SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K and Intel Arc A750 form a desktop pairing that targets the upper mid-range of the performance spectrum. The processor delivers top-tier multi-threaded throughput for its class, while the graphics card offers a solid foundation for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming, though it trails the CPU in relative standing. This combination is best suited for users who prioritize processor-heavy workloads like content creation and software development, with gaming performance that is competent but not class-leading.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is ideal for a desktop user whose primary workloads are CPU-bound rather than GPU-bound. The Core i5-13600K sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market, making it a strong choice for video editors, 3D renderers, and software developers who need rapid compilation times and heavy multi-threaded throughput. The Arc A750, in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, is a capable but secondary component; it handles modern game titles and GPU-accelerated tasks competently but will not define the system’s character.

For gamers targeting high refresh rates at 1080p, this build is a reasonable match, as the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 2000.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing will not be a bottleneck in most titles. However, at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor, so users expecting maxed-out settings at those resolutions should look elsewhere. Content creators who use applications that leverage Intel Quick Sync via the integrated UHD Graphics 770 will find additional value, as this can offload video encoding tasks from the discrete GPU.

Students and small business workstations will benefit from the CPU’s massive multi-threaded lead over typical office processors, with a Passmark multithread score of 37680 that crushes everyday productivity tasks. The system is not a budget build by any stretch, but it is not a halo-tier enthusiast rig either; it sits in a sweet spot for prosumers who need serious compute power without stepping up to the highest-end workstation parts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the CPU is the star, and the GPU is the supporting actor. The i5-13600K’s average benchmark score of 37685 places it within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H, showing it trades blows with modern rivals. Meanwhile, the Arc A750’s average score of 20582 is virtually identical to the Intel Arc B570, with a delta of just 0.1%, but it sits far below the CPU’s percentile rank. This means that in gaming, the A750 will almost always be the bottleneck, capping frame rates well before the 13600K breaks a sweat.

In CPU-intensive workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the bottleneck reverses. The GPU’s compute score of 5368 in Passmark is respectable, but the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 demonstrates that the processor can feed data faster than the GPU can process it in non-gaming tasks. For mixed workloads, such as streaming while gaming, the CPU has enough headroom with 20 threads to handle encoding overhead without impacting game performance, but the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM may become a constraint in newer titles with high-resolution textures.

Single-threaded performance is a strong point for the CPU, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1085, ensuring that legacy applications and lightly-threaded games run smoothly. However, the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 70 indicates that its API overhead is higher than ideal, which could introduce stuttering in poorly optimized titles. Overall, the system is well-balanced for productivity, but gamers will find the GPU is the primary limiter for frame rates in demanding scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-13600K posts exceptional numbers across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24221 multi-core and 2000.5 single-core, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The Geekbench multicore score of 15575 reinforces its multi-threaded prowess, while the single-core score of 2297 shows strong IPC. The 3DMark tests reveal excellent scaling: 2168 for 2 threads, 4283 for 4 threads, 7074 for 8 threads, and 10157 for max threads, demonstrating that the hybrid core layout efficiently utilizes additional threads. Passmark integer math hits 122481 and floating-point math reaches 90538, making it a beast for scientific and financial calculations.

The Arc A750 is a more modest performer. Its Passmark G3D score of 12534 places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, which is a solid mid-range result but nowhere near the CPU’s standing. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 indicates it can handle modern DirectX 12 titles, but the Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 show that compute workloads are handled adequately. The GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 732 is low for a discrete card, suggesting that 2D desktop tasks are not its forte.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 76, reflecting that the CPU drags the overall score up while the GPU pulls it down. Relative to its nearest rivals, the CPU is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, trailing by just 0.2%, but it beats the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H by 0.4%. The GPU is neck-and-neck with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, leading by 0.2%, and trails the AMD Radeon R9 M390X by 0.4%. This indicates that the pair is competitive with other mid-range desktop and high-end mobile components.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread performance is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking most games, but the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12534 suggests it will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most modern titles. At 1440p, the A750’s 8 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth will be sufficient for medium to high settings, but users should expect to dial back demanding features like ray tracing.

The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 70 and Vulkan score of 85631 indicate that it performs better in Vulkan-based titles, which are common in esports and newer AAA games. For competitive shooters like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2, the CPU’s high single-thread score of 1085 in 3DMark will allow frame rates to exceed 144 FPS at 1080p, provided the GPU can keep up. For graphically intensive single-player games, the A750’s 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will provide a stable 60 FPS at 1080p, but 4K gaming is out of reach for ultra settings.

The GPU’s 28 ray tracing cores are present, but the Passmark DirectX 10 score of 65 and DirectX 9 score of 181 suggest that older API performance is inconsistent. Estimates place this pairing in the field of a solid 1080p gaming machine, with the CPU ensuring that frame times remain consistent even in CPU-heavy scenes. Users planning to play at 1440p should consider the GPU the limiting factor, as the CPU will have ample headroom to spare.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7074 ensures that game logic and physics threads are handled with ease, but the GPU’s mid-range standing means 144Hz gaming is achievable only at 1080p with reduced settings. Frame rates will be stable, but the A750 will cap performance in demanding titles.

Streaming: With 20 threads, the i5-13600K can handle x264 encoding at medium preset while gaming, as its Passmark multithread score of 37680 provides ample headroom. The GPU’s compute score of 5368 is sufficient for hardware encoding, but the CPU is the better choice for quality streams.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 accelerates timeline rendering and export times, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM handles 4K previews with ease. The combination is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p editing, but 8K workflows will stress the GPU’s memory capacity.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Passmark floating-point math score of 90538 makes it a strong performer for CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles, but the GPU’s 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will accelerate GPU-accelerated renders. The 28 RT cores on the A750 provide hardware ray tracing support, but performance will be modest.

Software Development: The Passmark data compression score of 476394 and integer math score of 122481 make quick work of code compilation and unit testing. The 14 cores and 20 threads allow for parallel builds, and the CPU’s 86th percentile standing means it outperforms most workstation processors.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4124 in Passmark ensures snappy application launches, while the GPU is overkill for office tasks. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle daily driving, allowing the A750 to be reserved for occasional gaming or rendering tasks.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-13600K better than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435?

A: The data shows they are nearly identical. The i5-13600K has an average benchmark score of 37685, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435’s score of 37762, making the difference negligible in real-world use.

Q: How does the Arc A750 compare to the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, which is 0.1% higher than the Arc B570’s score of 20556. The two cards are statistically tied in performance.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and Passmark G3D score of 12534 suggest that 4K gaming is not viable at high settings. The CPU would not be the bottleneck, but the GPU would struggle to maintain playable frame rates.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance like?

A: The Core i5-13600K scores 2000.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 1085 in 3DMark single-thread, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This is excellent for lightly-threaded workloads and gaming.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A750 has 28 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. However, its performance in ray-traced titles will be moderate, as indicated by its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612.

Q: Is the CPU good for multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 and Passmark multithread score of 37680 place it in the 86th percentile, making it exceptionally strong for rendering, encoding, and compilation tasks.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the i5-13600K and Arc A750 pairing is 76, reflecting that the CPU’s high performance is partially offset by the GPU’s mid-range standing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build centered on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, combining the Core i5-13600K processor with the Intel Arc A750 graphics card. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread part with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The GPU is based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. Together, they achieve a combined percentile of 76, placing this build in the upper mid-range tier of desktop systems.

The processor’s 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs makes it a standout component, while the GPU’s 66th percentile ranking is respectable but less impressive. This pairing is best described as a CPU-first build, where the processor carries the system’s performance identity. The components are complementary in that the CPU provides massive compute headroom, while the GPU delivers adequate graphics performance for mainstream gaming and content creation.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K features 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It uses the Raptor Lake architecture on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which contributes to its strong memory latency performance. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and includes ECC memory support for workstation use.

Benchmark results show the CPU excels in all metrics. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 and single-core score of 2000.5 demonstrate balanced performance, while the 3DMark scores scale well: 2168 for 2 threads, 4283 for 4 threads, 7074 for 8 threads, and 10157 for max threads. The Passmark multithread score of 37680 and floating-point math score of 90538 confirm its strength in scientific and financial workloads. The data encryption score of 27075 and data compression score of 476394 highlight its utility in security and archiving tasks.

The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, has an average score of 37762, just 0.2% higher, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H scores 37522, 0.4% lower. This places the i5-13600K in a tightly contested performance tier, where minor architectural differences yield negligible real-world deltas. Its 86th percentile ranking means it outperforms 86% of all CPUs, making it a top-tier choice for desktop workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The GPU has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. Its base clock is 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The card has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 550 W power supply, with dual-slot cooling and one 6-pin plus one 8-pin power connector.

The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12534 places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, which is solid for 1080p gaming. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 indicates competent DirectX 12 performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 show strong compute capabilities. The FP32 performance of 17.20 TFLOPS and FP16 of 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) make it capable of heavy compute tasks, though the Passmark GPU compute score of 5368 suggests driver overhead limits peak throughput.

The A750’s nearest rival, the Intel Arc B570, has an average score of 20556, just 0.1% lower, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, 0.2% lower. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20662, 0.4% higher. This shows the A750 is performance-equivalent to a high-end mobile GPU and a modern entry-level desktop card. Its 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p ultra settings and 1440p medium settings, but the end-of-life production status and 66th percentile ranking indicate it is not a future-proof investment for high-resolution gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600K

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds