 cores, which allow for parallel builds and virtual machine workloads.

Students and office workers would find the system overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU’s efficiency (65W TDP) and integrated graphics mean it could function well as a productivity machine, with the A310E providing a modest upgrade for light graphical work. Small business workstations requiring multi-threaded performance for data analysis or financial modeling would see strong results from the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking. However, the GPU’s end-of-life status and lack of benchmark data suggest that its target audience is limited to those who need a basic display output or light GPU acceleration, as the CPU can handle most heavy lifting. The build is best suited for users who plan to upgrade the GPU later, as the CPU provides a strong foundation for future graphics upgrades.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The motherboard platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing RAM. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, meaning the system is ready for faster storage and future graphics cards. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 65W, so a modest power supply is sufficient, but upgrading the GPU would require a more substantial PSU. The data shows the CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is limited, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz is already high.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A310E with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 85th percentile performance would not bottleneck a mid-range or high-end graphics card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 slot supports modern GPUs, and the CPU’s 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for fast NVMe SSDs. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation builds. The GPU’s end-of-life status and successor (Battlemage) indicate that Intel has moved on, but the current card can still be used pending an upgrade. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a user could reuse existing memory or upgrade to faster DDR5, though the data does not specify speed limits. Overall, the upgrade path is clear: keep the CPU and platform, and invest in a better GPU to unlock the system’s true potential.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i7-13700 CPU with the Intel Arc A310E GPU. The CPU is a high-end 16-core, 24-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz and a 65W TDP. The GPU is an entry-level Arc 3 series card with 4 GB GDDR6 memory, a 64-bit bus, and a 75W TDP. The combined percentile for the build is 68, which reflects the CPU’s strong 85th percentile ranking offset by the GPU’s unmeasured performance (50th percentile). This pairing is inherently unbalanced, as the CPU is capable of far more than the GPU can deliver in graphics tasks.

The system’s overall tier is upper-midrange, driven almost entirely by the CPU’s benchmark scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25369 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 36387. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM place it in the low end for gaming, but its 6 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate mean it can handle some modern features at low settings. The build class is desktop, confirming it is intended for stationary use. In summary, this is a CPU-centric build that excels at productivity and compute tasks, but is severely limited in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, making it a candidate for immediate GPU replacement.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU build?

A: The combined percentile for the build is 68, which is influenced by the CPU’s high 85th percentile ranking and the GPU’s lower 50th percentile (based on the GPU’s lack of benchmark data).

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-13700 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, and it also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A310E?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s, which comes from its 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-13700 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 160?

A: The i7-13700 has an average benchmark score of 37135, while the Ryzen 7 160 has an average score of 37117, resulting in a deltaPct of 0, meaning they are statistically tied in performance.

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Core i7-13700 and the suggested PSU for the Arc A310E?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 250 W.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimated from benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

Q: What is the production status of the Intel Arc A310E?

A: The GPU is listed as end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with 6 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The memory configuration includes 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1).

The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are the most limiting factors for rendering, as they restrict texture detail and resolution. The 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is low by modern standards, which would cause performance drops in high-resolution textures. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low shading unit count (768) means that RT effects would be costly. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it can run modern APIs, but its performance is constrained by hardware. The 75W TDP and lack of power connectors make it a low-power solution, fitting for small builds. With no benchmark scores available, its percentile is set at 50, but the hardware data suggests it is a low-tier card suitable for basic gaming and light GPU compute, not for demanding rendering tasks. The 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs provide connectivity, but the GPU’s performance is the bottleneck in any graphics workload.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds