SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER pairing is a desktop build that combines a high-thread-count Raptor Lake processor with a Blackwell-generation GPU. Benchmark data shows a pronounced asymmetry: the CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU places at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. This report walks through the measured CPU and GPU scores, what they imply for real workloads, and how the two components interact in a complete system.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. Its base clock is 2.70 GHz and boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, includes ECC support, and exposes 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. An integrated UHD Graphics 770 unit is present, and the CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-core performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 26,620 points in multi-core and 3,758 points in single-core. Cinebench R20 yields 11,180 multi-core and 1,578 single-core, while Cinebench R15 returns 2,683 multi-core and 378 single-core. PassMark results include a multithread score of 31,725 and a single-thread score of 4,049, along with data compression at 383,972, data encryption at 22,182, extended instructions at 23,045, find prime numbers at 109, floating point math at 81,892, integer math at 111,044, physics at 1,782, and random string sorting at 42,040. The average benchmark score for this CPU is 44,240.

The CPU's percentile rank of 88 places it among the higher-performing desktop processors. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 averages 44,309 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i9-13950HX averages 44,342 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H averages 44,466 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D averages 44,573 (0.7% lower). The i5-13600 trails the fastest of these by less than a percentage point, meaning it sits in a tight cluster of high-end CPUs. For real workloads, this translates to strong multi-threaded performance for rendering, video encoding, and compile tasks, while the single-core scores (Cinebench R23 single 3,758, PassMark single-thread 4,049) support responsive everyday use and decent frame pacing in lighter tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU built on a 5 nm TSMC process. The chip, designated GB205, contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The GPU has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Clock speeds are a base of 2325 MHz and boost of 2512 MHz, with memory at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The GPU includes 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, 80 ROPs, 50 RT cores, and 200 tensor cores. It delivers 201.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, 502.4 GTexel/s texture rate, and 32.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). The card is dual-slot, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and has a TDP of 275 W. It supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

The only GPU benchmark provided is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 2,690. The GPU's percentile rank is 18, meaning it sits in the lower fifth of all GPUs in this database. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (score 2,664, 1% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2,662, 1.1% lower), the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2,660, 1.1% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (2,645, 1.7% lower). This places the RTX 5070 SUPER very close to entry-level and legacy GPUs in the one benchmark recorded. It is important to note that the 3DMark Steel Nomad test is a specific DX12 workload, and a single score does not capture the full range of GPU capabilities. Still, the data as presented suggests that the GPU's raw rasterization performance is far below that of the CPU's relative standing.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 places it at the 88th percentile, and its average benchmark score of 44,240 is nearly identical to the average score of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44,573, only 0.7% higher). The GPU's 3DMark score of 2,690 puts it at the 18th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 2,690. The combined percentile for the pair is 53, indicating that the overall system is exactly at the midpoint of all desktop builds, despite the CPU being far above the midpoint and the GPU far below.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that is ready for heavy compute tasks and a GPU that is not. In CPU-bound applications like Cinebench, the i5-13600 performs competitively with high-end mobile and desktop CPUs, with a delta of less than 1% from the AMD Ryzen 7 7500X3D. In GPU-bound tasks, the RTX 5070 SUPER's score is essentially identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030, a card from a much older generation. This creates a system that will excel at productivity and content creation but will be severely limited in graphics-heavy workloads such as gaming at high settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance: the CPU's percentile (88) is 70 points higher than the GPU's (18). In most gaming scenarios, the GPU is the performance bottleneck. The CPU's high multi-core score (Cinebench R23 26,620) and strong single-core score (Cinebench R23 3,758) mean it can feed a GPU with data quickly, but the GPU's low 3DMark score indicates it cannot keep up with the CPU's output in graphics-heavy scenes. For example, in a 1080p gaming scenario, the CPU might be able to render a game at high frame rates, but the GPU would limit the output to lower frame rates. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks such as video encoding or software compilation, the CPU's performance is the limiting factor, and the GPU's low score does not matter.

There is no measured FPS data for this combination, so the balance must be inferred from the benchmark percentiles. The CPU is a strong performer for its class, while the GPU is a very weak performer. This suggests that the system will excel in CPU-intensive tasks like 3D rendering, video editing, and development, but will struggle to deliver smooth frame rates in modern games at high settings. The GPU's 18 GB of VRAM and 672 GB/s bandwidth are high on paper, but the actual 3DMark score suggests that the GPU's rasterization throughput is not up to the level expected from a modern discrete card.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU supports dual-channel memory and has a 65 W TDP. The GPU has a 275 W TDP, which is more than four times the CPU's TDP. The GPU is a dual-slot card with a 16-pin power connector, and it is compatible with PCIe 5.0 x16. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, so the GPU can run at full speed.

The platform offers a clear upgrade path. If the user wants to improve the GPU-bound performance, they could replace the GPU with a model that has a higher percentile rank, though the exact models are not specified in the data. The CPU itself is at the 88th percentile, so there is limited headroom for CPU upgrades within the same socket, but the platform is mature. The CPU's TDP of 65 W means that a modest power supply is sufficient for the CPU, but the GPU's 275 W TDP will require a higher wattage PSU. The lack of a suggested PSU value means we cannot give a specific number, but the combination of a 65 W CPU and 275 W GPU implies a total system draw that is well above typical entry-level PSUs.

For memory, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility to choose between older, cheaper DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 modules. The dual-channel bus means that memory bandwidth is not the primary constraint for this CPU, and the 24 MB L3 cache helps reduce memory latency. The upgrade path for this platform is most obvious in the GPU, as the CPU already performs at a high level.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming

The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3,758 and multi-core score of 26,620 suggest that it can handle the CPU-side of gaming, including physics and AI. However, the GPU's 3DMark score of 2,690 at the 18th percentile indicates that it will not be able to push high frame rates in demanding games. The GPU has 18 GB of VRAM, which is generous, but the raw rendering performance is low. Estimated frame rates would be limited by the GPU, and even at lower resolutions, the GPU's low score would cap performance.

Streaming

Streaming depends on both CPU and GPU. The CPU has 20 threads, which is plenty for encoding video. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 shows that the CPU can handle simultaneous game and streaming workloads. The GPU's low 3DMark score may limit the game's visual quality, but the CPU-side encoding is strong. This system would be better suited to streaming CPU-heavy content, such as 3D rendering or software development, rather than high-quality gaming streams.

Video Editing

Video editing software relies heavily on CPU multi-core performance for rendering and effects. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 and PassMark multithread score of 31,725 indicate strong performance for timeline scrubbing and rendering. The GPU can assist with some effects, but its low 3DMark score means it will not accelerate GPU-accelerated tasks significantly. The CPU would be the primary driver, making this system good for 1080p and 4K editing, but not for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering

3D rendering, whether CPU-based (like mental ray) or GPU-based (like Octane), depends on the component that renders. CPU-based rendering will benefit from the 20 threads and high Cinebench scores. The PassMark floating point math score of 81,892 and integer math 111,044 show a strong CPU for compute. GPU-based rendering would be limited by the GPU's low performance, but the CPU can handle the scene setup and physics.

Software Development

Software development involves compiling, which is heavily CPU-bound. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 and PassMark data compression 383,972 indicate fast compilation and data processing. The GPU is not a major factor in development, so the low GPU score is not a problem. The CPU's 20 threads are ideal for parallel builds.

Student and Office Work

Office tasks like word processing, spreadsheet, and browsing are not demanding. The CPU's single-core score of 3,758 ensures fast response. The GPU is more than sufficient for 2D and light 3D. The system is overkill for office work, but it would be fast and quiet.

Who Should Build It

This build is suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The CPU is at the 88th percentile, making it competitive with the top processors in the database, while the GPU is at the 18th percentile. Target users include:

Content creators who do a lot of CPU-based rendering, video editing, or 3D modeling. The CPU's 20 threads and high multi-core scores make it ideal for such tasks.
Software developers who compile large codebases or run many virtual machines. The CPU's high integer and data compression scores help.
Students and office workers who need a responsive system for everyday tasks. The CPU's single-core speed ensures snappy performance.
Small business workstations that run CPU-heavy applications like financial modeling, data analysis, or engineering software.

Gamers at high resolution or high settings will be disappointed because the GPU is not up to the task. The data shows that the GPU's score is comparable to entry-level cards like the GT 1030, so gaming will be limited to older or less demanding titles at lower settings.

Build Overview

The Intel Core i5-13600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop build (buildClass "desktop"). The CPU is a 14-core Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, and the GPU is a 275 W Blackwell card. The combined percentile is 53, meaning the system is in the middle of all desktop builds. The CPU is at the 88th percentile, while the GPU is at the 18th. This asymmetry makes the build a CPU-centric workstation rather than a balanced gaming system. The CPU's launch MSRP is $255. The GPU has no launch MSRP listed. The system is best suited for productivity and development, with limited gaming potential.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Intel Core i5-13600 have?

A: The CPU has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 26,620 in multi-core and 3,758 in single-core.

Q: What is the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score?

A: The GPU scores 2,690 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad test, placing it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU percentile rank?

A: The CPU is at the 88th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does this build support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU TDP is 65 W and the GPU TDP is 275 W.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame-rate discussions are therefore estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU's high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single 3,758) suggests it can feed a GPU quickly, but the GPU's low 3DMark score of 2,690 (18th percentile) indicates that it will be the primary bottleneck in most games. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU would likely deliver frame rates similar to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030, which is in the same percentile range. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's low rasterization performance would be even more limiting. The GPU has a large 18 GB VRAM pool, but that does not compensate for the low raw throughput. For esports titles or older games, the system might be playable, but for modern AAA games at high settings, the frame rates will be well below what the CPU could otherwise support. As the data shows, the CPU is at the 88th percentile, while the GPU is at the 18th, so this is not a balanced gaming build.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming

Streaming

Video Editing

3D Rendering

Software Development

Student and Office Work

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds