SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop build that presents a stark contrast in performance tiers. The CPU is a high-performance 14-core processor that scores in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, despite its modern architecture, currently benchmarks in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This creates a severely unbalanced configuration where the processor vastly outclasses the graphics card in their respective performance hierarchies. The data indicates a system where CPU-bound tasks will excel, but GPU-accelerated workloads, particularly gaming and rendering, will be constrained by the graphics card's relatively low benchmark standing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process node. It is a 14-core, 20-thread processor with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This configuration, combining performance and efficiency cores, provides a robust foundation for multitasking and threaded workloads. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, though the presence of a discrete GPU makes that secondary. The processor has a 125 W TDP and uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's strong multi-threaded capabilities. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24,221 points in the multi-core test and 2,000.5 points in the single-core test. The 3DMark tests show a clear scaling pattern: 2,168 points with 2 threads, 7,074 with 8 threads, and 10,157 with the maximum thread count. This scaling indicates good utilization of its 20 threads. The Geekbench scores of 15,575 multi-core and 2,297 single-core further solidify its position as a top-tier mainstream processor. With an average benchmark score of 37,685 and a percentile rank of 86, it sits near the top of the CPU performance chart.

The data shows the i5-13600K is marginally faster than its closest rivals. It edges out the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 by 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively. It is 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H. These deltas are negligible, indicating that the i5-13600K is at parity with the best in its class, but it does not hold a decisive lead over them. In real-world terms, this performance translates to rapid application loading, smooth system responsiveness, and swift compilation times for software development tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The performance picture for this pairing is dominated by the extreme disparity between the two components. The CPU's percentile rank of 86 places it in the upper echelon of processors, while the GPU's percentile rank of 18 places it in the lower quartile of graphics cards. The combined percentile for the build is 52, which is a middling score that reflects the drag of the underperforming GPU on the overall system capability.

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the data. Consequently, all frame rate discussions must be treated as estimated projections based on the individual benchmark scores of the components rather than direct measurements.

The CPU's performance in productivity tasks is exceptional. In PassMark, it scores 37,680 in the multithread test and 4,124 in the single-thread test. Its floating-point math score of 90,538 and integer math score of 122,481 indicate strong raw compute power. The data compression score of 476,394 and encryption score of 27,075 suggest it can handle data-intensive workloads efficiently. These figures point to a CPU that will not be a bottleneck in any CPU-bound scenario.

The GPU presents a conflicting picture. It scores 2,690 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which is its only benchmark result. This score places it just 1% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 and Intel Arc Pro B50. It is 1.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440. These are all entry-level or legacy graphics cards, which indicates that the RTX 5070 SUPER's current benchmark performance is not competitive with modern mid-range or high-end GPUs. The combined picture is a system with flagship-level processing power but entry-level graphics performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It features the GB205 chip with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The GPU has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The memory clock is listed as 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. The core clocks are 2325 MHz base and 2512 MHz boost.

The GPU's compute specifications are substantial on paper. It has 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. It includes 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, which are the dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration, respectively. The FP32 performance is listed at 32.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at the same 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1). The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s.

Despite these modern specifications, the benchmark data shows a score of 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This result is inexplicably low when compared to its nearest rivals, which are all significantly older and less capable cards. For example, being only 1.1% faster than the GeForce GT 1030, a card from a much older generation with far fewer features, suggests that the benchmark score may not be representative of the GPU's true rendering potential. However, based strictly on the data available, the RTX 5070 SUPER's measured performance places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, meaning 82% of GPUs benchmark higher. This is a critical data point that defines the GPU's current standing in the database.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance in this build is heavily skewed toward the CPU. With the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 18th percentile, the graphics card is the clear limiting factor for any GPU-intensive workload. The data suggests that in gaming scenarios, the i5-13600K will be waiting on the RTX 5070 SUPER to render frames. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4,124 in PassMark and its strong multi-thread performance mean it can handle game logic and physics calculations with ease, but the GPU's low benchmark percentile will cap the frame rate.

For productivity tasks that do not rely on the GPU, the system will perform exceptionally well. Video encoding, software compilation, and data analysis are all dependent on the CPU, and the i5-13600K's scores indicate it will handle these with authority. The bottleneck shifts only when the workload involves 3D rendering or gaming, where the GPU's 18th percentile ranking becomes the primary constraint. The estimated FPS scaling, derived from the GPU's low score, would show poor performance relative to what the CPU is capable of supporting.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is severely compromised by the GPU. The RTX 5070 SUPER's benchmark score, which is only 1.1% above the GeForce GT 1030, suggests that achieving high frame rates at high refresh rates will be difficult. The CPU is more than capable, but the GPU will be the limiting factor, likely requiring lower resolutions and graphics settings to maintain playable frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads are well-suited for encoding video while gaming. The i5-13600K's high multi-thread scores in Cinebench R23 (24,221) and Geekbench (15,575) indicate it can handle the overhead of streaming software without significant impact on performance. The GPU's low performance will limit the gaming side, but the streaming pipeline itself is CPU-driven and will be smooth.

Video editing: This workload benefits from both CPU and GPU acceleration. The CPU's strong PassMark scores in integer math (122,481) and floating-point math (90,538) will help with timeline scrubbing and effects processing. The GPU's 18 GB of VRAM is sufficient for holding large video buffers, but its low compute percentile will slow down final renders that rely on GPU acceleration.

3D rendering: GPU-accelerated renderers will perform poorly due to the RTX 5070 SUPER's low benchmark percentile. However, CPU-based rendering will be excellent. The i5-13600K's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13,373 and R15 score of 3,642 indicate it can handle complex scenes, though slower than a dedicated high-end GPU.

Software development: This is a strong scenario for this build. Compilation is a CPU-intensive task, and the i5-13600K's high multi-thread scores will reduce build times. The PassMark data encryption score of 27,075 and extended instructions score of 28,805 also indicate strong performance for security-related tasks and code that uses modern instruction sets.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for this scenario. The CPU's single-thread performance is excellent for word processing and web browsing, and the GPU is more than adequate for basic 2D desktop rendering. The high TDP of the CPU (125 W) and GPU (275 W) makes this a power-hungry choice for simple tasks, but performance will never be an issue.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who require maximum CPU processing power but have minimal GPU demands. The target audience includes software developers who need fast compilation times, data analysts running complex simulations, and researchers performing CPU-bound calculations. The i5-13600K's 86th percentile ranking ensures it will handle these tasks with ease.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering engines will also find value. The processor's high Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,221 is a strong indicator of performance in this area. However, those who rely on GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane will be disappointed by the GPU's 18th percentile performance.

Gamers who play at lower resolutions or with graphics settings tuned down might find the system usable, but the GPU's benchmark scores suggest it is not suited for modern high-fidelity gaming. Small business workstations that run database queries, spreadsheet calculations, or other CPU-heavy office applications would benefit from the i5-13600K's speed, while the GPU serves its basic display output function.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is the modern standard for high-bandwidth devices. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's lanes.

The power requirements are significant. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 275 W. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector. The build's cooling solution must account for the combined 400 W of thermal output from these two components. The system is a dual-slot GPU design, which requires adequate case clearance.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU is already at the 86th percentile, leaving little room for improvement without a platform change. Replacing the RTX 5070 SUPER with a higher-performing GPU would immediately resolve the system imbalance. The PCIe 5.0 slot and 18 GB of GDDR7 memory in the current card are modern, but the low benchmark score suggests that a different card from the same generation would provide a substantial performance uplift. The CPU's unlocked multiplier also allows for overclocking to extract additional processing performance, though its current scores are already near the top of the chart.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13600K and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The CPU is a high-end model with a 14-core, 20-thread configuration based on the Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is a current-generation model with 18 GB of GDDR7 memory and 6,400 shading units.

The overall tier of this build is defined by the significant gap between its components. The combined percentile of 52 places it in the middle of all systems, but this is a misleading average. The CPU is in the 86th percentile, indicating top-tier processing performance, while the GPU is in the 18th percentile, indicating entry-level graphics performance. This pairing creates a system that is exceptional for productivity and development tasks but inadequate for modern gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering. The data clearly shows a workstation-class CPU paired with a GPU that benchmarks far below its generation's expectations.

FAQ

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-13600K has an average benchmark score of 37,685. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No. The data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate performance must be estimated from the individual benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark percentile?

A: The GPU is in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2,690 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the i5-13600K has an unlocked multiplier, indicating it is designed for overclocking.

Q: What type of memory does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds