SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14600K and Intel Arc A750 form a desktop pairing that places the combined system at the 78th percentile among all builds, with the CPU ranking at the 90th percentile and the GPU at the 66th. This combination pairs a high-end 14-core processor with a mid-range graphics card, and the benchmark data reveals a system where the CPU is the dominant component in most workloads, while the GPU provides a solid but not class-leading foundation for gaming and rendering.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The chip is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support. It uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present for basic display output, but the discrete Arc A750 handles graphics duties.

Benchmark results for the CPU are strong across the board. In Cinebench R23, the i5-14600K scores 24491 in multicore and 2064 in single-core. The multicore result is particularly telling: it places the chip in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly nine out of ten processors in the database. The single-core score of 2064 indicates excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly threaded tasks like gaming and everyday application responsiveness. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score drops to 13709, while single-core is 1935, and in the older R15 test, the scores are 3640 multicore and 297 single-core. These progressive results show consistent scaling across benchmark generations.

Geekbench results echo the Cinebench findings: a multicore score of 16673 and a single-core score of 2491. Passmark tests provide additional insight into specific workloads. The multithread score is 38682, with integer math at 125737 and floating-point math at 92794. Data compression reaches 482020, while encryption scores 27533. The extended instructions score is 28546, and random string sorting comes in at 51949. The find prime numbers score is 162, and physics is 2473. Single-thread performance is 4270. These numbers paint a picture of a CPU that excels at parallel workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering, while also maintaining strong single-core speed for gaming.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i5-14600K’s average benchmark score of 48618 is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, which scores 48698, a delta of -0.2%. It is also essentially matched with the AMD EPYC 4345P (48470, +0.3%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48287, +0.7%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995, -0.8%). The data shows the i5-14600K sits in a crowded performance band where single-digit percentage differences separate it from server and newer mobile processors. For real workloads, this means the i5-14600K is a versatile desktop chip that can handle both heavily threaded productivity and fast single-core tasks without a significant penalty compared to much more expensive alternatives.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is based on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, part of the Alchemist generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 21,700 million transistors and a die size of 406 mm². The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The core runs at a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. It features 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operations pipelines. There are 28 ray tracing cores, and while tensor cores are not listed, the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1). The card consumes 225 W TDP, requires a 550 W suggested PSU, and uses a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector. It is a dual-slot card with outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0.

In benchmark tests, the Arc A750 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612. Geekbench OpenCL scores 98554, while Vulkan scores 85631. Passmark results show a G3D score of 12534, GPU compute at 5368, and G2D at 732. DirectX tests in Passmark are more modest: DirectX 10 scores 65, DirectX 11 scores 72, DirectX 12 scores 70, and DirectX 9 scores 181. The GPU sits at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, indicating it outperforms two-thirds of the database but is not a top-tier card. Its average benchmark score is 20582.

The nearest rivals for the Arc A750 include the Intel Arc B570 with an average score of 20556 (0.1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534 (0.2% delta), the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20662 (-0.4% delta), and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20480 (0.5% delta). The data shows the Arc A750 is essentially tied with these cards, with performance differences of less than one percent. This is notable because it means the desktop Arc A750 performs on par with a mobile RTX 3070, which is a capable laptop GPU, but it does not surpass it. For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and some 1440p textures, but the card’s 66th percentile ranking suggests it will struggle with the heaviest 4K or ray-traced scenes compared to higher-end options.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system with a clear CPU advantage. The i5-14600K’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24491 places it in the 90th percentile, while the Arc A750’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 corresponds to a 66th percentile GPU ranking. The combined percentile for this build is 78, which is a strong overall position, but it is pulled down by the GPU. In CPU-centric tasks like Cinebench R23, the i5-14600K is 0.2% behind the Xeon Gold 5318H and 0.3% ahead of the EPYC 4345P, showing it competes with server-grade silicon. In GPU terms, the Arc A750 is 0.1% ahead of the Arc B570 and 0.2% ahead of the RTX 3070 Mobile, meaning its performance is effectively indistinguishable from those cards in aggregate.

The data also highlights the CPU’s single-core strength. With a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2064 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2491, the i5-14600K is well-suited for tasks that rely on low latency and high frequency. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12534 is respectable, but its DirectX 9 score of 181 compared to DirectX 11 at 72 and DirectX 12 at 70 suggests that older API workloads may run better than newer ones, which is an interesting quirk of the Alchemist architecture. Overall, the benchmark data indicates that this pairing excels in CPU-heavy applications like video editing and 3D rendering, while GPU-bound gaming at high settings will be limited by the Arc A750’s mid-range standing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the i5-14600K’s single-core performance (2064 in Cinebench R23) can drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the Arc A750’s 66th percentile ranking means it will not consistently hit 144+ FPS in demanding games at ultra settings. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p, but the GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 70 suggests modern titles will be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24491, provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark data compression score of 482020 indicates fast handling of stream data. The GPU’s compute score of 5368 is modest, so software encoding on the CPU is the better choice.

Video editing: The i5-14600K excels here, with a Geekbench multicore score of 16673 and Passmark integer math at 125737. The Arc A750’s 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate effects, but 8 GB VRAM may limit preview quality on large timelines.

3D rendering: In Cinebench R23 multicore, the CPU scores 24491, placing it in the 90th percentile, which means rendering times will be short for CPU-based renderers. For GPU rendering, the Arc A750’s 17.20 TFLOPS is usable but not top-tier, and the 66th percentile GPU ranking suggests slower render times than high-end cards.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4270 in Passmark and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2064 make compilation and code analysis fast. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with repetitive workloads. The GPU is not critical here, but its OpenCL score of 98554 can assist with parallel compute tasks.

Student and office work: The i5-14600K’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display tasks, and the CPU’s 90th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking. The Arc A750 is overkill for this scenario, but it adds no harm. The system’s combined 78th percentile makes it more powerful than needed for spreadsheets and documents.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-14600K compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i5-14600K has an average benchmark score of 48618, which is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698), 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4345P (48470), 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48287), and 0.8% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48995).

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile, and what does it mean?

A: The Arc A750 is at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 66% of GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 20582, and it is within 0.5% of rivals like the Arc B570 and RTX 3070 Mobile.

Q: Does this CPU support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The i5-14600K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation tasks.

Q: What is the power consumption of the GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The Arc A750 has a TDP of 225 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. It requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector.

Q: Are there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The i5-14600K scores 2064 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is strong for gaming and everyday tasks. Its Passmark single-thread score is 4270.

Q: What API support does the Arc A750 provide?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It also has 28 ray tracing cores.

Who Should Build It

This build is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU prowess. Gamers at 1080p will find the i5-14600K’s single-core strength (2064 in Cinebench R23) ideal for high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the Arc A750’s 66th percentile ranking means ultra settings in AAA games will require compromises. Content creators, especially video editors and 3D artists using CPU-based renderers, will benefit from the 90th percentile CPU, with Cinebench R23 multicore of 24491 and Geekbench multicore of 16673. Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times from the single-thread score of 4270 and the 24 MB L3 cache. Students and office workers will find the system vastly overpowered for their needs, but the integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. Small business workstations that require heavy multitasking or data processing, as indicated by the Passmark integer math score of 125737, will also be well-served.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the bottleneck in this pairing. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 66th percentile creates an imbalance where CPU-bound tasks will complete quickly while GPU-bound tasks lag behind. In gaming, the i5-14600K can produce frames faster than the Arc A750 can render them, so frame rates will be limited by the GPU in most scenarios. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 70 for the GPU is low compared to the CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 38682, reinforcing that the GPU is the weaker link. For productivity, the CPU will dominate, but any workload that offloads to the GPU, such as GPU rendering or compute, will see the 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance cap the system. The combined 78th percentile is a reflection of this imbalance—the CPU pulls the average up, but the GPU prevents the system from reaching the 90th percentile tier.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-14600K uses Intel Socket 1700, which is a platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so there is no bottleneck from the bus interface. The system’s TDP is 125 W for the CPU and 225 W for the GPU, totaling 350 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W, leaving headroom for additional drives or peripherals. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A750 with a higher-performing GPU, as the CPU’s 90th percentile ranking means it can support a much faster card without becoming the bottleneck. The platform also allows for CPU upgrades within the Socket 1700 family, though the i5-14600K is already a strong performer. Memory can be expanded or upgraded to DDR5 if not already in use, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes are future-proof for next-generation storage or accelerators.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core i5-14600K with the Intel Arc A750. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, and the GPU is an Alchemist-architecture card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile is 78, indicating a system that is above average but not top-tier. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile, making it a high-end processor, while the GPU at the 66th percentile is solidly mid-range. This pairing is best described as a CPU-first build where the processor’s power is not fully matched by the graphics card, making it ideal for compute-heavy tasks rather than maximum gaming performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores. The i5-14600K’s single-core performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 score of 2064 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2491, suggesting it can drive high frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios. However, the Arc A750’s 66th percentile GPU ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 indicate that the GPU will be the limiting factor in most games. At 1080p, players can expect playable frame rates in esports and older titles, but ultra settings in modern AAA games will likely result in frame rates below 60 FPS. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth may struggle with high-resolution textures, and the GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 70 suggests that newer API games will not perform as well as older ones. At 4K, the Arc A750 is not recommended, as its 66th percentile ranking and 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance are insufficient for smooth gameplay at that resolution. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary by game and settings.