SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

84%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

6,270 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a desktop combination that mixes a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake CPU sitting in the 88th percentile of all tracked processors with a 16 GB Blackwell 2.0 graphics card whose combined-build percentile lands at 62. The CPU is clearly the senior partner in this pairing by relative rank: it competes within a fraction of a percent of chips like the Intel Core i9-13950HX, while the GPU's database percentile of 36 places it in a much more modest position. One important caveat applies throughout: the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so every frame-rate statement below is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores rather than a recorded measurement.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread part built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 215 mm² and the Raptor Lake-S codename. Its clock range spans a 2.70 GHz base to a 5.00 GHz boost, and it carries a 65 W TDP — notably restrained for a chip with this many threads. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 pool, which is the tier that matters most for gaming latency and for keeping all twenty threads fed in rendering workloads.

The benchmark record shows a balanced performer. In Cinebench R23 the chip scores 26620 multi-core and 3758 single-core; scaled down, R20 returns 11180 and 1578, and R15 returns 2683 and 378. The single-core figures are the more interesting half of that picture: a 3758 in R23 indicates snappy per-thread throughput, which governs how quickly compile jobs finish one file at a time, how responsive game simulation loops run, and how well lightly threaded applications behave. The multi-core score of 26620 reflects the hybrid core layout doing real work across all twenty threads — enough throughput for 3D rendering, video encodes, and heavily parallel builds without entering halo-product territory.

PassMark data reinforces the same read. Integer math lands at 111044, floating point at 81892, and the overall multithread score at 31725, while single-thread sits at 4049. Utility-style scores are strong too: 383972 in data compression and 22182 in encryption mean file archiving, disk-to-disk transfers, and encrypted-volume work proceed quickly. The 1782 physics score and 109 in prime-number finding round out a profile that is competent everywhere and exceptional nowhere — the definition of a well-rounded mainstream CPU.

Against its nearest rivals, the i5-13600 is effectively tied with everything adjacent to it. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 averages 44309 against the Intel chip's 44240 — a delta of only -0.2 percent. The Intel Core i9-13950HX sits at 44342, again -0.2 percent away, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D trail at -0.5 and -0.7 percent respectively. Read carefully, that list says the i5-13600 matches a mobile i9-class part in aggregate benchmark performance. Its 88th percentile placement among all CPUs confirms it: this is a top-quartile processor that costs the performance of one.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With a 3758 Cinebench R23 single-core score, a 4049 PassMark single-thread result, and 24 MB of shared L3, the CPU side of this build can drive high-refresh play in CPU-bound titles. The GPU is the limiter at higher settings, but at mainstream resolutions the pairing should sustain high frame rates in esports and competitive titles.

Streaming. The 26620 multi-core R23 score and 31725 PassMark multithread result leave headroom to run an encoder alongside a game. Twenty threads mean the simulation loop and the broadcast pipeline rarely contend for the same resources, and the 896 GB/s of GPU memory bandwidth absorbs the render side without drama.

Video editing. Data compression at 383972 and encryption at 22182 translate directly to fast timeline scrubbing, asset decoding, and project archival. The 16 GB of GDDR7 on the GPU covers GPU-accelerated effects, while the 14 cores chew through export queues.

3D rendering. A 26620 R23 multi-core score is genuine rendering throughput, and the GPU contributes 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 with 280 tensor cores for AI-assisted denoising and upscaling. Viewport work is well served by the 8960 shading units and 686.6 GTexel/s texture rate.

Software development. The single-core strength (4049 PassMark single-thread) keeps IDEs and interpreters responsive, while the 31725 multithread score means parallel builds and containerized test suites complete quickly. Dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support and ECC compatibility add platform robustness for long-running services.

Student and office work. For documents, browsing, and lightweight photo work, this machine is overkill in the best sense — the 88th-percentile CPU means nothing in a productivity suite will ever feel slow, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display path if the discrete card is ever removed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 44240, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its closest rivals cluster within a single percent — the Ryzen AI Max 385 at 44309, the i9-13950HX at 44342, the Core Ultra X9 388H at 44466, and the Ryzen 5 7500X3D at 44573 — which means the i5-13600 is statistically indistinguishable from its competitive set in aggregate performance.

The GPU's record is thinner: a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, an average of 6270, and a percentile-versus-all-GPUs of 36. Its nearest rivals by average score are the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at 6270 (a 0 percent delta), the Quadro K620 at 6282 (-0.2 percent), the FirePro W600 at 6223 (0.8 percent), and the Radeon R7 M350 at 6327 (-0.9 percent). Taken together, the combined build percentile of 62 tells the story: a top-quartile CPU pulling a mid-pack GPU up the rankings. This is an asymmetric pairing, and every downstream conclusion follows from that asymmetry.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists in the database for this exact CPU-and-GPU combination, so all frame-rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than recorded. With that stated plainly: the 3DMark Steel Nomad result of 6269.5 and the 36th GPU percentile suggest a card aimed at mainstream gaming rather than ultra-enthusiast play. At 1080p and 1440p, where the CPU's 4049 single-thread score can assert itself, high frame rates in most titles are a reasonable expectation, with esports and competitive games benefiting most from the processor's responsiveness. At 4K with ultra settings, the GPU becomes the defining constraint, and frame rates should be expected to settle into the range typical of a mid-percentile card, with the 896 GB/s of bandwidth and DLSS-class hardware (280 tensor cores) available to reconstruct frames where supported. Ray tracing load falls on 70 RT cores, which is modest coverage for heavy path-traced presets at high resolution.

Who Should Build It

This combination suits the 1440p gamer first: the CPU is never the bottleneck at that resolution, and the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR7 provides the buffer depth modern titles demand. Content creators doing 1080p-to-1440p video work are well served — 26620 R23 multi-core plus 16 GB of VRAM is a competent editing platform. Software developers building parallel workloads, running VMs, or compiling large codebases get 20 threads and ECC-capable memory support. Students and small-business workstation users get responsiveness with substantial headroom for growth into heavier tasks. What this build is not: an ultra-enthusiast 4K ray-tracing rig or a flagship rendering box. The 36th GPU percentile rules that out. It is a pragmatic, CPU-forward desktop for people whose workloads are compute-diverse.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The CPU+GPU combination lands in the 62nd percentile of tracked builds, driven largely by the CPU's 88th-percentile placement.

Q: How does the i5-13600 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 44240 sits within one percent of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44309), Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342), Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466), and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573).

Q: Are there measured game FPS figures for this pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so any frame-rate figures cited for it are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What graphics benchmark score does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER carry?

A: A 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, with an average benchmark score of 6270 — identical to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102's 6270 average.

Q: Does the CPU support memory error correction?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed as true, and the chip accepts both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus.

Q: How much power does the build draw at the component level?

A: The CPU carries a 65 W TDP and the GPU a 350 W TDP. No suggested PSU figure is provided in the database for this card.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, so tuning headroom on the CPU side is limited by design.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis here is unambiguous. The CPU occupies the 88th percentile; the GPU occupies the 36th. In any workload that scales with graphics — high-resolution gaming, GPU rendering, ray-traced effects — the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the ceiling, and the i5-13600 will routinely wait on it. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios — high-refresh low-resolution gaming, compilation, simulation, physics — the processor's 3758 single-core and 26620 multi-core scores keep the pipeline full well beyond what the GPU can render. Because no measured FPS-at-resolution data exists for this pairing, the scaling evidence is indirect: the percentile gap of over fifty points is the clearest indicator that graphics throughput, not compute, limits this build's ceiling in visually intensive tasks. The practical consequence is that lowering resolution or settings will continue raising frame rates until the CPU finally becomes the limit — a sign of a GPU-limited, CPU-forward configuration.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing Intel's Raptor Lake mainstream workhorse with NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 mainstream graphics card. The CPU launched at a launch MSRP of $255; the GPU at a launch MSRP of 749 USD. Tier-wise, the picture is mixed by design: an 88th-percentile processor, a 36th-percentile graphics card, and a combined 62nd-percentile build. That combination profile describes a machine built for throughput diversity rather than graphics supremacy — strong at everything that touches the CPU, adequate-to-good at everything that touches the GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700, with support for both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel memory bus — DDR5 being the forward-looking choice for a new build. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself, and the GPU connects via a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, so the link is fully matched to the card's interface capability. Power is the one area requiring attention: the 65 W CPU TDP is trivial, but the GPU's 350 W TDP delivered through a single 16-pin connector means the power supply must be chosen with that draw in mind, since no suggested PSU figure is listed in the database. A sensible next upgrade follows the build's asymmetry: the graphics card is the weaker partner by percentile, so a GPU upgrade lifts the combined profile more than any CPU change would. The dual-slot, 304 mm-long card also means chassis clearance should be verified — the dimensions are listed at 137 mm height and 48 mm width alongside that length. The locked multiplier on the CPU means overclocking is not the tuning path here; platform-level upgrades (memory speed via DDR5, a stronger GPU) are where this build grows.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is built on TSMC's 5 nm process using the GB203 chip, packing 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die for a density of 120.6M per mm². The architecture is Blackwell 2.0. Compute resources include 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, producing a texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s. FP32 throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS, with FP16 running at the same rate (1:1). Ray tracing is handled by 70 RT cores, and AI workloads get 280 tensor cores — the hardware behind frame-reconstruction and denoising features.

Memory is the card's strongest asset: 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That buffer-and-bandwidth combination is what keeps modern high-texture games and GPU-accelerated creative applications from hitting memory walls, and it is the spec most likely to extend the card's useful life. Clocks run from a 2295 MHz base to a 2452 MHz boost — a narrow range indicating aggressive stock tuning. Output coverage is modern and complete: one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b, with DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 support.

In rendering terms, the Steel Nomad score of 6269.5 is the anchor: it places the card in the 36th percentile of tracked GPUs, dead even with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 and within a percent of the Quadro K620, FirePro W600, and Radeon R7 M350 in the database's ranking. For viewport rendering, the 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 and ample bandwidth deliver smooth interactive work; for final-frame GPU rendering, throughput scales with that Steel Nomad-class result. Paired with the i5-13600, the card benefits from a CPU that will never starve it of draw calls — the constraint in this build is always the graphics silicon itself, never the processor feeding it.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds