SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i7-12700KF + Intel Arc A750 — Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 12th-generation Alder Lake desktop processor with Intel's Arc A750 graphics card, creating a desktop system that sits at the 76th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU alone ranks at the 85th percentile against all processors, while the GPU lands at the 66th percentile against all graphics cards. This is a system where the processor clearly outpaces the graphics solution, which shapes the entire performance profile you can expect from this build.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Alder Lake architecture using a 10nm process node. It features a hybrid design typical of the 12th generation, though the FACT PACK does not break down performance-core versus efficiency-core counts. The base clock runs at 3.60 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and the chip carries a 125W TDP. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though no specific memory bandwidth figure is provided. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is worth noting for expansion planning.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 25 MB L3 cache. This cache configuration is well-suited for workloads that benefit from a large shared pool of last-level cache, such as database operations or certain compilation tasks. The processor has an unlocked multiplier, indicating overclocking headroom, and was released in November 2021 with a launch MSRP of $384.

Benchmark results show a strong all-around performer. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 28,838 in multi-core and 4,071 in single-core. The multi-core score is roughly 7 times the single-core score, which reflects good scaling across the 20 threads. In Geekbench, the multicore score is 14,367 against a single-core score of 2,255, again showing solid thread scaling. The 3DMark thread tests show a progression from 1,043 single-thread to 9,283 at 16 threads and 9,983 at max threads, indicating that the processor approaches its full throughput by 16 threads and gains little beyond that — this is typical for a 12-core part where the additional threads (from hyper-threading) provide diminishing returns.

Passmark results reinforce the picture: a multithread score of 34,092 and a single-thread score of 3,984. The integer math score of 113,521 is notably higher than the floating-point math score of 87,449, suggesting the processor is particularly strong in integer-heavy workloads like encryption, compression, and general office productivity. The data compression score of 441,960 and data encryption score of 23,181 both point to strong performance in archival and security tasks. The random string sorting score of 45,150 indicates good memory subsystem performance, which is relevant for database-style workloads.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 35,365, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals show how tight the competition is at this tier. The Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35,403, just 0.1% ahead. The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35,428, also 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35,305, which is 0.2% behind. The Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35,287, also 0.2% behind. This means the 12700KF sits in a cluster where any of these chips are effectively interchangeable in raw performance — the differences are within run-to-run variance. For real workloads, this means the 12700KF delivers performance essentially identical to its direct competitors, and you would not notice a difference in day-to-day use.

Balance and Bottleneck

This build presents a clear imbalance: the CPU is a top-15-percent-class processor, while the GPU is a mid-pack performer at the 66th percentile. The data indicates that the graphics card will be the limiting factor in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, while the CPU will have headroom to spare. This is not necessarily a bad thing — it depends on your use case — but it defines the system's behavior.

The CPU's 85th percentile ranking against all processors means it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database. The GPU's 66th percentile ranking means it sits just above the middle of the pack. When paired, the combined percentile drops to 76, reflecting that the weaker component drags the overall system down. In practical terms, this means that in CPU-bound scenarios (like simulation games, strategy titles, or heavy multitasking), this system will perform at a high level. In GPU-bound scenarios (like modern AAA games at high resolutions or GPU rendering), the system will perform at a mid-range level.

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so any FPS figures discussed later are estimates based on the benchmark scores. However, the benchmark results give strong hints about bottleneck behavior. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,283 is very high, and its single-thread score of 1,043 is also strong. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 is moderate. This suggests that in games that are heavily CPU-bound (typically at lower resolutions or in esports titles), the GPU will be the limiting factor — the CPU will be able to feed frames faster than the GPU can render them. In games that are GPU-bound (typically at higher resolutions or with heavy graphics settings), the balance will be more even, though the GPU will still be the primary constraint.

The Passmark GPU scores provide additional context. The G3D score of 12,534 is decent for a mid-range card, while the G2D score of 732 is relatively low, suggesting the card is not particularly strong in 2D desktop work. The DirectX scores are interesting: DirectX 9 scores 181, DirectX 10 scores 65, DirectX 11 scores 72, and DirectX 12 scores 70. The high DirectX 9 score relative to newer API versions suggests this card may have driver overhead issues in modern APIs, or it may simply reflect that the card is better optimized for older workloads. The GPU compute score of 5,368 is modest, indicating that this is not a compute-first card.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 35,365, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, placing the 12700KF in the upper echelon of desktop processors. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13700T, scores 35,403, a difference of -0.1% — essentially identical. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35,305, just 0.2% behind. These sub-1% differences mean that for any real-world workload, you would be hard-pressed to tell these CPUs apart without a stopwatch.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 20,582, placing it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. This is a mid-range result. The nearest rivals show a similar clustering: the Intel Arc B570 scores 20,556 (0.1% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662 (0.4% behind), and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480 (0.5% ahead). The Arc A750 is effectively tied with these cards, which span a range of mobile and desktop parts from different generations. This puts the A750 in a competitive position against older high-end mobile GPUs and current mid-range desktop GPUs.

Looking at the GPU benchmark breakdown, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 is the headline gaming metric. This is a modern DirectX 12 benchmark, and a score in this range suggests the card can handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with some headroom for 1440p in less demanding games. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554 and Vulkan score of 85,631 indicate that the card performs better in compute-oriented API tests than in gaming-specific ones, which is a pattern sometimes seen with Intel's Arc architecture.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is clearly the stronger component. The 76th combined percentile reflects that the GPU is the bottleneck in graphics-heavy workloads. For productivity tasks that are CPU-bound, this system will perform like a top-tier machine. For gaming, it will perform like a solid mid-range machine. The Passmark physics score of 1,780 for the CPU further confirms strong CPU performance in physics simulations, which are often a bottleneck in games.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-12700KF a good match for the Intel Arc A750?

A: The data shows the CPU is at the 85th percentile while the GPU is at the 66th percentile. This means the CPU has significant headroom in GPU-bound workloads, but the pairing is functional. For CPU-bound tasks, the system will excel; for GPU-bound tasks, the graphics card will be the limiting factor.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 12700KF scores 35,365 on average, which is within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-13700T (35,403), Intel Core 5 213PE (35,428), Intel Core i5-13600T (35,305), and Intel Core i7-12700K (35,287). These differences are negligible in real-world use.

Q: What kind of gaming performance can I expect?

A: There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 and its 66th percentile ranking, expect 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with 1440p possible in less demanding games. These are estimates, not measured results.

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the Arc A750 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Passmark DirectX 12 score is 70, while the DirectX 9 score is 181, suggesting the card is relatively stronger in older API workloads.

Q: What memory does this CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. No specific bandwidth figures are provided in the data, but the cache structure and memory controller are designed to work with either memory type.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, which means you can adjust the clock multiplier to overclock the processor. The base clock is 3.60 GHz and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz, so there is potential headroom if your cooling and power delivery allow it.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement?

A: The GPU has a 225W TDP and the suggested PSU rating is 550W. The card requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector. The CPU has a 125W TDP, so the total system power draw will be well within the suggested PSU rating.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i7-12700KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-end graphics card and one or two NVMe SSDs. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives you flexibility in choosing the memory type, though you must commit to one or the other when building the system — you cannot mix them.

The CPU has a 125W TDP, and the GPU has a 225W TDP with a suggested PSU rating of 550W. This leaves reasonable headroom for a system with a few drives and moderate fan counts. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector, so ensure your power supply has these available. The GPU is dual-slot, so it will occupy two expansion slots in your case.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the weak link. The CPU is at the 85th percentile, so upgrading it would yield diminishing returns. The GPU is at the 66th percentile, meaning a meaningful upgrade would be to a card that scores significantly higher on average benchmark scores. The nearest rival to the A750, the Intel Arc B570, scores nearly identically at 20,556, so a side-grade would not help. You would need to look at cards with higher average benchmark scores to see real gains. The platform itself supports PCIe Gen 4, so any modern GPU will work at full bandwidth.

The socket 1700 platform is mature, and the CPU is still in active production, so there is no immediate need to change platforms. If you are building new, this is a viable platform, though it is not the newest generation. The DDR4 and DDR5 support means you can reuse existing DDR4 memory if you have it, or invest in DDR5 for future-proofing. The 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes are enough for most configurations, but if you plan to run multiple high-bandwidth devices, you may need to plan your slot usage carefully.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6nm process node. The chip, codenamed DG2-512, contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The card has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective. The GPU has 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. It also features 28 ray tracing cores, though it has no tensor cores listed.

The base clock is 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz. This results in a pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 34.41 TFLOPS (at a 2:1 ratio). This means the card is roughly twice as fast in FP16 as in FP32, which is useful for certain compute workloads that can use reduced precision. The card has a 225W TDP and uses a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector configuration. It is a dual-slot card with display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0.

The benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 is the key gaming metric, and it places the card at the 66th percentile. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554 and Vulkan score of 85,631 are respectable, suggesting the card is reasonably capable in compute workloads. However, the Passmark scores are concerning: DirectX 9 scores 181, which is significantly higher than DirectX 10 (65), DirectX 11 (72), and DirectX 12 (70). This pattern suggests the card may have driver overhead issues in modern APIs, or it may simply be that the card is better optimized for older workloads. The G3D score of 12,534 is moderate, and the GPU compute score of 5,368 is on the lower end.

The nearest rivals put the card in perspective. The Intel Arc B570 scores 20,556 on average, just 0.1% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534, 0.2% ahead. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662, 0.4% behind, and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480, 0.5% ahead. This means the A750 performs like a mid-range card from a previous generation, which is consistent with its 66th percentile ranking.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The Intel Core i7-12700KF at the 85th percentile makes this an excellent choice for content creators who work with CPU-intensive applications like video encoding, 3D rendering in CPU-based renderers, or software compilation. The high integer math score of 113,521 and data compression score of 441,960 indicate strong performance in productivity tasks like file archiving, database operations, and general office work. The 20 threads handle multitasking well, making this suitable for developers running virtual machines or containers, or for students running multiple research applications simultaneously.

For gamers, this system is best suited for those who play at 1080p resolution and are willing to adjust settings to achieve high frame rates. The GPU's 66th percentile means it will handle esports titles and older games easily, but modern AAA games at high settings will require compromises. Gamers who play CPU-bound titles like strategy games or simulators will see the CPU's strength shine, as these games benefit from the 12 cores and 20 threads. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,283 suggests strong multi-threaded game performance in titles that can use many threads.

Small business workstations will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,984 in Passmark single-thread) for everyday applications, combined with the ability to handle heavier workloads like data analysis or financial modeling. The system's overall 76th percentile makes it a solid mid-range workstation. However, if your business relies on GPU-accelerated tasks like video editing, 3D modeling with GPU rendering, or machine learning training, this system may feel underpowered on the GPU side.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i7-12700KF with the Intel Arc A750. The CPU is a top-tier performer at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range performer at the 66th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 76, reflecting that the GPU holds the system back in graphics-heavy workloads. The system is best described as a CPU-first build: it excels in productivity, content creation (CPU-bound), and CPU-bound gaming, but is only average in GPU-bound scenarios.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 35,365 places it among the top 15% of processors, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.2%, meaning you get essentially the same performance as the Intel Core i7-13700T or i5-13600T. The GPU's average benchmark score of 20,582 places it in the top 34% of GPUs, and it performs like an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile or an Intel Arc B570. This is a balanced system in the sense that both components are from the same manufacturer, but it is imbalanced in raw performance.

The build class is desktop, which means it is intended for a stationary PC with standard power and cooling. The CPU has a 125W TDP and the GPU has a 225W TDP, so the system will require adequate cooling and a 550W power supply as suggested. The platform supports PCIe Gen 4, which is current and will not bottleneck modern components.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not measured results. The system's gaming performance is dictated primarily by the GPU, which sits at the 66th percentile.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612, this system is capable of 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with frame rates likely in the 60-90 FPS range for modern AAA games, and higher for esports titles. At 1440p, expect frame rates to drop to the 40-60 FPS range for demanding games, with lower settings required for smooth gameplay. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high textures, but may be limiting at 4K or with ultra-high texture packs.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1,043 in 3DMark single-thread, 4,071 in Cinebench R23 single-core) means that in CPU-bound games — particularly simulation, strategy, and esports titles — the system will not be held back by the processor. The 20 threads also help in games that utilize multiple cores, such as modern open-world titles. The Passmark physics score of 1,780 suggests good physics simulation performance, which is relevant for games with heavy physics engines.

For games that are GPU-bound, the Arc A750's performance is consistent with its 66th percentile ranking. The DirectX 12 score of 70 in Passmark is moderate, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,612 suggests the card handles modern APIs reasonably well, though not exceptionally. The high DirectX 9 score of 181 indicates that older games, or games running on legacy APIs, may perform better relative to expectations. Overall, treat this system as a solid 1080p gaming machine with the ability to push into 1440p in less demanding titles, but do not expect high-refresh-rate performance at 1440p in the latest AAA games without significant settings reductions.