SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-13700

37,135 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs a 16-core Intel Raptor Lake processor with a low-power Intel Arc entry-level GPU. The CPU ranks in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 40th percentile, giving the combined system a 63rd percentile overall. Benchmark data shows a large performance gap between the two components, making this a CPU-centric desktop that is strong for productivity and modest for gaming. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all gaming expectations below are estimates based on the individual component benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700 is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S, 10 nm process). It has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel operation and ECC enabled. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

The benchmark results position this processor well above the average. Its average benchmark score is 37,135, which places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals are all within 0.1% of this score: the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H (37,161, delta -0.1%), the Intel Core i9-12900T (37,112, delta +0.1%), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37,093, delta +0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (37,117, delta 0%). This means the i7-13700 is effectively tied with these CPUs in average benchmark performance, despite differences in architecture and core counts.

In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 25,369 and the single-core score is 2,008.5. The multi-core result is particularly strong for a 65 W part, indicating that the 16 cores can sustain heavy loads without excessive power draw. The single-core score is also high, suggesting excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and light-threaded applications. In Geekbench, the multi-core score is 17,025 and single-core is 2,329, reinforcing the same pattern. PassMark results show integer math at 138,974, floating-point math at 97,723, and extended instructions at 26,578. Data compression and encryption scores are 443,900 and 25,653, respectively. These numbers indicate that the CPU excels in tasks that can use many threads, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and large data processing.

The 3DMark threaded tests further illustrate scaling: 2-thread score is 2,176, 4-thread is 4,279, 8-thread is 7,649, 16-thread is 10,075, and max-thread is 11,737. The near-linear scaling up to 16 threads shows that the core configuration is well-balanced for multi-threaded workloads. For a desktop workstation, this CPU is a capable choice for any application that leverages multiple cores. Its TDP of 65 W means a standard air cooler can handle it, though sustained all-core loads will benefit from a good aftermarket cooler.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-13700 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as enabled.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i7-13700?

A: The launch MSRP is $384.

Q: Which socket does this CPU use?

A: It uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode.

Q: Is the processor overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: It provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark portfolio is dominated by strong multi-threaded scores. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core result of 25,369 is far above the typical range for a desktop processor, and the single-core score of 2,008.5 is also above average. The Geekbench multi-core score of 17,025 and single-core of 2,329 align with the 85th percentile rank. The average benchmark score of 37,135 is within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H and the Intel Core i9-12900T, confirming that this CPU sits in the top tier of available processors.

The GPU, Intel Arc A310, is a much lower performer. Its average benchmark score is 7,550, which places it in the 40th percentile of all GPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is 1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (delta +1%) and 0.1% slower than the AMD Radeon R7 250 (delta -0.1%). In PassMark, the GPU scores 5,433 in G3D and 2,157 in compute. The DirectX 12 score is 29, DirectX 11 is 33, DirectX 10 is 31, and DirectX 9 is 69, all of which are very low numbers. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 30,607 and 28,964, respectively, which are better but still indicate entry-level performance. The combined percentile of the CPU+GPU pair is 63, reflecting the large gap between the CPU's high tier and the GPU's mid-low tier.

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data pack. Therefore, all frame-rate expectations must be inferred from the component scores. The CPU’s performance suggests that it would not bottleneck any modern game, but the GPU’s low percentile and limited VRAM (4 GB) will constrain the overall gaming experience.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over graphics. The Core i7-13700’s 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 65 W TDP and strong multi-thread benchmarks, make it a solid choice for:

Content creators: Video editing, 3D rendering, and audio production rely heavily on multi-core CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,369 indicates the ability to handle long render times with efficiency.
Developers and engineers: Compiling code, running virtual machines, and building large projects benefit from high thread counts. The PassMark data compression and integer math scores (443,900 and 138,974) support these tasks.
Data analysts and researchers: Workloads that involve data processing, simulations, and statistical analysis can use the CPU’s floating-point and extended instructions (97,723 and 26,578).
Students: A desktop with a powerful CPU can handle any academic software, including CAD, statistical tools, and programming IDEs, without slowdowns.
Small business workstations: Office productivity, database management, and financial modeling are all CPU-bound tasks that this processor can handle with ease.

For gamers, the GPU is the limiting factor. The Arc A310 is an entry-level card with 4 GB VRAM and 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. It is best suited for 1080p gaming in esports titles or older games with lower settings. For modern AAA games at high details, the GPU would be the bottleneck, resulting in low frame rates. Therefore, this build is not recommended for high-fidelity gaming, but it can serve as a capable workstation for users who may add a stronger GPU later.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU is in the 85th percentile, while the GPU is in the 40th. In CPU-bound tasks, the system will perform exceptionally well, as the CPU is among the top 15% of all processors. In GPU-bound tasks, the system will be limited by the Arc A310, which is only about 1% faster than a GTX 1650 and 0.1% slower than a Radeon R7 250. This means that for gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions and detail settings. For productivity workloads that do not rely heavily on the GPU, the CPU will dominate, and the system will feel very responsive.

The combined percentile of 63 indicates that, overall, the system is above average, but this is largely due to the CPU. The GPU’s low performance means that any application that uses GPU acceleration (e.g., some video encoding, 3D modeling with viewport rendering) will be slower than what a more balanced system would offer. In a pure gaming scenario, the CPU would be underutilized because the GPU cannot keep up. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks, the GPU is not involved, so the system performs at the CPU’s high level.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-13700 uses the LGA 1700 socket, which is shared with other 12th and 13th generation Core processors. This provides a clear upgrade path within the same platform: you could swap in a higher-end 13th Gen CPU without changing the motherboard. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so you can choose either type based on your motherboard and budget. It also has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are more than enough for a single high-end graphics card. The GPU, the Arc A310, is a PCIe 4.0 x8 card, so it will work in a Gen 5 slot but will run at Gen 4 speeds.

The suggested PSU for this system is 200 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 30 W TDP, so the total power draw is only 95 W. This leaves a large headroom for additional components, but it also means that if you upgrade to a more powerful GPU, you will likely need a larger PSU. For instance, a mid-range GPU with a TDP of 200 W or more would require a 400 W or higher PSU. The CPU is not overclockable (multiplier locked), so the 65 W TDP is the maximum sustained power draw.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A310 with a stronger GPU. The CPU has enough performance to feed a mid-range or high-end GPU without becoming a bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes and the memory bandwidth (DDR5 or DDR4 dual-channel) are sufficient for a top-tier graphics card. Additionally, the system’s power budget can be expanded with a PSU upgrade. The GPU is already end-of-life (production status), with the successor Battlemage listed, so upgrading to a newer Intel GPU or an alternative brand is a logical step.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is a discrete graphics card built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation, 6 nm process). It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU is equipped with 768 shading units, 32 texture units, 16 ROPs, and 6 ray tracing cores. Its base and boost clocks are both 1750 MHz, with memory clock at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The card draws only 30 W of power, is a single-slot design, and requires no external power connectors. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and offers four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs.

The GPU’s compute capabilities are modest: FP32 throughput is 2.688 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 5.376 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. These numbers place it in the entry-level segment. The benchmark scores confirm this: PassMark G3D is 5,433, and the DirectX 12 score is 29. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 30,607 and 28,964, which are relatively low. The GPU’s percentile is 40, and its average score is 7,550, which is only 1% higher than a GTX 1650.

The 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for modern games, as many titles require more than 4 GB for high-resolution textures. At 1080p, some games can run with 4 GB, but they may stutter or lower textures. The 64-bit memory bus also restricts bandwidth, which affects performance in memory-heavy scenes. The 6 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but with such low compute power, ray tracing will be a performance killer. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which is good for API compatibility, but the hardware cannot deliver high frame rates with those features enabled.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (class: desktop) combining a high-end CPU and a low-end GPU. The CPU is in the 85th percentile, the GPU is in the 40th, and the combined percentile is 63. The system is clearly CPU-centric, with the processor providing the majority of its performance. The CPU’s 16 cores and 24 threads make it a powerful workstation processor, while the GPU is only suitable for basic graphics tasks and light gaming. The overall tier is mid-range: the CPU lifts the system into the top 15% of all PCs, but the GPU brings it down to the 63rd percentile overall. This is a balanced, powerful CPU with a placeholder GPU that can be upgraded later.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, the following statements are estimates based on the component benchmark scores. The CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread performance ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in any game. The GPU, however, is an entry-level card with 4 GB VRAM and a 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 compute. At 1080p, the GPU can likely handle esports titles (e.g., Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, Dota 2) at medium to high settings with acceptable frame rates. For more demanding AAA games, the GPU will struggle, especially at ultra settings. At 1440p, the GPU is not sufficient for most modern games, and at 4K it is not recommended. Given the GPU’s percentile (40th) and its proximity to the GTX 1650 (1% faster), users should expect performance similar to that of a GTX 1650, which is a budget card from a previous generation. The 4 GB VRAM will cause texture quality to be limited, and the 64-bit memory bus will restrict bandwidth. For a better gaming experience, a GPU upgrade is essential. Until then, this system is best used for productivity and casual gaming at lower resolutions.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-13700 + Intel Arc A310

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i7-13700

Intel Arc A310

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds