SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600KF

49,394 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER represent a pairing of a high-core-count desktop processor with a next-generation graphics card. The data available for this configuration is limited to synthetic benchmark scores; there are no measured frame rates for this exact combination. Consequently, all gaming performance analysis presented here is derived from the relative performance of the CPU and GPU in their respective benchmark suites, and should be treated as an estimate rather than a direct measurement.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates at a base clock of 3.50 GHz and can boost up to 5.30 GHz. The chip is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node and features a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory. It is an unlocked multiplier part, indicating overclocking capability, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700.

In synthetic benchmarks, the i5-14600KF demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance, which is typical for a chip with 20 threads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544 points places it in a competitive position. The single-core score of 4594 points in the same test suggests excellent responsiveness for lightly-threaded tasks. This combination of high multi-core throughput and robust single-core speed means the processor is well-suited for a variety of workloads, from compiling code to rendering frames. The Geekbench scores reinforce this picture, with a multi-core score of 17085 and a single-core score of 2445.

The processor's percentile ranking is at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, which indicates that it outperforms the vast majority of desktop processors in the benchmark database. Its average benchmark score is 49394. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tight cluster of performance. The i5-14600KF is a mere 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, which has an average score of 49228. It is also 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245. The only rival that outpaces it is the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388, which scores 0.8% higher. This indicates that while the i5-14600KF is a top-tier performer, it sits in a very densely packed performance envelope where architectural differences yield minimal real-world deltas.

For real workloads, the Passmark scores provide further insight. The multi-thread score of 38697 and the integer math score of 125982 indicate that the processor handles parallel compute tasks efficiently. The floating-point math score of 93048 is also high, which is relevant for scientific and engineering applications. Data encryption and compression scores of 27608 and 485140, respectively, suggest that the chip is capable in these areas, though these are not the primary strengths of the architecture.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i5-14600KF and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is unusual. The CPU is a top-tier part, ranking in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, however, ranks in the 18th percentile of all GPUs based on its single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690. This creates a significant performance disparity. In CPU-bound workloads, the processor will be the dominant force. In GPU-bound tasks, such as high-resolution gaming or rendering, the graphics card will be the limiting factor.

The combined percentile for this build is 54, which is a moderate overall ranking. This suggests that the pairing is not entirely balanced, with the CPU pulling the overall score up and the GPU pulling it down. In gaming scenarios, the bottleneck is almost certainly the GPU. The CPU's high single-core score of 4594 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient to feed a graphics card, even at lower resolutions. However, the GPU's low percentile ranking suggests it will not be able to keep up with the CPU's potential at any resolution. The lack of measured FPS data means we cannot quantify the exact scaling, but the percentile gap is a clear indicator that the GPU is the component that will limit frame rates in most scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The i5-14600KF has an average benchmark score of 49394, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900's score of 49228.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER ranks in the 18th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i5-14600KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's pixel fill rate?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s.

Q: Is the CPU's performance close to the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is 0.8% faster than the i5-14600KF, making it the closest rival in the data that outperforms it.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build is suited for users who prioritize CPU-centric tasks but still require a discrete GPU. The i5-14600KF's 90th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile large codebases, as the multi-threaded performance of 32544 in Cinebench R23 and 38697 in Passmark multi-thread will significantly reduce build times. Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the high multi-core throughput. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the processor's capabilities more than adequate for simulations and development work. Small business workstations that run data analysis or financial modeling software will see strong performance in CPU-bound tasks. However, for gamers, this build presents a challenge. The GPU's 18th percentile ranking means it will be the limiting factor, and users seeking high-refresh gaming at any resolution would find this pairing to be a mismatch, as the CPU's potential will be left untapped.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this build shows a stark contrast between the two components. The Intel Core i5-14600KF achieves an average benchmark score of 49394, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with a score of 49228, a delta of 0.3%. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 32544, and its single-core score is 4594. In Geekbench, it scores 17085 multi-core and 2445 single-core. The Passmark multi-thread score is 38697.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER presents a different picture. Its only benchmark score is 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M with a score of 2664, a delta of 1%. The overall combined percentile for this build is 54, reflecting the high CPU score and the low GPU score. The data indicates that this is a processor-heavy system where the GPU is the weaker component.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination of CPU and GPU. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. Based on the GPU's 18th percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690, the RTX 5070 SUPER is expected to be the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads. The CPU's high single-core score of 4594 in Cinebench R23 is not the limiting factor. For high-refresh gaming, the GPU's performance will likely fall short of what the CPU can support. The data suggests that players should expect frame rates that are significantly lower than what a high-end GPU would deliver, making this configuration unsuitable for competitive esports titles where high FPS is critical.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and uses the GB205 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz. Memory is clocked at 1750 MHz, with an effective speed of 28 Gbps. The memory subsystem consists of 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s.

The GPU has 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. It features 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores. Its compute capabilities include an FP32 throughput of 32.15 TFLOPS and an FP16 throughput of 32.15 TFLOPS. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s. The card has a TDP of 275 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector. It is a dual-slot card, measuring 245 mm in length.

Despite these specifications, the GPU's benchmark performance is low. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 places it in the 18th percentile, and it is only 1% faster than the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M. This indicates that while the hardware specifications suggest a modern and capable part, the actual measured performance is well below expectations for a GeForce 50-series product. The low percentile ranking suggests that the RT and tensor hardware, while present, may not be delivering the expected level of performance in the test workload.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The CPU is a top-tier performer, ranking in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with a strong multi-core and single-core performance profile. The GPU, however, is a low-tier performer, ranking in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 54, placing it in the middle of the database. This is a configuration where the processor is the dominant component, and the graphics card is a significant bottleneck. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is mid-range due to the GPU's limitations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-14600KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility in memory choice. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The processor has a TDP of 125 W. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and has a TDP of 275 W. The power supply requirements are not specified in the data, but the combined TDP of the CPU and GPU suggests a robust unit is necessary.

The upgrade path for this build is primarily focused on the GPU. Since the CPU is already in the 90th percentile, it is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most workloads. The data shows that the GPU, with an 18th percentile ranking, is the component that holds the system back. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RTX 5070 SUPER with a higher-performing graphics card that ranks higher in the percentile charts. The CPU and platform are capable of supporting such an upgrade. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the platform is not locked into a single memory type, though a user would need to ensure their motherboard and memory are compatible.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5070 SUPER's 18th percentile ranking indicates it will not deliver high frame rates. The CPU is capable, but the GPU will be the limiting factor, making this build unsuitable for high-refresh gaming.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32544, can handle encoding workloads. However, the GPU's low performance will impact the gaming portion of the stream, making the overall experience poor.

Video editing: The i5-14600KF is well-suited for video editing, with high scores in multi-threaded benchmarks. The GPU's low performance will affect effects rendering and timeline preview, but the CPU can handle the core editing tasks.

3D rendering: The CPU will excel in CPU-based rendering tasks, as evidenced by its 90th percentile ranking. The GPU's low benchmark score suggests it will be slow for GPU-accelerated rendering, making this a less efficient choice for that workload.

Software development: This is a strong scenario for the build. The CPU's high multi-threaded and single-threaded performance will speed up compilation and code analysis. The GPU's performance is irrelevant for most development tasks, so the CPU's power is fully utilized.

Student and office work: The CPU's excellent single-core performance of 4594 in Cinebench R23 ensures that everyday applications and office software will run smoothly. The GPU is more than sufficient for standard office tasks, but its low ranking means it offers no benefit for graphics-heavy applications.