SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i7-12700KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i7-12700KF

35,365 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop combination that pairs a high-percentile Alder Lake CPU with a modern Blackwell 2.0 graphics card. The CPU sits in the 85th percentile against all tracked processors, while the GPU's single recorded benchmark places it in the 18th percentile of the GPU database. The pairing's combined percentile is 52, which frames this as a CPU-led build rather than a balanced flagship pairing. Note that no measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination in the database — all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than measured.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i7-12700KF posts a strong and consistent set of CPU benchmark numbers. In Cinebench R23 it scores 28,838 multi-core and 4,071 single-core; in Cinebench R20 the figures are 12,111 multi-core and 1,709 single-core; and in the older R15 it records 2,906 multi-core and 410 single-core. Geekbench yields 14,367 multi-core and 2,255 single-core, while Passmark reports a 34,092 multithread score, a 3,984 single-thread score, and 1,780 in physics. The 3DMark CPU profile scales sensibly across thread counts: 1,043 single-thread, 2,065 at two threads, 4,011 at four, 7,211 at eight, 9,282 at sixteen, and 9,983 at maximum threads.

That scaling curve is revealing. The jump from single-thread to four threads is nearly fourfold, showing strong per-core throughput, while the gain from sixteen to twenty threads is marginal — 9,282 to 9,983 — reflecting the hybrid 12-core, 20-thread layout where the benchmark's sixteen-thread run already saturates most of the useful throughput. The processor's average benchmark score of 35,365 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs in the database, and its nearest rivals cluster remarkably tightly: the Intel Core i7-13700T averages 35,403 (a delta of -0.1 percent), the Intel Core i5-13600T 35,305 (0.2 percent), the Intel Core 5 213PE 35,428 (-0.2 percent), and the Intel Core i7-12700K 35,287 (0.2 percent). In other words, the 12700KF performs within a fraction of a percent of chips both above and below its family line.

On the graphics side, the RTX 5070 SUPER has one recorded result: 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12). Its listed nearest rivals by average score are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M at 2,664 (delta 1 percent), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 at 2,662 (1.1 percent), the Intel Arc Pro B50 at 2,660 (1.1 percent), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 at 2,645 (1.7 percent). Taken at face value in this database, the GPU sits in the 18th percentile of all GPUs — a low placement for a card with this hardware spec sheet, and a figure that should be read as a reflection of the database's scoring pool rather than of the silicon itself. The combined build percentile of 52 lands almost exactly at the midpoint: a top-quartile CPU pulling up a lower-percentile GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

This is a CPU-forward build. The processor's 85th percentile standing against the GPU's 18th percentile position creates a clear asymmetry: in any workload that scales with CPU throughput, the 12700KF will not be the limiting factor, while in graphically demanding scenarios the GPU is the component whose benchmark position defines the ceiling.

The 3DMark CPU profile supports this. At 9,983 points at maximum threads and 7,211 at eight threads, the CPU has substantial headroom for game logic, physics, and draw-call submission. The Passmark physics score of 1,780 and the strong integer (113,521) and floating-point (87,449) results reinforce that simulation-heavy and compute-heavy CPU workloads are well covered. When a game is CPU-bound — competitive titles at reduced settings, for instance — the 4,071 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 2,255 Geekbench single-core score indicate snappy per-thread responsiveness.

The bottleneck flips at higher resolutions and higher graphics presets. The RTX 5070 SUPER's single Steel Nomad score of 2,690 is the only direct measurement available, and its database percentile of 18 defines the GPU-side ceiling for this pairing. Since no measured FPS data exists for this combination, frame-rate scaling can only be discussed qualitatively: expect the estimated frame rate at ultra settings to be GPU-limited in modern AAA titles, with the CPU's percentile headroom going unused. In esports and lighter titles, the estimated ceiling moves to the CPU and display refresh rate instead. The combined percentile of 52 is the arithmetic expression of this imbalance — a top-tier CPU anchoring a mid-pack overall result.

Who Should Build It

This combination suits users whose workloads are CPU-dominant but who still want competent graphics capability. Software developers are the clearest fit: the 14,367 Geekbench multi-core score, 28,838 Cinebench R23 multi-core result, and 20 threads make compilation, containerized workloads, and local virtualization comfortable, and the 12-core layout handles parallel builds without the marginal-thread taper the 3DMark profile shows beyond sixteen threads.

Content creators working with video and 3D will find the CPU side excellent — the Passmark data compression score of 441,960 and encryption score of 23,181 indicate strong throughput for media pipelines — while the GPU's 18 GB of GDDR7 and 672 GB/s of bandwidth provide a large memory pool for scene work, even if its benchmark percentile is modest. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p targeting high refresh rates will get the most from the CPU's 85th-percentile responsiveness; at 4K ultra settings, estimated performance becomes GPU-bound. Students and small-business workstation builders get a dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 platform with an unlocked multiplier, active production status on both parts, and a launch MSRP of $384 for the CPU. The pairing makes least sense for someone whose workload is almost entirely GPU-bound rendering, where the CPU's strength would sit idle.

CPU Analysis

The Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread Alder Lake-S processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 215 mm² die. It runs a 3.60 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.00 GHz, carries a 125 W TDP, and fits Socket 1700. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, plus 25 MB of shared L3. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and the platform provides 20 CPU-attached PCIe 4.0 lanes. There is no integrated graphics — the "F" suffix — and ECC is not supported. The multiplier is unlocked.

The benchmark scores translate directly into workload behavior. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,838 against a single-core score of 4,071 gives a scaling ratio of roughly sevenfold, which is what you want to see from a hybrid architecture where performance cores carry the single-thread load and efficiency cores pad out parallel throughput. Geekbench's 2,255 single-core result is strong for the generation, meaning legacy applications and lightly threaded tools won't stall. The Passmark suite adds texture: 113,521 integer math and 87,449 floating-point math point to solid scientific and engineering compute; 441,960 in data compression and 45,150 in string sorting benefit developer and database work; and 28,650 in extended instructions shows the vector units being exercised. Against its nearest rivals, the 12700KF is statistically indistinguishable from the i7-13700T, i5-13600T, Core 5 213PE, and i7-12700K — all within a 0.2 percent band around its 35,365 average — which tells buyers that its measured performance tier, not its nameplate, is what matters.

FAQ

Q: No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU pair — what does the database actually contain?

A: The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty and `dataIsMeasured` is false. The only hard performance figures are the CPU benchmark suite (Cinebench, Geekbench, Passmark, 3DMark CPU), the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,690, and the percentile standings of 85 (CPU), 18 (GPU), and 52 (combined).

Q: How does the i7-12700KF compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 35,365 sits within 0.2 percent of the Intel Core i7-13700T (35,403), Intel Core i5-13600T (35,305), Intel Core 5 213PE (35,428), and Intel Core i7-12700K (35,287). The deltas are small enough that all five effectively occupy the same measured tier.

Q: What is the RTX 5070 SUPER's benchmark standing?

A: Its single recorded result is 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Listed rivals by average score include the Quadro K1100M (2,664), GeForce GT 1030 (2,662), Intel Arc Pro B50 (2,660), and GeForce GT 440 (2,645) — all within a 1.7 percent delta.

Q: Which component bottlenecks this build?

A: The GPU. With the CPU at the 85th percentile and the GPU at the 18th, graphically demanding workloads will be limited by the graphics card, while the CPU retains substantial headroom, as its 3DMark CPU profile (9,983 max threads, 1,043 single-thread) demonstrates.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking, and what memory does it use?

A: Yes — the multiplier is unlocked. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel memory bus, uses Socket 1700, and has a 125 W TDP with a 5.00 GHz boost clock.

Q: Is this a balanced pairing?

A: Not by percentile. The combined percentile of 52 sits at the midpoint precisely because a top-quartile CPU is averaged against a lower-percentile GPU. It is best characterized as a CPU-led build.

Q: What launch MSRP is on record?

A: The CPU's launch MSRP was $384. No launch MSRP is listed for the RTX 5070 SUPER in the database.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so every frame-rate statement here is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores, not a measurement.

At 1080p, the estimated picture is CPU-side comfort. The i7-12700KF's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,043, eight-thread score of 7,211, and Passmark physics result of 1,780 indicate that high-refresh gameplay in lighter and competitive titles should be well served, with the CPU rarely the constraint. At 1440p, the workload shifts toward the GPU: with the RTX 5070 SUPER's Steel Nomad result of 2,690 as the only anchor, estimated ultra-settings performance in demanding AAA titles should be moderate rather than exceptional, consistent with its 18th-percentile database standing. At 4K ultra, the estimate becomes firmly GPU-bound, and the CPU's 85th-percentile headroom contributes little. Ray tracing load lands entirely on the GPU's 50 RT cores; the CPU side of any RT workload — scene traversal, draw calls — is comfortably covered. Gamers should treat 1080p and 1440p as this pairing's estimated sweet spots, with the GPU defining the ceiling whenever settings are pushed to maximum.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 85th percentile standing, 5.00 GHz boost, and 4,071 Cinebench R23 single-core score make it well suited to high-refresh play at 1080p and 1440p. Estimated GPU-side limits appear only when ultra presets and heavier engines are in play, given the GPU's 2,690 Steel Nomad score and 18th percentile position.

Streaming: Twenty threads and a 28,838 Cinebench R23 multi-core score leave room for encoding alongside gameplay. The 3DMark CPU profile shows only marginal taper from sixteen threads (9,282) to twenty (9,983), meaning background streaming workloads can occupy spare threads without starving the game.

Video editing: The Passmark data compression score of 441,960 and the CPU's multi-core results handle timeline scrubbing, transcodes, and exports well. The GPU contributes 18 GB of GDDR7 and 672 GB/s of bandwidth — a large, fast buffer for media work — though its modest benchmark percentile suggests codec and effects acceleration, not raw render leadership.

3D rendering: Cinebench is the direct proxy here: 28,838 in R23 multi-core is a strong CPU render result. GPU-path rendering leans on the 6,400 shading units and 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32, with the Steel Nomad score of 2,690 as the measured anchor for expected throughput.

Software development: This is the build's strongest case. Geekbench multi-core at 14,367, Passmark multithread at 34,092, and strong integer (113,521) and string-sorting (45,150) results map directly to compilation, test suites, and containerized services. Dual-channel DDR5 support and 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes round out the platform.

Student and office work: Single-thread scores — 2,255 Geekbench, 3,984 Passmark — guarantee snappy everyday responsiveness. The absence of integrated graphics means the RTX 5070 SUPER is mandatory for display output, via its HDMI 2.1b or three DisplayPort 2.1b connectors.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build, as the buildClass field confirms: an Intel Socket 1700 Alder Lake processor meeting a TSMC-fabricated Blackwell 2.0 graphics card over PCIe. The overall tier, per the combined percentile of 52, is mid-pack — but that single number hides the split. The CPU contributes 85th-percentile performance with an average benchmark score of 35,365, essentially tied with the i7-13700T and i7-12700K. The GPU contributes an 18th-percentile standing on the strength of one recorded benchmark. Both parts carry active production status, so availability is not a concern on record. The pairing is best understood as a high-end CPU platform with a modern, memory-rich but benchmark-modest graphics card attached — a configuration whose measured identity is set by the processor.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5070 SUPER's specification sheet is thoroughly modern: the GB205 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die at 118.3 million transistors per square millimeter. It carries 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 render outputs, producing a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s. Raw compute is rated at 32.15 TFLOPS FP32, with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. Ray tracing is handled by 50 RT cores, and AI workloads by 200 tensor cores.

The memory subsystem is the standout: 18 GB of GDDR7 across a 192-bit bus, running at 1,750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That capacity-plus-bandwidth combination matters more than the benchmark percentile suggests for workload fit — large scenes, high-resolution textures, and memory-hungry production tools benefit from the pool regardless of the card's gaming standing. Clocks are set at a 2,325 MHz base and 2,512 MHz boost, TDP is 275 W through a single 16-pin connector, and the card occupies a dual-slot footprint with a 245 mm length. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, and API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark reality is sparse: one score, 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, and an 18th-percentile database position, with rivals clustering within a 1.7 percent band around it. For rendering, the interpretation is straightforward — the hardware spec (6,400 shaders, 32.15 TFLOPS, 672 GB/s) describes capable silicon, while the recorded score defines its measured tier in this database. With dataIsMeasured false and no per-game FPS records, GPU-side conclusions should be drawn from that single benchmark result and the percentile standing, with the caveat that a one-score profile is a thin evidence base for any strong verdict.