SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc A380E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600KF

38,103 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600KF and Intel Arc A380E pairing represents a desktop build with a stark performance asymmetry. The CPU is a high-end 14-core processor that sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a low-profile, entry-level Alchemist part that lands at the exact 50th percentile of all GPUs. This is a build where the processor is the star, and the graphics card is a functional but decidedly secondary component. The following analysis is based solely on the supplied benchmark data, which contains no measured frame-rate figures for this specific combination; all gaming performance is therefore estimated from the component scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 68, indicating it outperforms 68% of all tested system combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Core i5-13600KF compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F?

A: The i5-13600KF has an average benchmark score of 38103, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i5-14490F's average score of 38149. This makes the two processors statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the GPU socket and power requirement for the Arc A380E?

A: The Arc A380E is a single-slot card with a 75 W TDP that requires no power connectors. The suggested power supply for a system using this GPU is 250 W.

Q: What memory and PCIe interfaces do the CPU and GPU use respectively?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The Intel Arc A380E uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the FACT PACK lists the integratedGraphics field as null for the Intel Core i5-13600KF. This means a discrete GPU is mandatory for display output.

Q: What is the core count and boost clock of the i5-13600KF?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600KF has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Arc A380E?

A: The Intel Arc A380E has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380E is a modest graphics processor built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU is equipped with 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines, along with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. Its compute capabilities are rated at 4.096 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 8.192 TFLOPS for FP16 operations, indicating a design focused on efficiency rather than raw throughput.

Memory performance is a key constraint for this card. It uses 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, which yields a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed at 1937 MHz, operating at 15.5 Gbps effective. This is a relatively narrow memory interface, which will limit performance in high-resolution textures and compute workloads that are memory-bandwidth sensitive. The card's base and boost clocks are both fixed at 2000 MHz, resulting in pixel and texture rates of 64.00 GPixel/s and 128.0 GTexel/s, respectively.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it has the API feature set for modern games and applications. With a 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs, the A380E sits at the median of the performance distribution. Its benchmark scores are empty in the data, so its position is derived from its specification tier. For rendering, this GPU will handle entry-level 1080p workloads and basic content creation, but its 96-bit memory bus and 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput classify it as a starter or office-level component, not a high-performance renderer. The 75 W TDP and absence of power connectors confirm its low-power design intent.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the Intel Core i5-13600KF, which uses the Intel Socket 1700. This socket supports the Raptor Lake architecture, and the CPU natively supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory choice based on platform cost and performance goals. The processor provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth connection for modern storage and graphics cards, though the Arc A380E only uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The power delivery requirements are modest. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W, requiring no external power connectors. The suggested PSU for the system is 250 W, which leaves ample headroom for the combined 200 W TDP of the core components. This makes the build very power-efficient and suitable for compact or office-oriented systems. The GPU is a single-slot, low-profile card measuring 254 mm in length, 127 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, which eases physical installation constraints.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a more powerful graphics card. The CPU's 86th percentile performance and PCIe Gen 5 support indicate it can handle significantly faster GPUs without becoming a bottleneck. The 250 W suggested PSU, however, would need to be upgraded to support any modern mid-range or high-end discrete graphics card, as the current PSU headroom is only sufficient for the existing low-power components. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, which could extend its usable lifespan, but the platform's DDR4/DDR5 support means memory upgrades are the only other major lever for system tuning.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks over graphics performance. The i5-13600KF's 86th percentile CPU ranking and strong multi-core scores make it an excellent choice for developers compiling code, students running engineering or scientific simulations, and small business workstations handling data analysis or virtualization. The 14 cores and 20 threads provide substantial parallel processing power for these workloads, and the 31727 score in Cinebench R23 multicore demonstrates its capability in rendering and batch processing.

For content creators, the pairing is less ideal. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means GPU-accelerated tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering in GPU-centric applications will be limited. However, the CPU's strong performance in Passmark data compression (475505) and integer math (122169) makes it suitable for software-based encoding and processing workflows that rely on the processor. Gamers at 1080p with low to medium settings might find the A380E sufficient for esports titles, but the data shows it is not a high-refresh-rate or high-fidelity gaming card.

The build is also appropriate for general office productivity and web-based workloads, where the CPU's single-thread performance (1084 in 3dmark single-thread, 4479 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures snappy responsiveness. The low power draw of the entire system, with a 250 W suggested PSU, makes it a candidate for always-on or energy-conscious environments. The user base is therefore skewed towards professionals and hobbyists who need a fast processor for compute-heavy tasks but do not require high-end 3D rendering or gaming performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It is part of the Core 13th Gen series and is designed for the desktop market, using the Intel Socket 1700. The CPU has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. It supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation stability.

Benchmark results show a processor with dominant multi-threaded performance. The 3dmark_max_threads score is 10216, and the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 31727. The Passmark multithread score is 37488, with strong results in integer math (122169) and floating-point math (90424). The 3dmark_16_threads score of 9404 indicates that scaling is effective across the core count, though the 2-thread score of 2166 shows that lightly-threaded performance is also solid, but not exceptional. Single-thread performance is respectable, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1084 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4479.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 38103, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i5-14490F, which is 0.1% faster, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, which is 0.2% faster. This puts the i5-13600KF in a very tight performance cluster at the top of the mid-range, where the differences between chips are negligible. In real workloads, this translates to excellent performance in video editing, software compilation, and multi-tasking scenarios, where the 20 threads can be fully utilized. The unlocked multiplier allows for additional performance tuning, though the data does not specify overclocking results.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the component benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The i5-13600KF's high CPU percentiles suggest it will not be a limiting factor in most games, providing ample headroom for frame generation and physics calculations.

The Intel Arc A380E, with its 50th percentile GPU ranking, is the primary constraint for gaming. Based on its 4.096 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, this GPU is estimated to handle esports titles and older games at 1080p with medium settings. It is not expected to deliver high frame rates in modern AAA games at high or ultra settings, as the 96-bit memory bus will likely bottleneck texture streaming and high-resolution assets.

For competitive gaming at 1080p, the estimated frame rates could be playable in light titles, but the lack of measured data prevents any specific FPS numbers. The 8 ray tracing cores are present, but their performance at this tier is likely insufficient for meaningful ray-traced effects in real-time gaming, and the 6 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p but may be limiting for future titles. Users seeking a gaming-focused build should look at higher-tier GPUs, as the A380E is positioned for basic rendering and media tasks rather than high-performance gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this system is heavily skewed towards the CPU. The i5-13600KF sits at the 86th percentile for CPUs, while the Arc A380E sits at the 50th percentile for GPUs. This creates a clear bottleneck scenario where the GPU will limit performance in graphics-intensive workloads such as gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. In these tasks, the CPU will often be underutilized while the GPU is at its maximum capacity.

The data shows that the CPU is capable of significantly more than the GPU can deliver. For example, the CPU's Passmark multithread score of 37488 is high enough to feed a much faster graphics card. In gaming, the estimated FPS will be constrained by the GPU's 4.096 TFLOPS compute and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth, not by the CPU's processing power. This means the system is well-balanced for CPU-bound tasks like data compression, encryption, and software compilation, where the GPU is not a factor.

Conversely, in any workload that uses the GPU, the balance is poor. The CPU's performance headroom is wasted in GPU-bound scenarios, and the system will feel unbalanced to users expecting high graphics performance. The combined percentile of 68 reflects this middle-of-the-road overall position, with the CPU pulling the score up and the GPU pulling it down. The bottleneck is therefore situational: the CPU is the star in compute workloads, and the GPU is the limiting factor in visual workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build centered on the Intel Core i5-13600KF processor, paired with the Intel Arc A380E graphics card. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is defined by the 68th combined percentile. The CPU is a high-end 13th-generation part, while the GPU is an entry-level, end-of-life Alchemist product. This is a configuration that prioritizes processor performance for productivity and compute tasks, with the GPU serving as a basic display and acceleration solution.

The pairing is unusual because the CPU is capable of supporting a much more powerful GPU. The i5-13600KF's 86th percentile ranking and PCIe Gen 5 support suggest a platform built for longevity and high performance, while the A380E is a 75 W, single-slot card that appears more suited to an office or media PC. This is not a balanced gaming rig or a high-end workstation GPU setup; it is a system where the CPU is the main investment and the GPU is a placeholder for basic functionality.

In terms of physical and power characteristics, the build is compact and efficient. The GPU requires no power connectors, and the suggested PSU of 250 W is low. This makes the build easy to install in small form factor cases and quiet, low-power environments. The CPU's active production status and the GPU's end-of-life status indicate that this is a transitional build, likely put together to leverage the CPU's performance while using an available or inexpensive GPU, with the expectation of upgrading the graphics card later.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data provides a clear picture of the components' relative strengths. The Intel Core i5-13600KF achieves a 3dmark_max_threads score of 10216 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31727, underlining its multi-core capability. Its average benchmark score is 38103, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, with the nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14490F, being only 0.1% faster, confirming that the i5-13600KF is at the top of its performance class.

The Intel Arc A380E has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, making its average benchmark score 0. Its performance ranking is given as the 50th percentile of all GPUs, which is a median position. This means half of all GPUs are faster and half are slower, placing it firmly in the entry-level segment. In contrast, the CPU's 86th percentile is a high-end position, creating a significant gap in performance capability between the two components.

The combined picture is one of a powerful CPU constrained by a weak GPU. The system's combined percentile is 68, which is lower than the CPU's individual percentile but higher than the GPU's, reflecting the CPU's dominant influence on the overall score. The data indicates that the system will excel in CPU-intensive tasks and lag in GPU-intensive tasks. The CPU's scores in Passmark data compression (475505) and integer math (122169) are exceptional, while the GPU's lack of measured scores and median percentile suggest that its real-world performance is unremarkable. This is a build for compute, not for graphics.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600KF + Intel Arc A380E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600KF

Intel Arc A380E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds