SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14600KF + Intel Arc A750: Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 14th-generation Raptor Lake refresh processor with Intel's Arc A750 graphics card, creating a desktop build that targets the 78th percentile of all CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread part with a 125W TDP, while the GPU is an 8GB GDDR6 card with a 225W TDP, and together they form a system that sits in the upper-midrange of desktop performance. The data shows a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads and a graphics card that holds its own in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, but the absence of measured FPS data for this exact pairing means all gaming projections must be treated as estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, manufactured on Intel's 10nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The chip features a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 125W TDP and an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with ECC capability.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 32544 multi-core and 4594 single-core, indicating strong performance in both heavily threaded and single-threaded applications. The Cinebench R20 results show 13668 multi-core and 1929 single-core, while R15 scores are 3280 multi-core and 462 single-core. Geekbench returns 17085 multi-core and 2445 single-core scores.

The PassMark suite provides deeper insight into specific workload characteristics. Multi-thread performance scores 38697, while single-thread performance is 4273. Integer math scores 125982, floating-point math scores 93048, and extended instructions score 28785. Data compression scores 485140, data encryption scores 27608, and random string sorting scores 52056. Physics calculations score 2449, and prime number finding scores 161.

Comparing against nearest rivals, the i5-14600KF sits within a tight competitive band. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has an average score of 49228, just 0.3% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196, a 0.4% deficit. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, 0.8% behind, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796, which is 0.8% ahead of the i5-14600KF. These deltas are remarkably small, indicating that the i5-14600KF is positioned in a highly competitive performance tier where architectural differences matter more than raw benchmark deltas.

For real workloads, the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 32544 suggests strong rendering capability in CPU-based 3D applications, while the single-core score of 4594 indicates responsive performance in tasks that rely on individual thread speed, such as legacy software or lightly threaded games. The PassMark integer and floating-point scores of 125982 and 93048, respectively, point to solid general-purpose compute for office productivity, software compilation, and scientific calculations. The data compression score of 485140 is particularly notable for archival and database workloads, while encryption performance of 27608 indicates adequate but not exceptional cryptographic throughput.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 6nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute resources include 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operations pipelines. The GPU features 28 ray tracing cores, and while tensor core counts are not specified, the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Pixel rate is rated at 268.8 GPixel/s, texture rate at 537.6 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance at 17.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The card draws 225W TDP and requires a 550W suggested power supply, using a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector configuration. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0.

Benchmark results place the Arc A750 at the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20582. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test returns a score of 2612. Geekbench OpenCL scores 98554, while Vulkan scores 85631. PassMark results show G3D score of 12534, GPU compute score of 5368, and G2D score of 732. Legacy DirectX tests show scores of 181 for DirectX 9, 72 for DirectX 11, 70 for DirectX 12, and 65 for DirectX 10.

Rival comparisons show the Arc A750 is closely matched with several other GPUs. The Intel Arc B570 scores 20556, just 0.1% behind, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, 0.2% behind. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, which is 0.4% ahead, and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20480, 0.5% behind. These minimal deltas indicate that the Arc A750 performs in a narrow band around these competitors, though the modern feature set of the Arc architecture — including ray tracing and DirectX 12 Ultimate support — distinguishes it from older parts like the R9 M390X or Quadro M4000M.

For rendering workloads, the 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest capable 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, with the 8 GB VRAM acting as a constraint at higher resolutions or with heavy texture packs. The 28 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the GPU's overall compute throughput will limit ray-traced effects to lighter implementations. The 537.6 GTexel/s texture rate and 268.8 GPixel/s pixel rate provide solid fill rates for traditional rasterization.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-14600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This gives builders flexibility in choosing memory technology based on platform cost and performance priorities, though the benchmark data does not specify which memory type was used for testing. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern SSDs and graphics cards, though the Arc A750 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The platform supports ECC memory, which is a meaningful feature for workstation or data-integrity-sensitive applications. The CPU has a 125W TDP, and the GPU has a 225W TDP, resulting in a combined thermal design power of 350W for the core components. The GPU's suggested PSU is 550W, which leaves headroom for the CPU, motherboard, storage, and other peripherals when selecting a power supply. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with more VRAM or higher compute throughput, as the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support and DDR5 memory capability can accommodate a more powerful graphics card without changing the motherboard.

The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, potentially extending its useful lifespan by extracting additional performance beyond stock clocks. However, the tight 0.3-0.8% margins to nearest CPU rivals suggest that overclocking gains would be modest relative to the existing competitive positioning. The platform does not appear to support newer Intel generations, so future CPU upgrades would require a motherboard change, making GPU upgrades the more practical path for improving system performance over time.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78, which sits between the CPU's 90th percentile and the GPU's 66th percentile. This gap suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU provides significant headroom for compute-heavy tasks. In gaming scenarios, the Arc A750's 66th percentile position indicates that frame rates will be constrained by GPU performance rather than CPU throughput, particularly at higher resolutions where the 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors.

For CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, or database operations, the i5-14600KF's 90th percentile ranking means the system will perform well above average, with the GPU playing a minimal role. The PassMark multi-thread score of 38697 and integer math score of 125982 demonstrate substantial compute capability that would not be bottlenecked by the GPU in non-graphics tasks. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering with hardware acceleration or high-resolution gaming, the Arc A750's 66th percentile position will determine overall system performance.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores indicates that at 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4594 in Cinebench R23 single-core) can drive high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU will cap performance in graphically intensive games. At 1440p or higher, the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck, and the CPU's advantage becomes less relevant. For mixed workloads, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU's 20 threads provide ample capacity for encoding overhead without significantly impacting gaming performance, though the GPU's compute capabilities will still limit the overall experience.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's exact benchmark scores place it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49394. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, scores 49228, a 0.3% delta, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 scores 49796, leading the i5-14600KF by 0.8%. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 and single-core score of 4594 represent the headline figures for CPU performance, with the multi-core result indicating strong all-core workloads and the single-core result showing competitive per-thread performance.

The GPU's exact benchmark scores place it at the 66th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20582. The closest rival is the Intel Arc B570 at 20556, a 0.1% delta, while the AMD Radeon R9 M390X leads by 0.4% with a score of 20662. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631 provide modern API performance data, while PassMark G3D score of 12534 and GPU compute score of 5368 offer additional perspective.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU in relative percentile ranking, creating an imbalance that favors CPU-intensive workloads. The 78th combined percentile reflects this asymmetry, with the GPU holding back the overall system in graphics-heavy scenarios. For users who prioritize CPU compute over gaming, this pairing is well-suited; for gaming-focused users, the GPU represents the primary performance ceiling.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need substantial CPU compute power with moderate graphics capability. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find the Arc A750's 66th percentile position adequate for most titles, though the 8 GB VRAM may require texture quality reductions in newer games. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 90th percentile multi-core performance, with the GPU providing hardware acceleration for rendering and encoding tasks where applicable.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 20 threads and strong integer math score of 125982, while the GPU's compute capability of 5368 in PassMark GPU compute can assist with parallel processing tasks. Students and small business workstations that run office productivity suites, web applications, and data analysis tools will find the system more than sufficient, with the CPU's single-thread score of 4273 in PassMark ensuring responsive application performance. The ECC memory support adds appeal for users who require data integrity in financial or scientific computing applications.

The 78th combined percentile indicates this system sits above the majority of desktop builds, making it suitable for users who want strong all-around performance without reaching the top tier. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking makes this an excellent choice for CPU-bound workloads, while the GPU's 66th percentile means users should not expect high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming or 4K gaming without significant settings reductions.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78, placing it above 78% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, while the Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228, a 0.3% difference in favor of the Intel part.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does this CPU support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the i5-14600KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support also available.

Q: What is the suggested power supply rating for this GPU?

A: The Arc A750 has a suggested PSU rating of 550W, with a 225W TDP for the GPU itself.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The i5-14600KF scores 32544 in Cinebench R23 multi-core testing.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, while the Arc B570 scores 20556, a 0.1% difference in favor of the A750.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600KF with the Intel Arc A750. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake refresh processor with a 125W TDP and 90th percentile performance ranking, while the GPU is an 8GB GDDR6 card with a 225W TDP and 66th percentile performance ranking. The combined system percentile is 78, indicating an upper-midrange desktop build that prioritizes CPU performance over graphics capability.

The i5-14600KF represents a high-end processor choice with strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, backed by an average benchmark score of 49394 that places it within 1% of several competing CPUs from both Intel and AMD. The Arc A750 provides solid midrange graphics performance with modern features including ray tracing and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, though its 66th percentile position and 8 GB VRAM limit it to 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 4594 in Cinebench R23 can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU's 66th percentile position will cap performance in graphically demanding games, making 144Hz+ gaming achievable only in esports or lighter titles. The 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate memory bandwidth for 1080p, though texture-heavy games may require settings adjustments.

Streaming: The 20 threads and multi-thread score of 32544 in Cinebench R23 provide ample CPU capacity for software encoding while gaming, allowing simultaneous gameplay and streaming without significant CPU bottlenecks. The GPU's compute score of 5368 in PassMark GPU compute can assist with hardware encoding tasks, though the GPU's overall performance will limit gaming settings during streaming sessions.

Video editing: The CPU's 90th percentile multi-core performance, evidenced by the 32544 Cinebench R23 score, handles timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks efficiently. The GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects previews and hardware-accelerated encoding, though 8 GB VRAM may limit complex 4K projects with multiple layers.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering workloads will perform exceptionally well, with the 93048 PassMark floating-point math score and 38697 multi-thread score providing strong computational throughput. GPU-accelerated rendering will be constrained by the Arc A750's 66th percentile position, making it suitable for preview renders but less ideal for final production output.

Software development: The 20 threads and 125982 PassMark integer math score enable fast compilation of large codebases, while the 485140 data compression score accelerates packaging and build artifact handling. The 17085 Geekbench multi-core score indicates responsive system performance during development workflows with multiple applications and services running.

Student and office work: The CPU's 4273 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy application launching and document processing, while the 90th percentile overall CPU ranking provides headroom for multitasking across office suites, web browsers, and communication tools. The GPU is more than adequate for productivity graphics, though its 66th percentile position is largely unused in these workloads.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores rather than empirical testing of this specific pairing. The CPU's 90th percentile performance and the GPU's 66th percentile performance suggest that gaming frame rates will be primarily GPU-limited in most scenarios, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom to avoid bottlenecks.

At 1080p, the Arc A750's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth should deliver playable frame rates in most titles at medium-to-high settings, though the 8 GB VRAM may require lower texture settings in newer games. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 indicates modern API performance that compares favorably to its rivals, with the 0.1-0.5% deltas to the Arc B570, RTX 3070 Mobile, R9 M390X, and Quadro M4000M suggesting consistent performance across the competitive set.

At 1440p, the GPU's 66th percentile position will require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates, with the 8 GB VRAM becoming a more significant constraint. The CPU's single-core performance of 4594 in Cinebench R23 ensures that even at lower resolutions, the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most games. At 4K, the Arc A750 is unlikely to deliver acceptable frame rates except in undemanding titles, with the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources insufficient for high-fidelity 4K gaming. These estimates should be treated as general guidance; actual performance will vary by title, driver maturity, and system configuration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600KF

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds