SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600T

32,707 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER pairing is a study in stark contrast, combining a highly efficient, mid-range desktop processor with a graphics card that, based on the available data, underperforms even entry-level mobile GPUs. The CPU lands in the 83rd percentile among all processors, demonstrating strong multi-threaded capability for its 35-watt envelope, while the GPU sits in the 18th percentile, a position that fundamentally defines the system's capabilities. This is a desktop build where the processing power far outstrips the graphical output, creating a significant imbalance that dictates the system is best suited for CPU-intensive, non-gaming professional workloads rather than any form of modern 3D application. The benchmark data reveals a platform with exceptional computational efficiency but severely limited graphics headroom.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates with a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, a significant dynamic range that allows it to conserve power when idle and deliver performance on demand. This is a 10 nm part from Intel, featuring a 257 mm² die size, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, along with ECC memory support for enhanced system stability. The processor includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics and connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Its 35-watt TDP is a defining characteristic, marking it as a power-efficient desktop chip.

Benchmark results show the processor performing well above the median CPU. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 and single-core score of 3169 indicate a balanced capability for both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12840 reinforces this, while the single-core score of 2559 suggests solid per-thread performance. In the Passmark suite, the CPU achieves a multithread score of 26409 and a single-thread score of 3744, with notable sub-scores in integer math (95112) and floating-point math (64726). The data compression and encryption scores are particularly strong at 301827 and 18226 respectively, indicating robust throughput for data-centric tasks.

The processor's average benchmark score is 32707, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, include the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with a score of 32697 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F with a score of 32750 (-0.1% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 with a score of 32662 (0.1% delta). This places the i5-14600T in a performance tier virtually identical to these competitors, with performance deltas of less than 1% in either direction. The data suggests the i5-14600T is a very competitive mid-range desktop processor, delivering performance on par with recent high-end mobile and desktop parts from both Intel and AMD, while maintaining its low power draw.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data does not support this use case. The GPU's 18th percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690, which places it in the same performance bracket as the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 and GT 440, indicate it is not capable of driving modern games at high refresh rates. Any frame rate expectations for high-refresh gaming would be extremely poor, and this scenario is not viable with the current components.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for the encoding and multitasking demands of streaming. Its strong multi-threaded Passmark score of 26409 and high data encryption score of 18226 suggest it can handle the background workload of encoding a stream while maintaining application performance. However, the GPU's role in the streaming pipeline is severely limited by its low performance, making a high-quality stream with in-game encoding impossible due to the GPU's lack of graphical headroom.

Video Editing: This scenario presents a mixed picture. The CPU's strong multi-core performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447, will accelerate video encoding, decoding, and effects processing. The processor is a capable workhorse for the CPU-bound aspects of video editing. However, the GPU's low benchmark scores mean that GPU-accelerated effects, color grading, and real-time previews would be severely hindered, making this a frustrating experience for professional editors reliant on GPU acceleration.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the star here. In CPU-based rendering workloads, the i5-14600T's 14 cores and 20 threads will be fully utilized, delivering solid performance. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9427 reflects a strong rendering throughput from a desktop processor. Conversely, the GPU is unsuitable for GPU-accelerated rendering, as its 3DMark score and performance percentile are far too low to provide any meaningful acceleration in modern render engines.

Software Development: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU's high Passmark integer math score of 95112 indicates excellent performance for code compilation, a task that is heavily dependent on integer processing. The fast single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3169, will ensure a responsive system for code editing and IDE usage. The GPU is largely irrelevant for standard software development, meaning the imbalance is not a hindrance here.

Student and Office Work: The processor's efficiency and performance make it an excellent choice for this segment. The 35-watt TDP means the system will run cool and quiet, and the high single-core score of 3744 in Passmark ensures snappy application launches and fluid multitasking in office suites. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 and the lack of need for powerful 3D acceleration mean the discrete GPU's poor performance is a non-issue; the system would be highly effective for productivity tasks, research, and general computing.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The i5-14600T is a high-performing desktop processor, holding an 83rd percentile rank among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 32707. It performs within 0.3% of rivals like the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Ryzen 5 7400F.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 SUPER compare to other GPUs?

A: The data shows the GPU is in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690. This places it in the same performance bracket as the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M, which is just 1% behind, and the GeForce GT 1030, which is 1.1% behind.

Q: Is this system suitable for modern gaming?

A: No. The GPU's benchmark scores are extremely low, with performance rivaling entry-level cards like the GeForce GT 440. The data indicates it is not capable of delivering acceptable frame rates for modern games, and the lack of measured FPS data for this pairing confirms the expectation of poor gaming performance.

Q: What are the CPU's strongest benchmark areas?

A: The CPU excels in multi-threaded and data-intensive tasks. Its Passmark data compression score is 301827 and its integer math score is 95112. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 22447, all indicating strong computational throughput.

Q: What kind of memory does the i5-14600T support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also has ECC memory support, a feature typically found in workstation-class platforms.

Q: What is the physical size of the graphics card?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER is a dual-slot card with dimensions of 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core i5-14600T is $255.

Who Should Build It

This build is for a niche user who prioritizes CPU computation above all else and has minimal to no need for discrete GPU performance. The target user is a professional or hobbyist whose primary workload is CPU-bound, such as a software developer who compiles large codebases, a data analyst processing large datasets, or a researcher running complex simulations. The CPU's strong integer math score of 95112 and data encryption score of 18226 make it an excellent engine for these types of tasks.

This is also a suitable platform for students and small business workstations where the primary applications are office suites, web browsing, and database management. The processor's 35-watt TDP allows for a compact, quiet, and power-efficient system, and its high single-thread performance (3744 in Passmark) ensures a responsive user experience. For these users, the discrete GPU is effectively a non-factor; the system could even run on the integrated UHD Graphics 770, though the included GPU adds no gaming or professional graphics capability.

Content creators who work in CPU-based rendering or video encoding will find the i5-14600T a capable workhorse. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 indicates that render times will be respectable. However, this build is not for 3D artists, game developers, or video editors who rely on GPU acceleration, as the graphics card's performance percentile is too low to be of any practical use. The user must have a clear understanding that this is a CPU-centric system, and the GPU should be considered a placeholder or a display adapter rather than a performance component.

Balance and Bottleneck

This system has a fundamental and severe bottleneck in the GPU. The CPU is a high-performing component, sitting in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 18th percentile. This performance disparity means the GPU will be the limiting factor in any workload that uses it. In any 3D application, gaming, or GPU-accelerated compute task, the RTX 5070 SUPER's low processing power will cap performance, preventing the i5-14600T from being utilized to its full potential.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like code compilation, data compression, and multi-threaded rendering, the GPU is idle and the CPU's performance is the sole determinant of speed. The data shows the CPU can handle these tasks with high throughput, as evidenced by its Passmark multithread score of 26409. The bottleneck is therefore workload-dependent: the CPU is the limit in CPU-only tasks, and the GPU is the limit in any graphics-related task. The FPS scaling in games would be extremely poor, as the GPU's low performance would prevent the system from achieving playable frame rates, regardless of the CPU's capability.

Gaming Performance

Note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. The following analysis is framed as an estimate based on the benchmark scores.

The gaming performance of this system is estimated to be very poor. The GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of only 2690, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals to this score are not modern gaming cards but older, entry-level parts: the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664, 1% slower), the GeForce GT 1030 (2662, 1.1% slower), and the GeForce GT 440 (2645, 1.7% slower). This positioning indicates that the RTX 5070 SUPER is not in the same performance class as its name might suggest, and it is not designed for modern gaming workloads.

Given this GPU performance level, frame rates in any modern 3D game would be extremely low, likely in the single digits or low tens, even at 1080p with low settings. The card's 18 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are technically present, but the core processing power (32.15 TFLOPS FP32) is not sufficient to utilize them for gaming. The CPU's strong single-core performance (319 in Cinebench R15) would not be able to compensate for the GPU's lack of fill rate and shader processing power. The data indicates that this pairing is not viable for gaming, and any expectations of a playable experience are unsupported by the benchmark results. This system is definitively not a gaming platform.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture reveals a system with a powerful CPU and a very weak GPU. The Intel Core i5-14600T has an average benchmark score of 32707, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its performance is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F (32750, -0.1% delta). Key CPU scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447, a Geekbench multi-core score of 12840, and a Passmark multithread score of 26409.

In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This score is nearly identical to the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664, 1% delta) and the GeForce GT 1030 (2662, 1.1% delta). The combined percentile for the build is 51, which is a direct result of the high CPU percentile being averaged with the very low GPU percentile. The data shows a clear and significant performance gulf between the two main components, with the CPU operating at a high-performance tier and the GPU operating at an entry-level tier.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600T is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for the primary graphics card, a forward-looking interface. The system's primary limitation is the GPU, and the upgrade path is clear: replacing the RTX 5070 SUPER with a more powerful graphics card would be the single most impactful change. The CPU is powerful enough to support a high-end GPU, as its 83rd percentile performance suggests it would not bottleneck a more capable graphics solution in most scenarios.

The platform supports a wide range of memory options (DDR4 and DDR5), and the CPU's 35-watt TDP means power supply requirements are minimal for the processor itself. The GPU, however, has a 275-watt TDP and requires a single 16-pin power connector, so a new PSU would be required if the current one is not sufficient. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a model that has a higher benchmark score and a higher percentile ranking, as the current GPU is the clear bottleneck. The CPU and platform are solid foundations for a high-performance system, but the current GPU choice severely undermines the build's overall potential.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i5-14600T, a power-efficient 14-core processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER graphics card. The CPU is a strong performer, ranking in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, making it a capable engine for a wide range of professional and productivity tasks. The GPU, however, is exceptionally weak, ranking in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, with a 3DMark score comparable to decade-old entry-level cards.

The overall tier of this build, as indicated by its 51st combined percentile, is average, but this is misleading. The average is skewed by the two extremes. In practice, the system's performance will be either excellent (in CPU-bound tasks) or very poor (in GPU-bound tasks). This is a specialized build for a user who knows they need high CPU throughput and do not care about gaming or GPU acceleration. It is not a balanced system, and the low GPU performance prevents it from being a general-purpose or gaming machine. The benchmark data clearly defines this as a CPU-centric workstation for specific professional or productivity use cases.