SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14600K

48,618 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake refresh processor with NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0-based GeForce 50-series graphics card, landing at the 54th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU holds a 90th percentile position against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 18th percentile against all GPUs, creating a pronounced asymmetry in raw compute capability that shapes every workload profile. The processor's multi-threaded performance—a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24491—positions it firmly in workstation territory, while the graphics card's single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690 suggests modest rasterization headroom relative to its peers.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5070 SUPER's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 places it within 1.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 and 1.1% of the Intel Arc Pro B50, indicating entry-level rasterization throughput that will struggle to sustain high frame rates at demanding settings. The i5-14600K's single-core strength—a Geekbench single-core score of 2491 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2064—provides ample CPU headroom, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor for high-refresh 1080p or 1440p gaming.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads deliver a PassMark multithread score of 38682, which supports simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads without significant processor contention. However, the GPU's lack of measured performance data for encoding tasks, combined with its low 18th percentile ranking, means hardware-accelerated streaming quality may fall short of expectations for a 50-series part.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing and export performance benefit from the i5-14600K's Cinebench R20 multicore score of 13709, while the GPU's 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate capacity for 4K footage handling. The PassMark data compression score of 482020 indicates strong archival and proxy-generation throughput.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering excels with a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3640 and PassMark floating-point math score of 92794, making this a viable workstation for CPU-bound render engines. GPU-accelerated rendering will be constrained by the graphics card's low percentile position, with FP32 performance of 32.15 TFLOPS representing the theoretical ceiling.

Software development: Compilation tasks leverage the 20-thread processor with PassMark integer math scoring 125737, while the 24 MB shared L3 cache reduces cache-miss penalties in large codebases. The PassMark extended instructions score of 28546 supports vectorized build toolchains and modern compiler features.

Student and office work: The processor's 90th percentile ranking ensures responsive multitasking across office suites, virtual desktops, and browser workloads, while the GPU's modest performance is adequate for standard productivity displays. PassMark single-thread score of 4270 confirms snappy application launches and UI responsiveness.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-14600K delivers an average benchmark score of 48618 across all tested workloads, placing it at the 90th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H with an average score of 48698 (0.2% ahead), the AMD EPYC 4345P at 48470 (0.3% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX at 48287 (0.7% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 at 48995 (0.8% ahead). These sub-1% deltas indicate the i5-14600K sits in a tightly contested performance band where architectural differences matter more than raw score gaps.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690, placing it at the 18th percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M at 2664 (1.0% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 at 2662 (1.1% behind), the Intel Arc Pro B50 at 2660 (1.1% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 at 2645 (1.7% behind). This clustering suggests the RTX 5070 SUPER's measured performance is consistent with legacy and entry-level parts, despite its modern Blackwell architecture and 31,100 million transistor count.

The combined picture reveals a substantial mismatch: a top-decile CPU paired with a bottom-quintile GPU. The combined percentile of 54 reflects this average, but the CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 18th percentile create workload-dependent outcomes where CPU-bound tasks perform at near-flagship levels while GPU-bound tasks lag significantly behind contemporary expectations.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database. Consequently, all gaming frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as directional rather than definitive.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 and its 18th percentile position, ultra-settings gaming performance will likely align with the GT 1030 or GT 440 class of graphics cards, which historically deliver playable frame rates only at 720p or low-settings 1080p. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2064 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck these frame rates, but the GPU's limited throughput will cap performance well below high-refresh thresholds.

For competitive esports titles at low settings, the GPU may achieve playable frame rates at 1080p given its 201.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 502.4 GTexel/s texture rate. However, modern AAA titles at ultra presets will likely fall below 30 FPS at 1080p, and 1440p or 4K ultra gaming is not realistically supported by this graphics solution. The 18 GB VRAM capacity provides ample memory headroom, but memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s and the low compute throughput become the binding constraints.

Balance and Bottleneck

The i5-14600K's 90th percentile CPU ranking versus the RTX 5070 SUPER's 18th percentile GPU ranking establishes a clear hierarchy: the processor is never the limiting factor in any workload. CPU-bound tasks such as compilation, data compression, and physics simulation will operate at near-peak efficiency, with PassMark physics scoring 2473 and data encryption scoring 27533 demonstrating strong processor-side throughput.

Conversely, GPU-bound workloads—gaming, GPU rendering, and compute acceleration—will be severely constrained by the graphics card. The 3DMark score of 2690 indicates that the GPU delivers roughly one-twentieth the performance of top-tier graphics cards in the database, meaning the CPU will wait idly for GPU completion in most graphics-intensive scenarios.

The FPS scaling picture cannot be quantified due to missing measured data, but the benchmark-derived estimate is consistent: the GPU is the bottleneck for all graphics workloads, while the CPU's headroom remains entirely unused in those scenarios. In mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU can handle encoding on its 20 threads without impacting game performance, but the GPU's low rendering throughput will dominate the experience.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. It features a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, includes ECC support, and provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU.

The unlocked multiplier and active production status indicate ongoing availability for overclocking and system builders. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output capability without a discrete GPU, which may serve as a fallback for troubleshooting or basic office tasks.

Benchmark results show strong single-threaded performance with a Geekbench single-core score of 2491 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2064, placing it among the top tier for lightly-threaded applications. Multi-threaded scores—Cinebench R23 multicore of 24491 and Geekbench multicore of 16673—demonstrate robust scaling across the 20 threads. PassMark results further characterize the workload profile: integer math at 125737, floating-point math at 92794, and extended instructions at 28546 all indicate capable general-purpose computing, while the prime number search score of 162 is notably lower, reflecting the architecture's design priorities.

The CPU's 90th percentile position and tight clustering with rival parts (all within 0.9% in average score) suggest that real-world differences between the i5-14600K and its nearest competitors will be minimal, making other system components or price considerations more decisive in platform selection.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits builders who prioritize CPU-bound productivity workloads while accepting significant GPU limitations. Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering engines, software developers compiling large codebases, and data analysts running single-threaded or moderately parallel workloads will extract the most value from the i5-14600K's top-decile performance.

Students and office workers will find the processor's responsiveness—evidenced by PassMark single-thread score of 4270—more than adequate for everyday tasks, while the GPU's 18 GB VRAM can support multiple high-resolution displays via the 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings expectations may find the combination workable for less demanding titles, but the GPU's low percentile ranking makes this a poor choice for high-refresh or ultra-settings gaming. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, documentation, and light database work will benefit from the CPU's 90th percentile performance and the GPU's sufficient display output capabilities, though GPU-accelerated applications will disappoint.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 54, with the CPU at the 90th percentile against all CPUs and the GPU at the 18th percentile against all GPUs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-14600K's average benchmark score of 48618 is 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4345P, 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX, and 0.8% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245.

Q: What is the GPU's measured 3DMark performance?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it 1.0% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and 1.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440.

Q: Does this system support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC support available.

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The i5-14600K has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER features 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 672.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the CPU has a 125 W TDP.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14600K—a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor on Intel Socket 1700—with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU on PCIe 5.0 x16. The CPU was released in October 2023 with a launch MSRP of $319, while the GPU is listed as active with a release date of December 2025.

The overall tier from the percentiles is mixed: the CPU's 90th percentile ranking makes it a high-end processor by database standards, while the GPU's 18th percentile ranking places it in the entry-level segment. The combined percentile of 54 reflects this divergence, positioning the system as a whole in the mid-range tier—strong for CPU-centric tasks, weak for GPU-centric ones.

The die sizes reflect different manufacturing approaches: the CPU measures 257 mm² on Intel's 10 nm process, while the GPU measures 263 mm² on TSMC's 5 nm process with 31,100 million transistors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support. The processor provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface.

The GPU's power requirements include a 275 W TDP and a single 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU field is not provided in the data, so power supply headroom cannot be quantified; however, the CPU's 125 W TDP combined with the GPU's 275 W TDP indicates a total component draw of 400 W before other system components are considered.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-performing GPU, since the CPU has substantial headroom—its 90th percentile ranking means it can feed significantly faster graphics cards without becoming the bottleneck. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and dual-channel memory support future system expansion, while the CPU's active production status ensures ongoing platform support.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. It features 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 50 RT cores, while 200 tensor cores accelerate AI workloads. The base clock is 2325 MHz with a boost clock of 2512 MHz, producing FP32 performance of 32.15 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 32.15 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690, however, tells a different story than the architectural specifications suggest. At the 18th percentile against all GPUs, this part performs in the range of legacy cards like the GT 1030 and GT 440, with all nearest rivals within 1.7% of its score. The 672.0 GB/s bandwidth and 18 GB capacity are modern specifications, but the measured compute performance indicates significant limitations in real-world rendering workloads.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display output via 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The dual-slot design measures 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, with a 1x 16-pin power connector and 275 W TDP. For rendering tasks, the low 3DMark score suggests that GPU-accelerated rendering will be substantially slower than the CPU's rendering performance, making this pairing better suited to CPU-based render pipelines.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14600K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds