SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-14400

32,115 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-14400 and Intel Arc A750 form a desktop pairing that targets the upper-midrange of the performance spectrum. The CPU, a Raptor Lake Refresh part, combines 10 cores and 16 threads with a 2.50 GHz base clock and a 4.70 GHz boost clock, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The GPU, an Alchemist-generation Arc A750, brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 2400 MHz boost clock. Together, they represent a system that sits at the 74th percentile for all CPU+GPU combinations in the database, a figure that suggests a balanced, capable machine for a wide range of tasks, though the data also reveals specific strengths and bottlenecks that define its character.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14400 is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. Its configuration, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, is designed to handle both high-frequency single-threaded work and substantial multi-threaded loads. The 65 W TDP indicates a mainstream power envelope, and the Socket 1700 compatibility means it fits into a broad ecosystem of motherboards. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 pool, which is critical for feeding the cores in data-intensive scenarios.

Benchmark results place this CPU firmly in the upper quartile of all processors, with an 82nd percentile ranking. The Cinebench scores tell a clear story. The R23 multicore result of 21315 points is a strong showing for a mainstream desktop chip, indicating that it can sustain heavy all-core workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering. The single-core R23 score of 3009 is equally impressive, reflecting the high 4.70 GHz boost clock and efficient architecture, which translates to snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench scores corroborate this, with a multicore score of 9807 and a single-core score of 1905.

The PassMark suite offers a granular view of its capabilities. The multithread score of 25080 and integer math score of 82017 highlight its throughput in compute-heavy tasks, while the floating-point math score of 61549 suggests solid performance in scientific and engineering workloads. Data compression at 314995 and encryption at 16731 are also strong, pointing to good showing in file archiving and security-related tasks. The extended instructions score of 19816 indicates that the CPU handles modern SIMD instructions well, which is beneficial for multimedia and some scientific applications. It is worth remembering the find prime numbers score is quite low at 80, which may indicate a relative weakness in very specific integer-heavy, latency-sensitive operations, but this is an outlier compared to the rest of the data.

Looking at its nearest rivals, the i5-14400 is effectively neck-and-neck with the Intel Core i7-12800H, with a deltaPct of 0, and the Intel Core i7-13705H, where it is just 0.1% ahead. It also trades blows with the Intel Core i5-14450HX, leading by 0.2%, and the Intel Core i9-11900, which is 0.3% ahead. This places the desktop i5 in the same performance tier as some high-end mobile chips and a previous-generation desktop i9, demonstrating that the 14th-gen architecture delivers competitive multi-threaded performance in a lower-power envelope. For real workloads, this means the i5-14400 can handle demanding productivity suites, compile code, and render video without becoming a bottleneck, while its single-core strength ensures that day-to-day interaction remains fluid.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Core i5-14400 with the Arc A750 creates a system where the balance between CPU and GPU is the defining factor for performance in different workloads. The combined percentile of 74 indicates that, on average, this system outperforms a significant majority of all tested configurations. However, the individual percentiles reveal a potential imbalance: the CPU sits at the 82nd percentile, while the GPU is at the 66th percentile. This suggests that the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, and in many scenarios, it will be the GPU that sets the performance ceiling.

In gaming, this dynamic is clear. The CPU’s robust single-core and multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 single-core 3009, multi-core 21315) are more than sufficient to drive high frame rates in most titles. The bottleneck will likely be the GPU, particularly at higher resolutions where the rasterization load increases. While the CPU can handle the game logic and draw calls, the Arc A750’s 8 GB of VRAM and its compute capabilities will dictate the final frame rate. Conversely, in productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU is the primary engine. The high Cinebench multi-core score and PassMark multithread score will shine here, as the GPU accelerates specific effects or rendering passes, but the CPU is the workhorse.

The FPS scaling, or lack thereof in this data, is a key point. Since no measured FPS rows exist for this combination, we must estimate from benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 12534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 suggest it is a solid performer, but it is not in the top tier. The CPU’s performance is high enough that it will likely not be the limiting factor in most games, meaning the GPU will be the primary determinant of graphical settings and achievable frame rates. For users aiming for high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the GPU will be the ceiling, while at 1440p and 4K, the GPU will be even more dominant. In CPU-bound tasks, such as software compilation or complex spreadsheet calculations, the CPU will be the driver, and the GPU will be mostly idle.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture of this system’s performance is defined by the strong CPU and the capable, though not flagship, GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 32115, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i7-12800H (score 32121, deltaPct 0) and Intel Core i7-13705H (score 32076, deltaPct 0.1), are statistically tied, showing that the i5-14400 delivers performance on par with more expensive mobile parts. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20582, which places it in the 66th percentile. Its nearest rival is the Intel Arc B570, with a deltaPct of 0.1, indicating near-identical performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is also close, with the Arc A750 leading by 0.2%.

The CPU’s specific strengths are clear from the individual tests. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 is a strong result for a 65 W desktop chip, rivaling much higher-power parts. The PassMark single-thread score of 3741 confirms its excellent responsiveness. The GPU’s performance is more nuanced. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 is a modern, demanding test, and a score in this range indicates decent DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631 and OpenCL score of 98554 show that it handles compute and modern APIs well. The PassMark DirectX 9 score of 181 is notably high, suggesting excellent legacy API support, while the DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores (65, 72, and 70 respectively) are lower and more consistent with its mid-range positioning. The GPU compute score of 5368 is respectable, indicating it can accelerate some non-graphics workloads.

The combined percentile of 74 is a useful summary statistic. It suggests that this pairing is better than a large majority of alternatives, but it is not a top-tier enthusiast system. The CPU provides a high-performance foundation that will not hold the system back, while the GPU offers solid, mainstream performance. The data indicates a system that is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as well as content creation tasks that leverage the CPU’s multi-threading capabilities.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is designed for the desktop user who needs strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity and a capable GPU for gaming and creative work. The processor’s 82nd percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators who rely on CPU-heavy workloads. Video editors will find the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 and the PassMark multithread score of 25080 beneficial for faster rendering and export times. Software developers, particularly those working with large codebases, will benefit from the high integer math score of 82017 and the data compression score of 314995, which speed up compilation and version control operations.

For gamers, this system targets the mainstream segment. The GPU, while not a powerhouse, is capable of handling modern titles. The CPU’s high single-core performance ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, making this a good pairing for a smooth 1080p gaming experience. The 66th percentile GPU ranking means it can handle most games at high settings in 1080p, and it can also manage 1440p with some adjustments to settings. This is not a system for 4K ultra-high-refresh gaming, as the GPU is the limiting factor, but it is a robust platform for a wide range of games.

Students and small business workstations are also a target market. The CPU’s efficiency and strong multi-threaded performance make it ideal for multitasking, research, and office productivity. The GPU’s capability means it can also handle light CAD work or video conferencing with ease. For a small business, this pairing offers a solid balance of performance for both general office tasks and occasional creative projects. The combination of a high-performing CPU and a capable GPU is a versatile one, suitable for a user who wears many hats.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It is a substantial piece of silicon, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a key strength, as the high bandwidth can help in high-resolution textures and compute workloads. The core clocks are a base of 2050 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz, which are solid figures for a mid-range card.

The GPU’s compute resources include 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. It also features 28 ray tracing cores, which is a significant count for a mainstream card and enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games. The pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 537.6 GTexel/s, which are respectable figures that contribute to its rasterization performance. The FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1), indicating strong compute capability for both gaming and general-purpose workloads.

In benchmark terms, the Arc A750’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 shows it is a competent DirectX 12 performer. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631 is strong, suggesting good performance in modern APIs that are increasingly common in games. The OpenCL score of 98554 is also high, which is a positive sign for compute acceleration. The PassMark G3D score of 12534 is a solid mid-range result, and the GPU compute score of 5368 indicates it can handle some GPGPU tasks. For rendering, the Arc A750 can accelerate tasks through its compute cores and ray tracing units, though its 8 GB of VRAM may be a limitation for very large, complex scenes. The high bandwidth and modern feature set make it a good choice for 1080p and 1440p gaming and light to moderate creative work.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3009) ensures high frame rates are achievable, but the GPU will be the limiting factor. Based on the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 12534, it is likely to deliver high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p, but may need settings reduced for 1440p. The system is best suited for a 1080p high-refresh monitor.

Streaming: The CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads, along with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315, are more than sufficient to handle encoding a stream while gaming. The GPU’s compute capabilities can also assist with encoding, making this a capable streaming rig for most scenarios.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for the system. The high multi-threaded performance of the CPU (PassMark multithread 25080) will accelerate timeline editing and export. The GPU can accelerate effects and rendering, making the process smoother. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for most editing projects.

3D rendering: The CPU is the primary workhorse here, with its multi-core score being a major asset. The GPU’s 28 ray tracing cores and 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can provide hardware acceleration in compatible renderers, reducing render times. The 8 GB of VRAM may be a constraint for very large scenes.

Software development: The CPU excels in this role. The PassMark integer math score of 82017 and data compression score of 314995 are excellent for compilation and version control. The high core count allows for fast parallel builds, making this a productive development environment.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for basic tasks but provides a smooth experience. The high single-core score ensures snappy application launches and multitasking. The GPU is more than capable of handling any graphics requirements for presentations or data visualization, making this a versatile workstation.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the Intel Core i5-14400?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 is positioned in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, making it a high-performing mainstream processor that matches or exceeds the performance of several mobile and previous-generation desktop rivals.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A750 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, which is nearly identical to the Intel Arc B570 (deltaPct 0.1) and slightly ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct 0.2). This places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-14400 and Intel Arc A750 is 74, indicating that the system outperforms 74% of all tested CPU and GPU combinations in the database.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compare to its rivals?

A: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 21315. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12800H, has a very similar average score with a deltaPct of 0, meaning they perform at the same level.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14400 has a field for ECC memory that is marked as true, indicating support for error-correcting code memory.

Q: What is the process node for the GPU and CPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 CPU is built on Intel’s 10 nm process, while the Intel Arc A750 GPU is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) that pairs Intel’s 14th-generation Core i5 processor with Intel’s Arc series GPU. The system is a mid-to-high-tier configuration, as indicated by its combined percentile of 74. The CPU is a high performer, but the GPU is a solid mainstream part, creating a system that is well-balanced for its intended purpose. This is not an extreme enthusiast setup, but rather a versatile machine that excels in productivity and handles gaming well. The pairing is a coherent one, with the CPU’s strengths complementing the GPU’s capabilities, resulting in a system that will feel responsive and powerful for a majority of users.

Gaming Performance

It is important to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so all FPS discussion is an estimate based on the benchmark scores. The system is estimated to be a strong performer at 1080p, with the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 12534 suggesting it can handle most titles at high or ultra settings. The CPU’s high single-core score (Cinebench R23 single-core 3009) ensures it will not be a bottleneck, allowing the GPU to reach its full potential. At 1440p, the GPU will start to feel the strain more, and users may need to adjust settings to maintain high frame rates. At 4K, the GPU is likely the limiting factor, and the system may not deliver consistently high frame rates in demanding titles. The 8 GB of VRAM could also be a constraint in some games at higher resolutions with high-texture settings. Overall, this system is best suited for a high-refresh 1080p gaming experience, with the capability to handle 1440p if settings are tuned appropriately.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-14400 + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-14400

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds