SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600T

32,707 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600T is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh generation. It features a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which demonstrates a substantial frequency headroom for a low-power part. The chip is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm², and it maintains a remarkably low 35 W TDP—a figure that positions it as an efficiency-focused variant within the Core 14th Gen lineup. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache, which provides ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of the processor's capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14600T scores 22,447 in multi-core and 3,169 in single-core tests. The multi-core figure is particularly instructive: it places the chip in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, indicating that despite its low TDP, it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. The Geekbench scores of 12,840 multi-core and 2,559 single-core reinforce this assessment. The Passmark suite shows strong integer math performance at 95,112 and floating-point math at 64,726, with data compression reaching 301,827 and encryption at 18,226. These scores suggest the processor handles both compute-heavy and data-intensive workloads with competence.

The nearest rivals provide context for these numbers. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H posts an average score of 32,697, which is essentially identical to the i5-14600T's average of 32,707 (0% delta). The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32,750, a mere 0.1% higher, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 trails by 0.1% at 32,662. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H leads the group slightly at 32,812, representing a 0.3% advantage. What this means in practice is that the i5-14600T sits in an extremely tight competitive cluster—the entire spread among these four rivals is less than 0.5%. The low-power design does not sacrifice performance relative to these alternatives, which is notable given that several rivals are mobile or hybrid processors.

For real workloads, the 14-core configuration with 20 threads means the processor can handle parallel tasks effectively. The 24 MB shared L3 cache reduces memory latency for working sets that fit within it, while the dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory support allows builders to choose between legacy and modern memory platforms. The 5.10 GHz boost clock is exceptional for a 35 W part, ensuring that single-threaded responsiveness remains high even when the multi-core load is light.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The single-core performance, evidenced by the 3,169 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 3,744 Passmark single-thread score, provides the per-core speed that games require for high frame rates. With a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, the processor can drive high-refresh displays in esports and competitive titles, though the GPU pairing determines ultimate frame limits.

Streaming: The 20 threads available to the processor allow simultaneous encoding and gameplay without severe contention. The Passmark multi-thread score of 26,409 indicates sufficient headroom for software encoding at reasonable presets, while the 83rd percentile overall CPU ranking suggests the processor can maintain stream stability alongside other background tasks.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,447 and Geekbench multi-core score of 12,840 indicate strong performance in timeline rendering and export tasks. The data compression score of 301,827 suggests efficient handling of video codec workloads that rely on compression algorithms. Editors working with 1080p and 1440p footage will find the processor responsive, while 4K projects benefit from the thread count.

3D rendering: The Passmark floating-point math score of 64,726 and integer math score of 95,112 demonstrate the arithmetic throughput needed for rendering calculations. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9,427 confirms that CPU-based rendering engines like Blender's Cycles or V-Ray will complete frames at a competitive pace. The 35 W TDP means sustained rendering loads won't stress cooling solutions excessively.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit directly from the 20 threads and high cache capacity. The Passmark extended instructions score of 16,985 indicates solid SIMD performance for code that leverages modern instruction sets. The find prime numbers score of 121 is a weaker result, suggesting that certain algorithmic workloads may not scale as well, but general build processes and unit testing will run efficiently.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance and low 35 W TDP make this processor ideal for daily productivity tasks. Web browsing, document editing, spreadsheets, and presentation software will run comfortably on the 3,744 Passmark single-thread score. The efficiency also means quieter operation and lower electricity usage in shared or dorm environments.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the same socket used across Intel's 12th, 13th, and 14th generation desktop processors. This provides a broad upgrade path for users who start with this chip. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel configuration, allowing builders to choose based on their existing hardware or their preferred memory type. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for workstation-class builds where data integrity is paramount.

PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which means the latest high-bandwidth devices such as Gen 5 NVMe SSDs and graphics cards can operate at full speed. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and hardware acceleration for media playback, which is useful for troubleshooting or for builds that don't yet have a discrete GPU.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, while the CPU's TDP is only 35 W. This combined power requirement is modest by modern standards, meaning that a mid-range power supply can comfortably handle the system. The headroom between the total system draw and a typical 500-650 W PSU allows for future upgrades to more power-hungry components without immediately needing a new power supply. The GPU uses two 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot card, so case and PSU compatibility should be checked before purchase, but these are standard specifications.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to move to a higher-tier Socket 1700 processor if additional CPU performance is needed, since the socket and platform remain current. Alternatively, upgrading the GPU would be straightforward, as the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and 450 W PSU suggestion provide room for more powerful graphics cards within the same power envelope.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this pairing, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs, this combination sits in the upper tier of gaming systems. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,169 in Cinebench R23 and 3,744 in Passmark indicates that it will not bottleneck modern game engines, which typically rely on one or two primary threads. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 79,381 suggest it can handle modern DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles at high settings.

At 1080p resolution, this system is estimated to deliver high frame rates in competitive titles and very playable frame rates in AAA games, with the CPU's strong single-core performance allowing high refresh rates in less demanding games. At 1440p, the GPU will become the primary determinant of frame rates, and the 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should support high settings in most games, though texture-heavy titles may require settings adjustments. At 4K, the system is estimated to provide playable but not ultra-high frame rates in demanding titles, with the GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute providing the raw throughput needed for 4K rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM potentially limiting texture quality in the most demanding games.

The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) means it can run ray-traced effects and mesh shaders, though the 24 RT cores will deliver modest ray tracing performance rather than class-leading results. The 16 Gbps effective memory speed on GDDR6 provides adequate bandwidth for gaming workloads.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who play at 1080p and 1440p and want high settings without excessive power consumption. The 35 W CPU and 175 W GPU combine for a total system draw that a 450 W PSU can handle, making this an efficient choice for gamers who leave their systems running for long sessions. The 83rd percentile CPU and 87th percentile GPU mean that this system outperforms most other gaming PCs, so users will experience smooth gameplay in the majority of titles.

Content creators working with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the 20-thread CPU and the GPU's compute capabilities. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 91,657 indicates strong GPU compute performance for acceleration in applications like Adobe Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve that offload processing to the graphics card. The combination of high CPU multi-core scores and GPU compute makes this a capable workstation for individual creators.

Software developers will appreciate the 20 threads for compilation and the ECC memory support for data-sensitive work. The processor's strong single-thread performance also ensures that interactive development tools like IDEs and debuggers remain responsive. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support means future expansion with fast storage is possible.

Students and small business users who need a reliable desktop for everyday tasks will find the efficiency and performance balance appealing. The low CPU TDP means quieter operation and lower electricity bills, while the 83rd percentile CPU performance ensures the system won't feel slow even under heavier multitasking loads. The integrated graphics provide a backup if the discrete GPU needs servicing.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). This is the "Alchemist" generation of Intel Arc GPUs, positioned in the Arc 5 tier.

Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a substantial memory subsystem for the GPU's class, which benefits high-resolution textures and compute workloads that stream large datasets. The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operations pipelines, along with 24 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for rasterization-heavy scenes.

Compute performance is rated at 12.29 TFLOPS for FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). These figures place the GPU in a competitive position for gaming and content creation. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 79,381 confirm that the GPU delivers modern API performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 91,657 shows that compute workloads such as rendering, encoding, and machine learning inference can leverage the GPU effectively.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and upcoming games. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, allowing multi-monitor setups with high refresh rates and resolutions. The 175 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU are modest for the performance level, making this an efficient GPU option. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates that it outperforms the vast majority of graphics cards, though the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.6% higher), AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (0.7% lower), Intel Arc A570M (0.8% higher), and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (1.1% higher).

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 32,707, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result for a 35 W TDP processor. The nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of this score, demonstrating that the i5-14600T competes directly with processors from different architectures and market segments. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H leads at 32,812 (0.3% higher), while the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32,750 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32,697 (0% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32,662 (0.1% lower). This cluster of scores suggests that processor performance has converged at this tier, and the choice between these CPUs comes down to platform features and power efficiency rather than raw speed.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 57,756, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58,085 (0.6% higher), the Intel Arc A570M at 58,239 (0.8% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58,392 (1.1% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE at 57,367 (0.7% lower). The GPU's position among these rivals shows it sits in a competitive segment where small performance differences separate the options.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 85, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 85% of all desktop and laptop configurations in the database. This combined metric reflects the balanced nature of the pairing—neither component is dramatically stronger or weaker than the other, which is evident from the CPU's 83rd and GPU's 87th percentile positions.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and why does it matter?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has a TDP of 35 W. This is notably low for a 14-core processor, which means it generates less heat and requires less cooling. This allows for quieter systems and lower energy costs while still delivering 83rd percentile performance.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14600T supports ECC memory. This is a valuable feature for workstation and server applications where data corruption must be minimized. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This high bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and compute workloads that require rapid data movement, contributing to the GPU's 87th percentile ranking.

Q: Can this system handle ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A580 includes 24 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). This enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games, though the RT performance will be modest compared to higher-tier GPUs given the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute.

Q: What is the platform's upgrade potential?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports Intel's 12th, 13th, and 14th generation desktop processors. This provides a clear upgrade path to higher-tier CPUs without changing the motherboard. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, allowing for future high-bandwidth devices.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14600T has an average benchmark score of 32,707. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 0.3% higher, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 0.1% higher, the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores the same, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 0.1% lower. All rivals are within a narrow performance band.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W. Combined with the CPU's 35 W TDP, this is a modest power requirement. A quality 450 W PSU is sufficient, and there is headroom for future component upgrades without necessarily needing a larger power supply.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are well balanced in this pairing, with the CPU at the 83rd percentile and GPU at the 87th percentile. The 4-percentage-point gap between them suggests that neither component dramatically outperforms the other. In gaming workloads, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, where its 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 8 GB VRAM may constrain performance. At lower resolutions, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3,169 in Cinebench R23) should prevent it from bottlenecking the GPU.

For CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data compression (301,827 Passmark score), and encryption (18,226 Passmark score), the processor will be the primary determinant of performance. The GPU can accelerate some of these tasks via its OpenCL compute capability (91,657 Geekbench score), but the CPU's 20 threads provide the main throughput. The 35 W TDP of the CPU means it won't sustain peak boost clocks indefinitely under heavy all-core loads, which could slightly reduce multi-threaded performance in long rendering sessions.

The memory subsystem is balanced with both components: the CPU's dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support and the GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are both adequate for their respective roles. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU and PCIe 4.0 x16 on the GPU mean that data transfer between components will not be a bottleneck. The 450 W suggested PSU provides adequate power headroom, so power delivery is not likely to be a limiting factor for this pairing.

In mixed workloads that use both CPU and GPU simultaneously—such as gaming while streaming or rendering with GPU acceleration—the system should maintain balance, as neither component's thermal or power envelope will force the other to throttle significantly. The 87th percentile GPU and 83rd percentile CPU both have headroom over the 85th percentile combined ranking, suggesting no severe imbalance in any typical workload.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-14600T with the Intel Arc A580 in a desktop configuration. The combined system ranks in the 85th percentile of all builds in the database, placing it in the upper tier of desktop performance. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from Intel's Core 14th Gen series, using the Raptor Lake architecture on Socket 1700, with a 35 W TDP and boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The GPU is an Intel Arc A580 based on the Xe-HPG architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit memory interface.

This pairing represents a coherent desktop build where both components come from Intel and are designed to work together. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking and CPU's 83rd percentile ranking indicate that the system delivers balanced performance across CPU- and GPU-intensive workloads. The platform offers modern features including PCIe Gen 5 support, ECC memory compatibility, and both DDR4 and DDR5 memory options. The modest power requirements (35 W CPU, 175 W GPU, 450 W suggested PSU) make this an efficient desktop solution that doesn't compromise on performance. The build is suitable for gaming at 1080p and 1440p, content creation, software development, and general productivity, with the combined percentile indicating it outperforms the majority of systems in the database.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600T + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600T

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds