SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 paired with the Intel Arc A580 is a mid-range desktop combination built almost entirely from Intel silicon: a 14-core Raptor Lake processor sitting in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, matched with an Alchemist-generation discrete GPU in the 87th percentile. Both components are active-market parts, both launched in 2023, and both land within striking distance of notably higher-tier rivals in the benchmark database — the CPU trades blows with mobile flagship chips, and the GPU's aggregate score sits near cards that on paper belong to a different class. The combined build percentile of 88 marks this as a strong upper-mid-range pairing rather than an enthusiast rig, and no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than real-world captures.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S processor manufactured on Intel's 10 nm node, with a 215 mm² die and a base clock of 2.70 GHz that boosts to 5.00 GHz. The TDP is a modest 65 W, and the chip drops into Intel Socket 1700. Cache allocation is generous for the segment: 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, plus 24 MB of shared L3. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, which gives builders flexibility on platform cost, and ECC memory is supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU — notable because the Arc A580 itself only requires PCIe 4.0 x16, so the platform has headroom the GPU doesn't consume. The multiplier is locked, so tuning headroom is limited by design.

The benchmark profile shows a chip that is balanced rather than lopsided. Cinebench R23 scores of 26620 multi-core and 3758 single-core indicate that heavy all-core rendering workloads and snappy per-thread responsiveness are both covered. The Passmark single-thread result of 4049 and physics score of 1782 back that up: tasks that refuse to parallelize — game logic, scripting, older applications — will not bottleneck on this CPU. For real workloads, the multi-core figures translate into capable video encoding, code compilation, and 3D rendering throughput, while the Passmark data compression score of 383972 and encryption score of 22182 point to strong performance in file archiving and secure-data tasks. Integer math (111044) and floating point (81892) results round out a profile with no obvious weak spot outside of specialized prime-finding workloads.

Against its nearest rivals, the i5-13600 holds its ground almost perfectly. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 averages 44309 versus the Intel chip's 44240 — a delta of just 0.2 percent. The Intel Core i9-13950HX sits at 44342, only 0.2 percent ahead, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44466 is 0.5 percent ahead. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D leads by 0.7 percent at 44573. In practical terms, this desktop i5 delivers aggregate performance statistically indistinguishable from parts positioned as premium mobile flagships, and it does so at a 65 W TDP. That is the headline verdict: 88th-percentile throughput without enthusiast-class power demands. The launch MSRP was $255.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A580 is Intel's Alchemist-generation discrete card, built on the DG2-512 chip at TSMC on a 6 nm process. The die measures 406 mm² and packs 21,700 million transistors at a density of 53.4 million per square millimeter — a large, dense piece of silicon for this tier. The Xe-HPG architecture deploys 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, alongside 24 dedicated RT cores for hardware ray tracing. Base clock is 1700 MHz with a 2000 MHz boost, and the card sustains 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, doubling to 24.58 TFLOPS of FP16 at a 2:1 rate.

Memory is where the A580 punches above its class. The 8 GB of GDDR6 runs on a 256-bit bus with 2000 MHz memory clock delivering 16 Gbps effective, producing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure more typical of higher-tier cards, and one that keeps the 3072 shaders fed at high resolutions and texture settings. The 8 GB capacity is the practical ceiling for ultra-quality texture packs and ray-traced effects in modern titles, though bandwidth ensures that capacity, not speed, is the limiter. Pixel throughput is 192.0 GPixel/s and texture fill is 384.0 GTexel/s. On paper, the 24 RT cores give the card genuine hardware ray-tracing capability rather than a software fallback.

Benchmark results place the A580 at the 87th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 57756. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 (with Vulkan at 79381) describe a card fully capable of modern rendering pipelines — the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) feature level, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 support confirm full API coverage. The rival picture is striking: the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58085 (0.6 percent ahead), the Intel Arc A570M sits at 58239 (0.8 percent ahead), and both the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57367, 0.7 percent behind) and the RX 6950 XT (58392, 1.1 percent ahead) cluster within roughly one percent of the A580's aggregate. A card trading blows within a percentage point of an RX 6950 XT in the database's composite scoring is the strongest single data point in this build — the GPU's score-relative standing exceeds what its mid-tier branding suggests. Power draw is 175 W via two 8-pin connectors on a dual-slot card, with a suggested 450 W PSU for the whole system.

Benchmark Performance

Pulling the numbers together, this is a pairing where both components sit in the high 80s percentiles — CPU at 88, GPU at 87, combined build at 88. That symmetry is the defining characteristic of the configuration.

On the CPU side, the Cinebench progression is consistent across generations of the test: 2683 multi / 378 single in R15, 11180 / 1578 in R20, and 26620 / 3758 in R23. Multi-core to single-core scaling across R23 implies roughly seven times the throughput when all 20 threads are engaged versus one, which is healthy scaling for a hybrid 14-core design. Passmark multithread lands at 31725, with the specialized subtests (extended instructions at 23045, string sorting at 42040) showing well-distributed capability. The average benchmark score of 44240 anchors the 88th-percentile placement.

On the GPU side, the 57756 average score and 87th percentile come from a smaller but modern test set: Steel Nomad at 2229, OpenCL at 91657, Vulkan at 79381. The OpenCL figure is particularly relevant for compute-adjacent creative work — GPU-accelerated effects, some encoding paths, and OpenCL-based plugins will run comfortably. The combined picture is a system with no weak component: the CPU outranks 88 percent of the database, the GPU 87 percent, and neither drags the composite below the CPU's own standing.

Balance and Bottleneck

With both parts at effectively the same percentile, this is one of the more balanced pairings in the database. Neither component is dramatically over- or under-provisioned relative to the other, which means the limiting factor shifts by workload rather than being baked into the hardware.

For CPU-bound scenarios — high-refresh competitive titles, simulation-heavy games, streaming with software encoding on top of gameplay — the i5-13600's 88th-percentile standing and 4049 Passmark single-thread score indicate the processor will keep up long past the point where the GPU runs out of headroom. The physics score of 1782 reinforces this for titles with heavy world simulation. For GPU-bound scenarios — maximum-quality rendering at higher resolutions with ray tracing enabled — the A580 becomes the ceiling first, and its 8 GB of VRAM will be the first hard limit hit in texture-heavy scenes, despite the generous 512 GB/s of bandwidth delaying that moment.

A reasonable framing: the CPU is at a level where pairing it with a meaningfully faster GPU would still yield frame-rate gains, while the GPU is strong enough that stepping the CPU down a tier would begin to cost frames in CPU-limited titles. As shipped, the pairing is matched well for the 87th-to-88th percentile band it occupies.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database — the figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores above, not captured game runs. With that caveat stated plainly, expectations can still be framed from the data.

The A580's 87th-percentile standing and its proximity to rivals like the RX 6950 XT and RX 9070 GRE in composite scoring (within roughly one percent) indicate performance comfortably in the upper-mid range of the GPU landscape. At Full HD with ultra settings, the card's 384 GTexel/s fill rate and 512 GB/s bandwidth suggest high frame rates in most modern titles, with the CPU's strong single-thread results (3758 in Cinebench R23 single-core) supporting smooth frame delivery in CPU-limited scenarios. At QHD, the bandwidth reserves should hold up better than 8 GB-class cards with narrower buses. At 4K ultra, the 8 GB VRAM buffer becomes the primary constraint, and reduced settings would be advisable for consistent frame pacing. Ray tracing is supported in hardware via the 24 RT cores, but ultra-quality path tracing would push the card toward its limits; selective ray-traced effects are the realistic envelope.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-13600 good for gaming? A: Yes. Its 88th-percentile CPU standing, 3758 Cinebench R23 single-core score, and 4049 Passmark single-thread result indicate strong performance in titles that lean on one or a few fast threads.

Q: Can the Arc A580 handle ray tracing? A: It has 24 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so hardware ray tracing is genuinely supported. Demanding path-traced effects at maximum settings will strain the card and its 8 GB buffer.

Q: Is 8 GB of VRAM enough? A: For most current games at mainstream-to-high resolutions, yes — and the 512 GB/s of bandwidth on a 256-bit bus is unusually strong for this capacity. At 4K with ultra texture packs, 8 GB becomes the limiting factor.

Q: How does the CPU compare to rivals? A: Within a fraction of a percent. The Ryzen AI Max 385 and Core i9-13950HX are each only 0.2 percent ahead in average score, the Core Ultra X9 388H is 0.5 percent ahead, and the Ryzen 5 7500X3D leads by 0.7 percent.

Q: Can this build stream while gaming? A: The 26620 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 20 threads give ample headroom to run encoding or broadcast software alongside a game, particularly since the GPU, not the CPU, is the likelier frame-rate limiter.

Q: What power supply does the GPU need? A: The A580 carries a 175 W TDP with two 8-pin connectors, and Intel's suggested PSU for the card is 450 W.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable? A: No — the multiplier is locked. The 5.00 GHz boost clock is the ceiling.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: With a GPU in the 87th percentile and a CPU single-thread profile matching parts one tier higher, this pairing is well suited to high-refresh play at Full HD and QHD. The CPU's physics and single-thread scores indicate it will not be the first component to cap frame rates.

Streaming: The 20-thread CPU with a 26620 R23 multi-core score can absorb x264-style encoding loads while gaming, and the GPU's OpenCL result of 91657 supports compute-accelerated production tools. Dual memory support (DDR4/DDR5) allows platform flexibility.

Video editing: The multi-core throughput, 24 MB of shared L3 cache, and strong compression score (383972 in Passmark) make timeline scrubbing, proxy generation, and export workloads comfortable. The A580's full DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 support covers GPU-accelerated effects across major suites.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23's 26620 multi-core score directly reflects viewport and CPU render performance, while the A580's 24 RT cores and 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 give GPU render engines real hardware to use. Very large scenes will meet the 8 GB VRAM wall.

Software development: Compilation scales with cores and threads, and the near-parity with the i9-13950HX (0.2 percent delta) means build times competitive with premium mobile flagships. ECC support and Gen 5 PCIe lanes add workstation credibility.

Student and office work: For everyday productivity, this system is dramatically overqualified — snappy single-thread response, fast encryption and compression for file handling, and an integrated UHD Graphics 770 fallback if the discrete card is ever removed.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing Intel's 13th-generation Core i5 with Intel's Alchemist-generation Arc 5 GPU — an all-Intel platform from CPU to discrete graphics. The i5-13600 contributes a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S design at 65 W on Socket 1700, while the Arc A580 adds a 6 nm, 3072-shader GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 over a wide 256-bit bus. The combined percentile of 88, sitting between the CPU's 88 and the GPU's 87, defines the tier precisely: a well-matched upper-mid-range desktop with no component wasting the other's potential. Both parts remain in active production, making this a current-platform build rather than a legacy pairing.

Who Should Build It

The target audience is the performance-minded mainstream builder. Gamers playing at Full HD or QHD with ultra settings will find the 87th-percentile GPU and near-flagship-adjacent CPU well matched to their needs, with 4K ultra being the one aspiration this pairing should not be asked to fulfill due to VRAM limits. Content creators — video editors, 3D artists, streamers — get a 26620-point R23 multi-core engine and a GPU with genuine RT and OpenCL throughput. Developers and students benefit from a CPU that scores within 0.2 percent of an i9-class mobile flagship, with ECC support and dual DDR4/DDR5 memory paths adding longevity and flexibility. Small business workstations handling data processing will appreciate the encryption and compression scores. This build is not for extreme enthusiasts chasing the top percentiles — it is for users who want 88th-percentile composite performance from a balanced, current, all-Intel desktop platform.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds