SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600T

32,707 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14600T + Intel Arc A750

This desktop pairing combines a 14-core Intel Raptor Lake refresh processor with an Intel Arc A750 graphics card, landing at the 75th combined percentile across all benchmarked CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU is a 35W TDP part with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, while the GPU delivers 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, making this a balanced mid-range desktop configuration. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores and percentile positions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 35W TDP that positions it as a power-efficient desktop chip. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete Arc A750 handles graphics duties.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 83rd percentile among all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 32707. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 22447 multi-core and 3169 single-core. The multi-core score suggests strong performance in threaded workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core score of 3169 indicates responsive day-to-day operation and solid performance in lightly threaded applications. Geekbench results show 12840 multi-core and 2559 single-core, reinforcing the CPU's capability in both parallel and sequential tasks.

The Passmark suite provides more granular insights. Integer math scores 95112, floating-point math scores 64726, and extended instructions score 16985. These numbers indicate the CPU handles arithmetic-heavy workloads well, with particularly strong integer performance that benefits database operations, compression tasks, and general productivity software. Data compression scores 301827, while data encryption scores 18226 — the compression result is notably strong, suggesting the CPU excels at file archiving and data transfer workloads. Random string sorting scores 34310, and find prime numbers scores 121, which is a weak result for prime-number finding but does not meaningfully impact real-world usage.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i5-14600T sits within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (deltaPct -0.3), within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (deltaPct -0.1), and essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (deltaPct 0) and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (deltaPct 0.1). This places the i5-14600T in a tight cluster of mid-range processors where no single chip has a decisive advantage. The 35W TDP is notably lower than typical desktop processors, which means the performance-per-watt ratio is a key strength. The 14 cores (likely a combination of performance and efficiency cores given the 20 threads) provide ample parallelism, while the 5.10 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded response when needed.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU-GPU pair shows a system at the 75th overall percentile, indicating it outperforms three-quarters of tested desktop configurations. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking is stronger than the GPU's 66th percentile, suggesting the processor is the more capable component relative to its peers.

The Arc A750 GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 20582. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2612, which is a demanding modern workload. Geekbench OpenCL scores 98554, while Vulkan scores 85631 — the Vulkan result being notably lower suggests the GPU performs better under OpenCL compute tasks. Passmark results show G3D at 12534, GPU compute at 5368, and DirectX tests at 181 (DX9), 72 (DX11), 70 (DX12), and 65 (DX10). The G2D score of 732 indicates modest 2D acceleration. The GPU compute score of 5368 is relatively low compared to the G3D score, suggesting the Arc A750 is more optimized for graphics rendering than raw compute tasks.

GPU nearest rivals show the Arc A750 within 0.5% of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (deltaPct 0.5), within 0.2% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.2), within 0.1% of the Intel Arc B570 (deltaPct 0.1), and within -0.4% of the AMD Radeon R9 M390X. This clustering means the Arc A750 delivers performance comparable to a mobile RTX 3070 and the newer Arc B570, despite being an end-of-life product. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms its peer group more decisively than the GPU, making the processor the stronger component in this pairing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 with PCIe Gen 5 support providing 16 lanes from the CPU. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in memory choice. ECC memory support is included, which benefits workstation use cases where data integrity is critical. The platform supports the UHD Graphics 770 iGPU, so the system remains functional even if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and requires a 550W suggested PSU. The GPU's TDP is 225W, which combined with the CPU's 35W TDP leaves substantial headroom for other components under the 550W recommendation. The GPU uses 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, so the PSU must provide those connections. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, supporting multi-monitor setups with modern display standards.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing, given its 66th percentile versus the CPU's 83rd percentile. Swapping the Arc A750 for a higher-percentile GPU would better balance the system, though the 550W PSU recommendation may need revisiting depending on the replacement's power draw. Alternatively, the CPU's 35W TDP and Socket 1700 platform mean a higher-TDP Raptor Lake refresh processor could be installed without changing the motherboard, though the PCIe Gen 5 lanes and DDR5 support already provide modern connectivity. The 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM on the GPU is adequate for current games but could become a constraint at higher resolutions or with texture-heavy titles, making a GPU upgrade the more future-proof path.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile gap between CPU (83rd) and GPU (66th) indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most workloads. For CPU-bound tasks like data compression, encryption, and integer math, the i5-14600T performs at a high level relative to its peers, so these workloads will run smoothly. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming and 3D rendering, the Arc A750's lower percentile ranking means it will limit overall performance.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 suggests the GPU handles DX12 workloads at a moderate level, while the Passmark DirectX scores (DX9 at 181, DX11 at 72, DX12 at 70) indicate better performance in older DirectX versions. This pattern suggests the GPU is more efficient in legacy graphics APIs, which could mean newer titles using DX12 or Vulkan may not fully utilize the hardware. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631 being lower than OpenCL's 98554 reinforces this, as Vulkan is the more common API in modern games.

The CPU's 35W TDP means it generates minimal heat, so the GPU's 225W TDP dominates the system's thermal profile. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide ample bandwidth, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 GPU interface is not a bottleneck. Memory bandwidth is dual-channel, which is standard for this class, and the 24 MB L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency. In practice, the GPU will limit frame rates in graphically intensive games, while the CPU will comfortably handle physics, AI, and game logic. For productivity workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering that use both CPU and GPU, the GPU's compute score of 5368 will be the limiting factor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 66th percentile suggest the GPU will set the performance ceiling in games. The Arc A750's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 indicates it can handle DX12 titles, but the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 70 relative to DirectX 9's 181 shows a regression in newer APIs that may impact modern game performance.

For esports titles running DirectX 9 or 11, the GPU's stronger scores in those APIs (181 and 72 respectively) suggest playable frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA games at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's mid-pack performance will likely deliver 60 FPS in less demanding titles, while more graphically intensive games may require reduced settings to maintain smooth frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will be stressed by modern game textures, and frame rates will likely drop below 60 FPS in demanding titles. At 4K, this GPU is not well-suited for ultra settings, and users should expect significant compromises.

The CPU's single-thread score of 3744 in Passmark ensures that even at lower resolutions where CPU load is higher, the i5-14600T will not bottleneck the GPU. The 5.10 GHz boost clock provides strong per-core performance for game logic and physics. The 20 threads handle background tasks and streaming without impacting gaming performance. Overall, this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming with medium-to-high settings, with the GPU being the limiting factor at higher resolutions or with ray tracing enabled, given the 28 RT cores on the Arc A750.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets desktop users who need a balance of CPU-heavy productivity and moderate gaming performance. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and strong Passmark scores in integer math (95112), floating-point math (64726), and data compression (301827) make it suitable for content creators working with large files, developers compiling code, and small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office applications. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle parallel workloads efficiently, while the 35W TDP keeps power costs low for always-on systems.

For gamers, this build is appropriate for 1080p gaming with medium-to-high settings, particularly in titles that favor DirectX 9 or 11 where the GPU performs relatively better. Students building a desktop for coursework, light gaming, and occasional rendering will find the CPU's single-thread performance (3169 in Cinebench R23) responsive for everyday tasks. Small business workstations benefit from the ECC memory support and the CPU's data encryption score of 18226, which handles secure communications without dedicated hardware. Content creators working with video editing or 3D modeling will see strong CPU performance in render tasks, though GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the Arc A750's compute score of 5368.

The GPU's end-of-life status and 8 GB VRAM make this less suitable for future-proof gaming at high resolutions, but the CPU's active production status and strong benchmark scores mean the platform has longevity. Users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance will find this pairing well-suited, while those seeking maximum gaming frame rates should consider a higher-tier GPU.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture on TSMC's 6 nm process node. It contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines, along with 28 RT cores for hardware ray tracing. Base clock is 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s bandwidth at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Compute performance is rated at 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The 225W TDP and 550W suggested PSU indicate substantial power requirements for a desktop GPU.

Benchmark results place the Arc A750 at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 represents DX12 performance, while Geekbench OpenCL at 98554 and Vulkan at 85631 show compute capability. The Passmark suite reveals an interesting pattern: DirectX 9 scores 181, DirectX 11 scores 72, DirectX 12 scores 70, and DirectX 10 scores 65. This suggests the GPU performs significantly better in legacy DirectX 9 workloads, which may indicate driver maturity issues or architectural design choices. The G2D score of 732 is modest, and the GPU compute score of 5368 is relatively low, suggesting the Arc A750 prioritizes graphics rendering over general-purpose compute.

In rendering workloads, the 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 provides solid raw compute for 3D rendering, while the 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth handle moderate texture loads. The 28 RT cores enable ray-traced effects, though performance in RT-heavy scenes will be limited by the GPU's overall 66th percentile ranking. The 4.6 OpenGL support ensures compatibility with professional applications that rely on this API. The GPU's end-of-life status and successor Battlemage indicate this is a mature product with established drivers, though future optimization is unlikely.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-14600T, a 14-core Raptor Lake refresh processor with a 35W TDP and 83rd percentile CPU ranking, with the Intel Arc A750, an end-of-life Xe-HPG GPU with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 66th percentile GPU ranking. The combined system sits at the 75th percentile across all benchmarked configurations, indicating it outperforms three-quarters of tested desktop systems.

The CPU is the stronger component, with an average benchmark score of 32707 versus the GPU's 20582. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.3% in average score, showing it holds its own against AMD and Intel competitors. The GPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570, NVIDIA RTX 3070 Mobile, and AMD Radeon R9 M390X, all within 0.5%, indicating the Arc A750 delivers performance competitive with these alternatives. The 35W CPU TDP combined with the 225W GPU TDP means the system's power envelope is dominated by the GPU, and the 550W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom. This is a mid-range desktop configuration suitable for productivity-first users who game at 1080p, with the CPU providing headroom for future GPU upgrades.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The system sits at the 75th combined percentile across all benchmarked CPU-GPU pairings, meaning it outperforms 75% of tested desktop configurations.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600T compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i5-14600T scores 32707 on average, essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697, deltaPct 0) and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, deltaPct 0.1), and within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (32812, deltaPct -0.3) and AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (32750, deltaPct -0.1).

Q: What memory types does the i5-14600T support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A750 have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The CPU has a 35W TDP, while the GPU has a 225W TDP, with the GPU requiring a 550W suggested PSU.

Q: Does this build have measured gaming FPS data?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and how does it compare to the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc A750 is at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 20582, which is essentially tied with the Intel Arc B570 (20556, deltaPct 0.1).