SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600 + Intel Arc B580: A Balanced Mainstream Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with Intel's Battlemage-generation Arc B580 graphics card, creating a desktop build that sits at the 78th percentile overall among all CPU-GPU combinations in the database. The CPU achieves an 88th percentile ranking against all CPUs, while the GPU holds a 68th percentile position against all GPUs, suggesting a configuration where processing power slightly outpaces graphics capability in aggregate benchmark scores. The platform targets mainstream desktop users seeking strong multi-threaded productivity alongside modern graphics features, with the data indicating a system well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, content creation workflows, and general productivity tasks. Notably, no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK — all gaming performance discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as directional rather than definitive.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc B580's 68th percentile GPU ranking and 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest capability for 1080p high-refresh gaming, though the GPU's passmark G3D score of 15748 places it near the RTX 2080 (avg score 22895, deltaPct 0.6%) in aggregate benchmarks. The CPU's 3758 Cinebench R23 single-core score provides strong per-thread performance for frame pacing, while the 20 threads handle background tasks without stealing frames from the game. For 144Hz-class monitors at 1080p, the data indicates the GPU will be the limiting factor in most titles, with the CPU rarely bottlenecking at this resolution.

Streaming: The i5-13600's 20 threads and 111044 passmark integer math score offer substantial headroom for simultaneous game encoding and stream output. The Arc B580's 20 RT cores and modern Xe2-HPG architecture support hardware encoding, though the GPU's 68th percentile position means encoder quality and throughput are adequate but not flagship-tier. The 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth provides enough frame buffer for game plus streaming overlay workloads, reducing the likelihood of VRAM-related stutter during broadcasts.

Video editing: The CPU's 26620 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 383972 passmark data compression score indicate strong encoding and timeline performance for 1080p and 1440p video projects. The GPU's 27.34 TFLOPS FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) accelerates effects and color grading, while 12 GB VRAM handles 4K preview timelines. The combined 78th percentile system ranking suggests this build handles consumer video editing suites competently, with the CPU carrying most of the export workload and the GPU accelerating preview and effects rendering.

3D rendering: The i5-13600's 14 cores and 20 threads deliver solid CPU-based rendering performance, evidenced by the 26620 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 81892 passmark floating-point math score. The Arc B580's 2560 shading units and 427.2 GTexel/s texture rate provide GPU-accelerated rendering support, though the 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 compute places it in the mid-range category. For Blender and similar applications, the data suggests the CPU handles most rendering tasks well, while GPU rendering is feasible but not class-leading.

Software development: The 88th CPU percentile and 4049 passmark single-thread score indicate excellent compilation performance for single-threaded build steps, while 20 threads accelerate parallel builds. The 24 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache reduce memory latency during large codebase compilation. The 383972 data compression score suggests strong performance for source control operations and package management, making this a comfortable developer workstation for most projects.

Student and office work: The i5-13600's 65 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide an efficiency baseline for everyday tasks, while the Arc B580 adds graphics acceleration when needed. The 4049 passmark single-thread score ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet responsiveness. The 24 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support make this system overqualified for standard office workloads, but the headroom means it will handle future software demands without replacement.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 44240 places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 at 44309 (deltaPct -0.2%), essentially a statistical tie. The Intel Core i9-13950HX trails by 0.2% at 44342, while the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is 0.5% behind at 44466, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D is 0.7% behind at 44573. This clustering indicates the i5-13600 sits at a performance plateau where several competing processors land within a 1% band, making synthetic benchmark differences negligible in real-world use.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 23021 places it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, with the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP at 23061 (deltaPct -0.2%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22895 (deltaPct 0.6%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 at 23172 (deltaPct -0.7%), and NVIDIA P106-100 at 23249 (deltaPct -1%). The Arc B580 lands within 1% of the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 in aggregate scores, though these are average benchmark comparisons, not direct gaming tests. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 indicate modern API performance, while the passmark G3D score of 15748 reflects established workload behavior.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU in percentile terms by 20 points (88 vs 68), suggesting the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. The system's combined percentile of 78 sits between these values, indicating the GPU constrains overall performance more than the CPU. The 0.6% deltaPct advantage over the RTX 2080 in aggregate GPU benchmarks is notable given the Arc B580's newer architecture and 12 GB VRAM, suggesting the Intel card competes with older high-end NVIDIA offerings while using less power (190 W TDP vs the RTX 2080's higher consumption).

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The Arc B580's 68th GPU percentile and 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest 1080p high settings gaming is the sweet spot, with 1440p viable for less demanding titles and esports games. The CPU's 3758 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures the processor will not bottleneck modern game engines at 1080p, while the 20 threads provide headroom for game logic plus background applications.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's passmark G3D score of 15748 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 indicate the Arc B580 should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, with the 12 GB VRAM preventing texture-related stutter in modern games. For 1440p ultra, the 68th GPU percentile suggests frame rates will drop below 60 in demanding titles, making medium-high settings more appropriate. The 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 192-bit bus width provide adequate data throughput for 1440p textures, but the 13.67 TFLOPS compute places a hard ceiling on pixel throughput in GPU-bound scenarios.

The RTX 2080 comparison (deltaPct 0.6%) is instructive: that card historically delivered 60+ FPS at 1080p ultra and 40-60 FPS at 1440p ultra in most games. The Arc B580's similar aggregate score suggests comparable performance, though driver maturity and game-specific optimizations can shift results. The 20 RT cores support ray tracing, but the 68th percentile position means ray-traced effects will require significant resolution or quality reductions. Esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant should run well above 144 FPS at 1080p given the CPU's strong single-thread score and the GPU's raw throughput, though these estimates carry uncertainty without measured data.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh monitors will find this pairing appropriate, as the CPU's 88th percentile performance eliminates processor bottlenecks while the GPU's 68th percentile position handles most titles at high settings. Those seeking 1440p gaming should expect to adjust settings down from ultra, but the 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth keep modern textures viable. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's multi-core strength (26620 R23 multi-core) and the GPU's FP16 compute (27.34 TFLOPS) for accelerated effects, though GPU rendering performance is mid-range.

Software developers benefit from the 20 threads and 4049 single-thread score for fast compilation, while the 24 MB L3 cache speeds up frequently accessed code paths. Students and office workers will find this system overprovisioned but future-proof, with the 65 W CPU TDP keeping electricity costs moderate during light use. Small business workstations requiring occasional gaming or GPU acceleration would find the balance acceptable, though the GPU's 68th percentile means graphics-heavy workloads will not be flagship-class. The 78th combined percentile positions this as a solid mainstream desktop rather than an enthusiast or budget build.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads, given its 68th percentile versus the CPU's 88th percentile. At 1080p, the CPU's 3758 single-core score and 20 threads mean it can feed frames faster than the Arc B580 can render them, shifting the limit to the GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS compute and 213.6 GPixel/s pixel rate. The 0.6% deltaPct advantage over the RTX 2080 in GPU benchmarks suggests the graphics card performs at that historical level, which was often the limiting factor in 1080p high-refresh gaming.

In productivity workloads, the CPU becomes the limiting factor for single-threaded tasks despite its 88th percentile, as the 4049 passmark single-thread score is good but not exceptional. Multi-threaded tasks like video encoding leverage the 20 threads effectively, with the 26620 R23 multi-core score showing strong scaling. The GPU's 7729 passmark GPU compute score indicates it handles compute workloads competently but not exceptionally, meaning GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower than CPU rendering for some tasks. The 190 W GPU TDP versus 65 W CPU TDP shows the graphics card draws nearly three times the power, confirming it is the more demanding component in this pairing.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 uses the BMG-G21 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 19,600 million transistors into a 272 mm² die with a density of 72.1 million transistors per mm². The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) across a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth — sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high-resolution textures. The 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs produce 213.6 GPixel/s pixel fill and 427.2 GTexel/s texture throughput, while the 20 RT cores handle ray tracing workloads.

The 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 and 27.34 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio) compute figures place this GPU in the mid-range segment, with the 68th percentile ranking confirming this position. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 indicates modern API performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 shows strong cross-platform graphics capability. The passmark G3D score of 15748 and GPU compute score of 7729 reflect established workload performance, with the 0.6% deltaPct advantage over the RTX 2080 suggesting the Arc B580 competes with that 2018-era flagship. The 190 W TDP and 450 W suggested PSU indicate moderate power requirements, while the dual-slot cooler and 272 mm length require a standard ATX case. The 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs support modern displays, and PCIe 4.0 x8 bandwidth is sufficient for this performance class.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility on memory choice without changing motherboards. The CPU's 65 W TDP leaves thermal headroom, and the 5.00 GHz boost clock indicates the silicon can handle higher power envelopes if the motherboard allows. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 CPU lanes provides future expansion for faster SSDs or GPUs, though the Arc B580 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is still sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

The suggested PSU of 450 W for the GPU plus the CPU's 65 W TDP suggests a total system draw around 300-350 W under load, leaving room for upgrades within a 550-650 W power supply. The 190 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP create a 255 W combined thermal load, which most mid-range coolers and cases handle easily. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 88th percentile leaves significant headroom — the processor can drive GPUs several tiers above the Arc B580 without becoming the bottleneck. The 12 GB VRAM on the current GPU is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but moving to 4K would require a GPU with more memory and compute. The platform's DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 mean the motherboard can accommodate future components without replacement, though the LGA1700 socket has a limited upgrade path within the same generation.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-13600 a good match for the Intel Arc B580?

A: Yes, the 88th CPU percentile versus 68th GPU percentile means the processor has headroom, preventing CPU bottlenecks in most gaming and productivity workloads. The 20 threads and 3758 single-core score exceed what the GPU requires to stay fed.

Q: What resolution is this build best suited for?

A: Based on the GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS compute and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, 1080p high settings is the primary target, with 1440p viable on reduced settings. The 68th GPU percentile indicates 4K is beyond this card's comfortable range.

Q: Does the Arc B580 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 20 dedicated RT cores, but the 68th percentile performance means ray-traced effects will require significant resolution or quality compromises. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 reflects this mid-range positioning.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-13600's average benchmark score of 44240 is within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, Intel Core i9-13950HX, Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, making these processors statistically indistinguishable in synthetic tests.

Q: What memory should be used with this build?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration. The 24 MB L3 cache benefits from faster memory, so DDR5 would maximize performance, but DDR4 works for budget builds without major impact.

Q: Is the 450 W suggested PSU sufficient?

A: Yes, the 190 W GPU TDP plus 65 W CPU TDP totals 255 W of component power draw, leaving ample headroom for the rest of the system. A 450 W power supply provides comfortable margin for this configuration.

Q: Can this system handle video editing?

A: Yes, the 26620 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles export workloads, while the GPU's 27.34 TFLOPS FP16 accelerates effects and preview rendering. The 12 GB VRAM supports 4K timeline previews without texture swapping.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, featuring 14 cores (likely 6 performance and 8 efficiency cores) and 20 threads, with a 2.70 GHz base clock boosting to 5.00 GHz. The 65 W TDP makes it an efficient desktop processor, and the 215 mm² die size with 80 KB L1, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache provides substantial on-die storage. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration and includes UHD Graphics 770 for basic display output without a discrete GPU. ECC memory support is available, and the PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes offers modern connectivity.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performer: 26620 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 11180 in R20 multi-core indicate excellent scaling across the 20 threads. The 3758 R23 single-core and 1578 R20 single-core scores reflect solid per-thread performance, while the 4049 passmark single-thread score confirms this. The 383972 data compression score and 111044 integer math score highlight productivity strength, while the 81892 floating-point math and 23045 extended instructions scores show good compute versatility. The 31725 passmark multithread score and 1782 physics score round out the profile, with the 88th CPU percentile confirming this processor outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database. The 44240 average benchmark score places it in a dead heat with several competitors, all within 0.7% deltaPct, meaning real-world differences between these CPUs are negligible.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600, a 14-core Raptor Lake processor with 20 threads and a 5.00 GHz boost clock, with the Intel Arc B580, a Battlemage-generation GPU based on the Xe2-HPG architecture with 12 GB GDDR6 memory and 2560 shading units. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and the GPU's 68th percentile ranking combine for a 78th overall system percentile, placing this configuration in the upper-midrange tier of all desktop builds in the database. The 65 W CPU TDP and 190 W GPU TDP create a thermally manageable system requiring only a 450 W suggested power supply, making this an efficient desktop solution.

The CPU's 26620 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 4049 single-thread score establish it as a capable productivity processor, while the GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth provide solid 1080p gaming performance. The 0.6% deltaPct advantage over the RTX 2080 in GPU benchmarks positions the Arc B580 as a modern mid-range card competing with older high-end offerings. This build targets mainstream desktop users who need strong multi-threaded performance for content creation and development, plus capable 1080p gaming, without requiring flagship component pricing. The platform's DDR4/DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity offer upgrade flexibility, though the GPU is the current performance limiter in gaming scenarios. The 78th combined percentile suggests this is a well-balanced system for its class, with the processor providing headroom for future GPU upgrades.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + Intel Arc B580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds