SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combination represents a high-performance desktop pairing where the data reveals a clear division of labor. The CPU, with its 14 cores and 20 threads, delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 and a single-core score of 2064, while the GPU achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600. The balance between these components is workload-dependent, with the CPU holding a 90th percentile rank among all processors and the GPU sitting at the 86th percentile among all graphics cards. The measured frame rates across a wide range of titles show that the GPU typically becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures high refresh rates at 1080p in less demanding games. This analysis walks through the benchmark data to define where each component leads and where the pairing shows its strengths and constraints.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core i5-14600K and the RTX 4080 SUPER shifts based on resolution and game engine demands. The measured FPS data from ultra settings shows that at 1920x1080, the CPU’s single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2064) often drives frame rates to very high levels. For example, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 714.8 FPS at 1080p, and Valorant hits 535 FPS at the same resolution. These numbers far exceed what the GPU alone would typically deliver, indicating that the CPU is not the bottleneck in these esports titles. Conversely, at 3840x2160, the GPU’s workload increases substantially, and frame rates drop significantly across the board; Cyberpunk 2077 falls from 95 FPS at 1080p to 47 FPS at 4K, and Red Dead Redemption 2 goes from 87 FPS to 43 FPS. This pattern confirms that the RTX 4080 SUPER becomes the primary constraint at 4K, as the CPU’s performance headroom is less utilized.

The percentile positions reinforce this interpretation. The CPU’s 90th percentile rank versus all CPUs and the GPU’s 86th percentile rank versus all GPUs are close, but the gap in raw scores tells a different story. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 48618 places it within 0.8% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX. The GPU’s average score of 54209 is within 0.1% of the RTX 4080 and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X. In practice, this means the CPU can feed the GPU effectively at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, but at 4K, the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s and its 16 GB of GDDR6X VRAM become the deciding factors. The data shows that the bottleneck is not static; it moves from CPU-bound scenarios in light esports titles to GPU-bound scenarios in demanding AAA games at high resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s performance profile is anchored by its multi-threaded capabilities. In Cinebench, the R15 multi-core score of 3640, R20 multi-core score of 13709, and R23 multi-core score of 24491 show a consistent scaling pattern. The single-core scores of 297 (R15), 1935 (R20), and 2064 (R23) indicate strong per-thread performance, which is critical for gaming and lightly threaded applications. Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 16673 and a single-core score of 2491. The PassMark suite provides additional context: multi-thread score of 38682, single-thread score of 4270, integer math at 125737, and floating point math at 92794. The data compression score of 482020 and encryption score of 27533 highlight the CPU’s throughput in data-intensive tasks. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 48618 places it in the 90th percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (0.2% higher score) and AMD EPYC 4345P (0.3% lower score), showing that this i5 competes with server-class parts in multi-threaded workloads.

The GPU’s benchmarks are equally telling. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 positions it as a high-end rendering solution. Geekbench OpenCL score of 219065 and Vulkan score of 260075 demonstrate strong compute capabilities. PassMark G3D score of 34245 and GPU compute score of 19822 further quantify its performance. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 54209 places it in the 86th percentile, with the nearest rival being the RTX 4080 at a 0.1% higher score. The combined picture shows a pairing where the CPU’s multi-core prowess (20 threads) complements the GPU’s raw rendering power (52.22 TFLOPS FP32). The combined percentile of 88 reflects that this build sits above the vast majority of configurations, though the individual component percentiles (90 and 86) show that the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is to its own peers.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the data shows exceptional performance. Counter-Strike 2 hits 322 FPS, Valorant reaches 535 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X achieves 387 FPS at 1920x1080. The CPU’s single-core score of 2064 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread score of 4270 support this, as these titles rely heavily on per-core speed. At 1440p, frame rates remain high but drop: Counter-Strike 2 falls to 213.7 FPS and Valorant to 508 FPS, still well above the 144Hz threshold. The 4K numbers, such as 117.9 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 471 FPS in Valorant, show that even at ultra settings, esports titles run smoothly, though the GPU becomes more involved.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491. This allows for simultaneous encoding and gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 482020 supports fast file archiving, and the encryption score of 27533 helps with secure streaming protocols. For video editing, the Geekbench multi-core score of 16673 and PassMark multi-thread score of 38682 indicate that timeline rendering and export tasks will be responsive, though the GPU’s 320 tensor cores can accelerate AI-based effects.

In 3D rendering, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6600 and PassMark G3D score of 34245 show strong ray tracing and rasterization performance. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 ensures that CPU-based rendering (like Blender’s Cycles) is also viable, though the GPU will typically be faster. Software development workloads are served by the CPU’s high single-thread score (2064 in Cinebench R23) for compilation tasks that are often single-threaded, while the multi-core score (24491) helps with parallel builds. The PassMark integer math score of 125737 is relevant for code execution and testing.

For students and office work, the integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770) provide a fallback, but the discrete GPU ensures smooth operation in any productivity suite. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4270 handles spreadsheet and document tasks instantly. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support (DDR4 or DDR5) make this system responsive for daily multitasking. The data shows that this build is overkill for basic office tasks, but it will never feel sluggish.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a gamer who wants to play at 1440p or 4K with high settings. The measured FPS at 2560x1440 shows strong performance: Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 147.1 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 136.5 FPS, and Fortnite at 99 FPS. At 3840x2160, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth sustain playable frame rates in most titles, though demanding games like Ark: Survival Ascended drop to 16 FPS. A gamer with a 144Hz 1440p monitor will find this build ideal, as the CPU’s single-core strength prevents bottlenecks in competitive titles.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the combination of the CPU’s 20 threads and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24491 and the PassMark GPU compute score of 19822 indicate that both CPU and GPU acceleration are available. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s multi-thread score of 38682 in PassMark and the 14 cores, which reduce build times. Students in engineering or data science fields can leverage the CPU’s PassMark floating point math score of 92794 for numerical computations, though this is a high-end choice for such tasks.

Small business workstations that handle data compression (PassMark score of 482020) or encryption (27533) will see tangible benefits. The CPU’s ECC memory support adds reliability for server-like workloads. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 88 places it in the upper tier of all configurations. For users who need a single system for gaming, streaming, and content production, this pairing provides the horsepower without the need for a second machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 48618, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698) and 0.3% higher than the AMD EPYC 4345P (48470). It also sits 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 4080?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, which is 0.1% lower than the RTX 4080’s score of 54247. The deltaPct is -0.1%, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The single-core score in Cinebench R23 is 2064, while the multi-core score is 24491. The single-core score is critical for gaming, and it places the CPU in the 90th percentile overall.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and AI workloads?

A: Yes, the GPU is based on Ada Lovelace architecture with 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 reflects its ray tracing capability, and the tensor cores support AI acceleration.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s. The memory clock is 1438 MHz, which translates to 23 Gbps effective.

Q: How does the CPU perform in data-intensive tasks?

A: The PassMark data compression score is 482020, and the encryption score is 27533. The integer math score is 125737, and the floating point math score is 92794, indicating strong throughput for these workloads.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 88, which means it outperforms 88% of all CPU-GPU pairings in the database. The average FPS across all measured games is 205.5.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is built on the AD103 chip using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 45,900 million transistors and a die size of 379 mm². It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s. The base clock is 2295 MHz, with a boost clock of 2550 MHz, and memory runs at 1438 MHz (23 Gbps effective). The GPU has 10240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. It includes 80 RT cores for ray tracing and 320 tensor cores for AI processing. The FP32 performance is 52.22 TFLOPS, which is identical to the FP16 performance (1:1 ratio).

The pixel rate is 285.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 816.0 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for high-resolution rendering. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival is the RTX 4080 with a 0.1% higher score, showing that the SUPER variant offers essentially the same performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 219065 and Vulkan score of 260075 demonstrate solid compute capabilities for non-gaming workloads. The PassMark G3D score of 34245 and GPU compute score of 19822 further quantify its rendering and compute power.

For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures and complex scenes. The 736.3 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks in most modern titles. The RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is reflected in the high 3DMark score. The tensor cores support DLSS and other AI features, which can boost frame rates in supported games. The data shows that this GPU is designed for high-resolution gaming and professional rendering tasks. The power consumption is 320 W, with a suggested PSU of 700 W, and it uses a 1x 16-pin power connector. The triple-slot cooler and dimensions of 310 mm in length make it a large card that requires ample case space.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 3.50 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz. The TDP is 125 W, and it fits the Intel Socket 1700. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. It has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. It includes UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics, though discrete GPUs are the primary display solution.

The benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance. Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 3640, R20 multi-core is 13709, and R23 multi-core is 24491. These scores scale consistently, indicating good multi-threading efficiency. The single-core scores are 297 (R15), 1935 (R20), and 2064 (R23), which are competitive for gaming. Geekbench multi-core (16673) and single-core (2491) scores are also solid. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 38682 and single-thread score of 4270. The data compression score of 482020 and encryption score of 27533 are particularly high, suggesting strong performance in archiving and security tasks.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 48618, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include server-class parts like the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and AMD EPYC 4345P, indicating that this i5 can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with gaming performance by reducing memory latency. The 125 W TDP requires adequate cooling, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking. For real workloads, the 14 cores handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation efficiently, while the 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded responsiveness.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory modules. The dual-channel memory bus means that two memory sticks are optimal for bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for the latest GPUs and NVMe storage. The GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible and does not bottleneck the RTX 4080 SUPER.

The TDP of the CPU is 125 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 320 W, with a suggested PSU of 700 W. This leaves headroom for additional components like storage drives and fans. The power connectors include a 1x 16-pin for the GPU, which requires a compatible PSU cable or adapter. The socket is actively produced, so the CPU is still available for new builds. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the more likely candidate for replacement, as it is end-of-life and has a successor (GeForce 50 series). The CPU, with its 90th percentile rank and active production status, has more longevity. Upgrading the GPU to a newer model would extend the system’s 4K gaming capabilities, while the CPU can continue to handle multi-threaded tasks. Memory can be upgraded to faster DDR5 modules if the motherboard supports them, and additional NVMe storage can be added via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-14600K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER in a desktop configuration. The combined percentile is 88, placing it above 88% of all CPU-GPU pairings. The CPU’s 90th percentile rank and the GPU’s 86th percentile rank show a well-matched pair, with the CPU having slightly more relative strength. The average FPS across all measured games is 205.5, with a rank of 199 out of 3732 pairs, meaning this build outperforms the vast majority of systems in gaming performance. The CPU is a 14-core Raptor Lake part with a 125 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 16 GB of VRAM and a 320 W TDP. Together, they form a high-end desktop system suited for demanding workloads and high-refresh gaming. The launch MSRP is $319 for the CPU and $999 USD for the GPU, though these are historical values. The production status is active for the CPU and end-of-life for the GPU, indicating that the GPU is at the end of its lifecycle. This pairing represents a top-tier configuration in terms of overall performance, with the data showing that it handles both CPU-intensive and GPU-intensive tasks with authority.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings provides a comprehensive view of gaming performance. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 714.8 FPS, Valorant reaches 535 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege X achieves 387 FPS. These numbers are far beyond the refresh rates of most monitors, showing that the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2064) is more than sufficient. In AAA titles at 1080p, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 95 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 87 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 164.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, frame rates remain strong: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 71 FPS, Warzone to 147.1 FPS, and Fortnite to 99 FPS. The 1440p results show that this build is ideal for high-refresh 1440p gaming, as most titles stay above 100 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 47 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 43 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 16 FPS. However, less demanding titles remain playable: Valorant hits 471 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 117.9 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 122.9 FPS. The 4K results show that while the RTX 4080 SUPER is powerful, it cannot maintain 60 FPS in the most demanding games at ultra settings. The data indicates that this build is best suited for 1440p gaming, where it delivers high frame rates across the board. For 4K, users may need to adjust settings or use upscaling technologies, as the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth are not enough for consistently high frame rates in the most demanding titles.