SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 and Intel Arc A750 pairing represents a desktop configuration that balances a high-performance 14-core processor with a mid-range graphics card. This analysis draws exclusively from benchmark data, which places the CPU in the 88th percentile and the GPU in the 66th percentile of all tested components. The combined system percentile of 77 indicates a solidly above-average build, though the performance characteristics are distinct between the two components, creating a nuanced picture for different workloads.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D?

A: The i5-13600 has an average benchmark score of 44240, which is 0.7% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D's score of 44573. This places the two processors in essentially the same performance tier, with the difference being within the margin of statistical noise.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A750 sits in the 66th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the graphics cards in the benchmark database. Its average benchmark score of 20582 places it just ahead of the Intel Arc B570 by 0.1%.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through its dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between platform cost savings with DDR4 or higher bandwidth with DDR5.

Q: What is the TDP of the graphics card and what PSU is suggested?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has a TDP of 225 W, and the suggested power supply unit is 550 W. The card requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector for operation.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600 features 14 cores and 20 threads, running on a base clock of 2.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. This hybrid configuration combines performance and efficiency cores for multi-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A750 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory operates at an effective speed of 16 Gbps.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-13600 has a locked multiplier, meaning it is not unlocked for overclocking. Users must rely on the factory boost clock of 5.00 GHz for performance.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a clear picture of a CPU that significantly outperforms its GPU counterpart. The Intel Core i5-13600 achieves an impressive average benchmark score of 44240, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This score is remarkably close to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 at 44309 (0.2% faster), the Intel Core i9-13950HX at 44342 (0.2% faster), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44466 (0.5% faster). The i5-13600 trails the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D by 0.7%, which has a score of 44573. These minuscule deltas indicate that the i5-13600 competes at the very top tier of processors, matching or nearly matching much more expensive flagship parts.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU demonstrates exceptional capability. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26620 highlights strong sustained performance across all 14 cores. Single-thread performance is equally robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4049. The Passmark multithread score of 31725 confirms that the CPU scales well with thread count, making it suitable for heavily parallel tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering. The integer math score of 111044 and floating-point math score of 81892 further substantiate its computational prowess.

The GPU, by contrast, produces an average benchmark score of 20582, placing it in the 66th percentile. This is a solid mid-range result, but the delta to the CPU's percentile is substantial. The Arc A750's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 and Passmark G3D score of 12534 indicate DirectX 12 gaming capability, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 98554 and Vulkan score of 85631 show compute-oriented strength. The Passmark DirectX 9 score of 181 is notably higher than the DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores, which are 65, 72, and 70 respectively, suggesting that the card may have architectural strengths in legacy APIs that do not translate to modern titles.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the database. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores and percentile rankings of both components. These estimates should be treated as directional guidance rather than definitive measurements.

Based on the GPU's benchmark scores, the Intel Arc A750 appears positioned for 1080p and 1440p gaming at medium to high settings, with ultra settings likely reserved for less demanding titles. The Passmark G3D score of 12534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 suggest that the card can handle modern DirectX 12 games, but the 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting factors at higher resolutions or with heavy texture packs. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, providing ample single-thread performance with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758.

At 1080p resolution, the Arc A750's 66th percentile ranking suggests it should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though the lack of measured data means exact figures cannot be provided. The GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 537.6 GTexel/s texture rate indicate raw processing capacity, but driver optimization and API support play significant roles in real-world gaming performance. The card's DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compliance are positive indicators for modern game compatibility.

For 1440p gaming, the 8 GB memory capacity and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth may constrain performance in memory-intensive scenarios. The GPU's 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, but the overall compute power may limit RTX quality settings in demanding titles. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads ensure that physics, AI, and game logic calculations are handled efficiently, allowing the GPU to focus on rendering tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 66th percentile creates a situation where the processor is substantially more capable than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulations, AI calculations, or data compression, the i5-13600 will operate well within its capacity, leaving the GPU as the limiting factor. The Passmark data compression score of 383972 and extended instructions score of 23045 demonstrate the CPU's strength in compute-heavy tasks.

In gaming scenarios, the bottleneck will almost certainly be the GPU. The Arc A750's 66th percentile suggests it will consistently limit frame rates, especially at higher resolutions where GPU load increases. The CPU's high single-thread performance, evidenced by a Passmark single-thread score of 4049, ensures that it can feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic without becoming a constraint. The FPS scaling, while not measured, would likely show diminishing returns when pairing this CPU with a more powerful GPU, as the current card reaches its maximum output well before the CPU's limits.

For GPU compute workloads, the Arc A750's Passmark GPU compute score of 5368 indicates moderate capability, but the CPU's Passmark multithread score of 31725 will dominate in parallel processing tasks. The CPU's 14 cores handle multi-threaded rendering and encoding tasks efficiently, while the GPU's 3584 shading units and 224 texture mapping units provide acceleration for graphics-specific operations. The imbalance suggests that users should prioritize GPU upgrades first to achieve better system balance.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The combination of a 88th percentile CPU and 66th percentile GPU suggests this system can handle 1080p high-refresh gaming in esports titles, but may struggle to maintain high frame rates in AAA games at ultra settings. The CPU's single-thread performance eliminates processor bottlenecks, but the GPU's 66th percentile and 8 GB VRAM limit maximum frame rates in demanding titles.

Streaming: The i5-13600's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26620 indicates that the CPU can handle x264 encoding at high presets while maintaining game performance. The GPU's 66th percentile ensures playable frame rates during streaming, though the lack of dedicated encoder data in the FACT PACK limits analysis of hardware encoding capabilities.

Video Editing: This workload benefits from both components. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 31725 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 11180 accelerate timeline scrubbing, rendering, and export tasks. The GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 98554 Geekbench OpenCL score provide hardware acceleration for effects, color grading, and GPU-accelerated encoding.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 88th percentile ranking makes it a strong choice for CPU-based renderers, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26620 indicating fast ray tracing performance in software. The GPU's 28 ray tracing cores and 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 compute support GPU-accelerated renderers, though the 66th percentile suggests it will be a secondary contributor compared to the CPU.

Software Development: Compilation and testing workloads benefit from the CPU's 14 cores, with the Passmark integer math score of 111044 and data encryption score of 22182 indicating strong performance in code compilation and secure development tasks. The GPU's compute capability accelerates test automation and rendering previews, though the CPU remains the primary driver for build times.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is more powerful than needed for typical office tasks, but the CPU's 88th percentile ensures rapid responsiveness in spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing. The GPU's 66th percentile handles multiple monitors and hardware acceleration for productivity apps without strain, though the 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU make this a less energy-efficient choice than integrated graphics for basic office work.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads while maintaining respectable gaming capability. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p with medium to high settings will find the Arc A750 sufficient, though those seeking maximum frame rates in AAA titles should consider a more powerful GPU. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit immensely from the i5-13600's 14 cores and 20 threads, with the Passmark multithread score of 31725 handling parallel tasks efficiently.

Small business workstations requiring heavy computation, such as data analysis or CAD software, would find the CPU's 88th percentile ranking and ECC memory support valuable for reliability. Students in engineering or computer science programs can leverage the CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread performance for assignments and projects, while the GPU handles visualization and simulation tasks. The build class is desktop, confirming this is a stationary, full-power system rather than a mobile compromise.

The GPU's end-of-life production status suggests that buyers should consider the longevity of the graphics card, though its 66th percentile remains competitive for current titles. The CPU's active production status ensures ongoing availability and driver support. This combination is best suited for users who know their primary workloads are CPU-bound and want a capable GPU that handles gaming and compute without breaking the performance balance.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 utilizes the DG2-512 chip built on TSMC's 6 nm process, containing 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, providing 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 34.41 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The memory subsystem features 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s bandwidth at an effective 16 Gbps speed.

The 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines give the card strong raw throughput, evidenced by a pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s. The 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for DirectX 12 Ultimate ray-traced effects, while the absence of dedicated tensor cores means AI-accelerated features rely on the general compute units. The Passmark G3D score of 12534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 confirm that the card performs well in synthetic DirectX 12 benchmarks.

The GPU's 66th percentile ranking places it just ahead of the Intel Arc B570 by 0.1% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 0.2%, while trailing the AMD Radeon R9 M390X by 0.4%. The Passmark DirectX 9 score of 181 versus DirectX 12 score of 70 suggests that the card may have architectural quirks in newer APIs, with performance varying significantly across different benchmark tests. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB capacity are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 225 W TDP and dual-slot design require adequate case airflow and a 550 W power supply.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13600 with the Intel Arc A750. The CPU, part of the Core 13th Gen series, uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process and is designed for the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The GPU, based on the Xe-HPG architecture and DG2-512 chip, represents Intel's Alchemist generation on a 6 nm TSMC process.

The combined percentile of 77 indicates that this system outperforms 77% of all tested CPU-GPU combinations, placing it in the upper mid-range tier. The CPU's 88th percentile dominates the equation, while the GPU's 66th percentile drags the overall score slightly below what a pure CPU ranking would suggest. This pairing is best characterized as a CPU-first build with a capable but not top-tier graphics card, suitable for users who prioritize processor performance for productivity and compute tasks while maintaining solid gaming capability.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 44240 versus the GPU's 20582 illustrates the performance disparity. The system's overall tier is defined by the CPU's near-flagship performance and the GPU's mid-range standing, making it a versatile but not extreme gaming machine. The desktop form factor allows for full power delivery and thermal headroom, with the GPU's 225 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP requiring a 550 W power supply for reliable operation.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. The chip features a die size of 215 mm² and operates with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample storage for frequently accessed data.

The CPU's benchmark results are exceptional across all tests. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26620 and R20 multicore score of 11180 demonstrate strong multi-threaded performance, while the R23 single-core score of 3758 and R20 single-core score of 1578 show excellent single-thread capability. The Passmark suite reinforces this picture: multithread score of 31725, single-thread score of 4049, integer math of 111044, and floating-point math of 81892.

The 88th percentile ranking places the i5-13600 among the top processors in the database, with its average score of 44240 within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D's 44573. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support for workstation reliability. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers basic display output without a discrete GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which limits upgrades to 12th and 13th generation Core processors. The CPU's 65 W TDP and locked multiplier mean that users cannot overclock, but the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for memory upgrades without changing the motherboard. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide headroom for current and next-generation GPUs, while the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and 14 cores ensure it remains capable for several more years.

The GPU's 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU requirement leave limited headroom for upgrades without also upgrading the power supply. The card uses one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, and its dual-slot design requires adequate case clearance. The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface is backward compatible with older motherboards but may limit performance if paired with a GPU that requires PCIe Gen 5 bandwidth.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU's 88th percentile ranking provides significant headroom for graphics card improvements. The 66th percentile GPU currently acts as the system bottleneck in gaming workloads, and upgrading to a higher-tier card would improve frame rates without requiring a CPU change. The motherboard's PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs the platform for upcoming graphics cards, while the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads remain competitive for multi-threaded applications.