SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400F + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
90%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400F

32,279 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400F and Intel Arc B570 represent a balanced mid-range desktop pairing, targeting 1080p and 1440p gaming with respectable compute capabilities for light productivity. The CPU, a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, delivers strong multi-threaded performance for its class, while the GPU, based on Intel’s Xe2-HPG Battlemage architecture, offers competitive rasterization performance with a substantial 10 GB VRAM buffer. Combined, this system places in the 74th percentile for all desktop builds, indicating a solid tier above average, driven by a CPU that outperforms a significant majority of processors and a GPU that sits comfortably in the mid-range segment.

The benchmark data reveals a clear picture: this is not an ultra-high-end enthusiast rig, but a pragmatic choice for high-refresh-rate esports and smooth 1440p gameplay in many titles. The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs makes it a strong foundation, and its 65W TDP means it can be cooled effectively and paired with a modest power supply. The GPU’s 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while lower than the CPU’s standing, is sufficient to complement the processor in most gaming scenarios, though it will be the limiting factor in extremely demanding, GPU-bound workloads. The measured frame rates across a wide range of games confirm this assessment, showing excellent performance in lighter titles and playable, though not always high-refresh, results in AAA games at 1080p.

This analysis will break down the CPU and GPU architectures, the platform’s upgrade potential, and the precise benchmark scores that define this pairing’s capabilities. The goal is to provide a data-driven evaluation of what this build can realistically deliver for gamers, creators, and professionals, using only the measured performance metrics and specifications provided.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400F is a desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It features a hybrid configuration with 10 physical cores and 16 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance workload throughput and power consumption. The base clock is 2.50 GHz, which can boost up to 4.70 GHz under load, providing a strong single-threaded response for everyday applications and games. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache, which helps reduce latency and improve data access speeds in multi-threaded tasks.

Benchmark results show a well-rounded performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 21,645 points in the multi-core test and 3,055 points in the single-core test. The multi-core score is particularly notable, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 83% of processors on the market. This translates to strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where all cores are utilized. For instance, the PassMark multi-thread score of 25,470 and the integer math score of 81,524 indicate substantial throughput for parallel processing tasks. The single-thread score of 3,055 in Cinebench R23 is also competitive, ensuring snappy responsiveness in general use and solid performance in games that rely on a few fast cores.

Comparatively, the i5-14400F sits alongside the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Intel Core i9-11900, with average benchmark scores of 32,279, 32,233, and 32,226, respectively. The delta percentages are minimal, at 0.1% and 0.2%, indicating that these processors offer nearly identical overall performance. This means the i5-14400F is a contemporary peer to these parts, despite being a newer generation. The data also shows a slight edge over the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS (which has a -0.2% delta) and the Intel Core i7-12800H (0.5% delta), confirming its place in the upper mid-range tier of desktop and mobile chips. For real workloads, this CPU is more than capable of handling heavy multi-threaded applications like Cinebench rendering or PassMark’s data compression test, where it scores 315,521, without breaking a sweat.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i5-14400F is built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing between cost-effective older RAM or faster, newer modules. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a valuable feature for small business workstations or entry-level servers where data integrity is critical. For expansion, the CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is future-proof for high-bandwidth NVMe SSDs and the latest graphics cards, although the Arc B570 GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The platform’s power requirements are modest. The CPU has a 65W TDP, which is low for a 10-core processor, meaning a standard air cooler is sufficient, and the overall system power draw will be manageable. The GPU has a 150W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the entire system is 450W. This is a very reasonable requirement, allowing for a wide range of power supply units without needing a high-wattage, premium model. The system is a desktop class build, and the upgrade path from this CPU involves moving to a higher-core-count Raptor Lake refresh processor on the same socket, such as an i7 or i9 part, if more multi-threaded performance is needed in the future.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in demanding scenarios, so a future graphics card upgrade would yield the most significant performance gains in gaming. However, the CPU’s 20 MB of L3 cache and fast boost clock ensure that it will not hold back a more powerful GPU in most titles. The platform is mature, with a wide range of motherboards available, and the support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a builder can reuse existing RAM or invest in a newer memory standard without changing the CPU.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is a desktop graphics card based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It is the second generation of Intel’s discrete GPUs, codenamed Battlemage, and is positioned as an Arc 5 series part. The GPU features 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, along with 18 dedicated ray tracing cores. It does not have a listed number of tensor cores, but it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shaders. The card has a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz, producing 19 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem is a significant highlight, with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This is a generous amount of VRAM for a card in this class, which helps with higher-resolution textures and future game releases that demand more memory. The GPU’s compute capabilities are solid: 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 23.04 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, which supports 2:1 ratio for accelerated AI and compute workloads. The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for high-resolution rendering.

In benchmark tests, the Arc B570 performs well for its class. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,649, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 83,514, with a Vulkan score of 96,844. The PassMark G3D score is 14,195, which places the GPU in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. This puts it in direct competition with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (which has a 0.1% delta) and the Intel Arc A750 (-0.1% delta), showing that it is on par with those cards in overall benchmark scores. The GPU’s performance in rasterization is strong, but its ray tracing capability, while present, is likely to be a weaker point compared to NVIDIA’s offerings, as suggested by the relatively lower performance in the PassMark DirectX 12 test (score of 72) compared to DirectX 11 (score of 118). For rendering, the 10 GB VRAM is a clear advantage, allowing for larger scenes and textures without memory overflow.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination is best suited for gamers who prioritize high frame rates at 1080p and are willing to accept medium-to-high settings in the most demanding AAA titles. The measured FPS data shows that at 1920x1080, the build achieves over 100 FPS in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 (133 FPS) and Valorant (304 FPS), making it ideal for competitive gaming. For single-player games, it delivers playable frame rates, such as 39 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 and 36 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2 at 1080p, which are acceptable but not high-refresh. At 1440p, the performance drops further, but the system remains viable for many games, offering 29 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 and 128 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.

Content creators and developers will find value in the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 11,268 indicate that video editing, 3D rendering, and code compilation tasks will be handled efficiently. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and compute capabilities (11.52 TFLOPS FP32) are also suitable for light 3D modeling and GPU-accelerated rendering, though not for professional-grade workloads. Students and small business users will appreciate the platform’s low power requirements (65W CPU TDP, 450W suggested PSU) and the support for ECC memory, which provides system stability for long-running tasks. The build is not targeted at 4K gaming, where the GPU would struggle (e.g., 19 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K), but it is a versatile option for high-refresh 1080p gaming and moderate productivity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a relatively balanced pairing, but with a clear performance ceiling imposed by the GPU in certain workloads. The CPU’s percentile ranking (83rd) is significantly higher than the GPU’s (65th), indicating that the processor is the stronger component. In CPU-intensive games, such as esports titles, the system performs exceptionally well, with the CPU able to feed the GPU enough data to achieve high frame rates. For example, in Valorant at 1080p, the system reaches 304 FPS, which is likely CPU-bound, as the GPU is not stressed to its limit.

However, in GPU-intensive games with heavy graphics effects, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. In Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p, the FPS drops to 39, and at 1440p it falls to 29, which is typical of a GPU-bound scenario. The GPU’s 65th percentile ranking and its performance in 3DMark Steel Nomad (2,649) show that it can handle modern titles, but not at the highest settings or resolutions. The data shows that the FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p is not linear, with many games losing 20-30% performance, which indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. For example, in Fortnite, FPS drops from 64 at 1080p to 40 at 1440p, a 37.5% decrease, which is more than the resolution scaling would suggest, confirming the GPU’s limitation. The CPU, with its high single-thread score (3,055 in Cinebench R23), is unlikely to be a bottleneck in most games, but in the most CPU-heavy simulations, like Microsoft Flight Simulator (48 FPS at 1080p), the balance is more even.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile, and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 83% of processors. This indicates a strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performer for its class, suitable for gaming and productivity.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and why is it important?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory. This is a large amount for a mid-range GPU, allowing for higher-resolution textures and reducing the likelihood of running out of memory in modern games.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the system is 450 W, which is relatively low. This is due to the CPU’s 65W TDP and the GPU’s 150W TDP, making it a power-efficient build.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400F supports ECC memory. This is a feature typically found in workstation or server platforms, providing error correction for data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score compared to its nearest rival?

A: The Arc B570’s average benchmark score is 20,556. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, has an average score of 20,534, showing a performance delta of only 0.1%, meaning they are statistically equivalent.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-11900?

A: The i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32,279, while the i9-11900 has a score of 32,226. The delta is 0.2%, indicating that the i5-14400F is essentially on par with the older i9, making it a strong value proposition.

Q: What is the memory bus width and bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has a 160-bit memory bus with a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This provides sufficient data throughput for the 10 GB VRAM and helps maintain performance at higher resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-14400F delivers a strong showing across multiple benchmark suites. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 21,645, and its single-core score is 3,055. In Geekbench, it scores 11,268 for multi-core and 2,058 for single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 25,470 and a single-thread score of 3,701. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32,279, placing it in the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, has an average score of 32,233, with a delta of 0.1%, meaning the i5-14400F is marginally faster. The Intel Core i9-11900 is another close competitor, with a score of 32,226 and a 0.2% delta.

The Arc B570 GPU’s performance is competitive for its tier. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,649, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 96,844, with an OpenCL score of 83,514. The PassMark G3D score is 14,195, and the GPU compute score is 7,281. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20,556, placing it in the 65th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20,534, with a delta of 0.1%, indicating the Arc B570 is slightly ahead. The Intel Arc A750 is also close, with a score of 20,582 and a delta of -0.1%, showing the B570 is a direct successor in performance.

The combined picture for this build is that the CPU is the stronger component, outperforming the GPU by a wider margin in percentile terms (83rd vs 65th). This means the system is well-suited for CPU-bound tasks, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. The combined percentile for the build is 74th, which is above average, and the pair ranks 3,039 out of 3,732 pairs in terms of FPS, with an average FPS of 86.3 across all games tested. This indicates that while the system is not top-tier, it delivers a smooth experience in the majority of titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-14400F with the Intel Arc B570. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, and is designed for mainstream desktop use. The GPU is an Intel Arc B570, based on the Battlemage architecture, and is a dual-slot card that requires a single 8-pin power connector. The system’s overall performance tier is in the 74th percentile of all builds, indicating it is a solid mid-range machine that outperforms a majority of configurations.

The CPU’s 83rd percentile ranking makes it a high-end part relative to all processors, while the GPU’s 65th percentile ranking places it in the upper mid-range for graphics cards. This combination means the build is well-balanced for 1080p gaming and capable of handling 1440p in less demanding titles. The system’s PSU requirement is modest at 450W, and the CPU’s 65W TDP and GPU’s 150W TDP make it an efficient pairing that does not require exotic cooling solutions. The build is active in production, with both components currently available, and the CPU has a launch MSRP of $196, while the GPU has a launch MSRP of 219 USD. This is a practical, no-frills configuration for a user looking for strong performance in games and productivity without stepping into high-end pricing territory.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The build excels in esports titles, with measured FPS at 1080p being very high. For example, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 133 FPS, Valorant at 304 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege at 158 FPS. These frame rates are ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors (144Hz or higher), providing a competitive edge. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3,055 in Cinebench R23) ensures that these frame rates are sustained even in complex scenes.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 threads and 65W TDP make it suitable for streaming while gaming. The multi-thread score of 21,645 in Cinebench R23 indicates that there is enough headroom to encode video in software while the game runs, though using the GPU’s hardware encoder would be more efficient. The system can handle the load of a game and streaming software simultaneously, as evidenced by its high PassMark multi-thread score of 25,470.

Video Editing: For 1080p and light 1440p video editing, this system is well-suited. The CPU’s multi-core performance is strong, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 11,268, which helps with timeline scrubbing and export times. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM is beneficial for effects and color grading, and its compute performance (11.52 TFLOPS FP32) can accelerate rendering in supported software.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the primary workhorse for 3D rendering, and its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,645 is a good indicator of performance. The GPU can also assist in rendering with its 23.04 TFLOPS FP16 performance, but its 65th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier renderer. Still, for hobbyist or small-scale projects, this build offers a decent balance.

Software Development: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads are excellent for code compilation, with a PassMark integer math score of 81,524 showing strong performance in parallel tasks. The support for ECC memory is a bonus for stability during long builds. The GPU is less critical here, but its compatible APIs (DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.4) ensure it can handle graphics debugging.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic office tasks, but the fast single-core performance (3,055 in Cinebench R23) ensures snappy application load times and smooth multitasking. The low 65W CPU TDP means it operates quietly and efficiently, making it a good choice for a dorm room or small office. The GPU is not necessary for these tasks, but it provides headroom for occasional gaming or creative projects.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data shows that this build is primarily a 1080p gaming machine, with excellent performance in many titles and playable results in the most demanding ones. At 1920x1080, the system achieves over 100 FPS in several games, including Barony (112 FPS), Counter-Strike 2 (133 FPS), Roblox (171 FPS), and Valorant (304 FPS). For AAA games, the performance is lower but still playable: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 36 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 48 FPS. At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 29 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 27 FPS, making high-refresh 1440p gaming impossible in the most demanding titles. However, esports games still perform well, with Valorant at 259 FPS and Call of Duty: Warzone at 128 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, with most games falling below 30 FPS. For example, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 19 FPS, and Fortnite at 21 FPS, which is not a playable experience. The data confirms that this build is not intended for 4K gaming. The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 86.3, which is a solid average, but it is heavily weighted by the high performance in lighter titles. The pair ranks 3,039 out of 3,732 pairs, which means it is in the bottom 20% for average FPS, but this is due to the poor 4K performance. For 1080p gaming, the build is competitive, with many titles exceeding 60 FPS. The data is measured, not estimated, providing a reliable picture of the system’s gaming capabilities.